Literature DB >> 36166461

Curcumin-loaded nanocomplexes ameliorate the severity of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in hamsters infected with Opisthorchis viverrini.

Chutima Sitthirach1,2, Lakhanawan Charoensuk2,3, Chawalit Pairojkul2,4, Apisit Chaidee1,2, Kitti Intuyod2,4, Thatsanapong Pongking2,5, Phonpilas Thongpon1,2, Chanakan Jantawong2,6, Nuttanan Hongsrichan1,2, Sakda Waraasawapati2,4, Manachai Yingklang2,7, Somchai Pinlaor1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Comorbidity of Opisthorchis viverrini (OV) infection and nonalcoholic fatty-liver disease (NAFLD) enhances NAFLD progression to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) by promoting severe liver inflammation and fibrosis. Here, we investigated the effect of supplementation with curcumin-loaded nanocomplexes (CNCs) on the severity of NASH in hamsters.
METHODOLOGY: Hamsters were placed in experimental groups as follows: fed standard chow diet (normal control, NC); fed only high-fat and high-fructose (HFF) diet; O. viverrini-infected and fed HFF diet (HFFOV); group fed with blank nanocomplexes (HFFOV+BNCs); groups fed different doses of CNCs (25, 50 and 100 mg/kg body weight: HFFOV+CNCs25; HFFOV+CNCs50; HFFOV+CNCs100, respectively) and a group given native curcumin (HFFOV+CUR). All treatment were for three months.
RESULTS: The HFF group revealed NAFLD as evidenced by hepatic fat accumulation, ballooning, mild inflammation and little or no fibrosis. These changes were more obvious in the HFFOV group, indicating development of NASH. In contrast, in the HFFOV+CNCs50 group, histopathological features indicated that hepatic fat accumulation, cell ballooning, cell inflammation and fibrosis were lower than in other treatment groups. Relevantly, the expression of lipid-uptake genes, including fatty-acid uptake (cluster of differentiation 36), was reduced, which was associated with the lowering of alanine aminotransferase, total cholesterol and triglyceride (TG) levels. Reduced expression of an inflammation marker (high-mobility group box protein 1) and a fibrosis marker (alpha smooth-muscle actin) were also observed in the HFFOV+CNCs50 group.
CONCLUSION: CNCs treatment attenuates the severity of NASH by decreasing hepatic steatosis, inflammation, and fibrosis as well as TG synthesis. CNCs mitigate the severity of NASH in this preclinical study, which indicates promise for future use in patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36166461      PMCID: PMC9514634          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275273

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.752


Introduction

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is caused by excess triglyceride accumulation in the liver cells in the absence of alcohol consumption [1]. NAFLD is the most common chronic liver disease worldwide, occurring in about 25% of the global population [2]. The interactions of environmental and genetic factors are associated with risk for NAFLD development [3, 4]. NAFLD frequently progresses to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma or cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). Liver fat accumulation, hepatic inflammation and fibrosis all play a vital role in this [5, 6]. Chemical promotion of NAFLD progression to NASH is well known [7, 8]; however, the role of infectious agents in driving disease progression is unclear. In northeast Thailand, the incidence of fatty-liver disease is on the rise and infection with the small liver fluke, Opisthorchis viverrini, is common [9]. Infection with O. viverrini is one of the risk factors for periductal fibrosis and chronic inflammation, leading to hepatobiliary diseases including CCA [10]. Prior experimental study has demonstrated that O. viverrini infection and high-fat diets can rapidly accelerate the progression from NAFLD to NASH [11]. Although praziquantel is an effective drug for treating O. viverrini infection, re-infection following treatment is common in endemic areas, leading to persistence of a high prevalence of infection [12] and severe hepatobiliary diseases, including fatty liver [13]. In addition, delayed treatment [14], side effects following early treatment [15] and frequent treatments [16] are all likely to enhance risk of severe hepatobiliary diseases. There are no specific and effective drugs for NAFLD treatment [17]. Phytomedicine or herbal substances, which have few side effects and low toxicities, may offer alternative treatments to prevent NAFLD progression [18]. Curcumin is the principal active constituent in the rhizome of Curcuma longa L. (turmeric). It has been extensively studied because of its pharmacological properties, especially its antioxidant, anti-fibrosis, anti-inflammatory and anti-lipidemia activities [19, 20]. The efficacy of curcumin against bile-duct cancer, hepatobiliary disease and NAFLD has also been described [21, 22]. Use of curcumin is typically limited by its water insolubility, instability and poor bioavailability [23]; however, nanocarriers, especially involving encapsulation, have been developed to solve these limitations [24]. Treatment with nano-curcumin leads to improved glucose indices, lipids, inflammation, and nesfatin in overweight and obese patients with NAFLD [25]. We also developed a novel nano-encapsulated curcumin based on a polymeric nanocarrier (called curcumin-loaded nanocomplexes, CNCs) that is safe and has no obvious side effects during either short-term or long-term consumption in animal models [26, 27]. However, the hepatoprotective effects of CNCs on NASH progression have not been evaluated. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effects of CNCs on the severity of NASH induced by high-fat and high-fructose diets and O. viverrini infection in hamsters. Histopathological study, biochemical assays, western blotting and real-time PCR analysis were used. This preclinical study on the ability of CNCs to alleviate the progression of NASH might be translatable to future clinical use.

Materials and methods

Ethic statement

This experimental protocol was reviewed and approved by the Animal Ethic Committee of Khon Kaen University (IACUC–KKU–81/62). Hamsters were obtained from the Animal Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University.

Experimental design

Eighty male Syrian golden hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus: 4–6 weeks old and 80–100 g) were used for the experiment. Hamsters were divided into 8 groups (n = 10 each) as shown in Table 1.
Table 1

Experimental design and animal groups.

