| Literature DB >> 36164509 |
Ramachandran Krishna1, Eslavath Rajkumar1, John Romate1, Joshua George Allen2, Daniel Monica1.
Abstract
Carnatic raga-Bilahari based intervention is a music therapy technique that enhances relaxation and positivity by reducing anxiety. With extensive empirical evidence pointing out the detrimental challenges faced by the caregivers of cancer patients, the present study intends to find out the effectiveness of a Carnatic raga based music therapy on reducing anxiety, sleep disturbances, somatic symptoms and distress level among this population A single group pre-post research design was was used to conduct the study. General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28) was used as a screening tool to select participants, and 30 participants were chosen using the purposive sampling. These individuals received instruction in listening to Carnatic music (raga-Bilahari), 5 days a week. The vocal and instrumental recordings were given on alternative days with each session lasting 15-30 min over a month of standard care. From the findings it is observed that there is significant decrease in the anxiety (p < 0.001), sleep disturbances (p < 0.001), somatic symptoms (p < 0.001) and distress level (p < 0.001) after the intervention.The study result thus indicates that Carnatic raga-Bilahari-based music intervention is effective among caregivers of cancer patients to reduce anxiety, sleep disturbances, somatic symptoms presentation, and their distress level.Entities:
Keywords: Anxiety; Caregivers; Music intervention; Sleep disturbances; Somatic symptoms
Year: 2022 PMID: 36164509 PMCID: PMC9508548 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10681
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Sample distribution.
| Demographic details | Frequency (n = 30) | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 18–39 | 10 |
| 40–65 | 18 | |
| 65 above | 2 | |
| Gender | Male | 12 |
| Female | 18 | |
| Education | 10th | 2 |
| 12th | 3 | |
| Graduation | 14 | |
| Graduation and above | 11 | |
| Residence | Rural | 25 |
| Urban | 5 | |
Mean, SD, paired sample t test, effect size for pre-test and post-test comparison on general health.
| Variable | Pre-test | Post-test | t | p | Cohen’s d | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | ||||
| General health | 32.87 | 4.82 | 23.33 | 4.47 | 8.47 | .000 | 1.4 |
Mean, SD, paired-sample t-test and effect size for pre-test and post-test comparison on Anxiety.
| Variable | Pre-test | Post-test | t | p | Cohen’s d | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | ||||
| Anxiety | 34.90 | 5.35 | 22.63 | 3.43 | 11.47 | .000 | 2.0 |
Mean, SD, paired sample t-test, and effect size for pre-test and post-test comparison on Sleep Quality.
| Variable | Pre-test | Post-test | t | p | Cohen’s d | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | ||||
| Sleep quality | 12.57 | 1.305 | 6.27 | 1.639 | 17.38 | .000 | 3.1 |
Mean, SD, paired-sample t test and effect size for pre-test and post-test comparison on Somatic Symptoms.
| Variable | Pre-test | Post-test | t (t value) | p (Significant value) | Cohen’s d | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | ||||
| Somatic symptoms | 20.17 | 3.00 | 12.37 | 3.51 | 10.95 | .000 | 2.0 |