| Literature DB >> 36158949 |
Yu Su1, Genhua Li2, Huihui Zhao2, Song Feng2, Yan Lu3, Jilan Liu3, Chao Chen1, Feng Jin2.
Abstract
Hemoglobin (Hb) and lipid metabolism are critical in the pathophysiology of moyamoya disease (MMD), and Hb and triglycerides (TGs) both play roles in the development of cerebrovascular illness. However, there is little evidence of a link between Hb and TGs in patients with MMD. This study aimed to determine the association between Hb and TGs in patients who had recently been diagnosed with MMD. From March 2013 to December 2018, 337 patients clinically diagnosed with MMD were admitted to our hospital. Among these, 235 were selected for analysis in this retrospective, cross-sectional study. Each patient's clinical features were documented. For analysis, we used univariate analysis, smoothed-curve fitting, and multivariable, piecewise linear regression. Overall, the mean±standard deviation patient age was 48.14 ± 11.24 years, 44.68% were men, and the mean Hb concentration was 135.72 ± 18.99 g/L. After controlling for relevant confounders, smoothed-curve fitting revealed a nonlinear association between the Hb and TG concentrations (P = 0.0448). When the Hb concentration was below 141 g/L, multivariate piecewise linear regression analysis revealed a significant association between the Hb and TG concentrations [β: 0.01, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.00, 0.01; P = 0.0182], although the association disappeared above this threshold (β:-0.00, 95% CI:-0.01, 0.01; P = 0.4429). In individuals newly diagnosed with MMD, there is a significant correlation between Hb and TGs, which may be connected to MMD pathogenesis.Entities:
Keywords: cerebrovascular disease; hemoglobin; internal carotid arteries; moyamoya disease; triglycerides
Year: 2022 PMID: 36158949 PMCID: PMC9493253 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.994341
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurol ISSN: 1664-2295 Impact factor: 4.086
Figure 1Flowchart of inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Clinical characteristics of the study population.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Number of cases, | 235 |
| Age (years, mean ± SD) | 48.14 ± 11.24 |
| BMI (kg/m2, mean ± SD) | 25.42 ± 3.47 |
| Male | 105 (44.68) |
| Female | 130 (55.32) |
| No | 169 (71.91) |
| Yes | 66 (28.09) |
| No | 174 (74.04) |
| Yes | 61 (25.96) |
|
| |
| Hemorrhagic | 58 (27.75) |
| Ischemic | 151 (72.25) |
| TGs (mmol/L, mean ± SD) | 1.30 ± 0.82 |
| TC (mmol/L, mean ± SD) | 4.17 ± 0.90 |
| HDL-C (mmol/L, mean ± SD) | 1.19 ± 0.23 |
| LDL-C (mmol/L, mean ± SD) | 2.42 ± 0.70 |
| VLDL-C (mmol/L, mean ± SD) | 0.56 ± 0.36 |
| Lipoprotein (mmol/L, mean ± SD) | 265.03 ± 304.83 |
| Hb (g/L) | 135.72 ± 18.99 |
Hb, hemoglobin; TGs, triglycerides; TC, total cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; VLDL-C, very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.
Univariate analysis for TGs (mmol/L).
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|
| Age, years | −0.00 (−0.01, 0.01) | 0.9422 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 0.06 (0.03, 0.09) | <0.0001 |
| Male | Reference | |
| Female | −0.09 (−0.30, 0.12) | 0.3854 |
| No | Reference | |
| Yes | 0.13 (−0.11, 0.36) | 0.2851 |
| No | Reference | |
| Yes | 0.18 (−0.06, 0.42) | 0.1361 |
| Hemorrhagic | Reference | |
| Ischemic | 0.15 (−0.09, 0.39) | 0.2210 |
| TC, mmol/L | 0.29 (0.18, 0.40) | <0.0001 |
| HDL-C, mmol/L | −1.09 (−1.53, −0.65) | <0.0001 |
| LDL-C, mmol/L | 0.14 (−0.01, 0.29) | 0.0618 |
| VLDL-C, mmol/L | 1.75 (1.55, 1.95) | <0.0001 |
| Lipoprotein, mmol/L | −0.00 (−0.00, 0.00) | 0.9993 |
| Hb, g/L | 0.01 (−0.00, 0.01) | 0.0628 |
Hb, hemoglobin; TGs, triglycerides; TC, total cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; VLDL-C, very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.