GroupTreatmentGroup
no.abbreviation
1 Normal controls: not infected with O. viverrini (OV) and fed standard chow diet (Smart Heart, PCG, Bangkok, Thailand) and filtered water.NC
2 Fed high-fat, high-fructose (HFF) diet, no OV infection.HFF
3 Fed HFF diet and infected with OV.HFFOV
4 Fed HFF diet, infected with OV, fed blank nanocomplexes.HFFOV+BNCs
5 Fed HFF diet, infected with OV, fed curcumin-loaded nanocomplexes at 25mg/kg bw (equivalent to curcumin 6.25 mg/kg bw).HFFOV+CNCs25
6 Fed HFF diet, infected with OV, fed curcumin-loaded nanocomplexes at 50 mg/kg bw (equivalent to curcumin 12.5 mg/kg bw).HFFOV+CNCs50
7 Fed HFF diet, infected with OV, fed curcumin-loaded nanocomplexes at 100 mg/kg bw (equivalent to curcumin 25 mg/kg bw).HFFOV+CNCs100
8 Fed HFF diet, infected with OV, fed native curcumin at 25 mg/kg bw.HFFOV+CUR
The high-fat diet and high-fructose drinking water were prepared freshly every week and hamsters were fed on this diet all the time. In relevant treatment groups, the BNCs, CNCs and native curcumin were orally administered to hamsters using a gastric tube thrice weekly and continued until the animals were sacrificed at the end of 3 months. Hamsters were anesthetized with isoflurane and sacrificed by drawing blood directly from the heart. Afterwards, liver and blood-serum samples were collected. Sera were stored at -20°C until used to determine biochemical parameters. A portion of each liver sample was preserved in 10% formalin for histopathological and immunohistochemical analysis. The remainder of each liver sample was snap frozen in liquid nitrogen (for western-blot analysis) and immediately treated with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) for total RNA isolation. Frozen livers and preserved liver in TRIzol reagent samples were kept at -80°C until use.

Opisthorchis viverrini infection

Opisthorchis viverrini metacercaria were obtained from naturally infected cyprinid freshwater fish. The protocol, reagents and procedure for fish digestion were as described previously [28]. Fifty live O. viverrini metacercariae were administered to each hamster by oral inoculation using gastric intubation [11].

Preparation of curcumin, CNCs and BNCs

The curcumin powder (97% purity w/w) was purchased from Merck-Schuchardt (Hohenbrunn, Germany). Powdered CNCs (containing 28.6% curcumin by weight) and blank nanocomplexes (BNCs) were obtained as in the previous study [26, 27]. Curcumin powder was weighed and dissolved in corn oil, and BNCs and CNCs powders were dispersed in distilled water [29]. The final concentrations of CNCs used were 25, 50, and 100 mg/kg bw, which contained native curcumin at 6.5, 12.5 and 25 mg/kg bw, respectively. BNCs were administered to the appropriate groups at 100 mg/kg bw.

Preparation of the high-fat diet and high-fructose drinking water

The high-fat diet used was modified from that described previously [11]. The ingredients were a mixture of 40% control diet (Smart Heart; PCG, Bangkok, Thailand), 10% coconut oil (Roi Thai, Thailand), 10% corn oil (Golden Drop, Thailand), 1.25% cholesterol, 0.25% sodium deoxycholate (Sigma-Aldrich, St, Louis, Mo, USA), and 38.5% sucrose (Mitr Phol, Thailand). All of the ingredients were combined and formed into small discs, which were then incubated at 65°C for 24 h. The high-fructose drinking water was prepared by mixing d-glucose powder (18.9 g) and d-fructose powder (23.1 g) (Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany) in distilled water (1 L) [30]. HFF diet composition was determined by Central Laboratory (Thailand), Co. Ltd. according to the Association of Office Analytical Collaboration (AOAC) International guidelines and is shown in S1 Table.

Measurement of serum biochemistry parameters

Biochemical parameters of liver function (alanine aminotransferase: ALT) and lipid profiles (total cholesterol; TC; and triglyceride: TG levels) were measured at the end of the experiment from serum using automated analyzers (Cobas 8000 Modular Analysis Series, Roche Diagnostics International Ltd) at the clinical laboratory of Srinagarind Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Thailand.

Investigation of histopathological changes to the liver

To investigate the histopathology of liver changes (fat accumulation, ballooning, inflammation, and fibrosis), liver sections were stained with Mayer’s hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and the picrosirius-red method was applied. The protocol has been described elsewhere [29]. In brief, formalin-fixed liver samples were embedded in paraffin and cut into 5 μm thick sections using a rotary microtome HM 315 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). The sections were deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated in a descending ethanol series. Afterwards, slides were stained with Mayer’s hematoxylin and eosin for 10 and for 5 min, respectively. To observe fibrosis, the picrosirius red staining method was used (Solution A for 2 min, Solution B for 90 min, and Solution C for 2 min) and stained with Mayer’s hematoxylin 8 min. Finally, slides were washed with distilled water until clear-colored and dehydrated in an ascending ethanol series followed by xylene. Histopathological grading of NAFLD or NASH indicators (fat accumulation, ballooning, inflammation and fibrosis) was scored on a scale of 0–3, following previous studies [11, 31, 32]. Stained slides (7–8 hamsters per each group) were randomly selected and the lobular area at the periphery and perihilar regions of the liver were examined. The histopathological grading was performed by three independent researchers (agreement of two out of three being accepted), and the grading scores were confirmed by a senior clinical pathologist under light microscopy using 5X to 40X magnifications. The criteria for staging are shown in Table 2. All sections were examined for the characteristics of NAFLD/NASH to allow visualization of grading indicators (fat accumulation, ballooning, inflammation and fibrosis (see Fig 1). The scored grades were then applied to the algorithm for NAFLD/NASH diagnosis (shown in Fig 2).
Table 2

The histological scoring system of hepatic lobules in NAFLD modified from [11, 31, 32].

GradeLobular area at periphery and perihilar region of the liver
Fatty change grade
0 None
1 Dominant micro-vesicular steatosis
2 Mixed micro- and macro-vesicular steatosis
3 Dominant macro-vesicular steatosis
Ballooning grade
0 None
1 Pericentral regions
2 Periportal regions
3 Mixed (pericentral and periportal) regions
Inflammation grade
0 None
1 Pericentral inflammation
2 Periportal inflammation
3 Mixed pericentral and periportal inflammation
Fibrosis stage
0 None
1 Perisinusoidal/pericellular fibrosis
2 Periportal/portal fibrosis
3 Bridging fibrosis
Fig 1

Characteristics of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD, A and C) and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH, B and D).

Liver tissues were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E, A and B) and picrosirius red (C and D). A and C illustrate NAFLD. A): In this case of mild NAFLD steatosis, scattered micro-vesicles are seen in the hepatic lobules and with a predominantly perivenular distribution associated with ballooning (black arrow). C): Fibrosis is almost absent in NAFLD between lobules. B and D represent NASH. B): Macro-vesicular steatosis is scattered in the hepatic lobule (green arrow) and swollen (ballooned) hepatocytes are apparent with rarefied cytoplasm (black arrow). Periportal inflammation can be seen as a mixed inflammatory infiltrate consisted of mainly mononuclear cells as shown (yellow arrow). D): Pericellular and perisinusoidal lobular fibrosis (black arrows). H, hepatic vein.

Fig 2

Diagnostic algorithm for differentiation of NAFLD and NASH at the liver parenchyma [31].

