Seung Soo Yoo1, Shin Yup Lee1, Sun Ha Choi2. 1. Department of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41404, South Korea. 2. Lung Cancer Center, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu 41404, South Korea. sunha20@knu.ac.kr.
Core Tip: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation can be selected as an important salvage treatment for patients with severe cardiopulmonary dysfunction caused by lung cancer and other malignant tumors until the patients are stabilized or even cured.
INTRODUCTION
Lung cancer is one of the most commonly diagnosed malignancies and is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, with an average 5-year survival rate of 19%[1]. The clinical presentation of lung cancer varies among individuals, resulting in a range of symptoms that patients may find distressing[2]. Several common signs and symptoms associated with lung cancer can be classified as a result of the primary tumor, intrathoracic spread, distant metastases, paraneoplastic syndromes, or nonspecific symptoms[2]. Airway obstruction, superior venous cava syndrome, and massive pleural effusion secondary to lung cancer may cause dyspnea. Moreover, sudden airway obstruction can cause ventilation/perfusion mismatch or shunt, leading to life-threatening respiratory failure.Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is the only way to overcome hypoxia that persists even with conventional mechanical ventilator treatment. Patients with hematological malignancies, such as leukemia or lymphoma, may develop respiratory failure related to disease or chemotherapy, and in these cases, ECMO may be required for bridge treatment[3,4]. However, there are only a few reports on the use of chemotherapy during ECMO support as a treatment for respiratory failure in lung cancer, which has a low response rate and delayed response time compared with hematologic malignancy. Herein, we report the case of a patient treated with chemotherapy using ECMO for acute respiratory failure due to lung cancer.
CASE PRESENTATION
Chief complaints
In March 2021, a 53-year-old man visited the emergency room with worsening dyspnea.
History of present illness
The patient’s dyspnea started 1 mo ago and has progressed since then.
History of past illness
The patient is a 32 pack-year smoker.
Personal and family history
The patient had a free personal and family history.
Physical examination
On admission, his vital signs were as follows: Blood pressure, 126/80 mmHg; body temperature, 36.5 °C; heart rate, 112 bpm; and respiratory rate, 20 breaths/min.
Laboratory examinations
Atrial blood gas analysis (ABGA) showed a pH of 7.47, PCO2 of 27 mmHg, PaO2 of 67.7 mmHg, HCO3 of 19.8 mmHg, and SpO2 of 94.8% on room air.
Imaging examinations
Chest radiography revealed a suprahilar mass (Figure 1A), and a chest computed tomography (CT) scan showed a 4.9-cm mass in the right upper lobe (RUL). The mass on the CT scan appeared to cause narrowing of the right main bronchus and pulmonary artery (Figure 1B). He was admitted for evaluation of the lung mass. On day 2 of hospitalization, flexible bronchoscopy revealed an obstructing mass in the right main bronchus (Figure 1C). Bronchoscopic biopsy and endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EUBS-TBNA) were performed for the 4R lymph nodes. Upon suspicion of lung cancer, positron emission tomography (PET)-CT was performed (Figure 1D).
Figure 1
Initial chest radiography, chest computed tomography scan, bronchoscopy, and positron emission tomography-computed tomography. A: Chest radiography reveals a mass-like shadow in the right supra-hilar area; B: Chest computed tomography (CT) showing narrowing of the right main bronchus secondary to a mass; C: Bronchoscopy confirms that the right bronchus is almost completely obstructed by a mass; D: Positron emission tomography-CT showing a 5-cm hypermetabolic mass (SUVmax 20.8) in the right upper lobe and hypermetabolic 4R and 2R lymph nodes.
Initial chest radiography, chest computed tomography scan, bronchoscopy, and positron emission tomography-computed tomography. A: Chest radiography reveals a mass-like shadow in the right supra-hilar area; B: Chest computed tomography (CT) showing narrowing of the right main bronchus secondary to a mass; C: Bronchoscopy confirms that the right bronchus is almost completely obstructed by a mass; D: Positron emission tomography-CT showing a 5-cm hypermetabolic mass (SUVmax 20.8) in the right upper lobe and hypermetabolic 4R and 2R lymph nodes.
