| Literature DB >> 36159501 |
Yongzhu Zhang1, Ruicheng Wei1, Fidelis Azi2, Linshu Jiao1, Heye Wang1, Tao He1, Xianjin Liu1, Ran Wang1, Baiyi Lu1,3.
Abstract
Fermented soybean products are favorite foods worldwide because of their nutritional value and health effects. In this study, solid-state fermentation (SSF) of soybeans with Rhizopus oligosporus RT-3 was performed to investigate its nutraceutical potential. A rich enzyme system was released during SSF. Proteins were effectively transformed into small peptides and amino acids. The small peptide content increased by 13.64 times after SSF for 60 h. The antioxidant activity of soybeans was enhanced due to the release of phenolic compounds. The soluble phenolic content increased from 2.55 to 9.28 gallic acid equivalent (GAE) mg/g after SSF for 60 h and exhibited high correlations with microbial enzyme activities during SSF. The potential metabolic pathways being triggered during SSF indicated that the improved nutritional composition of soybean attributed to the biochemical reactions catalyzed by microbial enzymes. These findings demonstrated that SSF could evidently improve the nutritional value and prebiotic potential of soybeans.Entities:
Keywords: antioxidant activity; enzyme; metabolic pathway; nutraceutical potential; small peptide; soluble phenolic
Year: 2022 PMID: 36159501 PMCID: PMC9493129 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.972860
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Nutr ISSN: 2296-861X
FIGURE 1Changes of microbial enzyme activities and microstructure observation during SSF. (A) a, α-amylase; b, endoglucanase; c, exoglucanase; d, β-glucosidase; e, esterase; f, protease. (B) Microstructure. p < 0.05 was considered as the significant level. The small letters were used to show the significant difference between samples at different fermentation time.
FIGURE 2The content of soluble proteins and small peptides in soybeans during the SSF. (A) Soluble proteins; (B) small peptides. p < 0.05 was considered as the significant level. The small letters were used to show the significant difference between samples at different fermentation time.
Contents of the phenolic compounds in soybeans during SSF.
| Phenolic components (ug/g) | Fermentation time (h) | ||||||
| 0 | 12 | 24 | 36 | 48 | 60 | ||
| Vanillic acid | SP | 5.50 ± 0.37De | 6.81 ± 0.49Df | 25.26 ± 1.21Cef | 131.29 ± 8.99Ad | 34.03 ± 1.55Bf | 27.98 ± 1.84BCf |
| IP | 20.41 ± 1.05Cd | 22.83 ± 1.23Cd | 33.51 ± 3.81Ad | 27.07 ± 1.98Bc | 22.59 ± 1.48Ce | 16.09 ± 1.73De | |
| Syringic acid | SP | 17.65 ± 1.51Ae | 17.17 ± 1.09Aef | 14.26 ± 1.12Bf | 9.80 ± 0.81Ch | 4.44 ± 0.47Dg | N.D. |
| IP | 83.60 ± 5.36Cb | 89.62 ± 6.81BCb | 128.32 ± 12.26Ab | 101.29 ± 7.31Bb | 94.25 ± 10.33BCb | 79.56 ± 5.27Ca | |
| Epicatechin | SP | 14.50 ± 0.81Ce | 18.06 ± 1.46Bef | 18.26 ± 1.56Bf | 20.52 ± 2.71ABh | 21.02 ± 1.74ABfg | 23.03 ± 2.51Afg |