Characteristics of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD, A and C) and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH, B and D).

Liver tissues were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E, A and B) and picrosirius red (C and D). A and C illustrate NAFLD. A): In this case of mild NAFLD steatosis, scattered micro-vesicles are seen in the hepatic lobules and with a predominantly perivenular distribution associated with ballooning (black arrow). C): Fibrosis is almost absent in NAFLD between lobules. B and D represent NASH. B): Macro-vesicular steatosis is scattered in the hepatic lobule (green arrow) and swollen (ballooned) hepatocytes are apparent with rarefied cytoplasm (black arrow). Periportal inflammation can be seen as a mixed inflammatory infiltrate consisted of mainly mononuclear cells as shown (yellow arrow). D): Pericellular and perisinusoidal lobular fibrosis (black arrows). H, hepatic vein.

Immunohistochemistry assays

Tissue sections cut at 5 μm thickness were deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated in a descending ethanol series and then the sections were autoclaved at 110°C for 10 min in citrate buffer (10 mM sodium citrate, 0.05% Tween 20, pH 6.0) to retrieve antigen. Thereafter, slides were immersed in 3% H2O2 for 10 min to quench endogenous peroxidases. Non-specific binding was blocked by 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 1 h at room temperature. The slides were then incubated with primary antibodies, rabbit polyclonal anti-high-mobility group box protein 1 or HMGB–1 (1:300, ab79823, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), and mouse monoclonal anti-alpha smooth-muscle actin antibody or α–SMA (1:100, ab7817, Abcam) at 4°C overnight. Afterwards, slides were washed with phosphate-buffered saline solution (PBS) for 5 min, followed by incubation with a 1:200 dilution of horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-labeled goat anti-rabbit IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA, USA) and a 1:200 dilution of HRP-conjugated sheep anti-mouse IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch) at room temperature for 1 h. Then, the immunoreactivity was visualized by adding DAB solution (3’, 3’-diaminobenzidine) (0.02%) in 0.05 M Tris–HCl (pH 7.6) and 0.01% H2O2 (v/v) was used as a chromogenic substrate for 20 s. Slides were counterstained with Mayer’s hematoxylin for 2 min, and then washed with distilled water and dehydrated with ethanol (70, 95 and 100%) and xylene. The slides were examined under a light microscope using 20X magnification (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany). Ten representative, randomly selected areas of the liver, were monitored. Fibrosis and inflammation-cell scores were analyzed using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA).

Western blot analysis

Protein was extracted from frozen liver with lysis buffer until homogenous, and then centrifuged at 13000 rpm at 4°C for 10 min. The supernatant was collected and protein concentration measured using the BCA assay with an ELISA micro-plate reader. Approximately 20 μg of liver protein was separated by SDS–PAGE and the resolved proteins were transferred onto a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (PVDF). The membranes were blocked and incubated with primary antibody (α–SMA, 1:1000, ab7817, Abcam): diluted in 5% BSA) at 4°C overnight using gentle shaking. Afterwards, the membrane was washed with Tris-buffered saline with 0.1% Tween 20 detergent buffer and incubated with a secondary antibody 1:3000 dilution of HRP-conjugated sheep anti-mouse IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch) for 1 h. An enhanced chemiluminescence detection reagent (ECL Prime, GE Healthcare) was added onto the membrane and then the developed immunoreactive band was visualized using an Image Quant LAS4000 mini machine (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences AB, Uppsala, Sweden). Relative band intensity was measured using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA).

RNA extraction and quantitative real-time PCR

Total RNA was extracted from frozen liver samples with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The quality of RNA was checked using a Nanodrop 2000 (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA). RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA using the Revert Aid First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (K1621, Molecular Biology, Thermo Scientific), following the manufacturer’s protocol. To detect free fatty-acid uptake and lipogenesis, the genes for cluster differentiation 36 (CD36), sterol regulatory element-binding protein 1c (SREBP–1c), and fatty-acid synthase (FAS) were assessed. The specific primer pairs for the CD36 and FAS genes were designed based on sequence information for complete CD36 mRNA (accession number: U42430.1) and FAS mRNA (accession number: XM_005069786.4) of Mesocricetus auratus in the GenBank database using online primer 3 software (https://bioinfo.ut.ee/primer3-0.4.0/). The primer pair used for SREBP–1c was as previously described [33]. The specific primer pair for the free fatty-acid uptake gene (CD36) was as follows: F; 5´ ACGACTACATTTACGCACTGG 3´, R; 5´ TTGAAATATGCTTTGGCTTAGTGC 3´. The primer pairs for lipogenesis detection were as follows: F: 5´ CAGCTCAGAGCCGTGGTGA 3´ R; 5´ TTGATAGAAGACCGGTAGCGC 3´ for the SREBP-1c gene and F; 5´ CCATCATCCCCTTGATGAAGA 3´ and R; 5´ GTTGATGTCGATGCCTGTGAG 3´ for the FAS gene. The RT-PCR reaction (total volume 15 μL) included FastStart Universal SYBR Green Master mix (ROX, Roche Applied Science, Mannheim, Germany) and 5 μg of cDNA template. Cycling conditions in a Light Cycler 480 II system (Roche Applied Science, Mannheim, Germany) were as follows: annealing at 95°C for 10 min; 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 s, 60°C and 60°C and 61°C for the CD36, SREBP–1c, and FAS genes (respectively) for 30 s, and extension at 72°C for 1 min. Relative mRNA expression was calibrated using the 2‾ΔΔCT method, and the beta-actin (β-actin) gene was used as a calibrator. The determination of mRNA expression was conducted in duplicate.

Statistical analysis

Data from the eight groups in the experiment were presented as the mean ± standard deviation, and differences between groups were compared using one-way analysis of covariance (ANOVA) with the Tukey HSD post-hoc test. A nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the graded score and nonparametric data. These analyses were performed using IBM SPSS statistics version 26 (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp).

Results

Effect of CNCs on body weight and morphology of liver changes

The average body weight of hamsters in each treatment group at three months did not statistically significantly differ from that of the un-treated group (HFFOV). The average liver weight in the HFFOV group was significantly higher than in the HFF group (P< 0.05). In contrast, the liver weights in the HFFOV+CUR, HFFOV+BNCs and the three curcumin-loaded nanocomplex (CNCs) treatment groups (25, 50, and 100 mg/kg bw) did not significantly differ from weights in the HFFOV group (Table 3). The livers from all high-fat, high-fructose groups, whether supplemented or not with curcumin, BNCs, or CNCs (at 25, 50, and 100 mg/kg bw), were markedly enlarged and pale in color when compared to the NC group (Fig 3).
Table 3

Parameters relating to NAFLD/NASH disease of hamsters in the experimental groups at the end of three months.

