| Literature DB >> 36163018 |
Hiroaki Arima1, Akintije Simba Calliope1,2,3, Hideki Fukuda4, Theoneste Nzaramba5, Marie Goretti Mukakarake5, Takayuki Wada6, Takashi Yorifuji7, Leon Mutesa8, Taro Yamamoto9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Since 1996, many studies have reported that periodontal disease during pregnancy may be a risk factor for preterm birth and low birth weight; however, in Africa, periodontal disease is considered a non-high-priority disease. In addition, there are few dental facilities in rural Rwanda; thus, the oral condition of pregnant women has not been investigated. The objective of this study was to assess the tooth brushing habits of pregnant women in rural Rwanda and evaluate whether periodontal bacteria in the oral cavity of pregnant women are related to birth outcomes or oral cleaning habits.Entities:
Keywords: Low birth weight; Periodontal bacteria; Pregnant women; Preterm birth; Rwanda
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36163018 PMCID: PMC9512986 DOI: 10.1186/s12903-022-02443-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Oral Health ISSN: 1472-6831 Impact factor: 3.747
Fig. 1Geographical location of the survey site. The survey site, Mibilizi (Red dot), is located near the border with the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and approximately 240 km from the capital Kigali
Characteristics of the participants
| Average age | 31.2 ± 6.5 |
| Age group | |
| < 18 | 1 (0.7) |
| 18–35 | 104 (68.0) |
| > 35 | 48 (31.4) |
| Average gestational age (weeks)a | 27.7 ± 3.8 |
| Gravidity | |
| First | 40 (26.1) |
| 2–3 times | 51 (33.3) |
| 4–5 times | 36 (23.5) |
| 6–7 times | 19 (12.4) |
| 8 times or more | 7 (4.6) |
Data from 153 participants were compiled. Values indicate the average ± SD or n (%)
aData on gestational age are missing for 3 women
Fig. 2Copy number of each bacteria detected from the participant's saliva. This figure shows the distribution of each copy number of bacteria. The figure on the upper right is a comparison of periodontal bacteria only
Summary of the participants’ birth outcomes
| Total (n = 153) | Male (n = 67) | Female (n = 86) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Delivery perioda | ||||
| Preterm birth (< 37 weeks) | 4 (2.6) | 2 (3.0) | 2 (2.3) | 0.6146 |
| Full-term birth (37 ≤ GA < 41 weeks) | 147 (96.7) | 63 (95.5) | 84 (97.7) | |
| Post-term birth (≥ 42 weeks) | 1 (0.7) | 1 (1.5) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Average birth weight(g)b | 3210.5 ± 529.6 | 3303.0 ± 511.7 | 3138.7 ± 535.1 | 0.0570 |
| Birth weightb | ||||
| Normal (≤ 2500 g) | 142 (94.0) | 63 (95.5) | 79 (92.9) | 0.3696 |
| Low birth weight (2000 g ≤ BW < 2500 g) | 6 (4.0) | 3 (4.5) | 3 (3.5) | |
| Very low birth weight (< 2000 g) | 3 (2.0) | 0 (0.0) | 3 (3.5) | |
| Average birth length (cm)c | 50.9 ± 1.4 | 51.1 ± 1.3 | 50.7 ± 1.5 | 0.1295 |
We compiled the data for 153 people for whom we were able to obtain postnatal data. There were 67 males (43.8%) and 86 females (56.2%). Three pairs of twins (3/156: 1.9%) were born, but they were not included in this table
GA gestational age, BW birth weight
aOne participant who delivered a male newborn did not answer the questionnaire
bOne participant in each sex group did not answer the questionnaire
cOne participant did not answer the questionnaire
Correlation between the copy number of each bacterium and birth outcomes by multivariate analysis
