Literature DB >> 36166445

Risk factors of early mortality among COVID-19 deceased patients in Addis Ababa COVID-19 care centers, Ethiopia.

Taye Ashine Mezgebu1, Migbar Mekonnen Sibhat2, Melsew Tsegaw Getnet3, Kassie Tiruneh Gebeyehu2, Wuletaw Zewde Chane3, Edmialem Mesfin Getahun3, Asaminew Sane Habtamu4, Hailu Beyene Asmare5, Melke Mengistie Ambaw6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 is a global health care problem with high mortality. Despite early mortality seeming alarming, data regarding factors that lead to increased early mortality of COVID 19 patients is not well-documented yet. The objective of this study was to identify the risk factors of early mortality in patients with confirmed COVID-19 infections.
METHODOLOGY: A case-control study design was employed. With this, a total of 261 COVID-19 deceased recordings were reviewed. The cases of the study were recordings of patients deceased within three days of intensive care unit admission whereas, the rest 187 were recordings of patients who died after three days of admission. Data were collected using an extraction checklist, entered into Epi data version 4.4.2.2, and analyzed by SPSS version 25. After the description, binary logistic regression was run to conduct bivariate and multivariable analyses. Finally, statistical significance was declared at p-value <0.05, and an adjusted odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval was used to report the strength of association. RESULT: The analysis was performed on 261 (87 cases and 174 controls) recordings. About 62.5% of the participants were aged above 65 years and two-thirds were males. The presence of cardiovascular disease (AOR = 4.79, with 95%CI: 1.73, 13.27) and bronchial-asthma (AOR = 6.57; 95% CI: 1.39, 31.13) were found to have a statistically significant association with early mortality. The existence of complications from COVID-19 (AOR = 0.22; 95% CI: 0.07, 0.74) and previous history of COVID-19 infection (AOR = 0.17, 95% CI: 0.04, 0.69) were associated with decreased risk of early mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: Having cardiovascular diseases and bronchial asthma was associated with an increased risk of early mortality. Conversely, the presence of intensive care unit complications and previous history of COVID-19 infection were associated with decreased risk of early mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36166445      PMCID: PMC9514640          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.752


Introduction

The emerged coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), has quickly spread worldwide with varied clinical characteristics [1]. Until 20th February 2022, the COVID-19 pandemic has affected about 422 million cases and about 5.8 million deaths globally, covering more than 220 countries worldwide [2]. However, Africa is forecasted to be the most defenseless continent where COVID-19 spreading will have a massive impact on the health system [3]. In the same period, Ethiopia is burdened with 469,047 cases and 7,477 deaths. The clinical presentation and the mortality rate are widely varied across the countries. In countries like Ethiopia, with a diverse population, the clinical profile of COVID-19 is different even among different regions. Patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are perceived to have an increased risk of mortality in the early days of ICU admission. Different epidemiological studies had evidenced that the mortality rate was higher among ICU admitted patients than non-ICU patients [4-6]. In the recent studies of COVID-19 patients from Wuhan, intensive care unit mortality rates ranged from 52% to 62% [7-10]. A study indicated that patients admitted early in the epidemic of COVID-19 had a higher mortality rate than patients admitted later [11]. Some studies among non-COVID-19 patients demonstrated that the risk factors of early mortality are different from determinants of late mortality [12, 13]. Shreds of evidence from plenty of studies showed that the risk factors regarding early mortality of COVID-19 are varied and may include male, older age, comorbidity, smoking, lymphocyte count, and D-dimer [13, 14]. It is also hypothesized that delay in ICU admission could be one of the factors for early mortality after ICU admission [15]. One-third of all patient deaths occur within three days of ICU admission [13]. Recognizing factors that can facilitate early mortality among patients admitted to the ICU settings is clinically significant. Identification of these factors aids in designing more effective ICU therapeutic strategies that aid to stabilize the patients’ clinical condition, such as rescue therapy with advanced medical equipment and early human resources mobilization. Despite the clinical impact of early mortality is undisputable [11, 13, 16], studies assessing factors related to the early death of COVID-19 patients after ICU admission are scanty throughout the globe and in Ethiopia. Therefore, this study aims to identify risk factors for early mortality after ICU admission in patients with COVID-19.