ParametersNCHFFHFFOVHFFOV+ BNCsHFFOV+ CNCs25HFFOV+ CNCs50HFFOV+ CNCs100HFFOV+ CUR
Body weight (g) 158±15.38136±22.34172±23.45182±10.17166±13.24171±23.22173±30.41177±25.76
Liver weight (g) 4±0.378±1.12 a10±1.96 b10±0.949±0.5910±1.7010±2.249±1.66
LW/BW (Ratio) 0.02±0.0020.06±0.010 a0.06±0.0600.05±0.0050.05±0.0060.06±0.0140.06±0.0170.05±0.007
ALT(U/L) 46±7.1869±13.89115±21.40 b87±8.72 c85±28.71 c80±8.62 c89±14.2395±23.97
TC (mg/dL) 69±11.69189±35.81 a279±30.97 b205±4.32 c168±3.80 c192±6.51 c241±4.72 c177±26.84 c, g
TG (mg/dL) 93±4.03121±23.30148±39.56136±22.9296±13.78 c110±18.29 c88±15.61 c96±17.98 c

Liver weight/body weight: LW/BW; Alanine aminotransferase: ALT, Total cholesterol: TC; Triglyceride: TG.

The differences between groups were compared using one-way analysis of covariance (ANOVA) with the Tukey HSD post-hoc test. Any P-value of less than 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.

aP<0.05 when compared with NC,

bP<0.05 when compared with HFF,

cP<0.05 when compared with HFFOV,

dP<0.05 when compared with HFFOV+BNCs,

eP<0.05 when compared with HFFOV+CNCs25,

fP<0.05 when compared with HFFOV+CNCs50,

gP<0.05 when compared with HFFOV+CNCs100.

Fig 3

Morphological gross appearance of hamster livers.

Normal hamsters (NC); hamsters treated with high-fat/high-fructose diet only (HFF); O. viverrini-infected hamsters and fed the HFF diet (HFFOV); O. viverrini-infected with HFF diet and supplemented with blank nanocomplexes (HFFOV+BNCs); O. viverrini-infected hamsters with HFF diet and supplemented with curcumin-loading nanocomplexes (CNCs) 25, 50, 100 mg/kg bw; and O. viverrini-infected hamsters with HFF diet; and supplemented with curcumin (HFFOV+CUR).

Morphological gross appearance of hamster livers.

Normal hamsters (NC); hamsters treated with high-fat/high-fructose diet only (HFF); O. viverrini-infected hamsters and fed the HFF diet (HFFOV); O. viverrini-infected with HFF diet and supplemented with blank nanocomplexes (HFFOV+BNCs); O. viverrini-infected hamsters with HFF diet and supplemented with curcumin-loading nanocomplexes (CNCs) 25, 50, 100 mg/kg bw; and O. viverrini-infected hamsters with HFF diet; and supplemented with curcumin (HFFOV+CUR). Liver weight/body weight: LW/BW; Alanine aminotransferase: ALT, Total cholesterol: TC; Triglyceride: TG. The differences between groups were compared using one-way analysis of covariance (ANOVA) with the Tukey HSD post-hoc test. Any P-value of less than 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. aP<0.05 when compared with NC, bP<0.05 when compared with HFF, cP<0.05 when compared with HFFOV, dP<0.05 when compared with HFFOV+BNCs, eP<0.05 when compared with HFFOV+CNCs25, fP<0.05 when compared with HFFOV+CNCs50, gP<0.05 when compared with HFFOV+CNCs100.

Effect of CNCs on biochemical parameters

At the end of three months post-treatment, as shown in Table 3, the HFFOV group displayed significantly higher levels of ALT, TC and TG than did the HFF group (P< 0.05). In contrast, the level of ALT was significantly decreased in the treatment groups with CNCs at 25, and 50 mg/kg bw and BNCs, while treatment with CNCs at 100 mg/kg bw and native curcumin did not show a significant difference when compared to the HFFOV group (un-treated group). The level of TC was also significantly lower than in the HFFOV group after treatment with all regimens, while the level of TG was significantly lower only in the treatment group with CNCs (at 25, 50, and 100 mg/kg bw) and native curcumin (P< 0.05).

Effect of CNCs on histopathological changes of liver

The histopathological changes in the hepatic lobules of liver are shown in Figs 4 and 5. Using H&E and picrosirius-red staining (Fig 4A and 4B), the level of fat-droplet accumulation (micro vesicular), hepatocyte ballooning, slight to mild inflammatory-cell aggregation, and fibrosis in hepatic lobules of the liver were observed in the HFF group, indicating that NAFLD had been successfully induced in this model. These histological changes, particularly macro-vesicular changes, inflammation and liver fibrosis were more pronounced in the HFFOV group than in the HFF group (Table 4 and Fig 4), indicating NASH. After three months of treatment, all groups receiving supplements (CNCs, BNCs or CUR) showed a slight tendency to decreased fat accumulation, ballooning, inflammation, pericellular fibrosis, the exception being periportal fibrosis in hepatic lobules (Table 4 and Fig 5). Although the CNCs treatment groups exhibited decreased severity of hepatitis, as shown by reduction of fat accumulation and inflammatory-cell infiltration, fibrosis was still present: therefore, this condition was still classified as NASH.
Fig 4

Histopathological changes induced by O. viverrini infection and HFF diet.

A): H&E stain was used to demonstrate abnormalities in the liver; and B): Picrosirius red stain was used to investigate fibrosis. Experimental animal groups and abbreviations are the same as in Fig 3 legend.

Fig 5

Histopathological changes induced by O. viverrini infection and HFF diet in experimental groups that were also treated with CNCs.

A): H&E stain was used to investigate liver histopathological changes; and B): Picrosirius red stain was used to investigate fibrosis. Experimental animal groups and abbreviations are the same as in Fig 3 legend.

Table 4

Comparisons of liver pathology grades (ranging from 0 to 3 in each case) among the experimental groups.

CharacteristicsNCHFFHFFOVHFFOV+ BNCsHFFOV+ CNCs25HFFOV+ CNCs50HFFOV+ CNCs100HFFOV+ CUR
Steatosis grade 012–311111–2
Ballooning grade 0131–21–21–21–21–2
Inflammation grade 012–3221–222–3
Fibrosis stage 01332–32–333
Diagnosis No NAFLDNAFLDNASHNASHNASHNASHNASHNASH

*Lobular and hilar periphery differences are not significant.

Histopathological changes induced by O. viverrini infection and HFF diet.

