Literature DB >> 36168651

Ring of Fire: The Case of Mistaken Identity.

Clates P Adams1, Andrew Zabel2, Vanessa Hannick2.   

Abstract

This case investigates the difference between heterotopic pregnancy vs. intrauterine pregnancy, a topic that more emergency medicine physicians will face as the rates of assisted reproductive technologies increase. Throughout the case, the pathognomonic "Ring of Fire" is discussed, as is seen on the transvaginal ultrasound, and its reliability is assessed.
Copyright © 2022, Adams et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bleeding in pregnancy; colored flow doppler ultrasound; corpus luteal cyst; heterotopic pregnancy; heterotopic pregnancy (hp); pregnancy; ring of fire

Year:  2022        PMID: 36168651      PMCID: PMC9506592          DOI: 10.7759/cureus.29452

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cureus        ISSN: 2168-8184


Introduction

Heterotopic pregnancy is the presence of simultaneous pregnancies at two different implantation sites. Most commonly, these sites are a combination of intrauterine and extrauterine pregnancies [1]. In the setting of a true intrauterine pregnancy (IUP), signs suggestive of heterotopic pregnancy include complex adnexal masses or fluid in the pelvis. Additionally, color flow Doppler does not differentiate an ovarian pregnancy from a corpus luteal cyst, since the "Ring of Fire" appearance can be seen for either case and should no longer be considered pathognomonic for heterotopic pregnancy.

Case presentation

A 30-year-old pregnant female with a medical history of infertility of unknown cause presented at seven weeks and three days of gestation (confirmed by ultrasound and quantitative beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) of 40,000 mIU/mL, at an outside emergency department one week prior), with several days of scant vaginal bleeding and mild pelvic pain. A review of the cardiac, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, and genitourinary systems was otherwise normal. On physical exam, vital signs were clinically unremarkable. The patient was well-appearing and in no apparent distress, and her abdomen was soft and gravid with mild tenderness in the lower abdomen, bilaterally. Her cardiovascular exam demonstrated a regular rate and rhythm, with no murmur, gallop, or rub. Pulses were 3+ and equal in all extremities. A pulmonary exam showed non-labored breathing and lung fields were clear to auscultation bilaterally. Her quantitative beta-HCG was 120,000. Transvaginal color flow Doppler ultrasound was ordered and revealed the pathognomonic "Ring of Fire" (Figure 1). After obtaining the Doppler ultrasound image, the obstetrician on-call was consulted, and they favored the diagnosis of corpus luteal cyst over heterotopic pregnancy. The patient was re-evaluated by obstetrics the next morning, and several other physicians agreed. This case was not a heterotopic pregnancy and the patient went on to have a normal pregnancy.
Figure 1

"Ring of Fire" on ultrasound

Discussion

Heterotopic pregnancies have been diagnosed from five to 34 weeks of gestation. A total of 70% are diagnosed between five and eight weeks, 20% between nine and 10 weeks, and only 10% after the 11th week [2]. The historical incidence is 1/30,000 [3,4]. However, since the relative common use of assisted reproduction techniques, incidences have increased to 1/3,900 patients [5], and in those who receive in vitro fertilization (IVF), rates are quoted as 1/100 [6]. Interestingly, color flow Doppler does not differentiate an ovarian pregnancy from a corpus luteal cyst, since a “Ring of Fire” appearance can be seen for either according to the literature [7]. Although not performed in this case, anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) could have been used to differentiate between the diagnoses. The standard of treatment for an ectopic pregnancy, in the setting of a coexistent intrauterine pregnancy, is a laparoscopic salpingectomy and/or oophorectomy, to permit the intrauterine pregnancy to progress normally. Therefore, being able to differentiate between an ectopic and corpus luteum cyst will vastly alter the care and potential complications a patient could encounter.

Conclusions

There is a need for physicians to be alert in cases of pregnancy after IVF and those with concerning findings on transvaginal ultrasound. Confirming an IUP clinically, or by ultrasound, does not exclude the coexistence of ectopic pregnancy. It should be kept in the differential, suspected, and confirmed with AMH, in any patient presenting with abdominal pain or bleeding during pregnancy. The use of assisted reproduction techniques is increasing the likelihood of seeing a heterotopic pregnancy. A physician's failure to keep heterotopic pregnancy on the differential, after visualizing an IUP, can lead to a missed diagnosis and a catastrophic outcome for the mother.
  7 in total

Review 1.  Incidence and risk factors for ectopic pregnancy.

Authors:  M D Pisarska; S A Carson
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.190

Review 2.  Heterotopic pregnancy and assisted reproduction--an update.

Authors:  N Rojansky; J G Schenker
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 3.  Heterotopic pregnancy after ovulation induction and assisted reproductive technologies: a literature review from 1971 to 1993.

Authors:  J Tal; S Haddad; N Gordon; I Timor-Tritsch
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  In-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: a collaborative study of 1163 pregnancies on the incidence and risk factors of ectopic pregnancies.

Authors:  J Cohen; M J Mayaux; M L Guihard-Moscato; D Schwartz
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 5.  Combined intrauterine and extrauterine gestations: a review.

Authors:  E A Reece; R H Petrie; M F Sirmans; M Finster; W D Todd
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1983-06-01       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Ectopic pregnancy: transvaginal color Doppler of trophoblastic flow in questionable adnexa.

Authors:  A Kurjak; I Zalud; H Schulman
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 2.153

7.  Heterotopic pregnancy: A diagnosis we should suspect more often.

Authors:  Karim Ibn Majdoub Hassani; Abderrahim El Bouazzaoui; Mohammed Khatouf; Khalid Mazaz
Journal:  J Emerg Trauma Shock       Date:  2010-07
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.