Methods and materials

A case-control study was carried out in Addis Ababa COVID-19 care centers, Ethiopia by reviewing charts of patients admitted from June 2020 to October 2021. There are three large COVID-19 care centers in Addis Ababa. Of those, Millennium COVID-19 care center is the largest center, with a capability of 1000 beds, including 40 ICU beds in three separated ICU setups. The source population was all patients who deceased due to COVID-19 in the centers, whereas all COVID-19 confirmed patients who deceased in ICU from June 2020 to October 2021 were the study population. The cases of the study (early mortality) were recordings of patients deceased within three days of ICU admission whereas; the controls (late mortality) were recordings of patients who deceased after three days of admission. All recordings of COVID-19 patients who were deceased in the ICU from June 2020 to October 2021 with complete records were included. COVID-19 was classified in to mild, moderate, severe, and critical such that: Mild: Patients present with fever, cough, fatigue, anorexia, myalgia and other non-specific symptoms without evidence of pneumonia. Moderate: Patients present with fever, cough, dyspnea without severe pneumonia and hypoxia OR patients aged 60 years or above, OR with comorbidity. Severe/critical: Patients having fever, cough, dyspnea with severe pneumonia or severe acute respiratory infection evidenced by RR>30breaths/minute, SpO2 <92%onroomair, OR signs of sepsis, organ failure, OR septic shock [17].

Sample size determination

The sample size was determined using Epi-Info version 7.2 by considering diabetes mellitus (DM) as a determinant variable from a previous study [13] which yields the maximum sample size. The parameters used include a 95% confidence level, 80% study power, an odds ratio of 2.32, a 16.87% proportion of DM among controls, and a 1:2 case to control ratio. Finally, the total sample size was 264 (88 cases and 176 controls). Then, cases were selected intentionally by the researcher, and two respective controls next to the selected cases were selected randomly using the systematic random sampling technique.

Data collection tools and procedures

Initially, the patient registries were evaluated to extract the total number of cases and to confine patients who died early and those who died late in the ICU. Then, the charts were arranged based on their medical record number (MRN) and the date of ICU admission. Afterward, the data were collected using a pretested and structured data extraction checklist which is designed from different literature [1, 13, 15, 18–23]. Then, the charts were arranged based on their medical record number (MRN) and the date of ICU admission. Afterward, the data were collected using a pretested and structured data extraction checklist which was newly designed with related variables. The checklist comprised socio-demographic characteristics, comorbidities, disease severity, baseline laboratory findings, and COVID-19 management-related variables. Six data collectors (MSc emergency and critical care nurses) and two supervisors were recruited and trained for one about the requirements of data collection.

Analysis and interpretation of data

Data were cleaned, coded, and entered using Epi data version 4.4.2.2, and exported to SPSS version 25 for analysis. Cross-tabulation was done to determine the level of missing values and for data cleaning. Explorative analysis was conducted as well for continuous variables to determine the data distribution. Binary logistic regression was used to analyze the data. In the bivariate analysis, variables with a p-value of <0.2 were candidates for the final model for confounder adjustment. Multi-collinearity was checked using the variance inflation factor, and model fitness was checked using Hosmer and Lemeshow test (p = 0.361). In the multivariate analysis, an adjusted odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals was computed to identify the presence and strength of associations. Statistical significance was stated at a p-value of <0.05.

Ethical considerations

Ethical clearance was obtained from Saint Paul’s Hospital Medical College institutional review board (IRB) (ref = PM23/799). The IRB waived the study to be conducted by chart review. Since patient consent was not applicable due to the retrospective nature of the study, permission for data collection was obtained from the clinical director. The responsible bodies at each intensive care unit and liaison office were informed about the purpose of the study. The study was conducted per the declaration of Helsinki. Confidentiality and anonymity were assured by data coding and aggregate reporting, where no individual patient identifiers were included.

Results

This case-control study was conducted on 261 recordings of patients who died due to COVID-19 in the ICU (87 cases and 174 controls).

Socio-demographic characteristics and comorbidities

The study finding showed that 62.5% of the study participants aged above 65 years. Of those, 28.8% died within the first 72 hours of ICU admission. The mean age of patients was 63.6years (SD = 15.7) among the cases and 68.6 years (SD = 13.7) among controls. On the other hand, about two-thirds (65.2%) of the patients were males, of which 32.4% passed away within three days of ICU admission (Table 1).
Table 1

Socio-demographic characteristics between early mortality and late mortality among COVID-19 patients at Addis Ababa COVID-19 care centers, Ethiopia, 2022 (n = 261).

VariablesCategoryMortalityTotal (%)
Early (%)Late (%)
Age<65 years40 (40.8)58 (59.2)98 (37.5)
≥65 years47 (28.8)116 (71.2)163 (62.5)
SexMale55 (32.4)115 (67.6)170 (65.2)
Female32 (35.2)59 (64.8)91 (34.8)

Description of comorbidities and other clinical characteristics

According to the study results, the proportion of severe disease was higher (83.3%) among those who died late after ICU admission compared to patients who died early. On the contrary, a higher proportion of patients admitted with moderate disease (25.3%) died early after ICU admission than those who died after three days (12%). The study finding also revealed that 44.3% of the controls had a history of previous COVID-19 infection. Conversely, only 8% of patients with a history of COVID-19 infection were died within three days of ICU admission (early mortality). Regarding the preexisting medical illnesses, 183 (70.1%) of the patients had comorbidities, of which 83% had two or more comorbidities. The proportion of early mortality was much higher among patients with comorbid illnesses compared to those without comorbidities. The frequently documented chronic conditions were hypertension (35.6%), DM (35.2%), cardiovascular diseases (23.8%), and bronchial asthma (10.3%). Moreover, the proportion of patients who experienced COVID-19 complications was higher among the controls (77%) than in the early mortality (63%) (Table 2).
Table 2

Comorbidities and other clinical related characteristics between early mortality and late mortality among COVID-19 patients at Addis Ababa COVID-19 care centers, Ethiopia, 2022 (n = 261).

