Literature DB >> 36157587

CD6 deficiency impairs early immune response to bacterial sepsis.

Cristina Català1, María Velasco-de Andrés1, Alejandra Leyton-Pereira1, Sergi Casadó-Llombart1, Manuel Sáez Moya2, Rebeca Gutiérrez-Cózar2, Joaquín García-Luna3, Marta Consuegra-Fernández1, Marcos Isamat4, Fernando Aranda5, Mario Martínez-Florensa1, Pablo Engel1,2, Gustavo Mourglia-Ettlin3, Francisco Lozano1,2,6.   

Abstract

CD6 is a lymphocyte-specific scavenger receptor expressed on adaptive (T) and innate (B1a, NK) immune cells, which is involved in both fine-tuning of lymphocyte activation/differentiation and recognition of bacterial-associated molecular patterns (i.e., lipopolysaccharide). However, evidence on CD6's role in the physiological response to bacterial infection was missing. Our results show that induction of monobacterial and polymicrobial sepsis in Cd6 -/- mice results in lower survival rates and increased bacterial loads and pro-inflammatory cytokine levels. Steady state analyses of Cd6 -/- mice show decreased levels of natural polyreactive antibodies, concomitant with decreased cell counts of spleen B1a and marginal zone B cells. Adoptive transfer of wild-type B cells and mouse serum, as well as a polyreactive monoclonal antibody improve Cd6 -/- mouse survival rates post-sepsis. These findings support a nonredundant role for CD6 in the early response against bacterial infection, through homeostatic expansion and functionality of innate-related immune cells.
© 2022 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biological sciences; Components of the immune system; Immunology

Year:  2022        PMID: 36157587      PMCID: PMC9490029          DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  iScience        ISSN: 2589-0042


Introduction

Bacterial sepsis is a devastating condition resulting from a dysregulated immune response to infection, leading to a sustained pro-inflammatory state and eventually, to organ dysfunction and death (Singer et al., 2016). This response is triggered by conserved and broadly distributed structures present on bacterial cell walls generically named microbial-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs) (Janeway and Medzhitov, 2002). Examples of bacterial MAMPs include the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) from Gram-negative strains, lipoteichoic acid (LTA) and peptidoglycan (PGN) from Gram-positive ones, and unmethylated CpG DNA islands. Bacterial MAMPs recognition by the host’s immune system relies on the so-called pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), a series of nonpolymorphic, nonclonally distributed, and germ-line-encoded receptors from different structural protein families (Medzhitov, 2007), such as Toll-like receptors (TLRs), nucleotide oligomerization domain (NOD)-like receptors (NLRs), C-type lectin receptors (CLRs), absent in melanoma 2 (AIM2)-like receptors (ALRs), and scavenger receptors (SRs), among others (Li and Wu, 2021). These PRRs are broadly distributed among innate and adaptive immune cells, and exposure to their ligands activates the expression of inflammatory and immune response genes (Akira et al., 2006). CD6 is a lymphoid-specific member of the SR class I group characterized by several conserved repeats of the scavenger receptor cysteine-rich (SRCR) domain (Taban et al., 2022). CD6 is expressed on adaptive (T) and innate (B1a, NK) immune cells and is involved in (1) fine-tuning of lymphocyte activation/differentiation and (2) recognition of MAMPs (Sarukhan et al., 2016). CD6 consists of three extracellular SRCR tandem domains, a transmembrane region and a cytoplasmic tail with Ser/Thr/Tyr residues responsive through phosphorylation to signaling effectors (Sarukhan et al., 2016). This allows CD6 to modulate the signals delivered by the T and B cell receptor complexes, to which it physically associates (Gimferrer et al., 2004; Gonçalves et al., 2018). Recent studies show that the TCR-inducible CD6 signalosome comprises both positive (SLP-76, ZAP70, VAV1) and negative (UBASH3A/STS-2) regulators of T cell activation, which account for the long-standing difficulties in classifying it as an inhibitory or stimulatory co-receptor (Mori et al., 2021). The extracellular region of CD6 interacts with endogenous ligands such as CD166/ALCAM (for activated leukocyte cell adhesion molecule)—a broadly distributed cell adhesion molecule involved in T-APC stabilization and leukocyte/lymphocyte extravasation (Bowen et al., 2000; Ferragut et al., 2021); CD318/CDCP-1 (for CUB Domain-Containing Protein 1) (Enyindah-Asonye et al., 2017a); and galectins 1 and 3 (Escoda-Ferran et al., 2014; Liu, 2005). The same extracellular region also subserves PRR functions by sensing and interacting with MAMPs of bacterial (LPS, LTA, PGN) origin (Martínez-Florensa et al., 2014; Sarrias et al., 2007). In addition, LPS binding to membrane-bound CD6 delivers MAPK pathway activation signals via Erk1/2 phosphorylation (Sarrias et al., 2007). Bacterial MAMPs recognition by CD6 maps to short peptide sequences (11-mer long) at each SRCR domain (Martínez-Florensa et al., 2018). Interestingly, infusion of either soluble CD6 protein or CD6-based peptides results in therapeutic effects in mouse models of monobacterial and polymicrobial sepsis (Martínez-Florensa et al., 2014, 2017, 2018). On this basis, we hypothesize that CD6+ immune cells sense bacterial MAMPs and signal their functional status (Lenz, 2009; Sarrias et al., 2007), defining a physiological role for CD6 in the host’s response to bacterial infection. We have investigated this role using CD6-deficient mice (Cd6−/−) in different experimental models of sepsis.

