| Literature DB >> 36160392 |
Jing Chen1, Bixin Shen2, Zhengli Jiang1.
Abstract
Ulcerative colitis (UC), characterized by syndromes including abdominal pain, bloody stool, diarrhea, weight loss, and repeated relapse, is a non-specific inflammatory intestinal disease. In recent years, with the changing dietary habits in China, the incidence of UC has shown an upward trend. UC belongs to the category of recorded as "diarrhea," "chronic dysentery," and "hematochezia" in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), and Shenling BaiZhu powder (SLBZP) is one of the most effective and commonly used prescriptions. In this review, we aim to systematically summarize the clinical application and pharmacological mechanism of SLBZP in the treatment of UC to provide a theoretical basis for its clinical use and experimental evaluation of SLBZP. Our results showed that both SLBZP and SLBZP in combination with chemical drugs, have a significant therapeutic effect against UC with few adverse reactions. Furthermore, combined therapy was better than western medicine. Further, pathophysiological studies indicated that SLBZP has anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory, antioxidant effects, regulation relative cell signal transduction and regulation of gut microbiota. Although evidence suggests superior therapeutic efficacy of SLBZP for treating UC and the relative mechanism has been studied extensively, various shortcomings limit the existing research on the topic. There is a lack of UC animal models, especially UC with TCM syndromes, with no uniform standard and certain differences between the animal model and clinical syndrome. The dosage, dosage form, and therapeutic time of SLBZP are inconsistent and lack pharmacological verification, and clinical trial data are not detailed or sufficiently rigorous. In addition, SLSZP is composed of multiple Chinese drugs that contain massive numbers of ingredients and which or several components contribute to therapeutic effects. How they work synergistically together remains unknown. Therefore, on the one hand, large sample prospective cohort studies to clarify the clinical efficacy and safety of SLBZP in the treatment of UC are needed. In contrast, researchers should strengthen the study of the molecular biological mechanism of active ingredients and its synergistic actions, clarifying the mechanism of SLBZP in treating UC by multi-component, multi-target, and multi-pathway.Entities:
Keywords: clinical evidence; mechanism; shenling baizhu powder; signal pathway; ulcerative colitis
Year: 2022 PMID: 36160392 PMCID: PMC9494158 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.978558
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.988
FIGURE 1The processes of diagnosis and treatment of UC.
FIGURE 2Composition of prescription, clinical applications and therapeutic effects of SLBZP.
Overview of clinical studies of SLBZP.
| Classification | Therapeutic intervention | Treatment time (days) | Evaluation index | Results | References | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment group (UC cases/treatment drugs) | Control group (UC cases/treatment drugs) | |||||
| Monotherapy | 49 cases; Flavored SLBZP (1 dose per day, decocted in water, thrice daily) | 41 cases; Sulfasalazine (oral 2 g, 3 times a day), norfloxacin (oral 0.2 g, 3 times a day) and enema (150 ml, once a day) | 30 | Clinical efficacy | 1) The response in the treatment group was higher than control group |
|
| 75 cases; SLBZP (1 dose per day, decocted in water, twice daily) | 75 cases; Sulfasalazine (oral 0.5 g, 4 times a day) | 60 | 2) The recurrence rate in the treatment group was lower than control group |
| ||
| 53 cases; Flavored SLBZP (1 dose per day, decocted in water, twice daily) | 53 cases; Sulfasalazine (oral 1 g, 4 times a day) | 60 |
| |||
| 24 cases; SLBZP (according to the prescription powder the herbs and mixed, 6 g each dose, thrice daily) | 24 cases; Mesalazine (oral 1 g, 4 times a day) | 90 | Clinical efficacy, inflammatory factors and gut microbiota | 1) The response in the treatment group is higher than control group |
| |
| 50 cases; Flavored SLBZP (1 dose per day, decocted in water, twice daily) | 50 cases; Mesalazine (oral 1 g, 4 times a day) | 168 | 2) It could decrease the levels of IL-17, TNF-α, IL-23, CRP, ESR and increase the levels of IL-10 |
| ||
