| Literature DB >> 36160226 |
Haiyang Jin1, Deqi Zhang1, Yaqian Yan2, Cheng Yang1, Baoting Fang1, Xiangdong Li1, Yunhui Shao1, Hanfang Wang1, Junqin Yue1, Yanjing Wang1, Hongjian Cheng1, Yanhua Shi1, Feng Qin1.
Abstract
Manure application is an effective way to improve the utilization efficiency of organic resources and alleviate the adverse effects of long-term application of chemical fertilizers. However, the impact of applying manure under different nitrogen rates on soil microbial community in wheat field remains unclear. Treatments with and without chicken manure application under three nitrogen rates (N 135, 180 and 225 kg⋅hm-2) were set in wheat field. Soil organic carbon, available nutrients, and abundance, diversity, structure and co-occurrence pattern of soil microbial community at wheat maturity were investigated. Compared with no manure application, chicken manure application increased the soil organic carbon and available phosphorus, while the effects on soil mineral nitrogen and available potassium varied with different nitrogen rates. Chicken manure application significantly increased soil bacterial abundance under the nitrogen fertilization of 135 and 225 kg⋅hm-2, increased soil fungal abundance under the nitrogen fertilization of 135 kg⋅hm-2, but decreased soil fungal abundance under the nitrogen fertilization of 180 and 225 kg⋅hm-2 (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in alpha diversity indices of soil microbial communities between treatments with and without chicken manure application under different nitrogen rates (P > 0.05). Chicken manure application and its interaction with nitrogen rate significantly changed soil bacterial and fungal community structures (P < 0.05). There were significantly different taxa of soil microbial communities between treatments with and without chicken manure application. Chicken manure application reduced the ecological network complexity of soil bacterial community and increased that of soil fungal community. In summary, the responses of soil available nutrients and microbial abundance to applying chicken manure varied with different nitrogen rates. One growing season application of chicken manure was sufficient to alter the soil microbial community structure, composition and co-occurrence pattern, whereas not significantly affected soil microbial community diversity.Entities:
Keywords: co-occurrence network; manure; microbial community diversity; microbial community structure; soil; winter wheat
Year: 2022 PMID: 36160226 PMCID: PMC9490364 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.975571
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 6.064
FIGURE 1Soil organic carbon and available nutrients under different nitrogen and manure treatments. M and C indicate treatments with and without chicken manure application, respectively. Error bars represent standard deviations (n = 3). Different letters above bars indicate significant difference at 0.05 level.
FIGURE 2Soil microbial abundance under different nitrogen and manure treatments. M and C indicate treatments with and without chicken manure application, respectively. Error bars represent standard deviations (n = 3). Different letters above bars indicate significant difference at 0.05 level.
Soil microbial community alpha diversity indices under different nitrogen and manure treatments.
| Treatment | Bacterial community | Fungal community | ||
|
|
| |||
| Chao1 index | Shannon index | Chao1 index | Shannon index | |
| C135 | 3451 ± 161ab | 6.60 ± 0.04a | 614 ± 54a | 4.16 ± 0.28a |
| M135 | 3296 ± 37b | 6.57 ± 0.01ab | 641 ± 92a | 3.63 ± 0.85ab |
| C180 | 3484 ± 103a | 6.52 ± 0.03b | 582 ± 51a | 3.91 ± 0.49ab |
| M180 | 3401 ± 31ab | 6.53 ± 0.04b | 606 ± 20a | 3.94 ± 0.04ab |
| C225 | 3326 ± 101ab | 6.59 ± 0.01a | 617 ± 57a | 3.96 ± 0.41ab |
| M225 | 3342 ± 111ab | 6.57 ± 0.03ab | 591 ± 78a | 3.12 ± 0.72b |
Values are means ± standard deviation (n = 3). Different letters in the same column indicate significant difference at 0.05 level. C, no manure; M, applying manure.
FIGURE 3Non-metric multidimensional scaling analysis of soil microbial communities under different nitrogen and manure treatments. M and C indicate treatments with and without chicken manure application, respectively.
Similarity analysis (ANOSIM) of soil microbial communities under different nitrogen and manure treatments.
| Characteristics | Bacterial community | Fungal community | ||
|
|
| |||
|
|
| |||
| Nitrogen rate | −0.0374 | 0.661 | −0.0033 | 0.456 |
| Manure application | 0.5175 | 0.001 | 0.6235 | 0.001 |
| Nitrogen rate × Manure application | 0.2354 | 0.024 | 0.4058 | 0.001 |
Mantel test correlations between soil microbial community structure and soil properties.
| Soil property | Bacterial community | Fungal community | ||
|
|
| |||
|
|
| |||
| Soil organic carbon | 0.0498 | 0.595 | 0.2817 | 0.011 |
| Soil mineral nitrogen | −0.0574 | 0.622 | 0.0261 | 0.801 |
| Soil available phosphorus | 0.3215 | 0.002 | 0.4817 | 0.001 |
| Soil available potassium | 0.4590 | 0.002 | 0.3418 | 0.011 |
FIGURE 4Ecological networks of soil bacterial community and fungal community under different organic manure treatments. M and C indicate treatments with and without chicken manure application, respectively. Genera are represented as nodes and correlations as edges (red: copresence, blue: mutual exclusion). The node sizes are correlated to the genus degree, and node color indicates the corresponding taxonomic assignment at phylum level.
Topological parameters of soil microbial ecological networks under different organic manure treatments.
| Topological parameter | Bacterial community | Fungal community | Total microbial community | |||
|
|
|
| ||||
| C | M | C | M | C | M | |
| Number of nodes | 160 | 161 | 70 | 74 | 236 | 237 |
| Number of edges | 967 | 710 | 186 | 356 | 1643 | 1523 |
| Number of copresence edges | 496 | 380 | 158 | 321 | 932 | 954 |
| Number of mutual exclusion edges | 471 | 330 | 28 | 35 | 711 | 569 |
| Average number of neighbors | 12.088 | 8.820 | 5.314 | 9.944 | 13.924 | 12.852 |
| Clustering coefficient | 0.388 | 0.364 | 0.380 | 0.466 | 0.369 | 0.349 |
| Network density | 0.076 | 0.055 | 0.077 | 0.142 | 0.059 | 0.054 |
C, no manure; M, applying manure.