| Literature DB >> 36160329 |
Zhuang Zhang1, Rubo Sui1, Dongjian Xia2.
Abstract
Introduction: In this study, we aimed to investigate the role of rs531564 and the underlying signaling pathways.Entities:
Keywords: apoptosis; miR-124; recovery; rs531564; spinal cord injury; viability
Year: 2022 PMID: 36160329 PMCID: PMC9479737 DOI: 10.5114/aoms/151683
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Med Sci ISSN: 1734-1922 Impact factor: 3.707
Demographic, clinicopathological and genotypic parameters of the participants recruited in this study (LOS, length of stay)
| Clinical features | Rs531564 genotype | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| CC | CG + GG | ||
| 380 | 148 | ||
| Sex: | 0.708 | ||
| Male | 251 | 92 | |
| Female | 129 | 56 | |
| Age [years] | 32.62 ±12.43 | 33.82 ±11.31 | 0.307 |
| Complete injury on admission | 78 (20.52%) | 33 (22.29%) | |
| Acute LOS [days] | 16.35 ±4.27 | 20.12 ±5.23 | < 0.001 |
| Rehabilitation LOS [days] | 82.28 ±14.63 | 94.23 ±16.43 | < 0.001 |
Figure 1A – BIM, SMAD5 and JAG1 as the candidate target gene of miR-124-3p in HT22 cells with the ‘seed sequence’ in the 3’UTR. B – Luciferase activity reporter assay was conducted to verify BIM as the direct target gene of miR-124. C – Luciferase activity reporter assay verified that SMAD5 was not targeted by miR-124. D – Luciferase activity reporter assay verified that JAG1 was not targeted by miR-124. E – Correlation between expression levels of miR-124 and BIM mRNA (n = 64); they showed a negative regulatory relationship
Figure 2A – Expression of miR-124 increased in CC group compared with CG + GG group. B – Expression of BIM mRNA decreased in CC group compared with CG + GG group. C – Expression of BIM protein decreased in CC group compared with CG + GG group. D – BIM protein expression level of HT22 cells treated with miR-124a mimics and BIM siRNA was apparently lower than in the scramble control, while in cells treated with miR-124 inhibitors it was apparently higher than in the scramble control. E – BIM mRNA expression level of HT22 cells treated with miR-124a mimics and BIM siRNA was apparently lower than in the scramble control, while in cells treated with miR-124 inhibitors it was apparently higher than in the scramble control. F – Cells transfected with miR-124 inhibitors showed evidently upregulated viability when compared with the scramble controls, while cells transfected with miR-124 mimics and BIM siRNA showed lower viability. G – Number of survival cells transfected with miR-124 mimics and BIM siRNA was increased and the number of apoptotic cells was decreased compared with the scramble controls, while cells transfected with miR-124 inhibitors showed more survival cells and fewer apoptotic cells