| 30 cases; SLBZP (according to the prescription powder the herbs and mixed, 6 g each dose, thrice daily) | 30 cases; Mesalazine (oral 1 g, 4 times a day) | 84 | 3) It could promote the growth of probiotics and inhibit the proliferation and colonization of pathogenic bacteria |
| ||
| 26 cases; SLBZP (1 dose per day, decocted in water, twice daily) | 26 cases; Mesalazine (oral 1 g, 3 times a day) | 30 |
| |||
| 84 cases; Flavored SLBZP (1 dose per day, decocted in water, twice daily) | 84 cases; Mesalazine (oral 1 g, 3 times a day) | 56 |
| |||
| 43 cases; Flavored SLBZP (1 dose per day, decocted in water, twice daily) | 42 cases; Domperidone (oral 10 mg, 3 times a day) | 30 | Clinical efficacy | 1) The response in the treatment group is higher than control group |
| |
| 41 cases; Flavored SLBZP (1 dose per day, decocted in water, twice daily) | 41 cases; Compound Sulfamethoxazole and tetracycline | 7 |
| |||
| 55 cases; Flavored SLBZP (1 dose per day, decocted in water, twice daily) | 55 cases; Norfloxacin (oral 0.4 g, 2 times a day) | 20 |
| |||
| Combination therapy | 48 cases; SLBZP (according to the prescription powder the herbs and mixed, 6 g each dose, thrice daily) and Mesalazine (oral 1 g, 4 times a day) | 48 cases; Mesalazine (oral 1 g, 4 times a day) | 60 | Clinical efficacy, flammatory factors, antioxidation, immune function | 1) The response in the treatment group is higher than control group |
|
| 23 cases; SLBZP (according to the prescription powder the herbs and mixed, 6 g each dose, thrice daily) and Mesalazine (oral 1 g, 4 times a day) | 23 cases; Mesalazine (oral 1 g, 4 times a day) | 84 | 2) The response in the treatment group is lower than control group |
| ||
| 42 cases; SLBZP (according to the prescription powder the herbs and mixed, 6 g each dose, thrice daily) and Mesalazine (oral 1 g, 4 times a day) | 36 cases; Mesalazine (oral 1 g, 4 times a day) | 84 | 3) It could reduce the levels of IL-17, TNF-α and IL-23, CRP, ESR, IL-1β, IL-6 and IL-18, IL-2, IFN-γ and increase levels of IL-4 |
| ||
| 66 cases; SLBZP (granule, 6 g each dose, thrice daily) and Mesalazine (oral 1 g, 3 times a day) | 66 cases; Mesalazine (oral 1 g, 3 times a day) | 84 | 4) It could inhibit the expression of NLRP3, ASC and caspase-1 mRNA. |
| ||
| 40 cases; SLBZP (according to the prescription powder the herbs and mixed, 6 g each dose, thrice daily) and Mesalazine (oral 1 g, 4 times a day) | 40 cases; Mesalazine (oral 1 g, 4 times a day) | 56 | 5) It could reduce the serum MDA and increase the serum SOD levels |
| ||
| 50 cases; SLBZP (according to the prescription powder the herbs and mixed, 6 g each dose, thrice daily) and Mesalazine (oral 1 g, 4 times a day) | 50 cases; Mesalazine (oral 1 g, 4 times a day) | 56 | 6) It could reduce percentage of Th17 cells, IgA, IgM levels and increase the ratio of CD4+, CD4+/CD8+ T cells, the percentage of Treg cells |
| ||
| 49 cases; Flavored SLBZP (1 dose per day, decocted in water, twice daily) | 45 cases; Mesalazine (oral 1 g, 3 times a day) | 180 | 7) It could reduce the MMP-2, MMP-9 levels of UC patients |
| ||
| 31 cases; SLBZP (according to the prescription powder the herbs and mixed, 6 g each dose, thrice daily) and Mesalazine (oral 1 g, 4 times a day) | 31 cases; Mesalazine (oral 1 g, 4 times a day) | 60 |
| |||
| 45 cases; Flavored SLBZP (1 dose per day, decocted in water, twice daily) | 45 cases; Mesalazine (oral 0.5 g, 3 times a day) | 56 |
| |||
| 51 cases; SLBZP (1 dose per day, decocted in water, thrice daily) and Sulfasalazine (oral 0.5 g, 3 times a day) | 51 cases; Sulfasalazine (oral 0.5 g, 3 times a day) | 28 | Clinical efficacy, flammatory factors, antioxidation, immune function | 1) The response in the treatment group is higher than control group |
| |
| 47 cases; SLBZP (1 dose per day, decocted in water, twice daily) and Sulfasalazine (oral 0.5 g, 3 times a day) | 47 cases; Sulfasalazine (oral 0.5 g, 3 times a day) | 28 | 2) The recurrence rate and incidence of adverse reactions in the treatment group is lower than control group |
| ||
| 28 cases; SLBZP (according to the prescription powder the herbs and mixed, 6 g each dose, thrice daily) and Sulfasalazine (enema 3 g/50 ml, one time a day) | 28 cases; Sulfasalazine (enema 3 g/50 ml, one time a day) | 56 | 3) It could reduce the levels of TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α, INF-γ, HIF-α, IGF-1 and MMP-9 and increase levels of IL-10 |