| IP | 12.06 ± 1.02Ce | 13.19 ± 0.84BCde | 22.17 ± 1.77Be | 25.51 ± 1.78Bc | 32.69 ± 2.84Ad | 32.97 ± 2.83Ac | |
| Daidzin | SP | 263.87 ± 32.10Ab | 256.53 ± 7.95Ab | 246.07 ± 18.79Ab | 104.51 ± 8.14Be | 94.92 ± 7.66Bd | 77.37 ± 9.61Be |
| IP | 4.31 ± 0.25CDf | 4.81 ± 0.36Cef | 14.03 ± 0.61Aef | 6.00 ± 0.63Bd | 4.57 ± 0.46Cfg | 3.64 ± 0.25Dfg | |
| Glycitin | SP | 87.76 ± 5.56Ac | 86.30 ± 10.08ABc | 74.73 ± 6.66BCd | 73.30 ± 6.86Cf | 69.41 ± 4.94CDe | 58.70 ± 4.39De |
| IP | 0.78 ± 0.04Df | 0.80 ± 0.03Df | 1.06 ± 0.14Cg | 1.54 ± 0.17Bd | 2.77 ± 0.21Afg | 2.99 ± 0.15Ag | |
| Ferulic acid | SP | 50.93 ± 3.48Bd | 61.53 ± 4.78Ad | 54.07 ± 6.22Bde | 26.31 ± 3.00Ch | 14.11 ± 0.97Dfg | N.D. |
| IP | 124.95 ± 11.57Ba | 136.55 ± 18.46Ba | 206.69 ± 15.42Aa | 219.44 ± 18.40Aa | 119.66 ± 10.59Ba | 64.90 ± 4.79Cb | |
| Genistin | SP | 675.23 ± 31.31Aa | 670.90 ± 36.47Aa | 626.13 ± 51.48Aa | 446.19 ± 29.36Ba | 350.14 ± 30.46Ca | 345.07 ± 25.51Cb |
| IP | 50.01 ± 3.09Dc | 52.16 ± 4.37Dc | 84.08 ± 7.47Bc | 110.57 ± 8.21Ab | 62.26 ± 5.22Cc | 23.98 ± 2.57Ed | |
| Daidzein | SP | 78.74 ± 4.38Ec | 78.19 ± 6.99Ecd | 134.48 ± 12.98Dc | 201.87 ± 16.18Cb | 262.27 ± 11.87Bb | 370.77 ± 24.58Aa |
| IP | 1.28 ± 0.09Af | 1.01 ± 0.12Bf | 0.93 ± 0.07BCg | 0.91 ± 0.11BCd | 0.76 ± 0.03Cg | N.D. | |
| Glycitein | SP | 30.41 ± 2.19Cde | 33.61 ± 1.96Ce | 33.46 ± 2.26Cef | 49.11 ± 6.19Bg | 58.71 ± 5.92Be | 120.80 ± 10.07Ad |
| IP | 1.00 ± 0.05Bf | 1.06 ± 0.03Bf | 1.42 ± 0.07Ag | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. | |
| Quercetin | SP | 11.90 ± 0.76Ae | 11.69 ± 0.52Aef | 12.16 ± 0.91Af | 11.47 ± 1.01Ah | 11.69 ± 0.93Afg | 11.87 ± 0.75Afg |
| IP | 2.07 ± 0.26Bf | 2.44 ± 0.19Bef | 3.12 ± 0.20Afg | 2.39 ± 0.25Bd | 2.26 ± 0.17Bfg | 2.32 ± 0.19Bg | |
| Genistein | SP | 82.26 ± 4.97Ec | 98.13 ± 8.22DEc | 121.47 ± 13.15Dc | 160.08 ± 10.47Cc | 207.78 ± 30.61Bc | 252.80 ± 19.03Ac |
| IP | 1.33 ± 0.10Ef | 1.69 ± 0.19Ef | 4.32 ± 0.47Dfg | 5.20 ± 0.22Cd | 10.93 ± 0.61Af | 7.75 ± 0.81Bf | |
p < 0.05 was considered as the significant level. The capital letters were used to show the significant difference between different samples for the same component. The small letters indicated the significant difference between the different components within the same sample. N.D., not detected.
FIGURE 3The antioxidant activities of soybeans during SSF. (A) Reducing power; (B) DPPH radical scavenging activity; (C) ferric reducing antioxidant power; (D) ABTS cation radical scavenging ability. p < 0.05 was considered as the significant level. The small letters were used to show the significant difference between samples at different fermentation time for IP. The capital letters indicated the significant difference between samples at different fermentation time for SP. SP, soluble phenolics; IP, insoluble phenolics.