FINAL DIAGNOSIS
The final diagnosis of the presented case is stage IIIB (cT4N2M0) lung cancer, squamous cell carcinoma.
TREATMENT
On hospital day 3, the dyspnea suddenly worsened. The O2 saturation in room air decreased from 98% to 71%. Chest radiography revealed a nearly complete collapse of the right lung (Figure 2A). A reserve mask with an oxygen flow rate of 15 L/min was used, which improved the O2 saturation to 88%-90%. A high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) was administered, and the patient was then transferred to the intensive care unit.
Figure 2
Changes on chest radiography. A: On hospital day 3, chest radiography shows near total atelectasis of the right lung; B: On hospital day 5, atelectasis in the right lung is aggravated; C: On hospital day 16, the near total atelectasis of the right lung has improved, although right upper lobe atelectasis remains; D: On hospital day 19, right upper lobe atelectasis has improved.
Changes on chest radiography. A: On hospital day 3, chest radiography shows near total atelectasis of the right lung; B: On hospital day 5, atelectasis in the right lung is aggravated; C: On hospital day 16, the near total atelectasis of the right lung has improved, although right upper lobe atelectasis remains; D: On hospital day 19, right upper lobe atelectasis has improved.On hospital day 4, ABGA showed a pH of 7.301, PCO2 of 39 mmHg, PaO2 of 44.4 mmHg, HCO3 of 18.4 mmHg, and SpO2 of 75.9% on oxygen supply via an HFNC with FiO2 of 80% and flow rate of 60 L/min. Mechanical ventilation support was started with lung-protective mechanical ventilation and pronation, according to the current protocols. However, the respiratory condition did not improve, and the patient eventually presented with refractory hypoxemia with a PaO2/FiO2 ratio of 46.7, FiO2 of 100%, and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 12 cmH2O. Accordingly, an urgent decision was made to initiate venovenous ECMO (CardioHelp; Getinge Critical Care, Gothenburg, Sweden) by percutaneous cannulation of the right femoral vein (25-Fr draining cannula) and right jugular vein (17-Fr restitution cannula). At the start of the ECMO run, blood flow was set at 4 L/min, sweep gas flow was set at 2 L/min, and unfractionated heparin was infused to match a partial thromboplastin time ratio of 1.5- to 2-fold that of the baseline. Ultra-protective mechanical ventilation was instituted in pressure-controlled ventilation mode with a driving pressure of 8 cmH2O, PEEP of 12 cmH2O, respiratory rate of 8 breaths/min, and FiO2 of 60%. Chest radiography revealed an aggravated collapse of the right lung (Figure 2B). ABGA showed pH of 7.462, PCO2 of 25.9 mmHg, PaO2 of 373.1 mmHg, HCO3 of 20.9 mmHg, and SpO2 of 99.8% on ECMO and ventilator support.Biopsy of the mass in the right main bronchus and 4R lymph nodes revealed squamous cell carcinoma. The patient was diagnosed with stage IIIB (cT4N2M0) lung cancer. On hospital day 6, the patient was extubated and in spontaneous breathing supported by HFNC oxygen therapy at 35 L/min with a FiO2 of 45% (awake ECMO). On hospital day 7, gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy without dose reduction was initiated while the patient was on ECMO support. The doses of gemcitabine and cisplatin were 1250 mg per body surface area (BSA) and 70 mg/BSA, respectively. ECMO therapy was discontinued on day 12 of hospitalization, while HFNC was continued. On day 15 of hospitalization, the HFNC was discontinued. On hospital day 16, the total atelectasis of the right lung had improved, although RUL atelectasis remained (Figure 2C). On hospital day 20, the RUL atelectasis improved (Figure 2D). The patient was discharged on hospital day 26 without dyspnea.
OUTCOME AND FOLLOW-UP
After two cycles of gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy, a CT scan showed a decrease in the primary tumor size in the right main bronchus (Figure 3A). The patient received concurrent chemoradiotherapy with a weekly paclitaxel/cisplatin regimen. After the completion of concurrent chemoradiotherapy, the CT scan revealed further improvement in the right main bronchus narrowing due to the mass (Figure 3B). Eight months after lung cancer diagnosis, the patient did well without any dyspnea.
