| Literature DB >> 36159820 |
Qixia Shen1,2,3,4, Lisha Teng1,2,3,4, Yucheng Wang1,2,3,4, Luying Guo1,2,3,4, Feng Xu5, Hongfeng Huang1,2,3,4, Wenqing Xie1,2,3,4, Qin Zhou1,2,3,4, Ying Chen1,2,3,4, Junwen Wang6, Youying Mao7, Jianghua Chen1,2,3,4, Hong Jiang1,2,3,4.
Abstract
Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) has an over 30% risk of recurrence after kidney transplantation (Ktx) and is associated with an extremely high risk of graft loss. However, mechanisms remain largely unclear. Thus, this study identifies novel genes related to the recurrence of FSGS (rFSGS). Whole genome-wide sequencing and next-generation RNA sequencing were used to identify the candidate mutant genes associated with rFSGS in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from patients with biopsy-confirmed rFSGS after KTx. To confirm the functional role of the identified gene with the MDH2 c.26C >T mutation, a homozygous MDH2 c.26C >T mutation in HMy2.CIR cell line was induced by CRISPR/Cas9 and co-cultured with podocytes, mesangial cells, or HK2 cells, respectively, to detect the potential pathogenicity of the c.26C >T variant in MDH2. A total of 32 nonsynonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and 610 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) related to rFSGS were identified. DEGs are mainly enriched in the immune and metabolomic-related pathways. A variant in MDH2, c.26C >T, was found in all patients with rFSGS, which was also accompanied by lower levels of mRNA expression in PBMCs from relapsed patients compared with patients with remission after KTx. Functionally, co-cultures of HMy2.CIR cells overexpressing the mutant MDH2 significantly inhibited the expression of synaptopodin, podocin, and F-actin by podocytes compared with those co-cultured with WT HMy2.CIR cells or podocytes alone. We identified that MDH2 is a novel rFSGS susceptibility gene in patients with recurrence of FSGS after KTx. Mutation of the MDH2 c.26C >T variant may contribute to progressive podocyte injury in rFSGS patients.Entities:
Keywords: MDH2; kidney transplantation; next-generation RNA sequencing; recurrent focal segmental glomerulosclerosis; whole genome sequencing
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36159820 PMCID: PMC9495259 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.962986
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 8.786
Figure 1Representative pathology from FSGS patients before and after KTx by Periodic acid-Schiff staining. Note that focal segmental glomerular sclerosis with fibrosis is apparent in all FSGS patients before KTX and is also found in those with recurrent FSGS patients after KTx. Because KTx largely improved progressive renal injury in those FSGS patients, no renal biopsy was performed in the remission patients after KTx based on the ethical reasons. The healthy control kidneys are obtained from unmatched donor kidneys. Scale bar: 100um. KTx, kidney transplantation.
Figure 2Identification of SNPs related to recurrence of FSGS after kidney transplantation. Bar plot showing summary of different types of SNP variants mapped to exons identified in PBMCs from recurrence (n≥2) and remission (n≥2) subjects excluding those also identified in HCs. RC, recurrence; RM, remission; HC, healthy control.
Figure 3Identification of DEGs related to recurrence of FSGS after kidney transplantation.Volcano plot showing DEGs between (A) RC group and RM group; (B) RC group and HC group; (C) RM group and HC group. Each dot represents a gene. Red dots represent up-regulate genes, green dots represent down regulated genes. The numbers marked in the upper left and upper right corner represents the number of DEGs. (D) Venn diagram showing overlap of DEGs identified by pairwise comparison among the three groups. Top 20 enriched (E) Kegg terms and (F) GO terms. RC, recurrence; RM, remission; HC, healthy control.
Figure 4Crosstalk analysis among significantly enriched pathways suggested homozygous c.26C>T variant in MDH2 as a potential pathogenic mutation. (A) Pathway crosstalk among rFSGS related pathways. Triangular arrow represent SNPs, blue nodes represents pathways involving SNPs, green nodes represent pathways without SNPs involvement. Solid line represents crosstalk between each pair, Edge-width corresponds to the score of specific pathway pair. Larger edge-width indicates higher score. Dotted line represents SNPs enrichment. (B) mRNA expression level of MDH2 in remission group and recurrence group. *p <0.05.
Figure 5rs6720 leads to loss of MDH2 expression in HMy2.CIR cells and disturbed crebs cycle. (A) Western blot analysis with anti-MDH2 antibodies in rs6720 mutant and WT HMy2.CIR cells. a-tubulin was used as loading controls. (B) The scores plot of PLS-DA model of the LS-MS (positive model) spectral data between the selected PCs. Each point in the graph represents a sample. Different colors represent different groups, and different color circles represent different PCA groups. (C) Results of clustering patterns of metabolites differential expression. Red represents upregulation, blue represents downregulation. Different color bars represent different groups. (D) Metabolite ratios assessed by liquid chromatographic tandem-mass spectrometry in mutant and WT HMу2.CIR cells. Suc, succinate; Cit, citrate; Mal, malate; *p<0.05.
Figure 6HMy2.CIR cells carrying rs6720 mutation in MDH2 caused injury to podocytes. (A–C) Representative pictures and quantification of immunofluorescence staining of F-actin (green), synaptopodin (red) and DAPI (blue) in podocytes before and after WT or mutant HMy2.CIR cell exposure. (D–F) Representative pictures and quantification of immunofluorescence staining of F-actin (green) and podocin (red) in podocytes before and after WT or mutant HMy2.CIR cell exposure. Six random fields were taken from each coverslip (mean ± SD, n=6). Scale bar: 50um. Western blot and statistics for Synaptopodin (G, I) and Podocin (H, J) from podocytes before and after WT or mutant HMy2.CIR cell exposure (mean ± SD, n=9-12). #p < 0.05; ##p<0.01; ###p<0.001; NS, no significance.