| Literature DB >> 36160992 |
Iftikhar Ali1,2,3, Ajab Khan2, Ahmad Ali2, Zahid Ullah2, Dong-Qin Dai1, Naveed Khan2, Asif Khan4, Abdel Rahman Al-Tawaha5, Hassan Sher2.
Abstract
Malnutrition is mainly caused by iron and zinc micronutrient deficiencies affecting about half of the world's population across the globe. Biofortification of staple crops is the right approach to overcome malnutrition and enhance nutrient contents in the daily food of humans. This study aimed to evaluate the role of foliar application of iron and zinc in Trichoderma harzianum treated soil on various growth characteristics, quality, and yield of wheat varieties. Plants were examined in the absence/presence of T. harzianum, and iron and zinc micronutrients in both optimal and high-stress conditions. Although the symbiotic association of T. harzianum and common wheat is utilized as an effective approach for wheat improvement because of the dynamic growth promoting the ability of the fungus, this association was found tremendously effective in the presence of foliar feeding of micronutrients for the enhancement of various growth parameters and quality of wheat. The utilization of this approach positively increased various growth parameters including spike length, grain mass, biomass, harvest index, and photosynthetic pigments. The beneficial role of T. harzianum in combination with zinc and iron in stimulating plant growth and its positive impact on the intensities of high molecular weight glutenin subunits (HMW-GS) alleles make it an interesting approach for application in eco-friendly agricultural systems. Further, this study suggests a possible alternative way that does not merely enhances the wheat yield but also its quality through proper biofortification of iron and zinc to fulfill the daily needs of micronutrients in staple food.Entities:
Keywords: HMW-GS; Trichoderma harzianum; iron; wheat; zinc
Year: 2022 PMID: 36160992 PMCID: PMC9490233 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.960948
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 6.627
Mean squares of the different traits in the studied wheat genotype.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | 11 | 4.87*** | 605.1*** | 260.6*** | 4.646*** | 170939*** | 12303.2*** | 0.0003NS | 49.60* | 0.010*** | 0.027NS | 0.053*** |
| Error | 22 | 1.202 | 2.629 | 13.80 | 0.167 | 24976 | 3191.0 | 0.0004 | 16.59 | 0.003 | 0.009 | 0.015 |
where, PM, physiological maturity; SPS, seeds per spike; PH, plant height; SPL, spike length; DH, days to heading; HI, harvest index; GM, grain mass; Chl a, chlorophyll a; Chl b, chlorophyll b; TChl, total chlorophyll. *, Significant, ***, Highly significant and NS, Non-significant.
Figure 1Effects of Fe, Zn, and Trichoderma harzianum on the studied traits. Where: *, ** and *** are depicting statistical significances at 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001 probability level, respectively. While the bars without * are showing no statistically significant differences (NS).
Analysis of variance of different traits in studied wheat genotype.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| Control | 135.3c | 178.0c | 107.2bc | 14.37b | 4416.7a | 478.7ab | 0.108ab | 47.8d | 0.100c | 0.033c | 0.160d |
|
| 140.3a | 154.7d | 110.8abc | 14.33b | 3630.7b | 440.7abc | 0.122ab | 55.0bc | 0.253ab | 0.187abc | 0.440abc |
| Zn-9mM | 139.7ab | 182.0ab | 92.4d | 13.80b | 3788.7ab | 339.0de | 0.106b | 52.8bcd | 0.230ab | 0.173abc | 0.403abc |
| Zn-18mM | 138.7ab | 182.3ab | 111.5abc | 11.23d | 3614.7b | 417.3bcd | 0.116ab | 57.3abc | 0.260ab | 0.136bc | 0.396bc |
| Fe-9mM | 139.7ab | 154.3d | 109.7abc | 14.10b | 3538.0b | 282.3e | 0.116b | 57.6abc | 0.256ab | 0.143bc | 0.400abc |
| Fe-18mM | 139.3ab | 183.3ab | 108.0bc | 14.33b | 3654.7b | 422.7abcd | 0.124ab | 56.2bc | 0.193bc | 0.046c | 0.233cd |
| Fe-9mM)/ | 139.7ab | 182.3ab | 106.1c | 16.37a | 3509.3b | 422.3abcd | 0.118ab | 59.6ab | 0.123c | 0.063c | 0.153d |
| Fe-18mM/ | 139.0ab | 144.3e | 112.9ab | 14.23b | 3544.7b | 353.0cde | 0.119ab | 52.6cd | 0.253ab | 0.130bc | 0.383bc |
| Zn-9mM/ | 139.3ab | 181.7ab | 108.3abc | 13.80b | 3674.0b | 516.7a | 0.142a | 56.3bc | 0.247ab | 0.230ab | 0.476ab |
| Zn-18mM/ | 138.7ab | 182.3ab | 114.4a | 14.10b | 3642.7b | 378.7cd | 0.115ab | 55.8bc | 0.230ab | 0.073bc | 0.303bcd |
| Fe-9mM/ | 138.0b | 180.7bc | 112.6ab | 12.20c | 3921.3ab | 424.3abcd | 0.135ab | 52.8bcd | 0.190bc | 0.110bc | 0.303bcd |
| Fe-18mM/ | 139.0b | 184.0a | 82.9e | 14.30b | 3639.3b | 359.7cde | 0.121ab | 64.2a | 0.297a | 0.317a | 0.610a |
For traits code, see Table 1. Different letters are showing statistical differences among treatments at p < 0.05.
Figure 2Overview of wheat responses for the studied traits to different treatments. Blue boxes represent enhanced effect; green boxes represent no significant differences; while, yellow boxes represent negative/decreased effect of the respective treatment, in comparison to control. Further, the black font color of the studied trait represents a response to both low and high concentration; the red color represents a response to low concentration; while, the green color represents a response to the high concentration of the respective treatment.
Figure 3SDS-PAGE profile of HMW-GS alleles of the studied wheat cultivar and its area integrated densities under different treatments. For accuracy and validity of data, the average area integrated densities were determined for comparison. HMW-GS 2* asterisk.