VariablesCategoryEarly mortality (%)Late mortality (%)Total (%)
Smoking historyYes65 (41.9)90 (58.1)155 (59.4)
No22 (20.8)84 (79.2)106 (40.6)
Triage severity categoryMild2 (20.0)8 (80.0)10 (3.8)
Moderate22 (51.2)21 (48.8)43 (16.5)
Severe63 (30.3)145 (69.7)208 (79.7)
History of previous COVID-19 infectionYes7 (8.3)77 (91.7)84 (32.2)
No80 (45.2)97 (54.8)177 (67.8)
Number of comorbiditiesNone11 (14.1)67(85.9)78 (29.9)
One10 (30.3)23 (69.7)33 (12.6)
≥ two66 (44.0)84 (56.0)150 (57.5)
Diabetics MellitusYes42 (45.7)50 (54.3)92 (35.2)
No45 (26.6)124 (73.4)169 (64.8)
HypertensionYes39 (41.9)54 (58.1)93 (35.6)
No48 (28.6)120 (71.4)168 (64.4)
Cardiovascular diseaseYes38 (61.3)24 (38.7)62 (23.8)
No49 (24.6)150 (75.4)199 (76.2)
Bronchial asthmaYes14 (51.9)13 (48.1)27 (10.3)
No73 (31.2)161 (68.8)234 (89.7)
COPDYes8 (100)08 (3.1)
No79 (31.2)174 (68.8)253 (96.9)
MalignancyYes11 (37.9)18 (62.1)29 (11.1)
No76 (32.8)156 (67.2)232 (88.9)
Renal diseaseYes5(50.0)5 (50.0)10 (3.8)
No82 (32.7)169 (67.3)251 (96.2)
ICU admission delayYes39 (56.5)30 (43.5)69 (26.4)
No48 (25.0)144 (75.0)192 (73.6)
Complication of COVID-19Yes55 (29.1)134 (70.9)189 (72.4)
No32 (44.4)40 (56.2)72 (27.6)

Note: COVID-19 complications include acute kidney injury, pulmonary embolism, shock, delirium, electrolyte disturbance, and pneumothorax

Abbreviation: ICU, Intensive Care Unit; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; COVID-19-coronavirus 2019

Note: COVID-19 complications include acute kidney injury, pulmonary embolism, shock, delirium, electrolyte disturbance, and pneumothorax Abbreviation: ICU, Intensive Care Unit; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; COVID-19-coronavirus 2019

Description of baseline vital signs and laboratory findings

Concerning baseline vital signs, about 88.1%, 50.6%, and 73.2% of the patients were tachypneic, tachycardia, and hypoxic at admission. Among patients who died within 72 hours of ICU admission, 56.3%, 55.2%, and 31% had leukocytosis, anemia, and thrombocytopenia. The average white blood cell count at admission was 15.71×103c/μL (SD = 16.70) among the early mortality group and 14.82×103c/μL (SD = 11.30) among the controls. Furthermore, the mean serum albumin was 2.55g/dl (SD = 1.40) among patients who died within the first 72 hours of ICU admission and 2.6g/dl (SD = 0.92) among patients who died 3 days later after admission. Almost two-thirds of the early mortality had random blood sugar levels of >200mg/dl, whereas it was noted among just one-third of the controls (Table 3).
Table 3

Baseline vital sign parameters and laboratory finding between early mortality and late mortality among COVID-19 patients at Addis Ababa COVID care centers, Ethiopia, 2022 (n = 261).