Results

CD6 deficiency confers susceptibility to bacterial sepsis

Upon induction of different models of monobacterial (Escherichia coli-induced peritonitis and Klebsiella pneumoniae-induced pneumonitis) and polymicrobial (cecal ligation and puncture [CLP]-induced peritonitis) sepsis, Cd6−/− mice from C57BL/6 background (Orta-Mascaró et al., 2016) showed lower survival rates compared with wild-type (WT) littermate controls (Figure 1). Further in vivo analyses of Cd6−/− mice after CLP-induced sepsis showed higher peritoneum and spleen bacterial loads (Figure 2A), and higher plasma and/or peritoneum pro-inflammatory cytokines (interleukin-6 [IL-6] and TNF-α) (Figure 2B), together with a trend to lower peritoneal neutrophil infiltration (Figure 2C). These results indicate that CD6 deficiency confers a nonspecific susceptibility to bacterial sepsis, which could result from impaired innate and/or adaptive immune responses.
Figure 1

Cd6 mice show higher susceptibility to different experimental models of bacterial sepsis

WT and Cd6 mice were subjected to CLP-induced peritonitis (left), E. coli-induced peritonitis (9 × 106 CFU/mouse, i.p.) (middle) or K. pneumoniae-induced pneumonitis (9 × 108 CFU/mouse, i.n.) (right). Percent average of mouse survival is represented over time. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01 (Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon test).

Figure 2

Cd6 mice show poor prognosis markers post-CLP induced sepsis

(A) Bacterial load post-CLP. Bacterial burden in peritoneum (left) and spleen (right) from WT and Cd6 mice was assessed at 24 h post-CLP induction. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM of CFU/g or CFU/mL. A representative experiment of 3 independently performed experiments is shown. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01 (Mann-Whitney test).

(B) Cytokine levels post-CLP. Plasma and peritoneum IL-6 and tumor necrosis factor aloha (TNF-α) levels from WT and Cd6 mice were assessed by ELISA at 24 h post-CLP induction. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. A representative experiment of 3 independently performed is shown. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01 (Mann-Whitney test).

(C) Peritoneal neutrophil infiltration pre- and post-CLP. Percentage (left) and absolute number (right) of neutrophil (Gr1+F4/80−) in peritoneum from WT and Cd6 mice was assessed under basal conditions and 24 h post-CLP. A representative experiment of 3 independently performed is shown. ∗p < 0.05 (Mann-Whitney test).

