| Literature DB >> 36160585 |
Yuchen Hu1, Qingbo Tang1,2, Xuan Wang3, Shahid Ali4.
Abstract
It is now possible to propagate CSR information through social media platforms. Electronic word of mouth (eWOM) directly impacts image and upcoming portfolios of the organization. Customers, employees, and other stakeholders generate revenue for the company. Our goal was to understand why people were sharing and commenting in response to terrible reports about corporate social responsibility (CSR) on WeChat. A company's desire to comment on and share CSR news and its perception of its own social and environmental responsibility were all presumed explanatory variables in our investigation. 315 WeChat users were asked to grade a fictitious news report of the environment. The results were shocking. According to our findings, an individual's attitude toward actions and the effectiveness of information directly correlates to their social and environmental awareness level. EWOM may be discouraged by a company's brand name, which has the potential to harm its reputation with its customers.Entities:
Keywords: corporate image; corporate social responsibility; electronic word of mouth; social networking sites; structural equation modeling
Year: 2022 PMID: 36160585 PMCID: PMC9493480 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.894505
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
Measurement scale.
| Dimension | Constructs | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Information Sharing | INT1 | In order to distribute and discuss this information, I’ll primarily use social networking sites like We Chat |
| INT2 | Sharing and discussing this information with my friends is most likely to occur | |
| INT3 | I went with social media to spread and discuss this piece of information | |
| Normative influence | NORI1 | I think this piece of news is worth reading |
| NORI2 | It’s my view that this piece of news is worth reading | |
| NORI3 | I believe that the knowledge in this report is vital | |
| Corporate image | CIMA1 | I have a favorable impact on the NH company and am concerned it is a trustworthy source of information |
| CIMA2 | Using WeChat to discuss and share CSR news is, in my perception, a brilliant idea | |
| CIMA3 | It’s a great idea to discuss and share CSR news on social media | |
| Attitude and Beliefs | ATT1 | CSR-related news should be distributed |
| ATT2 | Being worried about the state of society makes me feel like a member of my neighborhood. I see myself as a person concerned about the welfare of others and the environment | |
| ATT3 | I am concerned about my impact on the environment and strongly support environmental protection | |
| Social awareness | SAW1 | This data will be spread and commented on primarily through social networking sites (SNSs) |
| SAW2 | My companions are likely to hear about this news | |
| SAW3 | I went with social media to spread and discuss this piece of information | |
| Environmental awareness | ENVC1 | I think you should read this news item |
| ENVC2 | My opinion is that this article contains useful information | |
| ENVC3 | As far as I’m concerned, this piece of news is essential |
Demographic of the sample.
| Percent (%) | |
|---|---|
|
| |
| Male | 45.455 |
| Female | 59.545 |
|
| |
| 16–30 | 28.56 |
| 31–45 | 47.88 |
| 46–65 | 28.56 |
The data’s descriptive statistics.
| Variables | Items | Observations | Coefficient of variation (CV) | Mean | Std. dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ECSR | 3 | 315 | 0.2602 | 4.5100 | 0.7118 |
| CCSR | 3 | 315 | 0.0449 | 3.3915 | 0.3773 |
| EVA | 4 | 315 | 0.1533 | 3.4734 | 0.5061 |
| SAW | 3 | 315 | 0.61005 | 2.709 | 1.5729 |
| IFS | 7 | 315 | 0.0819 | 3.24555 | 0.2541 |
| NINF | 7 | 315 | 0.1323 | 3.87135 | 0.48825 |
| CIMG | 5 | 315 | 0.2436 | 2.4885 | 0.5775 |
| eWOM | 4 | 315 | 0.28035 | 3.62565 | 0.96915 |
ECSR: Environmental CSR, CCSR: Commercial CSR, EVA: Environmental awareness, SAW: Social awareness, IFS: Information sharing, NINF: Normative influence, CIMG: Corporate image, eWOM: Electronic word of mouth.