Figure 3
Changes on chest computed tomography scan. A: After two cycles of gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy, the size of the right upper lobe mass has decreased; B: After concurrent chemoradiotherapy, the right main bronchus, narrowed by the tumor, has further improved.
Changes on chest computed tomography scan. A: After two cycles of gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy, the size of the right upper lobe mass has decreased; B: After concurrent chemoradiotherapy, the right main bronchus, narrowed by the tumor, has further improved.
DISCUSSION
Lung cancer can cause atelectasis, which can lead to shortness of breath. In this case, sudden obstruction of the right main bronchus caused severe hypoxia, which was not relieved with oxygen supply. The mechanism of refractory hypoxia can be explained by a shunt, implying perfusion to the non-ventilated lung. Radiotherapy or endobronchial treatment with a stent is an option for intraluminal obstruction of the main bronchus. However, the patient in the current case did not have the time to receive such treatment because of life-threatening hypoxia.ECMO can provide cardiac and pulmonary support in critically ill patients with cardiogenic shock or acute respiratory failure[5]. The use of ECMO in cancer patients who develop severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains controversial[6]. However, several studies have reported the successful use of ECMO in patients who develop respiratory failure after chemotherapy for hematologic malignancies[3,4,6,7]. Chung et al[8] reported that under ECMO support, the patient underwent bronchial stent implantation and was successfully weaned off ECMO. Airway obstructions may qualify for intensive respiratory support compared with diffuse parenchymal malignancy because bronchial intervention procedures enable quick recovery from respiratory failure if airway stenosis is relieved[7,8]. In the case of solid tumors, respiratory failure may occur either during the disease itself or during the treatment course; however, only a few studies have been conducted on ECMO use in these patients. Because of the adverse effects of ECMO, specifically, infections, bleeding, and thrombocytopenia, the administration of chemotherapy is not routinely advised in patients suffering from malignancies[9]. Our experience, in this case, indicates that ARDS caused by shunting in patients with central airway lung cancer should not be considered a contraindication to ECMO treatment. With our successful treatment outcome with chemotherapy in ECMO, we suggest that chemotherapy during ECMO in solid tumors should be considered in the presence of severe hemodynamic instability or respiratory failure refractory to standard medical support.The pharmacokinetics of chemotherapy with ECMO is not yet fully understood. Several factors may affect pharmacokinetics, including the circuit of ECMO, the changes in the volume distribution, and the alteration in drug clearance. Sherwin et al[9] reported pharmacokinetic parameters and dose recommendations for anti-infective drugs, including antibiotics, under ECMO treatment, primarily in neonates. However, information on the pharmacokinetics of anti-cancer drugs during ECMO is still lacking. The current case showed that standard doses of gemcitabine and cisplatin were effective in ECMO treatment, although further studies on chemotherapy with ECMO in solid tumors are needed. Numerous clinical studies will be necessary to determine the appropriate indications for ECMO.
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, ECMO may play an important role as a bridge therapy for respiratory failure due to ARDS in patients with central airway obstruction secondary to lung cancer. As such, this treatment approach must be considered in these patients.
Authors: Nikhil A Huprikar; Matthew R Peterson; Jeffrey D DellaVolpe; Valerie G Sams; James H Lantry; Robert J Walter; Michael B Osswald; Kevin K Chung; Phillip E Mason Journal: Int J Artif Organs Date: 2018-09-17 Impact factor: 1.595
Authors: Philipp Wohlfarth; Roman Ullrich; Thomas Staudinger; Andja Bojic; Oliver Robak; Alexander Hermann; Barbara Lubsczyk; Nina Worel; Valentin Fuhrmann; Maria Schoder; Martin Funovics; Werner Rabitsch; Paul Knoebl; Klaus Laczika; Gottfried J Locker; Wolfgang R Sperr; Peter Schellongowski Journal: Crit Care Date: 2014-01-20 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Jae Heun Chung; Hye Ju Yeo; Hyun Myung Cho; Jin Ook Jang; Byung Min Ye; Gun Yoon; Dong Hoon Shin; Dohyung Kim; Woo Hyun Cho Journal: Cancer Res Treat Date: 2016-06-24 Impact factor: 4.679