| Literature DB >> 36159301 |
Jinpeng Xu1, Guomei Tian2, Ting Zhang1, Hongyu Zhang1, Jian Liu1, Qi Shi1, Jiale Sun3, Haixin Wang1, Bokai Zhang1, Qunhong Wu1, Zheng Kang1.
Abstract
Background: Obesity among the elderly imposes a significant health and economic burden. The purpose of this study was to measure the obesity prevalence and income-related inequality among older adults in China and to explore the determinants of the inequity.Entities:
Keywords: Chinese elderly; concentration index; decomposition analysis; income-related inequality; obesity
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36159301 PMCID: PMC9500363 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.918630
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Public Health ISSN: 2296-2565
Descriptive statistics for variables (N = 4541).
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||
|
| |||
| 60–69 years | 2994 (65.93) | 2751 (91.88) | 243 (8.12) |
| 70–79 years | 1271 (27.99) | 1174 (92.37) | 97 (7.63) |
| 80 years and older | 276 (6.08) | 253 (91.67) | 23 (8.33) |
|
| |||
| Male | 2370 (52.19) | 2212 (93.33) | 158 (6.67) |
| Female | 2171 (47.81) | 1966 (90.56) | 205 (9.44) |
|
| |||
| Married | 3750 (82.58) | 3452 (92.05) | 298 (7.95) |
| Single | 791 (17.42) | 726 (91.78) | 65 (8.22) |
|
| |||
| Primary school or below | 3167 (69.74) | 2912 (91.95) | 255 (8.05) |
| Junior high school | 846 (18.63) | 782 (92.43) | 64 (7.57) |
| High/secondary school | 414 (9.12) | 376 (90.82) | 38 (9.18) |
| College or above | 114 (2.51) | 108 (94.74) | 6 (5.26) |
|
| |||
| Urban | 2219 (48.87) | 2016 (90.85) | 203 (9.15) |
| Rural | 2322 (51.13) | 2162 (93.11) | 160 (6.89) |
|
| |||
| Northeast China | 481 (10.59) | 442 (91.89) | 39 (8.11) |
| East China | 1589 (34.99) | 1438 (90.50) | 151 (9.50) |
| Central China | 1285 (28.30) | 1173 (91.28) | 112 (8.72) |
| West China | 1186 (26.12) | 1125 (94.86) | 61 (5.14) |
|
| |||
| Yes | 2341 (51.55) | 2170 (92.70) | 171 (7.30) |
| No | 2200 (48.45) | 2008 (91.27) | 192 (8.73) |
|
| |||
| Poorest | 934 (20.57) | 872 (93.36) | 62 (6.64) |
| 2nd | 941 (20.72) | 866 (92.03) | 75 (7.97) |
| Middle | 972 (21.40) | 897 (92.28) | 75 (7.72) |
| 4th | 910 (20.04) | 835 (91.76) | 75 (8.24) |
| Highest | 784 (17.26) | 708 (90.31) | 76 (9.69) |
|
| |||
| Yes | 4265 (93.92) | 3920 (91.91) | 345 (8.09) |
| No | 276 (6.08) | 258 (93.48) | 18 (6.52) |
|
| |||
| Yes | 3024 (66.59) | 2772 (91.67) | 252 (8.33) |
| No | 1517 (33.41) | 1406 (92.68) | 111 (7.32) |
|
| |||
| Yes | 1320 (29.07) | 1247 (94.47) | 73 (5.53) |
| No | 3221 (70.93) | 2931 (91.00) | 290 (9.00) |
|
| |||
| Yes | 870 (19.16) | 812 (93.33) | 58 (6.67) |
| No | 3671 (80.84) | 3366 (91.69) | 305 (8.31) |
|
| |||
| None | 2098 (46.20) | 1945 (92.71) | 153 (7.29) |
| 1~3 times per week | 333 (7.33) | 312 (93.69) | 21 (6.31) |
| 4 or more times per week | 2110 (46.47) | 1921 (91.04) | 189 (8.96) |
| Openness, Mean (SD) | 3.96 (0.65) | 3.96 (0.65) | 3.96 (0.72) |
| Conscientiousness, Mean (SD) | 3.45 (0.72) | 3.44 (0.72) | 3.60 (0.77) |
| Extraversion, Mean (SD) | 3.90 (0.62) | 3.89 (0.62) | 3.90 (0.63) |
| Agreeableness, Mean (SD) | 3.05 (0.92) | 3.05 (0.92) | 3.04 (0.95) |
| Neuroticism, Mean (SD) | 2.92 (0.78) | 2.92 (0.78) | 2.90 (0.77) |
|
| |||
| High | 3598 (79.23) | 3297 (91.63) | 301 (8.37) |
| Low | 943 (20.77) | 881 (93.43) | 62 (6.57) |
Figure 1Distribution of BMI of the elderly in China, 2018 (N = 4541).
