Literature DB >> 36159438

Congenital ovarian anomaly manifesting as extra tissue connection between the two ovaries: A case report.

Myeong Gyun Choi1, Jong Woon Kim2, Yoon Ha Kim1, A Mi Kim1, Tae Young Kim1, Hyun Kyung Ryu1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ovarian anomalies except for uni- or bilateral streak gonads are rare. We present a rare case of an ovarian anomaly in which both ovaries were connected by extra tissue. CASE
SUMMARY: A 32-year-old, primipara with a twin pregnancy at 36 weeks of gestation was admitted to the hospital with severe preeclampsia. She underwent emergency cesarean section owing to persistent headache, blurred vision, and general edema. Following a peritoneal incision, a thin rectangular-shaped tissue was seen in front of the uterus. After delivery, the extra tissue was removed; no other anomalies were reported in either the ovaries or uterus. Pathology results of the removed tissue disclosed a well-vascularized loose stromal tissue with few follicles and scattered luteinized cells. In this case, to prevent pelvic adhesion or intestinal obstruction resulting from volvulus, strangulation, and torsion, the extra tissue was removed.
CONCLUSION: We report a case of a rare ovarian anomaly where both ovaries were connected by extra tissue. If the extra tissue extends to the abdominal cavity, it should be removed to prevent pelvic adhesion or abdominal complications including intestinal volvulus, strangulation, and torsion. ©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Case report; Connected ovaries; Extra tissue; Ovarian anomaly

Year:  2022        PMID: 36159438      PMCID: PMC9477659          DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i26.9318

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Clin Cases        ISSN: 2307-8960            Impact factor:   1.534


Core Tip: Herein we present the case of a rare ovarian anomaly where both ovaries were connected by extra tissue. If the extra tissue extends to the abdominal cavity, it should be removed to prevent pelvic adhesion or abdominal complications including intestinal volvulus, strangulation, and torsion.

INTRODUCTION

Several ovarian anomalies have been reported. Among them is ovarian absence; in phenotypic females, the absence of both ovaries is generally linked to chromosome abnormalities and gonadal dysgenesis syndrome. In this case, individuals are likely to have streak gonads or underdeveloped gonads, which are a risk factor for malignancy[1]. Congenital unilateral ovarian agenesis in a normal female is extremely rare and asymptomatic in most cases. Ipsilateral renal or ureteric agenesis and/or ipsilateral malformation of the fallopian tube may be accompanied by congenital unilateral ovarian agenesis. The etiology of unilateral ovarian agenesis has yet to be explained. The two most likely causes of unilateral ovarian agenesis are an asymptomatic torsion of the ovary with consequent organ ischemia and reabsorption or a defect in the development of the Mullerian and gonadal structures underlying vascular anomalies[2]. Another example of ovarian anomalies is ectopic ovaries; whether accessory or supernumerary, ectopic ovaries are also extremely rare, 1 in 29000 to 1 in 70000 gynecologic admissions[3], and may be associated with other congenital genitourinary abnormalities[1]. An accessory ovary contains ovarian tissue and is usually connected to a normal ovary. In contrast, supernumerary ovaries are not attached to the ovary but may be found at various sites in or outside the pelvis. In this report, we present a rare case of an unreported anomaly in which both ovaries were connected by extra tissue.

CASE PRESENTATION

Chief complaints

A 32-year-old female presented with high blood pressure.

History of present illness

The primipara woman with a twin pregnancy at 36 weeks of gestation was admitted to the hospital with high blood pressure and proteinuria. Her blood pressure was 160/100 mmHg, while laboratory test results showed 3+ proteinuria. The pregnancy followed a successful in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer.

History of past illness

The patient had no history of past illness.

Personal and family history

The patient had no specific history of genetic diseases.

Physical examination

She underwent emergency caesarean section owing to persistent headache, blurred vision, and general edema. Following a peritoneal incision, a thin rectangular-shaped tissue was seen in front of the uterus (Figure 1); it formed a connection between the two ovaries (Figure 2). We displaced this tissue, incised the uterus, and delivered the fetuses.
Figure 1

Thin rectangular-shaped tissue in front of the uterus (arrow).

Figure 2

The tissue connected to both ovaries at the posterior view of the uterus after a cesarean section.

Thin rectangular-shaped tissue in front of the uterus (arrow). The tissue connected to both ovaries at the posterior view of the uterus after a cesarean section.

Laboratory examinations

There were no specific findings related to laboratory examinations.

Imaging examinations

There was no specific findings observed on imaging examinations.

FINAL DIAGNOSIS

Congenital ovarian anomaly manifesting as an extra tissue connection between the two ovaries.

TREATMENT

After delivery, we set the margins of both ovaries to avoid injuring the normal ovaries. First, both ends of the extra tissue were ligated and excised. Then the extra tissue was removed; no other abnormal findings were observed in both the ovaries and uterus. We explored the lower abdomen as much as possible to check for extra ovary tissues and any other malformations such as renal anomalies, but there were no specific findings. Pathology results of the removed tissue disclosed a well-vascularized loose stromal tissue with few follicles and scattered luteinized cells (Figure 3).
Figure 3

Well-vascularized loose stromal tissue with few follicles and scattered luteinized cells (x100).

Well-vascularized loose stromal tissue with few follicles and scattered luteinized cells (x100).

OUTCOME AND FOLLOW-UP

After surgery, the patient recovered and was discharged on the third postoperative day. During an outpatient follow-up after one month, the patient had no abdominal symptoms and ultrasonography revealed no abnormal findings on both adnexa.

DISCUSSION

Several studies have reported numerous cases of ovarian anomalies including bilateral and unilateral ovary absence, accessory, and supernumerary ovary. However, there are no reports on cases of connected ovaries, and to the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report. Our patient was admitted to the hospital with severe preeclampsia. She did not present other symptoms such as abdominal pain or pelvic pain and the pregnancy followed a successful in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. She underwent an emergency caesarean section owing to severe headache, blurred vision, and general edema. A tissue connection between both ovaries was discovered by chance. In vitro fertilization is associated with several complications including ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (characterized by swollen and painful ovaries), which results from the use of injectable fertility drugs, such as human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG)[4]. However, there seems to be no association between connected ovaries and ovulation induction complications. The extra tissue attached to an ovary may be asymptomatic and is not associated with infertility. In most cases, it may be left untreated with observation. However, as in the present case, if both ovaries are connected and a rectangular-shaped tissue lies in the abdominal cavity, this extra tissue can cause pelvic adhesion or intestinal volvulus, strangulation, and torsion resulting in intestinal obstruction[5]. Therefore, the extra tissue should be removed.

CONCLUSION

Herein we report the case of a rare ovarian anomaly where both ovaries were connected by extra tissue. In this case, to prevent pelvic adhesion or intestinal obstruction resulting from volvulus, strangulation, and torsion, the extra tissue was removed.
  3 in total

1.  Intestinal obstruction from adhesions--how big is the problem?

Authors:  D Menzies; H Ellis
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Unilateral ovarian agenesis and fallopian tube maldescent.

Authors:  A Dueck; D Poenaru; M A Jamieson; I K Kamal
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 3.  Incidental finding of an accessory ovary in a 16-year-old at laparoscopy. A case report.

Authors:  L L Vendeland; L Shehadeh
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 0.142

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.