Literature DB >> 36158351

A Cross-Sectional Study to Ascertain the Effect of COVID-19 Pandemic on Regional Anaesthesia Practices Amongst Anaesthesiologists of India.

Anju Gupta1, Bhavya Krishna2, Vishnu Narayanan3, Shailendra Kumar4, Nishkarsh Gupta5, Amit K Malviya6, Rajeev Kumar Malhotra7, Lokesh Kashyap8.   

Abstract

Background and aims Regional anaesthesia has been advocated as a preferred modality during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‑19) pandemic, but pursuing regional anaesthesia during COVID-19 is challenging. Our cross-sectional survey aimed to analyze the challenges in conducting regional anaesthesia and the alterations in practices imposed by the COVID‑19 pandemic across the nation. Material and methods The questionnaire was validated by seven experts. Following ethical approval and trial registration, this Google Forms-based survey was circulated to anaesthesiologists across the country via emails over 3 months (April 2021 to June 2021). Weekly reminders were sent to the non-responders till the desired sample size was attained, after which the survey was closed and responses were analyzed. Results Five hundred and thirty-two of 1100 anaesthesiologists completed the survey (48.3% response rate). Among the 532 respondents, 65.8% reported an increase in the use of regional anaesthesia due to the pandemic, with 77.4% reporting a change in practice. Almost 90% of the respondents used a dedicated operation theatre for all infected patients. Most respondents (75%) used disposable plastic drapes (75%) and full personal protective equipment (PPE) for COVID-19-positive patients during the procedure. However, using PPE resulted in poor vision due to fogging and multiple attempts and increased performance duration. Most respondents (74.4%) used gloves to maintain ultrasound probe sterility, while many other respondents (65.7%) used a sterile camera cover for the same. Many respondents ordered inflammatory markers during preoperative evaluation. Conclusion The present survey revealed that there was increased utilization of regional anaesthesia with increased utilization of PPE, sterility routines, and ordering of investigations. The use of PPE led to many challenges while performing regional anaesthesia. However, many deviations were identified from the accepted recommendations, and one needs to be aware of proper practices to achieve optimal patient outcomes and provider safety.
Copyright © 2022, Gupta et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aerosols; anesthesiologists; covid 19; covid-19 retro; electronic mail; pandemic; personal protective equipment

Year:  2022        PMID: 36158351      PMCID: PMC9487841          DOI: 10.7759/cureus.28228

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cureus        ISSN: 2168-8184


  25 in total

Review 1.  Regional Anesthesia in the Patient Receiving Antithrombotic or Thrombolytic Therapy: American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Evidence-Based Guidelines (Fourth Edition).

Authors:  Terese T Horlocker; Erik Vandermeuelen; Sandra L Kopp; Wiebke Gogarten; Lisa R Leffert; Honorio T Benzon
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 6.288

2.  What Is an Aerosol-Generating Procedure?

Authors:  Michael Klompas; Meghan Baker; Chanu Rhee
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 14.766

3.  Neurological Complications of Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19): Encephalopathy.

Authors:  Asia Filatov; Pamraj Sharma; Fawzi Hindi; Patricio S Espinosa
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-03-21

4.  Treating postdural puncture headache in COVID-19 positive patient- is bilateral greater occipital nerve block the answer?

Authors:  Abhijit Nair; Sandeep Diwan
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2020-09-24

Review 5.  Aerosol generating procedures and risk of transmission of acute respiratory infections to healthcare workers: a systematic review.

Authors:  Khai Tran; Karen Cimon; Melissa Severn; Carmem L Pessoa-Silva; John Conly
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Limiting factors for wearing personal protective equipment (PPE) in a health care environment evaluated in a randomised study.

Authors:  Martina Loibner; Sandra Hagauer; Gerold Schwantzer; Andrea Berghold; Kurt Zatloukal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Thrombocytopenia is associated with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infections: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Giuseppe Lippi; Mario Plebani; Brandon Michael Henry
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 3.786

8.  COVID-19 outbreak: less stethoscope, more ultrasound.

Authors:  Danilo Buonsenso; Davide Pata; Antonio Chiaretti
Journal:  Lancet Respir Med       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 30.700

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.