| Literature DB >> 36159328 |
Seyhan Taskin1, Taskin Celik1, Seniz Demiryurek2, Sibel Turedi3, Abdullah Taskin4.
Abstract
Objectives: Dietary supplementation combined with exercise may potentiate the beneficial effects of exercise by reducing exercise-induced oxidative stress and improving mitochondrial quality and capacity. In this study, the effects of creatine monohydrate (CrM) supplementation with low and high-intensity exercise on mitochondrial biogenesis regulators, Nrf2 anti-oxidant signaling pathway and muscle damage levels were investigated. Materials andEntities:
Keywords: Creatine; Exercise; Mitochondrial biogenesis; Nrf2; Oxidative stress
Year: 2022 PMID: 36159328 PMCID: PMC9464337 DOI: 10.22038/IJBMS.2022.65047.14321
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Basic Med Sci ISSN: 2008-3866 Impact factor: 2.532
Effect of creatine supplementation and exercise on mitochondrial biogenesis markers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 147.3±18.5*, † | 181.2±20.2‡, § | 169.3±38.6 ||, ¶ | 361.3±89.6Δ,Σ | 166.5±24.8Ω | 267.6±51.0 | ˂0.001 |
|
| 910.8±158.7 | 894.6±512.0 | 791.1±298.6 | 858.5±305.9 | 1180.3±290.3 | 1190.1±628.2 | 0.288 |
|
| 2.84±0.2† | 2,72±0.2‡,§ | 3.07±0.4# | 3.38±0.4Δ | 2.38±0.2Ω | 3.58±0.5 | ˂0.001 |
|
| 424.3±119.0 | 398.0±112.9 | 378.1±77.7¶ | 515.0±134.3 | 536.9±176.6 | 579.2±158.2 | 0.037 |
Mean ± standard deviation. There is a statistical difference between the following groups (P˂0.05); *: C vs LIE+CrM, †: C vs HIE+CrM, ‡: C+CrM vs LIE+CrM, §: C+CrM vs HIE+CrM, ||: LIE vs LIE+CrM, ¶: LIE vs HIE+CrM, #: LIE vs HIE, Δ: LIE+CrM vs HIE, Σ: LIE+CrM vs HIE+CrM, Ω: HIE vs HIE+CrM. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1 alpha (PGC-1α), Nuclear respiration factor-1 (NRF-1), Nuclear respiration factor-2 (NRF-2), Mitochondrial transcription factor A (TFAM)
C: Control, C+Crm: Control+Creatine monohydrate, LIE: Low Intensity Exercise, LIE+CrM: Low Intensity Exercise+Creatine monohydrate, HIE: High Intensity Exercise, HIE+CrM: High Intensity Exercise+Creatine monohydrate
Figure 1Protein expression of Nrf2 (A) and HO-1 (B) in muscle tissue was examined with western blotting. Protein level of Nrf2 and HO-1 normalized to β-actin. Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation of three independent experiments, n=7 per group
Oxidative stress parameters after eight weeks of exercise training with creatine monohydrate supplementation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.87 ± 0.27 *, † | 0.89 ± 0.24 ‡, § | 1.07 ± 0.32 | 1.40 ± 0.20 Δ | 0.93 ± 0.24 | 1.32 ± 0.23 | 0.001 |
|
| 23.17 ± 5.65 | 25.65 ± 7.20 | 27.13 ± 10.30 | 17.98 ± 5.95 | 28.48 ± 6.79 Ω | 16.04 ± 4.43 | 0.009 |
|
| 2.72 ± 0.63 *, † | 2.90 ± 0.63 ‡, § | 2.58 ± 0.87 ||, ¶ | 1.32 ± 0.54 Δ | 3.20 ± 0.96 Ω | 1.26 ± 0.48 | ˂0.001 |
Mean ± standard deviation. There is a statistical difference between the following groups (P˂0.05); *: C vs LIE+CrM, †: C vs HIE+CrM, ‡: C+CrM vs LIE+CrM, §: C+CrM vs HIE+CrM, ||: LIE vs LIE+CrM, ¶: LIE vs HIE+CrM, Δ: LIE+CrM vs HIE, Ω: HIE vs HIE+CrM
C: Control, C+Crm: Control+Creatine monohydrate, LIE: Low Intensity Exercise, LIE+CrM: Low Intensity Exercise+Creatine monohydrate, HIE: High Intensity Exercise, HIE+CrM: High Intensity Exercise+Creatine monohydrate
Figure 2Total anti-oxidant status level (A) and total oxidant status level (B) of experimental groups. Mean ± standard deviation. There is a statistical difference between the following groups (P˂0.05); *: C vs LIE+CrM, †: C vs HIE+CrM, ‡: C+CrM vs LIE+CrM, §: C+CrM vs HIE+CrM, Δ: LIE+CrM vs HIE, Ω: HIE vs HIE+CrM
Figure 3Photomicrography of transverse and longitudinal sections taken from m.soleus. (H&E, 20X, 40X)
Figure 4Photomicrography of longitudinal sections taken from m.soleus. (Masson Trichrome staining, 20X, 40X). C: Control; C+CrM: Control+CrM; LIE: Low Intensity Exercise; LIE+CrM: Low Intensity Exercise+CrM; HIE: High Intensity Exercise; HIE+CrM: High Intensity Exercise+CrM. Myofibril bundle (arrowhead), intramuscular connective tissue increase (down arrow)