A): H&E stain was used to demonstrate abnormalities in the liver; and B): Picrosirius red stain was used to investigate fibrosis. Experimental animal groups and abbreviations are the same as in Fig 3 legend.

Histopathological changes induced by O. viverrini infection and HFF diet in experimental groups that were also treated with CNCs.

A): H&E stain was used to investigate liver histopathological changes; and B): Picrosirius red stain was used to investigate fibrosis. Experimental animal groups and abbreviations are the same as in Fig 3 legend. *Lobular and hilar periphery differences are not significant.

Effect of CNCs treatment on the inflammation and fibrosis indicators in liver

Fig 6 depicts the immunochemistry staining (HMGB–1 and α–SMA expression) and the relative intensity of liver-protein expression using western-blot analysis (α–SMA expression). The expression levels of HMGB–1 and α–SMA were significantly higher in the HFFOV group than in the HFF group (Fig 6A and 6B). In contrast, the level of HMGB–1 was significantly lower in the group treated with CNCs (at 25, 50, and 100 mg/kg bw), while treatments with BNCs and curcumin did not lead to significant differences when compared to the un-treated group (HFFOV). The level of α–SMA was significantly decreased after treatment with CNCs (at 25 and 50 mg/kg bw), BNCs and curcumin, while treatment with CNCs (at 100 mg/kg bw) did not show significant differences when compared to the HFFOV group (P> 0.05). According to the western-blot analysis, the groups treated with CNCs at 25 and 50 mg/kg bw, BNCs and curcumin exhibited a lower relative intensity of α–SMA when compared to the HFFOV group (Fig 6C), but this was not statistically significant.
Fig 6

Effect of treatment with CNCs on inflammation and fibrosis in hamsters infected with O. viverrini and fed an HFF diet.

A): Images show immunohistochemical staining (original magnification ×100) for HMGB–1 on the left and a graph of intensity of cell inflammation (assessed at 200x magnification) on the right. B): Images show immunohistochemical staining (original magnification ×200) for α–SMA on the left and a graph of intensity of cell inflammation (assessed at 200x magnification) on the right. C): Protein expression of α-SMA by western blot and quantitative analysis was normalized by β-actin from different individual hamsters. Results are presented as mean±SD. Statistical analyses were done using one-way ANOVA *P< 0.05 (Tukey’s multiple comparisons test) (n = 4–5 in each group). Abbreviations are the same as in Fig 3 legend.

Effect of treatment with CNCs on inflammation and fibrosis in hamsters infected with O. viverrini and fed an HFF diet.

A): Images show immunohistochemical staining (original magnification ×100) for HMGB–1 on the left and a graph of intensity of cell inflammation (assessed at 200x magnification) on the right. B): Images show immunohistochemical staining (original magnification ×200) for α–SMA on the left and a graph of intensity of cell inflammation (assessed at 200x magnification) on the right. C): Protein expression of α-SMA by western blot and quantitative analysis was normalized by β-actin from different individual hamsters. Results are presented as mean±SD. Statistical analyses were done using one-way ANOVA *P< 0.05 (Tukey’s multiple comparisons test) (n = 4–5 in each group). Abbreviations are the same as in Fig 3 legend.

Effect of CNCs treatment on expression of genes associated with free fatty-acid uptake and lipogenesis

The relative expression levels of CD36, SREBP–1c, and FAS genes, determined using RT-PCR, are shown in Fig 7. The expression level of CD36 in the HFFOV group was significantly higher than in the HFF group. On the other hand, it was significantly lower in the CNCs-treated groups (all dose rates) and CUR group when compared with the HFFOV group (Fig 7A). The SREBP-1c gene was more highly expressed in all treatment groups compared to the un-treated group (HFFOV), with the highest expression in the group treated with CNCs at 50 mg/kg bw, followed by those treated with CNCs at 100 and with 25 mg/kg bw, native curcumin and BNCs, in that order (Fig 7B). The expression level of the FAS gene was highest in the groups treated with CNCs at 100 and 50 mg/kg bw (Fig 7C).
Fig 7

Effects of curcumin-loading nanocomplexes on mRNA expressions levels.

A): CD36 associated with free fatty-acid uptake by liver cells; B): SREBP-1c; and C): FAS associated with lipid synthesis. Expression levels were measured at the end of the 3-month experimental period. For each group, total RNA was measured from the tissues of three hamsters and the mean±SD shown. Statistical analyses were done using one-way ANOVA *P< 0.05 (Tukey’s multiple comparisons test). Abbreviations are the same as in Fig 3 legend.

Effects of curcumin-loading nanocomplexes on mRNA expressions levels.

A): CD36 associated with free fatty-acid uptake by liver cells; B): SREBP-1c; and C): FAS associated with lipid synthesis. Expression levels were measured at the end of the 3-month experimental period. For each group, total RNA was measured from the tissues of three hamsters and the mean±SD shown. Statistical analyses were done using one-way ANOVA *P< 0.05 (Tukey’s multiple comparisons test). Abbreviations are the same as in Fig 3 legend.

Discussion

In this study, NAFLD and NASH were successfully induced in hamsters after three months by administration of a high-fat and high-fructose diet and infection with O. viverrini. This agrees with a previous study by Chaidee et al., 2019 [11]. These conditions were apparent in the HFFOV group, which exhibited severe liver pathology including macro-vesicular/micro-vesicular steatosis, hepatocellular ballooning, periductal inflammation, and fibrosis relative to the HFF group. However, hamsters treated with CNCs, relative to the HFFOV group, exhibited reduced hepatic steatosis and decreased expression of genes involved in free fatty-acid uptake, inflammation and fibrosis. Alleviation of histopathological features were consistent with the lower serum levels of ALT, TC, and TG parameters. Treatment with CNCs mitigates the severity of NASH by reducing expression of genes associated with the uptake of free fatty acids (CD36), liver inflammation (HMGB–1) and fibrosis (α–SMA). The potential mechanism by which CNCs ameliorate NASH in hamsters infected with Opisthorchis viverrini is shown in Fig 8.
Fig 8

Potential mechanism of curcumin-loaded nanocomplexes ameliorate the severity of NASH in hamsters infected with Opisthorchis viverrini.