VariablesCategoryCases (%)Controls (%)Total (%)
Respiratory rate (bpm)<247 (22.6)24 (77.4)31 (11.9)
≥2480 (34.8)150 (65.2)230 (88.1)
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)<906 (16.2)31 (83.8)37 (14.2)
≥9081 (36.2)143 (63.8)224 (85.8)
Pulse rate beat per minute<10038 (29.5)91 (70.5)129 (49.4)
≥10049 (37.4)83 (62.9)132 (50.6)
Oxygen saturation (%)<9068 (35.6)123 (64.4)191 (73.2)
≥9019 (27.1)51 (72.9)70 (26.8)
Temperature (°C)<37.585 (35.9)152 (64.1)237 (90.8)
≥37.52 (8.3)22 (91.7)24 (9.2)
White blood cell count (cells/uL)<11,00038 (35.5)69 (64.5)107 (41.0)
≥ 11,00049 (31.8)105 (68.2)154 (59.0)
Hemoglobin (milligram/dl)<1248 (49.0)50 (51.0)98 (37.5)
≥ 1239 (23.9)124 (76.1)163 (62.5)
Platelet count (cells/uL)<150,00027 (42.9)36 (57.1)63 (24.1)
≥ 150,00060 (30.3)138 (69.7)198 (75.9)
Creatinine, (milligram/dL)≤1.250 (25.6)145 (74.4)195 (74.7)
> 1.237 (56.1)29 (43.9)66 (25.3)
Blood urea nitrogen (mg/dl)<4535 (26.9)95 (73.1)130 (49.8)
≥ 4552 (39.7)79 (60.3)131 (50.2)
Alanine aminotransferase (U/L)<4045 (24.2)141 (75.8)186 (71.3)
≥ 4042 (56.0)33 (44.0)75 (28.7)
Serum potassium (mmol/L)<3.508 (100)8 (3.1)
3.5–5.060 (33.7)118 (66.3)178 (68.2)
> 527 (36.0)48 (64.0)75 (28.7)
Serum sodium (mmol/L)<13522 (41.5)31 (58.5)53 (20.3)
135–14665 (31.3)143 (68.8)208 (79.7)
Albumin (gram/dl)<3.468 (33.2)137 (66.8)205 (78.5)
≥3.419 (33.9)37 (66.1)56 (21.5)
Random blood sugar (milligram /dl)<20031 (22.6%)106 (77.4)137 (525)
≥20056 (45.2)68 (54.8)124 (47.5)
Chest radiological findingUnilateral infiltration18 (19.8)73 (80.2)91 (34.9)
Bilateral infiltration69 (40.6)101 (59.4)170 (65.1)

Abbreviation: ICU, intensive care unit; bpm, breath per minute; °C, degree Celsius; dl, deciliter; mEq/L, mill equivalent per liter; mg/dl, mill gram per deciliter.

Abbreviation: ICU, intensive care unit; bpm, breath per minute; °C, degree Celsius; dl, deciliter; mEq/L, mill equivalent per liter; mg/dl, mill gram per deciliter.

COVID-19 management-related factors

Among the study participants, 62.1% of patients were intubated. Of those, 31% died within three days of ICU admission. The proportion of patients who received vasopressor therapy was higher among those who died late after ICU admission (59.8%) than those who died early (44.8%). Prone position was assumed by 40.2% of the cases and 74.1% of the controls. In addition, 95.1%, 95.4%, 85.4%, and 23.4% of the patients took systemic antibiotics, corticosteroid therapy, thromboprophylaxis, and antivirals respectively (Table 4).
Table 4

Treatment at ICU admission among early and late mortality of ICU admitted COVID-19 at Millennium COVID care center, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia 2022 (n = 261).

VariablesCategoryCases (%)Controls (%)Total (%)
Mode of ventilationNon invasive37 (37.4)62 (62.6)99 (37.9)
Intubated50 (30.9)112 (69.1)162 (62.1)
Broad-spectrum AntibioticsYes74 (29.8)174 (70.2)248 (95.1)
No13 (100)0 (0%)13 (4.9)
Vasopressors,Yes39 (27.3)104 (72.7)143 (54.8)
No48 (40.7)70 (70.1)118(45.2)
Systemic steroidYes81 (32.5)168 (67.5)249 (95.4)
No6 (50.0)6 (50.0)12 (4.6)
ThromboprophylaxisYes69 (30.9)154 (69.1)223 (85.4)
No18 (47.4)20 (52.6)38 (14.6)
AntihypertensiveYes19 (32.2)40 (67.8)59 (22.6)
No68 (33.7)134 (66.3)202 (77.4)
AntiviralYes11 (18.0)50 (82.0)61 (23.4)
No76 (38.0)124 (62.0)200 (76.6)
Prone positionYes35 (21.3)129 (80.0)164 (62.8)
No52 (53.6)45 (46.4)97 (37.2)
Blood transfusionYes029 (100)29 (11.1)
No87 (37.5)145 (62.5)232 (88.8)
HemodialysisYes11 (20.0)44 (80.0)55 (21.1)
No76 (36.9)130 (63.1)206 (78.9)

Risk factors of early mortality

After data description, bivariate and multivariable analyses were performed using the binary logistic regression model. Variables with a p-value of <0.25 in the bivariate analysis were candidates for confounder adjustment in the final model. After checking the model fitness, the multivariable analysis was run. In the multivariate analysis, COVID19 complications, cardiovascular disease (CVD), bronchial asthma, and previous history of COVID-19 infection showed statistically significant association with early mortality of COVID-19 patients at a 95% confidence level. Patients having CVD were 4.79 times (AOR = 4.79; 95%CI: 1.73, 13.27) more likely to die within the first 72 hours of ICU admission compared to those who had no CVD. Likewise, patients with bronchial asthma had 6.57 times increased chance of early mortality compared to their counterparts (AOR = 6.57; 95% CI: 1.39, 31.13). On the contrary, the odds of early mortality among patients who had a history of previous COVID-19 infection were 83% decreased compared to their counterparts (AOR = 0.17; 95% CI: 0.04, 0.69). The other variable that showed significant association with early mortality was the presence of COVID-19 complications. Patients who experienced COVID-19 complications (such as acute kidney injury, pulmonary embolism, shock, delirium, electrolyte disturbance, and pneumothorax) were 78% times less likely to die within the first three days than after then (Table 5).
Table 5