Cd6 mice show higher susceptibility to different experimental models of bacterial sepsis WT and Cd6 mice were subjected to CLP-induced peritonitis (left), E. coli-induced peritonitis (9 × 106 CFU/mouse, i.p.) (middle) or K. pneumoniae-induced pneumonitis (9 × 108 CFU/mouse, i.n.) (right). Percent average of mouse survival is represented over time. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01 (Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon test). Cd6 mice show poor prognosis markers post-CLP induced sepsis (A) Bacterial load post-CLP. Bacterial burden in peritoneum (left) and spleen (right) from WT and Cd6 mice was assessed at 24 h post-CLP induction. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM of CFU/g or CFU/mL. A representative experiment of 3 independently performed experiments is shown. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01 (Mann-Whitney test). (B) Cytokine levels post-CLP. Plasma and peritoneum IL-6 and tumor necrosis factor aloha (TNF-α) levels from WT and Cd6 mice were assessed by ELISA at 24 h post-CLP induction. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. A representative experiment of 3 independently performed is shown. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01 (Mann-Whitney test). (C) Peritoneal neutrophil infiltration pre- and post-CLP. Percentage (left) and absolute number (right) of neutrophil (Gr1+F4/80−) in peritoneum from WT and Cd6 mice was assessed under basal conditions and 24 h post-CLP. A representative experiment of 3 independently performed is shown. ∗p < 0.05 (Mann-Whitney test).

Innate B cell subsets and natural polyreactive antibodies are decreased in CD6-deficient mice

In order to screen immune response in Cd6−/− mice, B cell populations were studied, as they have been previously linked to bacterial sepsis resolution (Boes et al., 1998; Kelly-Scumpia et al., 2011). B cell studies from steady state mice showed no differences between Cd6−/− and WT littermate controls regarding total peritoneal and spleen B cell numbers (Figure 3A left and 3B left). However, Cd6−/− mice showed lower spleen but not peritoneum B1a cell numbers (Figure 3A right and 3B middle), in agreement with previous data from Cd6−/− mice of different (DBA-1) genetic background (Enyindah-Asonye et al., 2017b). Moreover, numbers of marginal zone B (MZB) cells, a CD6-negative spleen B cell subpopulation also linked to innate immune functions (Palm and Kleinau, 2021), were also lower in our Cd6 mice compared with WT littermates (Figure 3B right).
Figure 3

Steady state Cd6 mice show low spleen B1a and MZB cell levels

(A) Percentage and absolute numbers of peritoneal B (CD19+) and B1a (CD19+CD11b+CD5+) cells as assessed by flow cytometry. Mean ± SEM is indicated. ∗p < 0.05 (Mann-Whitney test).

(B) Percentage and absolute numbers of spleen B (CD19+), B1a (CD19+CD5+), and MZB (B220+CD21+CD23−) cells as assessed by flow cytometry. Mean ± SEM is indicated. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01 (Mann-Whitney test).

Steady state Cd6 mice show low spleen B1a and MZB cell levels (A) Percentage and absolute numbers of peritoneal B (CD19+) and B1a (CD19+CD11b+CD5+) cells as assessed by flow cytometry. Mean ± SEM is indicated. ∗p < 0.05 (Mann-Whitney test). (B) Percentage and absolute numbers of spleen B (CD19+), B1a (CD19+CD5+), and MZB (B220+CD21+CD23−) cells as assessed by flow cytometry. Mean ± SEM is indicated. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01 (Mann-Whitney test). Spleen B1a and MZB cells are considered the main source of natural polyreactive antibodies (NAbs), which in turn are known to play an important role in the innate immune response against bacterial infection (Aziz et al., 2015; Rohrbeck et al., 2021; Zhou et al., 2007). On this basis, in vitro and in vivo production of anti-dinitrophenol (DNP) antibodies—a surrogate for NAbs (Gunti et al., 2015)—was investigated in Cd6 mice of C57BL/6 background. Thus, in vitro stimulation of splenocytes from steady-state Cd6 and WT littermate mice with different LPS doses for 24 h showed lower anti-DNP IgM levels in the former case (Figure 4A), suggesting a lower sensitivity to LPS sensing. In addition, serum analyses showed lower levels of anti-DNP antibodies of different classes (immunoglobulin M [IgM] and IgA) and subclasses (IgG2b and IgG2c) for steady-state Cd6 mice compared with WT controls (Figure 4B). The latter result would again agree with similar findings in Cd6 mice from DBA-1 background, in which only total IgM polyreactive antibodies were found to be lowered (Enyindah-Asonye et al., 2017b).
Figure 4