Relationship between Hb (g/L) and TGs (mmol/L) in different models.
|
|
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||||
| Hb, g/L | 0.01 (−0.00, 0.01) | 0.0628 | 0.00 (−0.00, 0.01) | 0.0874 | 0.00 (0.00, 0.01) | 0.0448 |
|
| ||||||
| Q1 (67–125) | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
| Q2 (126–136) | 0.30 (0.00, 0.59) | 0.0512 | 0.17 (−0.04, 0.39) | 0.1106 | 0.22 (0.03, 0.40) | 0.0255 |
| Q3 (137–146) | 0.28 (-0.02, 0.58) | 0.0641 | 0.25 (0.03, 0.47) | 0.0291 | 0.24 (0.04, 0.44) | 0.0189 |
| Q4 (147–183) | 0.30 (0.01, 0.59) | 0.0453 | 0.20 (−0.05, 0.45) | 0.1253 | 0.20 (−0.02, 0.43) | 0.0801 |
Model II adjusted for sex; age; smoking status; alcohol consumption; BMI; disease type; TC; HDL-C; LDL-C; VLDL-C; and lipoproteins.
Model III adjusted for: sex; age (smooth); smoking; alcohol consumption; BMI (smooth); disease type; TC (smooth); HDL-C (smooth); LDL-C (smooth); VLDL-C (smooth); and lipoprotein (smooth).
Figure 2Association between Hb (g/L) and TGs (mmol/L). (A) smooth fitted curve of Hb and TGs, (B) scatter plot for the distribution of Hb and TGs. The solid red line represents the smooth curve fit between the variables. The blue bands represent the 95% CI of the fit. The model is adjusted for sex; age; smoking status; alcohol consumption; BMI; disease type; TC; HDL-C; LDL-C; VLDL-C; lipoproteins.
Threshold effect analysis of the relationship between Hb and TG levels.
|
| ||
|---|---|---|
|
|
| |
|
| ||
| Linear effect | 0.00 (−0.00, 0.01) | 0.0874 |
|
| ||
| Inflection point (K) | 141 | |
| <141, effect 1 | 0.01 (0.00, 0.01) | 0.0182 |
| >141, effect 2 | −0.00 (−0.01, 0.01) | 0.4429 |
Model I, linear analysis; Model II, non-linear analysis. Adjusted variables: sex; age; smoking status; alcohol consumption; BMI; disease type; TC; HDL-C; LDL-C; VLDL-C; and lipoproteins. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Figure 3Association between Hb (g/L) and TGs (mmol/L) in patients with hemorrhagic MMD. (A) smooth fitted curve of Hb and TGs, (B) scatter plot for the distribution of Hb and TGs. The solid red line represents the smooth curve fit between the variables. The blue bands represent the 95% CI of the fit. The model was adjusted for age; smoking status; alcohol consumption; BMI; disease type; TC; HDL-C; LDL-C; VLDL-C; and lipoproteins.
Figure 4Association between Hb (g/L) and TGs (mmol/L) in patients with ischemic MMD. (A) smooth fitted curve for Hb and TGs, (B) scatter plot for the distribution of Hb and TGs. The solid red line represents the smooth curve fit. The blue bands represent the 95% CI of the fit. The model was adjusted for age; smoking status; alcohol consumption; BMI; disease type; TC; HDL-C; LDL-C; VLDL-C; and lipoproteins.