Bivariate and multivariate analysis of risk factors associated with early mortality after ICU admission among COVID-19 patients at Addis Ababa COVID 19 care centers, Ethiopia, 2022 (n = 261).

Risk factorsCategoryMortalityCOR (95%CI)AOR (95%CI)Sig.
LateEarly
Age<65 years5840111
≥65 years116470.59 (0.35, 0.99)0.51 (0.19, 0.1.32)0.165
Triage scoreNot severe2429111
Severe631450.53 (0.28–0.97)0.48 (0.18, 1.27)0.138
Complication of COVID-19Yes134551.95 (1.11, 3.42)0.22 (0.08, 0.59) 0.003 *
No4032111
Prone positionYes129350.24 (0.14, 0.41)0.56 (0.15, 2.08)0.384
No455211
History of previous COVID-19 infectionYes7779.07 (0.3.96, 20.77)0.17 (0.04, 0.69) 0.013 *
No9780111
Diabetes MellitusYes29812.32 (01.36, 3.95)0.96 (0.34, 2.68)0.934
No2832111
HypertensionYes25341.82 (.94,3.51)1.65 (0.53, 5.13)0.388
No327911
Cardiovascular diseaseYes24144.85 (2.65, 8.87)4.79 (1.73, 13.27) 0.003 *
No339911
Bronchial asthma,Yes13142.38 (1.06, 7.53)6.569 (1.39, 31.13) 0.018 *
No16173111
ICU admission delayYes30390.26 (0.14, 0.46)1.41 (0.53, 3.71)0.491
No1444811
VasopressorYes104390.55 (0.33, 0.92)0.85 (0.33, 2.18)0.728
No7048111
Pulse rate (beat per minute)<1009138111
≥10083491.41 (0.84, 2.37)2.89 (0.92, 9.12)0.070
Peripheral oxygen saturation (%)<90123681.48 (0.811, 2.716)0.52 (0.12, 2.19)0.372
≥905119111
Creatinine (mg/dl)<1.214550111
≥ 1.229373.70 (2.07, 6.63)1.91 (0.48, 7.53)0.358
Platelet count (cells/μl)<150,00036271.73 (0.95, 3.09)1.52 (0.56, 4.10)0.414
≥ 150,00013860111
Alanine amino-transferase (U/L)<4014145111
≥ 4033422.29 (1.23, 4.28)1.30 (0.44, 3.86)0.632
Hemoglobin (g/dl)<1250483.05 (1.79, 5.21)1.12 (0.38, 3.29)0.840
≥ 1212439111
Serum sodium (mmol/L)>13531221.56 (0.84, 2.90)1.72 (0.51, 5.80)0.385
135–14514365111
Random blood sugar (mg/dl)<20010631111
≥20068560.37 (0.19, 0.72)2.09 (0.59, 7.39)0.253

Note

* significantly associated with early mortality

Note: COVID-19 complications include acute kidney injury, pulmonary embolism, shock, delirium, electrolyte disturbance, and pneumothorax

Abbreviation: COR, crude odds ratio; AOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; ICU, intensive care unit

Note * significantly associated with early mortality Note: COVID-19 complications include acute kidney injury, pulmonary embolism, shock, delirium, electrolyte disturbance, and pneumothorax Abbreviation: COR, crude odds ratio; AOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; ICU, intensive care unit

