| Literature DB >> 36160852 |
Anamei Silva-Reis1, Maysa Alves Rodrigues Brandao-Rangel1, Renilson Moraes-Ferreira1, Thiago Gibson Gonçalves-Alves1, Victor Hugo Souza-Palmeira1, Helida Cristina Aquino-Santos1, Andre Luis Lacerda Bachi2, Luis Vicente Franco de Oliveira3, Rodrigo Álvaro Brandão Lopes-Martins3, Iranse Oliveira-Silva3, Regiane Albertini1, Claudio Ricardo Frison1, Rodolfo P Vieira1,3.
Abstract
Background: Obesity impairs lung function and mechanics and leads to low-grade inflammation, but the effects of combined physical exercise (CPE) on that are unknown.Entities:
Keywords: exercise immunology; lung; obesity; overweight; physical training; pulmonary inflammation and fibrosis
Year: 2022 PMID: 36160852 PMCID: PMC9491379 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2022.946402
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.755
FIGURE 1Effects of combined training on body composition. Figure 1A shows the subcutaneous fat area. Figure 1B shows the visceral fat area. Figure 1C shows the total fat mass. Figure 1D shows muscle mass. Paired t-test was performed to compare the pre- and post-effects of rehabilitation (i.e., eutrophic non-obese pre x eutrophic non-obese post; overweight pre x overweight post; obesity I pre x obesity I post). A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. These data presented parametric distribution and were additionally evaluated using one way ANOVA followed by the Newman–Keuls test for multiple comparisons among the groups.
FIGURE 2Effects of combined training on the levels of FeNO, MIP, MEP, and ISWT. Figure 2A shows the levels of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO). Figure 2B shows the maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP). Figure 2C shows the maximum expiratory pressure (MEP). Figure 2D shows the distance reached in ISWT. Paired t-test was performed to compare the pre- and post-effects of rehabilitation (i.e., eutrophic non-obese pre x eutrophic non-obese post; overweight pre x overweight post; obesity I pre x obesity I post). A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. These data presented parametric distribution and were additionally evaluated using one way ANOVA followed by the Newman–Keuls test for multiple comparisons among the groups.
FIGURE 3Effects of combined training on the lung function test. Figure 3A shows the FVC%; Figure 3B the VEF1%; Figure 3C the VEF1/FVC; Figure 3D PEF%; Figure 3E MEF25%; Figure 3F MEF50%; Figure 3G MEF75%. Paired t-test was performed to compare the pre- and post-effects of rehabilitation (i.e., eutrophic non-obese pre x eutrophic non-obese post; overweight pre x overweight post; obesity I pre x obesity I post). A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. These data presented parametric distribution and were additionally evaluated using one way ANOVA followed by the Newman–Keuls test for multiple comparisons among the groups.
FIGURE 4Effects of combined training on lung mechanics. Figure 4A shows the resistance of the whole respiratory system (R5 Hz); Figure 4B the resistance of the proximal airways (R20 Hz); Figure 4C the resistance of the distal airways (R5–20 Hz); Figure 4D the reactance of the respiratory systems (X5 Hz); Figure 4E the impedance of the respiratory systems (Z5 Hz); Figure 4F the resonant frequency (RFres); Figure 4G central resistance of the respiratory system (RCentral); Figure 4H the peripheral resistance of the respiratory system (RPeripheral). Paired t-test was performed to compare the pre- and post-effects of rehabilitation (i.e., eutrophic non-obese pre x eutrophic non-obese post; overweight pre x overweight post; obesity I pre x obesity I post). A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. These data presented parametric distribution and were additionally evaluated using one way ANOVA followed by the Newman–Keuls test for multiple comparisons among the groups.
FIGURE 5Effects of combined training on pulmonary and systemic fibrotic biomarkers. Figure 5A shows the pulmonary levels of IGF-1; Figure 5B the plasma levels of IGF-1; Figure 5C the pulmonary levels of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10; Figure 5D the plasma levels of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10; Figure 5E the pulmonary levels of anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrotic protein Klotho; Figure 5F the plasma levels of anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrotic protein Klotho; Figure 5G the pulmonary levels of the anti-inflammatory adipokine adiponectin; and Figure 5H the plasma levels of the anti-inflammatory adipokine adiponectin. Paired t-test was performed to compare the pre- and post-effects of rehabilitation (i.e., eutrophic non-obese pre x eutrophic non-obese post; overweight pre x overweight post; obesity I pre x obesity I post). A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. These data presented parametric distribution and were additionally evaluated using one way ANOVA followed by the Newman–Keuls test for multiple comparisons among the groups.
FIGURE 6Effects of combined training on the systemic cellular immune response. Figure 6A shows the number of total leukocytes (white blood cells—WBC). Figure 6B shows the number of neutrophils. Figure 6C shows the number of lymphocytes. Figure 6D shows the number of monocytes. Figure 6E shows the number of basophils. Figure 6F shows the number of eosinophils. Figure 6G shows the number of red blood cells (RBC). Figure 6H shows the number of glycated hemoglobin (HBG). Paired t-test was performed to compare the pre- and post-effects of rehabilitation (i.e., eutrophic non-obese pre x eutrophic non-obese post; overweight pre x overweight post; obesity I pre x obesity I post). A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. These data presented parametric distribution and were additionally evaluated using one way ANOVA followed by the Newman–Keuls test for multiple comparisons among the groups.