By the end of the three-month experiment, there was no statistically significant difference in the average body weight or the liver weight of hamsters from all treatment groups when compared to the HFFOV group. The livers from all groups fed with the high-fat, high-fructose diet, whether treated with native curcumin, BNCs, or CNCs (at 25, 50, and 100 mg/kg bw) or un-treated (HFF and HFFOV), were enlarged relative to normal controls and pale in color. These indicate that the treatments we used might not do much to improve morphological features of the liver. Treatment with CNCs (all doses) led to decreased liver pathology by reducing fat accumulation, ballooning, inflammation, and fibrosis in both lobular and hilar areas of the liver. The levels of ALT, TC, and TG from blood serum samples were also significantly lower. These findings were similar to those in previous experimental and clinical studies using native curcumin treatment [25, 34, 35]. It has been postulated that curcumin ameliorates hepatic steatosis and reduces elevated biochemical parameters through removal of fat from liver by decreasing synthesis of triglyceride and other lipids, and lowering inflammation [36, 37], as well as improving levels of liver enzymes and insulin resistance [38]. Moreover, reduction of triglyceride storage is related to de-novo lipolysis, the key player in the process of assembling very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) which is secreted out of the liver [39]. Unexpectedly, hamsters in the treatment group given blank nanocomplexes (BNCs) exhibited reduced levels of ALT and TC, indicating that the nanomaterials alone might be partially involved in attenuation of fat accumulation in liver. We suspect that macrophages might phagocytose BNCs and excrete them into the blood circulation [26]. However, further study is required in this regard. We evaluated the effects of CNCs on the expression levels of genes related to uptake of fatty acids (CD36 gene) and to the TG synthesis pathway [40]. The expression level of CD36 was decreased after treatment with CNCs or native curcumin. These results were similar to those previously reported by Mun and colleagues after treatment with water-extracted turmeric of mice fed a high-fat diet for eight weeks [41]. Moreover, the reduced expression of CD36 in our study was also associated with the lowering of serum TG levels, implying that CNCs might have an effect on TG synthesis by reducing free fatty-acid uptake. Curcumin has known antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties by suppressing oxidative stress, ER stress, cell damage, and collagen deposition, as well as inhibiting liver damage by reducing the cytosolic and nuclear translocation of high mobility groups, especially high mobility group box 1 (HMGB–1) [42]. In this study, we also found a significantly decreased expression of HMGB–1 in the CNCs treatment group, especially at doses of 25 and 50 mg/kg bw, while levels in groups treated with native curcumin and BNCs were not statistically significantly different from the HFFOV group. This finding indicated that CNCs had a higher ability to reduce HMGB–1 expression than did native curcumin. The low efficiency of native curcumin for reducing inflammation levels might be due to its water insolubility, instability, and poor bioavailability [23]. In addition, the expression level of α–SMA, the marker for fibrosis, was also lower in groups treated with CNCs and native curcumin. These findings are consistent with previous research using native curcumin or nanocurcumin treatments that could lower the levels of HMGB–1 and α–SMA expression [21, 29, 43]. Surprisingly, we found that SREBP–1c and FAS genes were up-regulated in all treatment groups and the highest expression was found in the CNCs treatment groups, followed by native curcumin and BNCs groups in that order. The sterol regulatory element binding protein-1c (SREBP-1c) regulates expression of several enzymes implicated in cholesterol, lipid and glucose metabolism [44]. Increased SREBP-1c expression is responsible for initiating the transcription of lipogenic enzymes for catalyzing TG production and can induce insulin resistance [39]. Our results contrasted with those of previous studies, which have indicated that SREBP–1c expression was reduced after curcumin treatment [21, 43]. These contrasting findings may be due to differences in experimental designs: we administered CNCs treatments as well as other supplements in our study less frequently than previous researchers who fed high doses of curcumin on a daily basis [43, 45]. Although we found up-regulation of SREBP–1c and FAS genes, our histopathological study strongly indicated lower severity of hepatic disease in the treatment groups. Possibly, the homeostasis of lipid metabolism in the liver might be precisely controlled by several metabolic pathways, such as those associated with lipoprotein metabolism, cholesterol metabolism, bile acid metabolism and fatty acid metabolism [46, 47]. However, the underlying mechanism by which curcumin acts on hepatic lipid metabolism needs further research. Nevertheless, although CNCs treatment did not show a dose-dependent effect on several results, treatment with CNCs, particularly at 50 mg/kg bw, three times per week, demonstrated a greater ability to reduce hepatic pathology severity and related biochemical parameters than CNCs at 25 and 100 mg/kg bw, or native curcumin or BNCs. This concentration of CNCs (50 mg/kg bw) might be the appropriate dose for use in further studies that are required.

Conclusion

This study indicates that the severity of hepatic injury and NASH were alleviated by CNCs treatment. Supplementation with CNCs also reduced both plasma triglyceride and cholesterol concentrations. These beneficial effects of CNCs treatment were partly mediated by reducing the expression of genes associated with fatty-acid uptake (CD36), inflammation (HMGB–1) and fibrogenesis (α–SMA). This study demonstrates the therapeutic potential of CNCs that might have future clinical application for averting NASH development.

Nutrient composition of HFF diet.

(DOCX) Click here for additional data file.

Raw gel images for α-SMA and β-actin proteins expression.

(PDF) Click here for additional data file. 18 Jul 2022
PONE-D-22-11833
Curcumin-loaded nanocomplexes ameliorate the progression of NAFLD to NASH in hamsters infected with Opisthorchis viverrini
PLOS ONE Dear Dr. Pinlaor, Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.
 