Discussion

Existing evidence showed that several COVID-19 patients died within the first three days of admission [16, 24]. Identifying the factors for this increased death in the early stages of ICU admission would enable us to set evidence-based interventions and reduce this problem. Perhaps, to the best of researchers’ knowledge, no such study has been conducted in Ethiopia. Thus, this case-control study assessed the risk factors of early mortality among COVID-19 patients at the intensive care unit of Addis Ababa COVID-19 care centers. After adjusting for potential confounders, four variables were found to be independent risk factors of early mortality among COVID-19 ICU patients. Patients having CVD were 4.79 times (AOR = 4.79; 95%CI: 1.73, 13.27) more like to die within the first 72 hours of ICU admission compared to those who had no CVD. This finding is consistent with the study conducted in Pakistan [18] and Wuhan, China [8, 25]. However, these studies investigated the factors associated with mortality of COVID-19 patients as a whole and were not specific to early mortality. The possible justification could be the effect of COVID-19 on the cardiovascular system. Severe COVID-19 disease is associated with hemodynamic instabilities, severe ARDS (requiring high PEEP levels of ventilation), decreased cardiac output, hypervolemia, sepsis, and those who received nephrotoxic drugs [26]. These effects may, in turn, worsen the preexisting cardiovascular disease leading to more severe illness, cardiac arrest, and higher mortality [24]. Likewise, patients with bronchial asthma had 6.57 times increased chance of early mortality compared to their counterparts (AOR = 6.57; 95% CI: 1.39, 31.13). This finding was conformable with previous studies in the United Kingdom [27] and Korea [28] that reported a higher risk of COVID-19 severity and mortality among asthmatic patients. The reason for this might be that COVID-19 infection trigger acute exacerbation of bronchial asthma that leads to oxygen hunger. Hence, hypoxia can result in respiratory failure ending up in premature death. However, the findings of studies conducted in France [29] and New York City [30] contradict the current study result. This discrepancy might be due to the difference in the study subjects. Unlike in our study, previous studies reported factors for overall COVID-19 mortality (merging both late and early mortality). Further studies are therefore required to completely elucidate the role of asthma in early mortality. On the contrary, the odds of early mortality among patients who had a history of previous COVID-19 infection were 83% decreased compared to their counterparts (AOR = 0.17; 95% CI: 0.04, 0.69). This finding is supported by studies done in the USA [31], Australia [32], and the UK [33] that showed a low reinfection rate, morbidity, and mortality among those who had a history of previous COVID-19 infection. This might be due to the development of antibodies and strengthened immune systems after being infected by COVID-19, which declines the probability of severe disease [34, 35]. Even though we could not find former reports regarding the association between early mortality and previous history of COVID-19 infection, this finding magnifies the impact of COVID-19 vaccination to boost immunity and patient outcome. The other variable that showed significant association with early mortality was the presence of COVID-19 complications. Patients who experienced COVID-19 complications had a 78% reduced mortality risk within the first 72 hours than after three days of ICU admission. The rationale could be that most fatal ICU complications such as septic shock, acute kidney injury, hospital-acquired infections, and ventilator-associated pneumonia occur late in the ICU (after 48–72 hours of admission) after intubation [36]. Furthermore, even patients who developed ICU complications in the early days may die after three days and recorded as late mortality. Hence, this high record of complication-associated deaths in the late mortality group might conceal the effect of complications on the early mortality group despite its impact on poor patient outcomes, in general, being undisputable. To strengthen this rationale, deaths linked to COVID-19 complications were more prevalent among the late mortality group in this study. While using and interpreting the findings of this study, the following issues should be taken into consideration. The main limitation of this study was the lack of consideration of the duration from symptom onset up to hospital admission. Irrespective of the possible factors for early mortality, patients who had stayed longer to seek medical attention might not have a similar length of hospital stay and in-hospital outcome compared to those who did not delay. Secondly, as the samples were selected based on the outcome status, it could be quite difficult to evaluate the effect of some variables (e.g. ICU complications) that might affect the survival and timing of mortality. Besides, the general limitation of retrospective studies could be another point to be reminded of while applying the study findings.

Conclusion

Having cardiovascular diseases and bronchial asthma was associated with an increased risk of early mortality. Conversely, the presence of ICU complications and previous history of COVID-19 infection were associated with reduced risk of mortality in the first three days of ICU admission. Hence, it is essential to put specific strategies to manage and control the identified factors to minimize the high burden of early mortality among COVID-19 patients. (SAV) Click here for additional data file.