| ||
| 25 cases; Flavored SLBZP (1 dose per day, decocted in water, thrice daily) and Sulfasalazine (oral 1 g, 4 times a day) | 25 cases; Sulfasalazine (oral 1 g, 4 times a day) | 28 | 4) It could inhibit the expression of NF-κB p65 and promote the expression of β2AR and β-arrestin2 of intestinal mucosa |
| ||
| 31 cases; Flavored SLBZP (1 dose per day, decocted in water, thrice daily) and Sulfasalazine (oral 1 g, 4 times a day) | 31 cases; Sulfasalazine (oral 1 g, 4 times a day) | 30 | 5) It could increase the CD3+, CD4+, CD8+ T cells levels |
| ||
| 46 cases; SLBZP (1 dose per day, decocted in water, thrice daily) and Sulfasalazine (oral 1 g, 4 times a day) | 46 cases; Sulfasalazine (oral 1 g, 4 times a day) | 56 |
| |||
| 53 cases; SLBZP (granule, 6 g each dose, thrice daily) and Sulfasalazine (oral 1 g, 4 times a day) | 53 cases; Sulfasalazine (oral 1 g, 4 times a day) | 90 |
| |||
| 57 cases; Flavored SLBZP + Tao hua decoction (1 dose per day, decocted in water, thrice daily) | 57 cases; Mesalazine (oral 1 g, 4 times a day) | 90 | Clinical efficacy | 1) The response in the treatment group is higher than control group |
| |
| 64 cases; Flavored SLBZP + Tong Xie Yao Fang (1 dose per day, decocted in water, thrice daily) | 40 cases; Compound Diphenoxylate Tablets (oral 50 mg, 3 times a day) and oryzanol (oral 20 mg, 3 times a day) | 42 |
| |||
| 20 cases; SLBZP + Shaoyao Gancao decoction (1 dose per day, decocted in water, thrice daily) | 16 cases; Sulfasalazine (oral 1 g, 3 times a day) | 28 |
| |||
| 30 cases; Sishen Pills + SLBZP (1 dose per day, decocted in water, thrice daily) + Mesalazine (oral 1 g, 4 times a day) | 30 cases; Mesalazine (oral 1 g, 4 times a day) | 56 | Clinical efficacy, inflammatory factors and intestinal flora | 1) The response in the treatment group is higher than control group ( |
| |
| 2) It could increase the numbers of bifidobacterium and | ||||||
| 32 cases; Shaoyao decoction + flavored SLBZP (1 dose per day, decocted in water, thrice daily) | 34 cases; Mesalazine (oral 1 g, 4 times a day) | 168 | Clinical efficacy and recurrence rate | 1) The total effects of two groups have no significantly difference |
| |
| 2) Recurrence rate in treatment group were lower than in control group | ||||||
| 30 cases; Flavored SLBZP + Gegenqinlian decoction (1 dose per day, decocted in water, thrice daily) | 30 cases; Sulfasalazine (oral 1 g, 3 times a day) | 90 | Clinical efficacy | 1)The response in the treatment group is higher than control group |
| |
| 55 cases; SLBZP (1 dose per day, decocted in water, thrice daily) + kangfuxin solution (Enema, 50 ml) | 55 cases; Sulfasalazine (oral 0.5g, 3 times a day) + Trimebutine Maleate (oral 0.5g, 3 times a day) +Albumin tannate tablet (oral 0.5g, 3 times a day) | 30 | Clinical efficacy | The response in the treatment group is higher than control group |
| |
| 43 cases; Flavored SLBZP (1 dose per day, decocted in water, thrice daily) + enema (100 ml, 2 times a day) | 37 cases; enema (100 ml, 2 times a day) | 42 | Clinical efficacy | 1) The response in the treatment group is higher than control group |
| |
| 59 cases; Flavored SLBZP (1 dose per day, decocted in water, thrice daily) + Mesalazine (oral 1 g, 3 times a day) + acupuncture | 59 cases; Mesalazine (oral 1 g, 3 times a day) | 84 | Clinical efficacy and inflammatory factors | 1) The response in the treatment group is higher than control group |
| |
| 47 cases; Flavored SLBZP (1 dose per day, decocted in water, thrice daily) + Mesalazine (oral 1 g, 3 times a day) + warm acupuncture | 46 cases; Mesalazine (oral 1 g, 3 times a day) | 28 | 2) it could decrease the serum 5-HT and SP, numbers of intestinal yeast, serum IL-6 and TNF-α levels and increase the levels of SS and VIP, intestinal bifidobacteriu, |
| ||
| 3) It exhibited immunomodulatory effects by regulating the levels of Th17, Treg, Th17/Treg, HMGB-1, HIF-1α, IGF-1 | ||||||
FIGURE 3Regulation of Immune functions and intestinal permeability of SLBZP in UC.
FIGURE 4Relative cell signal transduction including MAPK signaling pathway, TLR/NF-κB signaling pathway, JAK/STAT signaling pathway were regulated by SLBZP.
FIGURE 5Autophagy and endoplasmic reticulum stress were regulated by SLBZP.
FIGURE 6Effects of single Chinese herb and its active ingredients from SLBZP in treatment of UC.
FIGURE 7The structures of prototype and metabolites components of herbs in SLBZP.