We have received a thoughtful review of your manuscript. In order to not unduly lengthen the review process, I would like to give you the opportunity to revise your manuscript based on the one review. I agree with the points raised by the reviewer. Please submit your revised manuscript by Sep 01 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file. Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:
If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter. A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'. A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'. An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'. If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols. We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Kind regards, Michael W. Greene, Ph.D. Academic Editor PLOS ONE Journal Requirements: When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements. 1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf  and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf 2. In your Data Availability statement, you have not specified where the minimal data set underlying the results described in your manuscript can be found. PLOS defines a study's minimal data set as the underlying data used to reach the conclusions drawn in the manuscript and any additional data required to replicate the reported study findings in their entirety. All PLOS journals require that the minimal data set be made fully available. For more information about our data policy, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability. "Upon re-submitting your revised manuscript, please upload your study’s minimal underlying data set as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and include the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers within your revised cover letter. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories. Any potentially identifying patient information must be fully anonymized. Important: If there are ethical or legal restrictions to sharing your data publicly, please explain these restrictions in detail. Please see our guidelines for more information on what we consider unacceptable restrictions to publicly sharing data: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions. Note that it is not acceptable for the authors to be the sole named individuals responsible for ensuring data access. We will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide in your cover letter. 3. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure: “This study was supported by the Research and Researchers for Industries (RRI: MSD62I0041), Thailand Science Research and Innovation (TSRI: RDG6250045) and Mekong Health Science Research Institute Khon Kaen University (MeHSRI09/2561).” Please state what role the funders took in the study.  If the funders had no role, please state: "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript." If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed. Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf. 4. PLOS ONE now requires that authors provide the original uncropped and unadjusted images underlying all blot or gel results reported in a submission’s figures or Supporting Information files. This policy and the journal’s other requirements for blot/gel reporting and figure preparation are described in detail at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-blot-and-gel-reporting-requirements and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-preparing-figures-from-image-files. When you submit your revised manuscript, please ensure that your figures adhere fully to these guidelines and provide the original underlying images for all blot or gel data reported in your submission. See the following link for instructions on providing the original image data: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-original-images-for-blots-and-gels. In your cover letter, please note whether your blot/gel image data are in Supporting Information or posted at a public data repository, provide the repository URL if relevant, and provide specific details as to which raw blot/gel images, if any, are not available. Email us at plosone@plos.org if you have any questions. 5. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice. [Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.] Reviewers' comments: Reviewer's Responses to Questions Comments to the Author 1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented. Reviewer #1: Partly ********** 2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? Reviewer #1: Yes ********** 3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available? The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified. Reviewer #1: Yes ********** 4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English? PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here. Reviewer #1: Yes ********** 5. Review Comments to the Author Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters) Reviewer #1: The authors investigated the effect of nanoencapsulated and natural curcumin on liver injuries and the development of nonalcoholic fatty-liver disease in combination with OV liver fluke infection and a high-fat high-fructose diet. The strength of the study is the number of groups, including three different doses of nanoencapsulated curcumin and the number of animals within the groups (7 individuals). In general, the authors show the results of the original research and the data obtained may be of interest to the researchers in similar areas. Nevertheless, I believe that the text of the manuscript needs a revision. 1. Fig.5 - there is not any indications on diagrams whether something is changing significantly or not. Accordingly, only those results that are significant should be described in the text, so (lines 272-281) ...” The expression level of CD36 was high in the HFFOV group compared with the HFF group (Fig 5A) and was lower than this in all groups receiving treatment (with BNCs, CNCs or CUR).” Are there statistically significant differences between each of these groups to draw such conclusions? 2. Similar question applies to Fig4C - is there any significant difference among the groups? If there are no statistical changes, then there should also be no reason to indicate in the text that one group is higher or lower. At present, in the results, discussion, and even in the abstract, some text states about non-significant changes between groups. Authors should carefully revise the text of the manuscript and remove all such statements about statistically insignificant changes. Moreover, where there is no significant difference, it could be written that there were no significant differences among groups. Otherwise, it will be a misinterpretation of the obtained results. 3. Table 2 can be transferred to the supplements 4. It is unclear, what criteria the authors used to clearly distinguish NAFLD and NASH, could the author provide any criteria in Table 3 how it is possible to separate these two pathologies using the hamster model? It would be very helpful if the authors modified the Table 3 and inserted NAFLD and NASH criteria in the histological scoring system 5. There are many abbreviations in the abstract, while some of them are given without decoding, for example, HFF diet (HFF); TC and TG. 6. The company name and catalogue code of the primary and secondary antibodies used should be indicated in the M&M. ********** 6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files. If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public. Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy. Reviewer #1: No ********** [NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.] While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.
18 Aug 2022 PONE-D-22-11833 Curcumin-loaded nanocomplexes ameliorate the progression of NAFLD to NASH in hamsters infected with Opisthorchis viverrini Title has been changed to “Curcumin-loaded nanocomplexes ameliorate the severity of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in hamsters infected with Opisthorchis viverrini” Response to the Journal Requirements: When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements. 1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf Response: We have rechecked and ensured that the manuscript meets PLOS ONE’s style requirements, including those for file naming. 2. In your Data Availability statement, you have not specified where the minimal data set underlying the results described in your manuscript can be found. PLOS defines a study's minimal data set as the underlying data used to reach the conclusions drawn in the manuscript and any additional data required to replicate the reported study findings in their entirety. All PLOS journals require that the minimal data set be made fully available. For more information about our data policy, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability. "Upon re-submitting your revised manuscript, please upload your study’s minimal underlying data set as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and include the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers within your revised cover letter. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories. Any potentially identifying patient information must be fully anonymized. Important: If there are ethical or legal restrictions to sharing your data publicly, please explain these restrictions in detail. Please see our guidelines for more information on what we consider unacceptable restrictions to publicly sharing data: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions. Note that it is not acceptable for the authors to be the sole named individuals responsible for ensuring data access. We will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide in your cover letter. Response: Our Data Availability statement can now be found as supportive information. 3. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure: “This study was supported by the Research and Researchers for Industries (RRI: MSD62I0041), Thailand Science Research and Innovation (TSRI: RDG6250045) and Mekong Health Science Research Institute Khon Kaen University (MeHSRI09/2561).” Please state what role the funders took in the study. If the funders had no role, please state: "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript." If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed. Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf. Response: we have stated the role of funders as suggested: “The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.” 4. PLOS ONE now requires that authors provide the original uncropped and unadjusted images underlying all blot or gel results reported in a submission’s figures or Supporting Information files. This policy and the journal’s other requirements for blot/gel reporting and figure preparation are described in detail at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-blot-and-gel-reporting-requirements and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-preparing-figures-from-image-files. When you submit your revised manuscript, please ensure that your figures adhere fully to these guidelines and provide the original underlying images for all blot or gel data reported in your submission. See the following link for instructions on providing the original image data: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-original-images-for-blots-and-gels. In your cover letter, please note whether your blot/gel image data are in Supporting Information or posted at a public data repository, provide the repository URL if relevant, and provide specific details as to which raw blot/gel images, if any, are not available. Email us at plosone@plos.org if you have any questions. Response: We have provided our raw blot/gel image data in Supporting information as is required. 5. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice. Response: we have re-checked all references and all are correct. Response to the Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: The authors investigated the effect of nanoencapsulated and natural curcumin on liver injuries and the development of nonalcoholic fatty-liver disease in combination with OV liver fluke infection and a high-fat high-fructose diet. The strength of the study is the number of groups, including three different doses of nanoencapsulated curcumin and the number of animals within the groups (7 individuals). In general, the authors show the results of the original research and the data obtained may be of interest to the researchers in similar areas. Nevertheless, I believe that the text of the manuscript needs a revision. Response: We thank the reviewer for their critical evaluation and suggestions for improving the manuscript. We would like to respond to each point as follows. 1. Fig.5 - there is not any indications on diagrams whether something is changing significantly or not. Accordingly, only those results that are significant should be described in the text, so (lines 272-281) ...” The expression level of CD36 was high in the HFFOV group compared with the HFF group (Fig 5A) and was lower than this in all groups receiving treatment (with BNCs, CNCs or CUR).” Are there statistically significant differences between each of these groups to draw such conclusions? Response: We have reanalyzed and revised Fig 5A (old version, now Fig 7A in the new version). Text was also revised in line with this change. 2. Similar question applies to Fig4C - is there any significant difference among the groups? If there are no statistical changes, then there should also be no reason to indicate in the text that one group is higher or lower. At present, in the results, discussion, and even in the abstract, some text states about non-significant changes between groups. Authors should carefully revise the text of the manuscript and remove all such statements about statistically insignificant changes. Moreover, where there is no significant difference, it could be written that there were no significant differences among groups. Otherwise, it will be a misinterpretation of the obtained results. Response: We have reanalyzed and revised Fig 4 (old version, now Fig 6 in the new version). Text was also revised in line with this change. 3. Table 2 can be transferred to the supplements Response: We have moved Table 2 to the supplements where it is referred to as Table S1. 4. It is unclear, what criteria the authors used to clearly distinguish NAFLD and NASH, could the author provide any criteria in Table 3 how it is possible to separate these two pathologies using the hamster model? It would be very helpful if the authors modified the Table 3 and inserted NAFLD and NASH criteria in the histological scoring system. Response: We have revised Table 3 (old version, now Table 2 in the new version) and inserted the criteria used to distinguish between NAFLD and NASH as suggested. 5. There are many abbreviations in the abstract, while some of them are given without decoding, for example, HFF diet (HFF); TC and TG. Response: We have amended the abstract accordingly in the revised version. 6. The company name and catalogue code of the primary and secondary antibodies used should be indicated in the M&M. Response: We have added this information in the revised version. Submitted filename: Response to reviewer-PONE-D-22-11833R1.docx Click here for additional data file. 13 Sep 2022 Curcumin-loaded nanocomplexes ameliorate the severity of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in hamsters infected with Opisthorchis viverrini PONE-D-22-11833R1 Dear Dr. Pinloar, We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements. Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication. An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org. Kind regards, Michael W. Greene, Ph.D. Academic Editor PLOS ONE Additional Editor Comments (optional): Reviewers' comments: Reviewer's Responses to Questions Comments to the Author 1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation. Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed ********** 2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented. Reviewer #1: Yes ********** 3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? Reviewer #1: Yes ********** 4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available? The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified. Reviewer #1: Yes ********** 5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English? PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here. Reviewer #1: Yes ********** 6. Review Comments to the Author Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters) Reviewer #1: The authors took into account my suggestions and comments and made appropriate changes to the manuscript. The text has been significantly improved and technically sound. I have no further suggestions. ********** 7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files. If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public. Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy. Reviewer #1: No ********** 19 Sep 2022 PONE-D-22-11833R1 Curcumin-loaded nanocomplexes ameliorate the severity of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in hamsters infected with Opisthorchis viverrini Dear Dr. Pinlaor: I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org. If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org. Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access. Kind regards, PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff on behalf of Dr. Michael W. Greene Academic Editor PLOS ONE
  46 in total

