| Literature DB >> 36159672 |
Gang Wu1, Xiaodan Hui1, Linhui Hu1,2, Yunpeng Bai1,2, Abdul Rahaman3, Xing-Fen Yang4, Chunbo Chen1,5,6,7.
Abstract
With the advancement in the field of nanotechnology, different approaches for the synthesis of nanomaterials have been formulated, among which the bioinspired or biomimetic nanoplatforms have been utilized for different biomedical applications. In this context, bioinspired or biomimetic nanoparticles (NPs) have been synthesized in which the inspiration for synthesis is taken from nature or its components. Innovations in bioengineering tools and bio-conjugation chemistry have enabled scientists to develop novel types of such nanoplatforms. They have several advantages over normal synthesis protocols. In this review, we 1) summarized nanomaterial types and their advancements in bioinspired nanotechnology therapies; 2) discussed the major types, novel preparation methods, and synthesis progress of NPs in current biomedical fields; 3) gave a brief account of the need for synthesizing NPs via a bioinspired route rather than their common route; 4) highlighted the updated information on the biomimetic synthesis of different types of NPs; and 5) provided future perspectives in the synthesis of novel NPs for their potential applications in biomedical sciences.Entities:
Keywords: bioinspired nanoparticles; biomimetic nanoparticles; camouflage nanoparticles; natural nanoparticles; quantum dots
Year: 2022 PMID: 36159672 PMCID: PMC9494199 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.952523
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol ISSN: 2296-4185
FIGURE 1Illustrates different plasma membrane coatings on different nanoparticles for cancer immunotherapy. The plasma membranes of different types of cells like RBC, WBC, and cancer cells were extruded and coated with different types of nanoparticles (liposomes, dendrimers, carbon dots, polymeric nanoparticles, metallic nanoparticles, etc.) to form biomimetic nanoparticles which evoke immune responses (T cells, B cells, dendritic cells) to participate in the process of cancer immunotherapy.
FIGURE 2Illustrates different plasma membrane coating on different nanoparticles for cancer immunotherapy.
Summarizes the nanoparticles formed by bioinspired technology discussed in the review article.
| Type of nanoparticle | Name of nanoparticle | Synthesis protocol | Application | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Silver nanoparticle | Bioinspired AgNPs |
| Good killing effect against gram-positive and gram-negative strains of |
|
| Gold nanoparticle | AuNPs coated with reduced graphene oxide. |
| Enhanced antibacterial and anticancerous activity on |
|
| Iron oxide nanoparticle | SPION-loaded silica nanocapsules | SPION-loaded silica nanocapsules based on a bimodal catalytic peptide surfactant stabilized nanoemulsion template method | Encapsulating iron oxide into silica nanocapsules simply signifies the drug delivery ability. |
|
| Poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) nanoparticles | Polymeric nanoparticles coated with programmed cancer cell membrane (BiNPs) | Stimulated cancer cells for over-expression of integrin expression on the outermost surface of cells and then coated polymeric nanoparticles membranes. | Enhanced circulation time, escape from immune system, and improved biocompatibility |
|
| Alginate NPs | Bioinspired alginate NPs | Microbubble-bursting method | Improvement in size and dispersity of formed NPs |
|
| Nanovesicle | PSMA-targeted “Hybrid” nanoparticles | Hybrid nanoparticles in which they loaded PSA cleavable prodrug doxorubicin (DOX-PSA). | Increased specificity, decreased tumor growth in |
|
| Nanovesicle | Polymeric nanovesicle (TPZ/AI-NV) | Used diblock copolymers for the synthesis of nanovesicle: one was chlorine e6 (Ce6)–modified PEG-polyserine, another one was PEG-poly (Ser-S-NI | Precise drug delivery and finally synergistic therapeutic effect was observed |
|
| Nanovesicle | Biomimetic nanovesicle coated by PD-1 receptors | First, they transfected HEK 293 T cells with plasmid to express PD-1 on the surface of cell membrane and secondly they synthesized nanovesicles by dialysis method using repeated extrusion process | Nanovesicles accumulate near the tumor regions and retard the tumor growth through the filtration of CD8+ T cells. |
|
| Exosomes | Melanoma (cancer of skin)-derived exosomes | Loaded with immunomodulatory CpG DNA displayed | Better in eradicating tumor than either exosomes or DNA alone |
|
| Exosomes | Withaferin A (WFA)–loaded exosomes targeted by conjugated it with folic acid | Bioinspired exosomes derived from bovine milk | Enhanced antitumor effect (74%) when compared to non-targeted exosomes (50%) |
|
| Lipoproteins | Bioinspired lipoprotein particle bLP | Loaded both a photothermal agent (DiOC18 ( | D-bLP remodeled the tumor stromal microenvironment (TSM) and M-bLP killed the tumor cells and inhibited tumor relapse and metastasis |
|
| Nanovehicle based particle | Bioinspired tumor-responsive theranostic nanovehicle (BTV) | A theranostic probe of photochlor (HPPH), a tumor-activated melittin pro-peptide (TM), and a ROS-responsive prodrug gemcitabine (RG) was loaded into a lipoprotein-based bioinspired nanovehicle | Drastic elimination of multiple immunosuppressive cells and enhanced infiltration of cytotoxic lymphocytes in tumor |
|
| Chitosan or calcium phosphate–based Nanoparticles | VitB12 was conjugated on chitosan or calcium phosphate–based NPs | Ionic gelation method | Oral absorption of insulin was highly enhanced |
|
| Polycaprolactone nanoparticles | Polyhydroxybutyrate/poly-3-caprolactone (PHB/PCL) mats | Process of electrospinning | Significant antimicrobial activity toward both the strains of bacteria (gram-positive/gram-negative), very good water holding capacity, hydrophilicity, and |
|
| Quantum dots | Fluorescent C-quantum dots | By the process known as hydrothermal approach using | Enhanced |
|
FIGURE 3Illustrates D-bLP-mediates photothermal remodelling of tumor stroma which increases the accessibility of second wave of nanoparticles M-bLP near cancer cells.