| Bacterial species | Variables | Estimate | Std. Error | t value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Bacteria | Intercept | 0.0514 | 0.0881 | 0.583 | 0.5609 |
| Age of the mother | 0.0619 | 0.0887 | 0.698 | 0.4865 | |
| Birth weight | −0.3278 | 0.1089 | −3.012 | 0.0032** | |
| Birth length | 0.2268 | 0.1024 | 2.215 | 0.0286* | |
| Gestational age | 0.1047 | 0.1199 | 0.873 | 0.3844 | |
| Sex of the newborn | 0.0933 | 0.0886 | 1.054 | 0.2942 | |
| Intercept | −0.0596 | 0.0602 | −0.991 | 0.3237 | |
| Age of the mother | 0.1059 | 0.0606 | 1.747 | 0.0831 | |
| Birth weight | −0.1051 | 0.0744 | −1.412 | 0.1604 | |
| Birth length | 0.1037 | 0.0700 | 1.482 | 0.1409 | |
| Gestational age | 0.0122 | 0.0819 | 0.149 | 0.8816 | |
| Sex of the newborn | 0.1356 | 0.0605 | 2.241 | 0.0268* | |
| Intercept | −0.0235 | 0.0727 | −0.324 | 0.7467 | |
| Age of the mother | 0.1832 | 0.0732 | 2.502 | 0.0136* | |
| Birth weight | −0.2096 | 0.0898 | −2.333 | 0.0212* | |
| Birth length | 0.1901 | 0.0845 | 2.250 | 0.0262* | |
| Gestational age | −0.0426 | 0.0989 | −0.430 | 0.6679 | |
| Sex of the newborn | 0.1384 | 0.0731 | 1.893 | 0.0606 | |
| Intercept | 0.0225 | 0.0822 | 0.274 | 0.7848 | |
| Age of the mother | 0.0774 | 0.0828 | 0.934 | 0.3522 | |
| Birth weight | −0.2248 | 0.1016 | −2.212 | 0.0288* | |
| Birth length | 0.2862 | 0.0956 | 2.994 | 0.0033** | |
| Gestational age | −0.2143 | 0.1119 | −1.914 | 0.0579 | |
| Sex of the newborn | 0.2404 | 0.0827 | 2.908 | 0.0043** | |
| Intercept | 0.0252 | 0.0950 | 0.265 | 0.7910 | |
| Age of the mother | −0.0576 | 0.0957 | −0.602 | 0.5480 | |
| Birth weight | −0.0802 | 0.1174 | −0.683 | 0.4960 | |
| Birth length | 0.0071 | 0.1104 | 0.065 | 0.9480 | |
| Gestational age | 0.0412 | 0.1293 | 0.319 | 0.7510 | |
| Sex of the newborn | 0.1293 | 0.0955 | 1.354 | 0.1780 |
A generalized linear model for multivariate analysis was performed using neonatal data to analyze the relationship between the copy number of each bacterium and birth outcomes. * indicate p value < 0.05 and ** indicate p value < 0.01
Oral care status during pregnancy
| Frequency of daily tooth brushinga | |
| 1 time | 115 (75.7) |
| 2 times | 36 (23.7) |
| 3 times | 1 (0.7) |
| Frequency of brush replacementb | |
| 3 months | 39 (26.0) |
| 6 months | 21 (14.0) |
| 1 year or more | 80 (53.3) |
| No brush used | 10 (6.7) |
| Oral cleaning method | |
| Brush and paste | 132 (86.3) |
| Brush | 11 (7.2) |
| Stick or finger | 8 (5.2) |
| Gargle | 2 (1.3) |
| Lifetime dental examination history | 22 (14.4) |
Data from 153 participants were compiled. All values represent n (%)
aData on the frequency of daily tooth brushing are missing for 1 woman
bData on the frequency of brush replacement are missing for 3 women
Comparison of the copy numbers of bacteria by oral cleaning habit
| Bacterial species | Frequency of daily tooth brushing | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 times or more | 1 time | ||
| Total bacteria | 9.83E6 ± 1.10E7 | 1.11E7 ± 1.17E7 | 0.5463 |
| 5.56E4 ± 8.47E4 | 1.72E5 ± 4.22E5 | 0.0061 | |
| 8.28E3 ± 1.47E4 | 1.27E4 ± 1.82E4 | 0.1353 | |
| 1.93E5 ± 3.64E5 | 2.28E5 ± 3.54E5 | 0.6103 | |
| 1.40E4 ± 4.10E4 | 1.03E4 ± 1.69E4 | 0.5987 | |
Data from 153 participants were compiled. In this table, the copy number of each bacterium is displayed as the average ± SD
aData on the frequency of daily tooth brushing is missing for 1 person
bData on the frequency of brush replacement are missing for 3 people