Confirmatory factor analysis (measurement model).
| Variables | Items | Standard loadings | Cronbach-α | CR | AVE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Environmental awareness | EVA 1 | 0.753 | 0.878 | 0.843 | 0.530 |
| EVA 2 | 0.783 | ||||
| EVA 3 | 0.716 | ||||
| EVA 4 | 0.731 | ||||
| Social awareness | SAW 1 | 0.876 | 0.963 | 0.984 | 0.715 |
| SAW 2 | 0.931 | ||||
| SAW 3 | 0.900 | ||||
| SAW 4 | 0.921 | ||||
| SAW 5 | 0.890 | ||||
| SAW 6 | 0.800 | ||||
| SAW 7 | 0.729 | ||||
| Information sharing | IFS 1 | 0.790 | 0.959 | 0.983 | 0.710 |
| IFS 2 | 0.910 | ||||
| IFS 3 | 0.887 | ||||
| IFS 4 | 0.914 | ||||
| IFS 5 | 0.844 | ||||
| IFS 6 | 0.831 | ||||
| IFS 7 | 0.861 | ||||
| Normative influence | NIFN 1 | 0.675 | 0.949 | 0.947 | 0.597 |
| NIFN 2 | 0.890 | ||||
| NIFN 3 | 0.813 | ||||
| NIFN 4 | 0.794 | ||||
| NIFN 5 | 0.813 | ||||
| NIFN 6 | 0.840 | ||||
| NIFN 7 | 0.696 | ||||
| Environmental CSR content | ECSR 1 | 0.784 | 0.899 | 0.930 | 0.639 |
| ECSR 2 | 0.854 | ||||
| ECSR 3 | 0.826 | ||||
| ECSR 4 | 0.884 | ||||
| ECSR 5 | 0.742 | ||||
| Commercial CSR | CCSR 1 | 0.799 | 0.752 | 0.815 | 0.751 |
| CCSR 2 | 0.915 | ||||
| CCSR 3 | 0.753 | ||||
| Corporate image | OIM 1 | 0.659 | 0.802 | 0.879 | 0.600 |
| OIM 2 | 0.609 | ||||
| OIM 3 | 0.856 | ||||
| OIM 4 | 0.989 | ||||
| eWOM | EWOM 1 | 0.791 | 0.858 | 0.868 | 0.571 |
| EWOM 2 | 0.731 | ||||
| EWOM 3 | 0.792 | ||||
| EWOM 4 | 0.783 |
Discriminate validity analysis.
| Variables | EVA | SOA | INS | NIFN | ENC | CIMG | eWOM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EVA |
| ||||||
| SAW | 0.3423 |
| |||||
| IFS | 0.28245 | 0.5124 |
| ||||
| NIFN | 0.3696 | 0.3948 | 0.5512 |
| |||
| ECSR | 0.17535 | 0.5712 | 0.4368 | 0.32025 |
| ||
| CIMG | 0.32655 | 0.25095 | 0.189 | 0.33285 | 0.2331 |
| |
| eWOM | 0.126 | 0.1323 | 0.10185 | 0.11655 | 0.0483 | 0.48615 |
|
Figure 1Path analysis.
The outcomes of hypothesis testing on the structures.
| Hypothesis | Structural paths | Decision | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| H1 | EVA → ECSR | 0.309*** | 2.447 | Supported |
| H2 | EVA → CCSR | 0.296** | 2.344 | Supported |
| H3 | SAW → ECSR | 0.351*** | 3.294 | Supported |
| H4 | SAW → CCSR | 0.228** | 1.522 | Supported |
| H5 | NIFN → ECSR | 0.502** | 4.677 | Supported |
| H6 | NIFN → CCSR | 0.372* | 3.022 | Supported |
| H7 | IFS → ECSR | 0.242** | 1.597 | Supported |
| H8 | IFS → CCSR | 0.447* | 3.738 | Supported |
| H9 | ECSR → eWOM | 0.471*** | 4.416 | Supported |
| H10 | CCSR → eWOM | 0.315*** | 2.717 | Supported |
| H11 | CIMG → eWOM | 0.467*** | 3.770 | Supported |