Literature DB >> 36161170

A spinal manipulative therapy altered brain activity in patients with lumbar disc herniation: A resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

Ya Wen1, Xiao-Min Chen1, Xin Jin1, Dong-Ya Ling2, Shao Chen1, Qin Huang1, Ning Kong2, Jin-Er Chai1, Qing Wang3, Mao-Sheng Xu2, Hong-Gen Du1.   

Abstract

Purpose: Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is one of the leading causes of low-back pain and results in a series of clinical symptoms, including pain, reflex loss, and muscle weakness. Spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) can relieve pain and promote internal and external stabilization of the lumbar spine. In this study, we investigated whether the brain alterations of LDH patients with SMT were frequency-dependent based on the calculation of Amplitude of Low-Frequency Fluctuations (ALFF) and fractional ALFF (fALFF). Further, we established a cohort of LDH patients to evaluate the contribution of SMT treatments to brain functional reorganization.
Methods: A total of 55 participants, including 27 LDH patients and 28 health controls (HCs), were collected. All LDH patients underwent two fMRI scans (before SMT and after the sixth SMT session). To represent LDH-related brain oscillatory activities, we calculated the ALFF and fALFF in the conventional band (0.01-0.08 Hz), the slow-4 band (0.027-0.073 Hz), and the slow-5 band (0.01-0.027 Hz). Moreover, we extracted ALFF and fALFF values in clusters with significant differences to evaluate the SMT effect.
Results: Compared with HCs, the LDH patients before SMT (LDH-pre) exhibited increased fALFF in right lingual gyri in the conventional band, and showed increased fALFF in left Cerebelum_Crus1 in the slow-4 band. We further examined the abnormal brain activities changes before and after the SMT intervention. The ALFF and fALFF values of LDH-pre group were higher than those of the HCs and LDH-pos groups. After SMT, the increased ALFF and fALFF values were suppressed for patients in conventional band and slow-4 band.
Conclusion: The present study characterized the altered regional patterns in spontaneous neural activity in patients with LDH. Meanwhile, SMT is an effective treatment of LDH, and we supposed that it might have been involved in modulating dysfunctional brain regions which are important for the processing of pain. The findings of the current study may provide new insights to understand pathological mechanism of LDH.
Copyright © 2022 Wen, Chen, Jin, Ling, Chen, Huang, Kong, Chai, Wang, Xu and Du.

Entities:  

Keywords:  amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations; frequency dependence; lumbar disc herniation; resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging; spinal manipulative therapy

Year:  2022        PMID: 36161170      PMCID: PMC9490403          DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.974792

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Neurosci        ISSN: 1662-453X            Impact factor:   5.152


  45 in total

Review 1.  Neuroanatomical hypothesis of panic disorder, revised.

Authors:  J M Gorman; J M Kent; G M Sullivan; J D Coplan
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 18.112

2.  An improved approach to detection of amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (ALFF) for resting-state fMRI: fractional ALFF.

Authors:  Qi-Hong Zou; Chao-Zhe Zhu; Yihong Yang; Xi-Nian Zuo; Xiang-Yu Long; Qing-Jiu Cao; Yu-Feng Wang; Yu-Feng Zang
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 2.390

Review 3.  Current concepts for lumbar disc herniation.

Authors:  Thami Benzakour; Vasilios Igoumenou; Andreas F Mavrogenis; Ahmed Benzakour
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  Resting-state fMRI: a review of methods and clinical applications.

Authors:  M H Lee; C D Smyser; J S Shimony
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Outcomes of acute and chronic patients with magnetic resonance imaging-confirmed symptomatic lumbar disc herniations receiving high-velocity, low-amplitude, spinal manipulative therapy: a prospective observational cohort study with one-year follow-up.

Authors:  Serafin Leemann; Cynthia K Peterson; Christof Schmid; Bernard Anklin; B Kim Humphreys
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 1.437

Review 6.  Mechanism of action of spinal manipulative therapy.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Maigne; Philippe Vautravers
Journal:  Joint Bone Spine       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.929

7.  The oscillating brain: complex and reliable.

Authors:  Xi-Nian Zuo; Adriana Di Martino; Clare Kelly; Zarrar E Shehzad; Dylan G Gee; Donald F Klein; F Xavier Castellanos; Bharat B Biswal; Michael P Milham
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 8.  Association of Spinal Manipulative Therapy With Clinical Benefit and Harm for Acute Low Back Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Neil M Paige; Isomi M Miake-Lye; Marika Suttorp Booth; Jessica M Beroes; Aram S Mardian; Paul Dougherty; Richard Branson; Baron Tang; Sally C Morton; Paul G Shekelle
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Compressing the lumbar nerve root changes the frequency-associated cerebral amplitude of fluctuations in patients with low back/leg pain.

Authors:  Fuqing Zhou; Yanlin Zhao; Li Zhu; Jian Jiang; Muhua Huang; Yong Zhang; Ying Zhuang; Honghan Gong
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Associations of Regional and Network Functional Connectivity With Exercise-Induced Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Nicholas J Bush; Victor Schneider; Landrew Sevel; Mark D Bishop; Jeff Boissoneault
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 5.383

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.