Figure 2Concentration curve of obesity among the elderly in China. The black line, running from the lower-left corner to the upper-right corner, is the equality line. The orange line below the equality line represents the concentration curve.
Decomposition of concentration index in obesity among the elderly in China.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| 60–69 years | −0.002 | −0.014 | 0.020 | 0.000 | −0.402 |
| 70–79 years | −0.008 | −0.030 | −0.059 | 0.002 | 2.515 |
| 80 years and older | Ref | ||||
|
| |||||
| Male | −0.014 | −0.088 | 0.002 | 0.000 | −0.243 |
| Female | Ref | ||||
|
| |||||
| Married | 0.002 | 0.023 | 0.007 | 0.000 | 0.244 |
| Single | Ref | ||||
| Subtotal demographic factors | 0.001 | 2.114 | |||
|
| |||||
| Primary school or below | 0.054* | 0.467 | −0.110 | −0.051 | −73.886 |
| Junior high school | 0.044 | 0.104 | 0.153 | 0.016 | 22.815 |
| High/secondary school | 0.056* | 0.063 | 0.334 | 0.021 | 30.542 |
| College or above | Ref | ||||
|
| |||||
| Urban | 0.017* | 0.104 | 0.228 | 0.024 | 34.262 |
| Rural | Ref | ||||
|
| |||||
| Northeast China | 0.033** | 0.043 | 0.243 | 0.011 | 15.183 |
| East China | 0.046*** | 0.203 | 0.044 | 0.009 | 12.830 |
| Central China | 0.042*** | 0.150 | −0.075 | −0.011 | −16.295 |
| West China | Ref | ||||
|
| |||||
| Yes | −0.002 | −0.011 | −0.136 | 0.001 | 2.134 |
| No | Ref | ||||
|
| |||||
| Poorest | −0.018 | −0.045 | −0.794 | 0.036 | 51.845 |
| 2nd | −0.004 | −0.011 | −0.381 | 0.004 | 5.949 |
| Middle | −0.011 | −0.029 | 0.040 | −0.001 | −1.638 |
| 4th | −0.008 | −0.020 | 0.454 | −0.009 | −13.153 |
| Highest | Ref | ||||
|
| |||||
| Yes | 0.011 | 0.133 | −0.001 | 0.000 | −0.137 |
| No | Ref | ||||
|
| |||||
| Yes | 0.010 | 0.083 | −0.014 | −0.001 | −1.725 |
| No | Ref | ||||
| Subtotal socioeconomic conditions | 0.048 | 68.727 | |||
|
| |||||
| Yes | −0.025** | −0.092 | −0.041 | 0.004 | 5.397 |
| No | Ref | ||||
|
| |||||
| Yes | −0.003 | −0.007 | 0.013 | 0.000 | −0.135 |
| No | Ref | ||||
|
| |||||
| None | −0.012 | −0.067 | −0.128 | 0.009 | 12.335 |
| 1~3 times per week | −0.021 | −0.019 | 0.044 | −0.001 | −1.215 |
| 4 or more times per week | Ref | ||||
| Subtotal health behavior variables | 0.011 | 16.382 | |||
| Openness | 0.025 | −0.335 | 0.008 | −0.003 | −3.616 |
| Conscientiousness | −0.007 | 1.059 | 0.004 | 0.004 | 6.050 |
| Extraversion | −0.001*** | −0.291 | 0.010 | −0.003 | −4.185 |
| Agreeableness | −0.006 | −0.046 | 0.003 | 0.000 | −0.217 |
| Neuroticism | −0.001 | −0.049 | −0.018 | 0.001 | 1.289 |
|
| |||||
| High | 0.012 | 0.116 | 0.017 | 0.002 | 2.863 |
| Low | Ref | ||||
| Subtotal psychosocial factors | 0.002 | 2.183 | |||
| Residual (unexplained) | −0.005 | 10.594 |
dy/dx, Marginal effects; Elast, elasticity; Cj, Concentration index of explanatory variables; Cont to C, Contribution to the overall concentration index; C%, Percentage contribution to CI; Ref, reference group.
P–value, *p < 0.10; **0.05 ≤ p < 0.10; ***p < 0.01.
Figure 3Contribution to inequality in obesity among the elderly in China (%).