Review 1.  Proliferative and nonproliferative lesions of the rat and mouse hepatobiliary system.

Authors:  Bob Thoolen; Robert R Maronpot; Takanori Harada; Abraham Nyska; Colin Rousseaux; Thomas Nolte; David E Malarkey; Wolfgang Kaufmann; Karin Küttler; Ulrich Deschl; Dai Nakae; Richard Gregson; Michael P Vinlove; Amy E Brix; Bhanu Singh; Fiorella Belpoggi; Jerrold M Ward
Journal:  Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.902

2.  Curcumin ameliorates liver damage and progression of NASH in NASH-HCC mouse model possibly by modulating HMGB1-NF-κB translocation.

Authors:  Rejina Afrin; Somasundaram Arumugam; Azizur Rahman; Mir Imam Ibne Wahed; Vengadeshprabhu Karuppagounder; Meilei Harima; Hiroshi Suzuki; Shizuka Miyashita; Kenji Suzuki; Hiroyuki Yoneyama; Kazuyuki Ueno; Kenichi Watanabe
Journal:  Int Immunopharmacol       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 4.932

3.  Ultrasonography assessment of hepatobiliary abnormalities in 3359 subjects with Opisthorchis viverrini infection in endemic areas of Thailand.

Authors:  Eimorn Mairiang; Thewarach Laha; Jeffrey M Bethony; Bandit Thinkhamrop; Sasithorn Kaewkes; Paiboon Sithithaworn; Smarn Tesana; Alex Loukas; Paul J Brindley; Banchob Sripa
Journal:  Parasitol Int       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 2.230

4.  Curcumin rescues high fat diet-induced obesity and insulin sensitivity in mice through regulating SREBP pathway.

Authors:  Lili Ding; Jinmei Li; Baoliang Song; Xu Xiao; Binfeng Zhang; Meng Qi; Wendong Huang; Li Yang; Zhengtao Wang
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 4.219

5.  The effect of nano-curcumin on HbA1c, fasting blood glucose, and lipid profile in diabetic subjects: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Hamid Reza Rahimi; Amir Hooshang Mohammadpour; Mostafa Dastani; Mahmoud Reza Jaafari; Khalil Abnous; Majid Ghayour Mobarhan; Reza Kazemi Oskuee
Journal:  Avicenna J Phytomed       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct

6.  Water Extract of Curcuma longa L. Ameliorates Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.

Authors:  Jeongeun Mun; Shintae Kim; Ho-Geun Yoon; Yanghee You; Ok-Kyung Kim; Kyung-Chul Choi; Yoo-Hyun Lee; Jeongmin Lee; Jeongjin Park; Woojin Jun
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 7.  Chronic Inflammation in Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis: Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Strategies.

Authors:  Carmelo Luci; Manon Bourinet; Pierre S Leclère; Rodolphe Anty; Philippe Gual
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 5.555

Review 8.  Mechanisms of hepatic triglyceride accumulation in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

Authors:  Yuki Kawano; David E Cohen
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-02-09       Impact factor: 7.527

9.  Curcumin inhibits lipolysis via suppression of ER stress in adipose tissue and prevents hepatic insulin resistance.

Authors:  Lulu Wang; Bangling Zhang; Fang Huang; Baolin Liu; Yuan Xie
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 5.922

10.  Curcumin supplementation mitigates NASH development and progression in female Wistar rats.

Authors:  Rory P Cunningham; Mary P Moore; Angelique N Moore; James C Healy; Michael D Roberts; R Scott Rector; Jeffrey S Martin
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2018-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.