Transfer Alert

This paper was transferred from another journal. As a result, its full editorial history (including decision letters, peer reviews and author responses) may not be present. 5 Jul 2022
PONE-D-22-10705
Risk Factors of early mortality among COVID-19 deceased patients in Addis Ababa COVID-19 Care Centers, Ethiopia
PLOS ONE Dear Dr. Mezgebu, Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process. Please submit your revised manuscript by Aug 19 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file. Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:
If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter. A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'. A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'. An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'. If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols. We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Kind regards, Zivanai Cuthbert Chapanduka, MBChB (M.D) Academic Editor PLOS ONE Journal Requirements: When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements. 1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf 2. We note that you have indicated that data from this study are available upon request. PLOS only allows data to be available upon request if there are legal or ethical restrictions on sharing data publicly. For more information on unacceptable data access restrictions, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions. In your revised cover letter, please address the following prompts: a) If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially sensitive information, data are owned by a third-party organization, etc.) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent. b) If there are no restrictions, please upload the minimal anonymized data set necessary to replicate your study findings as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories. We will update your Data Availability statement on your behalf to reflect the information you provide. 3. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ 4. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice. Additional Editor Comments: Thank you for the manuscript. Please read the reviewers comments and requirements carefully and respond to the best of your ability [Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.] Reviewers' comments: Reviewer's Responses to Questions Comments to the Author 1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available? The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English? PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 5. Review Comments to the Author Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters) Reviewer #1: Thank you for the opportunity to review this paper.We have a few comments/questions for the authors. 1 Were participants and/or researchers blind? 2. On what type of significance is the focus in the presentation of results: statistical or clinical? 3. Line 90:Delete despite, start with International evidence suggests that ....and find some references 4. When was the diagnosis made, that is important before ICU admission 5. Please explain, what you mean by intentionally, as you also mention randomly selecting the patients. 6. Line 161: delete have 7. Line 158: what parameters were used as mild, moderate and severe disease? 8. Line 163: This sentence is a bit confusing, please rephrase, I assume you are trying to say whereas only 8% of patients with early mortality ...... 9. Line 169: rephrase to than in the cases with early mortality 10: Table 2: What parameters were looked with regards to complications of COVID-19. 11. Line 181: Reword: cases to with early mortality 12. Line 184: Reword cases to: early mortality case208: typing error most likely: please change like to likely Line 216: What parameters did you look at as "COVID complications"? Please name them however leave it under one group as mentioned in the table. 13: Sentence that starts in line 227: Is this statement completely true? Perhaps no such study has been conducted in Ethiopia would be more appropriate. 14. Last sentence beginning in line 252: Rephrase, to additional studies are therefore required to completely elucidate the role of asthma in early mortality or leave it out completely as you have discussed why other findings are different from yours. 15: Line 270: delete counted and rather say were recorded or were grouped under the late mortality group based on the criteria of early vs late mortality. Reviewer #2: Abstract: Is this study a Case-Control? All patients have the disease, therefore there is no ‘Control’ group without the disease. Consider re-classifying the study type. This study is a retrospective review of patient files, the authors need to be very clear about this. What is the ‘response rate’ referring to? This normally applies to survey type studies using questionnaires. Consider the use of this term Introduction Line 74 is ambiguous, consider revising the last phrase: ‘‘…mortality in the early days of ICU admission before the causes of death are recognized’’ Ethics Approval number should be included in the manuscript. Use of the term ‘’response rate’’ also requires revision. this normally applies to qualitative/survey-type studies and does not seem to apply to this study type. Methods: study design needs revision and clarity. Discussion Line 229: the word 'lately' should be later Line 281: samples recruited does not sound right, you cannot recruit samples. Conclusion: Does an association with late mortality necessarily imply protection from early mortality? the researchers also need to be able to clarify how severe disease with complications could be physiologically protective; what physiological or clinical management factors could explain this finding? Line 289: avoid using the word 'halt': chronic diseases cannot easily be halted, their course tends to be slowly progressive. ********** 6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files. If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public. Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy. Reviewer #1: Yes: Dr Ravnit Grewal MBChB, FC Path (Haem) , M Med (Stellenbosch University), Principal Pathologist/Senior Lecturer, Department of Haematology and Cell Biology, Faculty of Health Sciences, National Health Laboratory Services/ University of the Free State Bloemfontein, South Africa Reviewer #2: No ********** [NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.] While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.
Submitted filename: PLOSone COVID.pdf Click here for additional data file. 31 Jul 2022 Point-by-point responses were provided and attached as a separate file in the submission system. Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers EM.docx Click here for additional data file. 12 Sep 2022 Risk Factors of early mortality among COVID-19 deceased patients in Addis Ababa COVID-19 Care Centers, Ethiopia PONE-D-22-10705R1 Dear Dr. Mezgebu, We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements. Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication. An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org. Kind regards, Zivanai Cuthbert Chapanduka, MBChB (M.D) Academic Editor PLOS ONE Additional Editor Comments (optional): Reviewers' comments: Reviewer's Responses to Questions Comments to the Author 1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation. Reviewer #1: (No Response) Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed ********** 2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented. Reviewer #1: (No Response) Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? Reviewer #1: (No Response) Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available? The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified. Reviewer #1: (No Response) Reviewer #2: No ********** 5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English? PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here. Reviewer #1: (No Response) Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 6. Review Comments to the Author Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters) Reviewer #1: Thank you for the opportunity to edit the manuscript. It is indeed a topical subject. I wish you all the best in your future research and would hope that you have follow up studies on this project as well. Reviewer #2: Thank you for the revisions. The manuscript reads well. The authors should also double-check the final version of the manuscript since the Journal does not edit manuscripts. ********** 7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files. If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public. Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy. Reviewer #1: Yes: Dr Ravnit Grewal Reviewer #2: No ********** 19 Sep 2022 PONE-D-22-10705R1 Risk Factors of early mortality among COVID-19 deceased patients in Addis Ababa COVID-19 Care Centers, Ethiopia Dear Dr. Mezgebu: I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org. If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org. Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access. Kind regards, PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff on behalf of Dr. Zivanai Cuthbert Chapanduka Academic Editor PLOS ONE
  34 in total

1.  Determinants of mortality of patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a case-control study.

Authors:  Jian Li; Luyu Yang; Qian Zeng; Qingyun Li; Zhitao Yang; Lizhong Han; Xiaodong Huang; Erzhen Chen
Journal:  Ann Palliat Med       Date:  2021-04-15

2.  Association of Cardiac Injury With Mortality in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19 in Wuhan, China.

