| Literature DB >> 36158905 |
Georgios Katsanos1, Konstantina-Eleni Karakasi1, Ion-Anastasios Karolos2, Athanasios Kofinas1, Nikolaos Antoniadis1, Vassilios Tsioukas2, Georgios Tsoulfas3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation has evolved into a safe life-saving operation and remains the golden standard in the treatment of end stage liver disease. The main limiting factor in the application of liver transplantation is graft shortage. Many strategies have been developed in order to alleviate graft shortage, such as living donor partial liver transplantation and split liver transplantation for adult and pediatric patients. In these strategies, liver volume assessment is of paramount importance, as size mismatch can have severe consequences in the success of liver transplantation. AIM: To evaluate the safety, feasibility, and accuracy of light detection and ranging (LIDAR) 3D photography in the prediction of whole liver graft volume and mass.Entities:
Keywords: 3dscan; Ex vivo volumetry; Graft volume; Light detection and ranging; Liver grafts
Year: 2022 PMID: 36158905 PMCID: PMC9376777 DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v14.i7.1504
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Hepatol
Figure 1Liver graft measurement using an original structure 3D scanning sensor.
Figure 2The particular sensor can be adapted to any device with iOS and iPadOS operating system. A: The device used in the present study. The structure core sensor, the adjustment bracket, the USB communication cable, and the iPad (6th generation) are shown; B: The Occipital original structure sensor; C: An exported 3D model of a liver graft; D: The final 3D model of the liver graft.
Figure 3Flowchart of the light detection and ranging assisted volumetric assessment of liver grafts.
Donor demographics.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 | Female | 59 | IBI | > 10 | 60 | 1.6 | 23.43 | 1.76 |
| 2 | Male | 32 | IBI | > 10 | 75 | 1.7 | 25.95 | 1.88 |
| 3 | Male | 64 | SH | > 10 | 85 | 1.75 | 27.75 | 2.03 |
| 4 | Female | 63 | ICH | 60 | 70 | 1.6 | 27.34 | 2.06 |
| 5 | Female | 46 | ICH | 5 | 90 | 1.7 | 31.14 | 2.41 |
| 6 | Female | 54 | ICH | 20 | 120 | 1.75 | 39.18 | 1.63 |
| 7 | Male | 49 | IBI | > 10 | 75 | 1.83 | 22.39 | 1.95 |
N: Donor number; BMI: Body mass index; BSA: Body surface area; IBI: Ischemic brain injury; SB: Subarachnoid haemorrhage; ICH: Intracerebral haemorrhage.
Results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 | 1202 | 1179 | 1275.04 | 1261.53 | 59.53 | 4.95 |
| 2 | 1623 | 1490 | 1590.52 | 1594.30 | -28.70 | -1.77 |
| 3 | 2201 | 2090 | 1781.61 | 2236.30 | 35.30 | 1.60 |
| 4 | 1332 | 1248 | 1440.86 | 1335.36 | 3.36 | 0.25 |
| 5 | 1227 | 1141 | 1818.15 | 1220.87 | -6.13 | -0.50 |
| 6 | 1074 | 1040 | 2266.36 | 1112.80 | 38.80 | 3.61 |
| 7 | 1623 | 1482 | 1680.03 | 1585.74 | -37.26 | -2.30 |
Estimated graft mass = Light detection and ranging (LIDAR) volume mL × 1.07 gr/mL. The LIDAR error is calculated by subtracting the LIDAR estimated liver mass from the actual mass (weight) of the grafts. N: Donor number; g: Grams; LIDAR: Light detection and ranging.
ANOVA: Single factor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Between groups | 225616.3945 | 2 | 112808.1972 | 0.861884735 | 3.554557 |
| Within groups | 2355938.641 | 18 | 130885.4801 | ||
| Total | 2581555.035 | 20 |
SD: Standard deviation; df: Degrees of freedom; MS: Mean squares; F crit: F critical.
Figure 4Results of light detection and ranging assisted prediction of whole liver mass in grams in the seven liver grafts.