Seyed Mohammad Reza Safavi1, Azim Honarmand2, Behzad Nazemroaya2, Amir Mohammad Ataie3, Zahra Kamran4. 1. Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Isfahan, Iran. 2. Anesthesiology and Critical Care Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Isfahan, Iran. 3. Urology & Nephrology Research Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences Hamadan, Iran. 4. School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Isfahan, Iran.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Induced stimulation while endotracheal intubating affects hemodynamic status. The present study compares the hemodynamic changes caused by endotracheal intubating after administering two doses of intranasal Dexmedetomidine. METHODS: In an experimental (before-after) trial, 88 patients undergoing general anesthesia enrolled in the study. The Iranian Register of Clinical Trial (IRCT) code of the study was IRCT20160307026950N15 (https://en.irct.ir/trial/39269). Patients were allocated to two intervention groups and one control group by random. Intranasal Dexmedetomidine and Normal saline 0.9% were administrated 30 minutes before induction of anesthesia. (1 μg/kg Dexmedetomidine in group 1, 2 μg/kg Dexmedetomidine in group 2 and 1 mg Normal saline 0.9% in group 3). Vital signs and hemodynamic parameters were measured and recorded in minutes 1, 3, 5, and 10th after induction. Data analysis was done by ANOVA and Chi-square tests. RESULTS: Heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and mean arterial pressure were reduced in patients receiving dexmedetomidine (P<0.05), but there were no significant changes in the control group. In arterial oxygenation (P>0.05), there was no significant difference between the three groups in the arterial blood oxygen amount. CONCLUSION: Premedication of intranasal dexmedetomidine influences the hemodynamic changes due to anesthesia induction. The dose of 2 µg/kg is better than one µg/kg in improving the hemodynamic state following intubation. IJPPP
BACKGROUND: Induced stimulation while endotracheal intubating affects hemodynamic status. The present study compares the hemodynamic changes caused by endotracheal intubating after administering two doses of intranasal Dexmedetomidine. METHODS: In an experimental (before-after) trial, 88 patients undergoing general anesthesia enrolled in the study. The Iranian Register of Clinical Trial (IRCT) code of the study was IRCT20160307026950N15 (https://en.irct.ir/trial/39269). Patients were allocated to two intervention groups and one control group by random. Intranasal Dexmedetomidine and Normal saline 0.9% were administrated 30 minutes before induction of anesthesia. (1 μg/kg Dexmedetomidine in group 1, 2 μg/kg Dexmedetomidine in group 2 and 1 mg Normal saline 0.9% in group 3). Vital signs and hemodynamic parameters were measured and recorded in minutes 1, 3, 5, and 10th after induction. Data analysis was done by ANOVA and Chi-square tests. RESULTS: Heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and mean arterial pressure were reduced in patients receiving dexmedetomidine (P<0.05), but there were no significant changes in the control group. In arterial oxygenation (P>0.05), there was no significant difference between the three groups in the arterial blood oxygen amount. CONCLUSION: Premedication of intranasal dexmedetomidine influences the hemodynamic changes due to anesthesia induction. The dose of 2 µg/kg is better than one µg/kg in improving the hemodynamic state following intubation. IJPPP
Authors: A Li; V M Yuen; S Goulay-Dufaÿ; Y Sheng; J F Standing; P C L Kwok; M K M Leung; A S Leung; I C K Wong; M G Irwin Journal: Br J Anaesth Date: 2018-02-02 Impact factor: 9.166
Authors: Alan Tung; Nicholas A Fergusson; Nicole Ng; Vivien Hu; Colin Dormuth; Donald E G Griesdale Journal: Br J Anaesth Date: 2020-02-22 Impact factor: 9.166