Authors:  Shaobo Shi; Mu Qin; Bo Shen; Yuli Cai; Tao Liu; Fan Yang; Wei Gong; Xu Liu; Jinjun Liang; Qinyan Zhao; He Huang; Bo Yang; Congxin Huang
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 14.676

3.  Risk Factors Associated With Mortality Among Patients With COVID-19 in Intensive Care Units in Lombardy, Italy.

Authors:  Giacomo Grasselli; Massimiliano Greco; Alberto Zanella; Giovanni Albano; Massimo Antonelli; Giacomo Bellani; Ezio Bonanomi; Luca Cabrini; Eleonora Carlesso; Gianpaolo Castelli; Sergio Cattaneo; Danilo Cereda; Sergio Colombo; Antonio Coluccello; Giuseppe Crescini; Andrea Forastieri Molinari; Giuseppe Foti; Roberto Fumagalli; Giorgio Antonio Iotti; Thomas Langer; Nicola Latronico; Ferdinando Luca Lorini; Francesco Mojoli; Giuseppe Natalini; Carla Maria Pessina; Vito Marco Ranieri; Roberto Rech; Luigia Scudeller; Antonio Rosano; Enrico Storti; B Taylor Thompson; Marcello Tirani; Pier Giorgio Villani; Antonio Pesenti; Maurizio Cecconi
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 21.873

4.  Inpatient hospital complications and lengths of stay: a short report.

Authors:  Ronald J Lagoe; Pamela E Johnson; Mark P Murphy
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2011-05-05

Review 5.  COVID-19 pandemic - an African perspective.

Authors:  Shabir Ahmad Lone; Aijaz Ahmad
Journal:  Emerg Microbes Infect       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 7.163

6.  Intubated COVID-19 predictive (ICOP) score for early mortality after intubation in patients with COVID-19.

Authors:  Mitsuaki Nishikimi; Rehana Rasul; Cristina P Sison; Daniel Jafari; Muhammad Shoaib; Koichiro Shinozaki; Timmy Li; Kei Hayashida; Daniel M Rolston; Jamie S Hirsch; Lance B Becker
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Early vs. Late Onset Cardiac Injury and Mortality in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients in Wuhan.

Authors:  Wei Sun; Yanting Zhang; Chun Wu; Shuyuan Wang; Yuji Xie; Danqing Zhang; Hongliang Yuan; Yongxing Zhang; Li Cui; Meng Li; Yiwei Zhang; Yuman Li; Jing Wang; Yali Yang; Qing Lv; Li Zhang; Philip Haines; Wen-Chih Wu; Mingxing Xie
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-05-28

8.  Allergic disorders and susceptibility to and severity of COVID-19: A nationwide cohort study.

Authors:  Jee Myung Yang; Hyun Yong Koh; Sung Yong Moon; In Kyung Yoo; Eun Kyo Ha; Seulgi You; So Young Kim; Dong Keon Yon; Seung Won Lee
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2020-08-15       Impact factor: 10.793

9.  Presenting Features and Early Mortality from SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Cancer Patients during the Initial Stage of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Europe.

Authors:  David J Pinato; Alvin J X Lee; Federica Biello; Elia Seguí; Juan Aguilar-Company; Anna Carbó; Riccardo Bruna; Mark Bower; Gianpiero Rizzo; Sarah Benafif; Carme Carmona; Neha Chopra; Claudia Andrea Cruz; Francesca D'Avanzo; Joanne S Evans; Myria Galazi; Isabel Garcia-Fructuoso; Alessia Dalla Pria; Thomas Newsom-Davis; Diego Ottaviani; Andrea Patriarca; Roxana Reyes; Rachel Sharkey; Christopher C T Sng; Yien Ning Sophia Wong; Daniela Ferrante; Lorenza Scotti; Gian Carlo Avanzi; Mattia Bellan; Luigi Mario Castello; Javier Marco-Hernández; Meritxell Mollà; Mario Pirisi; Isabel Ruiz-Camps; Pier Paolo Sainaghi; Gianluca Gaidano; Joan Brunet; Josep Tabernero; Aleix Prat; Alessandra Gennari
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 6.639

10.  Assessment of Clinical Characteristics and Mortality-Associated Factors in COVID-19 Critical Cases in Kuwait.

Authors:  Mariam Ayed; Abdulwahab A Borahmah; Anwar Yazdani; Ahmad Sultan; Ahmad Mossad; Hanouf Rawdhan
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 1.927

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.