Ursula Köberle1, Renate Grohmann2, Michael Belz3, Waldemar Greil2,4, Detlef Degner3. 1. Bundesärztekammer, Bereich Arzneimittelkommission der deutschen Ärzteschaft, Herbert-Lewin-Platz 1, 10623, Berlin, Deutschland. ursula.koeberle@baek.de. 2. Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Deutschland. 3. Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Göttingen, Deutschland. 4. Psychiatrische Privatklinik Sanatorium Kilchberg, Kilchberg, Schweiz.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In 2011, direct healthcare professional communication (DHPC) letters on citalopram and escitalopram were sent out to address the risk of QTc prolongation in the ECG. Healthcare professionals were informed about a reduction of the maximum recommended daily dose. Furthermore, a contraindication for QTc-prolonging co-medication was given. Previous studies noted that these instructions were implemented incompletely. AIM: For the first time, this study analyzed how the DHPC affected the prescription of citalopram and escitalopram in patients with anxiety disorders. METHODS: Drug utilization data from the project "Arzneimittelsicherheit in der Psychiatrie e. V." (AMSP) was used to examine whether the proportion of patients treated with a higher-than-recommended daily dose ("high dose") and the proportion of patients with QTc-prolonging co-medication would decrease post-DHPC (combined category of citalopram/escitalopram). RESULTS: Drug utilization data of n = 364 patients pre- and n = 262 patients post-DHPC were compared. The proportion of patients with high dose declined from 10.7% to 5.4% (p = 0.019). The proportion of patients with QTc-prolonging co-medication did not change significantly from pre- (54.7%) to post-DHPC (51.5%, p = 0.437). DISCUSSION: In accordance with previous studies, the proportion of high-dose patients decreased after DHPC publication while the proportion of patients with QTc-prolonging co-medication remained widely unchanged. The specific recommendation on daily dosage seems to have been better implemented than the broadly formulated contraindication of QTc-prolonging co-medication. Hence, DHPCs should be written precisely and give advice for specific clinical situations.
BACKGROUND: In 2011, direct healthcare professional communication (DHPC) letters on citalopram and escitalopram were sent out to address the risk of QTc prolongation in the ECG. Healthcare professionals were informed about a reduction of the maximum recommended daily dose. Furthermore, a contraindication for QTc-prolonging co-medication was given. Previous studies noted that these instructions were implemented incompletely. AIM: For the first time, this study analyzed how the DHPC affected the prescription of citalopram and escitalopram in patients with anxiety disorders. METHODS: Drug utilization data from the project "Arzneimittelsicherheit in der Psychiatrie e. V." (AMSP) was used to examine whether the proportion of patients treated with a higher-than-recommended daily dose ("high dose") and the proportion of patients with QTc-prolonging co-medication would decrease post-DHPC (combined category of citalopram/escitalopram). RESULTS: Drug utilization data of n = 364 patients pre- and n = 262 patients post-DHPC were compared. The proportion of patients with high dose declined from 10.7% to 5.4% (p = 0.019). The proportion of patients with QTc-prolonging co-medication did not change significantly from pre- (54.7%) to post-DHPC (51.5%, p = 0.437). DISCUSSION: In accordance with previous studies, the proportion of high-dose patients decreased after DHPC publication while the proportion of patients with QTc-prolonging co-medication remained widely unchanged. The specific recommendation on daily dosage seems to have been better implemented than the broadly formulated contraindication of QTc-prolonging co-medication. Hence, DHPCs should be written precisely and give advice for specific clinical situations.
Authors: Sigrid Piening; Flora M Haaijer-Ruskamp; Jonie T N de Vries; Menno E van der Elst; Pieter A de Graeff; Sabine M J M Straus; Peter G M Mol Journal: Drug Saf Date: 2012-05-01 Impact factor: 5.606
Authors: Stacie B Dusetzina; Ashley S Higashi; E Ray Dorsey; Rena Conti; Haiden A Huskamp; Shu Zhu; Craig F Garfield; G Caleb Alexander Journal: Med Care Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: F Jacobi; M Höfler; J Strehle; S Mack; A Gerschler; L Scholl; M A Busch; U Maske; U Hapke; W Gaebel; W Maier; M Wagner; J Zielasek; H-U Wittchen Journal: Nervenarzt Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 1.214
Authors: Lauren B Gerlach; Hyungjin Myra Kim; Matheos Yosef; Anne E Sales; Claire Stano; Helen C Kales; Kara Zivin Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2017-09-28 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Bengt Danielsson; Julius Collin; Anastasia Nyman; Annica Bergendal; Natalia Borg; Maria State; Lennart Bergfeldt; Johan Fastbom Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-03-12 Impact factor: 2.692