Metabolites detected by GC-MS analysis in US and FS.
| Metabolites | Area % of each sample | Metabolites | Area % of each sample | ||
| US | FS | US | FS | ||
|
| Octanoic acid | 12.19 ± 5.45a | 0.16 ± 0.15b | ||
| Glucose | 8.38 ± 5.67a | 0.12 ± 0.07b | Oleic acid | 0.43 ± 0.23a | 0.05 ± 0.02b |
| Galactopyranose | 0.90 ± 0.33a | 1.06 ± 0.71a | 9-Octadecenoic acid | 0.53 ± 0.61a | 1.10 ± 0.90a |
| Galactopyranoside | 14.81 ± 6.64a | 0.54 ± 0.23b | 9,12-Octadecadienoic acid | 3.27 ± 0.67b | 51.82 ± 3.04a |
| Glucopyranoside | 1.074 ± 1.509a | 0.26 ± 0.22a | Total fatty acids | 27.38 ± 8.16b | 64.76 ± 10.19a |
| Lactose | 16.73 ± 8.51 | N.D. |
| ||
| Maltose | 1.47 ± 0.95 | N.D. | Glycine | N.D. | 0.26 ± 0.09 |
| Mannose | 0.86 ± 0.68a | 0.01 ± 0.00b | Homoserine | N.D. | 0.39 ± 0.27 |
| Total carbohydrates | 44.21 ± 5.57a | 1.99 ± 1.18b | Lysine | 0.50 ± 0.34a | 0.48 ± 0.32a |
|
| Proline | N.D. | 0.38 ± 0.36 | ||
| D-pinitol | 7.03 ± 7.03 | N.D. | Threonine | N.D. | 0.10 ± 0.04 |
| Ethanol | N.D. | 0.45 ± 0.17 | Total amino acids | 0.50 ± 0.34b | 1.60 ± 0.66a |
| Glycerol | 2.38 ± 1.16b | 6.48 ± 2.07a |
| ||
| Maltol | N.D. | 0.24 ± 0.07 | Acetic acid | N.D. | 4.18 ± 1.35 |
| Mannitol | 0.12 ± 0.03a | 0.07 ± 0.01b | Benzoic acid | 0.62 ± 0.37 | N.D. |
| 1,2-Propanediol | N.D. | 0.32 ± 0.20 | Butanoic acid | 1.46 ± 0.75b | 3.46 ± 0.15a |
| 2,3-Butanediol | 7.53 ± 5.78a | 10.75 ± 5.77a | Carboxylic acid | 1.65 ± 1.12a | 0.89 ± 0.25a |
| Total alcohols | 17.05 ± 7.87a | 18.30 ± 7.85a | Gluconic acid | 0.11 ± 0.05a | 0.02 ± 0.00b |
|
| Propanoic acid | 0.11 ± 0.05b | 2.65 ± 0.29a | ||
| Docosahexaenoic acid | 0.55 ± 0.33a | 0.65 ± 0.23a | Total organic acids | 3.95 ± 0.67b | 11.20 ± 1.51a |
| Dodecanoic acid | 0.64 ± 0.27a | 0.04 ± 0.01b |
| ||
| Hexadecanoic acid | 6.38 ± 2.32a | 8.04 ± 7.23a | Stigmasterol | 1.96 ± 1.11a | 0.44 ± 0.09b |
| Linolenic acid | 0.07 ± 0.02a | 0.09 ± 0.03a | Sitosterol | 4.94 ± 2.31a | 1.22 ± 0.15b |
| Octadecatrienoic acid | 3.23 ± 2.81a | 0.44 ± 0.15a | Urea | N.D. | 0.50 ± 0.43 |
| Octadecanoic acid | 0.11 ± 0.05b | 2.36 ± 0.84a | |||
p < 0.05 was considered as the significant level. The small letters indicated the significant difference for the same component between US and FS. N.D., not detected.
FIGURE 4The analysis of metabolite profiles in US and FS and the potential metabolic pathways involved during SSF. (A) PCA biplot; (B) heatmap dendrogram; (C) metabolic pathways involved during SSF. Upregulated metabolites: red color; Downregulated metabolites, green color; Undetected metabolites, black color. US, unfermented soybean; FS, fermented soybean.