| Literature DB >> 36159752 |
Xinyue Li1, Saisai Yan1, Jiajia Lu1, Yanqiu Ding1.
Abstract
Currently, the level of economic globalisation is expanding, which gives organizations more room to grow while also subjecting them to an increasing amount of pressure from the market. Companies are forced to deal with an increasing number of unclear aspects due to the unstable internal and external environments, which also increases the risks they confront. A management system for corporate financial risk is according to studies on early warning systems for financial risks. Its goals are to raise the standard of corporate financial management and boost economic advantages, identify concerns and potential hazards in the corporate financial management process, stop corporate financial crises in their tracks, and lessen the losses brought on by such crises. The financial risk management of the organization is predicted and examined in this research using the logistic regression model. The use of a logistic regression model allows for the simultaneous analysis of various risk factors, such as discrete and continuous variables, as well as the analysis of external variables' interactions and confounding. This method is suited for widespread usage in practice because it has shown exceptional outcomes in study that are 16.24% better than those of the conventional method.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36159752 PMCID: PMC9492431 DOI: 10.1155/2022/2733923
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Environ Public Health ISSN: 1687-9805
Figure 1Fund movement chart.
Figure 2Data mining structure.
Figure 3Comparison chart of production cost of the company.
Figure 4Membership function diagram.
Figure 5Change of loss function.
Change of training error.
| 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 10 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Traditional method | 0.06 | 0.19 | 0.12 | 0.17 | 0.23 | 0.04 |
| Methods in this paper | 0.03 | 0.14 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.25 |
Correlation analysis between simulation output and target output.
| 0 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 1 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Traditional method | 0.69 | 0.55 | 0.56 | 0.25 | 0.07 | 0.15 |
| Methods in this paper | 0.78 | 0.19 | 0.65 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.54 |
Training results.
| 0 | 20 | 40 | 60 | 80 | 100 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Traditional method | 0.72 | 0.95 | 0.21 | 0.04 | 0.69 | 0.46 |
| Methods in this paper | 0.90 | 0.46 | 0.28 | 0.67 | 0.31 | 0.38 |
Figure 6Change of training error.
Figure 7Correlation analysis between simulation output and target output.
Figure 8Training results.