Steady state Cd6 mice show low and NAbs levels

(A) Splenocytes (2 × 105 cells) from steady state WT and Cd6 mice were stimulated in vitro for 24 h with different concentrations of LPS. Anti-DNP IgM levels in culture supernatants were assessed by ELISA. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM arbitrary units (A.U.). ∗p < 0.05 (two-way ANOVA, Sidak’s multiple comparisons test).

(B) Serum anti-DNP IgM, IgG, IgG1, IgG2b, IgG2c, IgG3, and IgA levels from steady state mice were assessed by ELISA. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM A.U. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001 (Mann-Whitney test).

Steady state Cd6 mice show low and NAbs levels (A) Splenocytes (2 × 105 cells) from steady state WT and Cd6 mice were stimulated in vitro for 24 h with different concentrations of LPS. Anti-DNP IgM levels in culture supernatants were assessed by ELISA. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM arbitrary units (A.U.). ∗p < 0.05 (two-way ANOVA, Sidak’s multiple comparisons test). (B) Serum anti-DNP IgM, IgG, IgG1, IgG2b, IgG2c, IgG3, and IgA levels from steady state mice were assessed by ELISA. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM A.U. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001 (Mann-Whitney test).

Adoptive B cell and serum transfer improve sepsis-induced Cd6 mice survival

The involvement of B cells and NAbs in the increased susceptibility of Cd6 mice to bacterial infection was investigated by a series of adoptive cell and serum transfer experiments. First, adoptive transfer of negatively sorted spleen B cells the day before CLP induction improved Cd6 mice survival rates only when B cells were from WT but not from Cd6 mice (Figure 5A). Such protective effect may be attributable to B1a and MZB cells, as they are underrepresented in the spleen B cell pool from Cd6 mice (Figure 3B). As shown in Figure 5B, no protective effect was seen in CLP-induced sepsis survival of Cd6 mice upon prior transfer of wild-type T and NK cells. Next, amelioration of Cd6 mouse survival post-CLP induction was also observed upon transfer of pooled inactivated whole sera from WT but not from Cd6 mice (Figure 6A). Due to the complex composition of whole serum, such a protective effect cannot be unequivocally attributed to the NAbs fraction. So, additional transfer experiments were performed using a previously reported polyreactive mAb (H2h4-7-50) of the IgG2b subclass (Sáez Moya et al., 2021). As illustrated in Figures 6B–6D, H2h4-7-50 mAb transfer improved CLP-induced Cd6 mouse survival in a dose-dependent manner, together with a trend to reduced total peritoneum and spleen bacterial burdens and IL-6 systemic levels.
Figure 5

Adoptive WT B cell transfer improves Cd6 mice survival to CLP-induced sepsis

(A) Cd6 mice were i.p. pre-treated overnight with 107 cells/mouse of negatively sorted (GR1-CD11c-CD3-NK1.1-) spleen B cells from WT or Cd6 mice, before CLP induction. Percent average of mouse survival is represented over time. ∗p < 0.05 (Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon test).

(B) Cd6 mice were i.p. pre-treated overnight with negatively sorted (GR1-CD11c-CD19-B220-) spleen T and NK cells (107 cells/mouse) from WT mice, before CLP induction. Percent average of mouse survival is represented over time. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01 (Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon test).

Figure 6

Adoptive antibody transfer improves Cd6 mice survival to CLP-induced sepsis

(A) Cd6 mice were i.p. pre-treated overnight with inactivated pooled whole sera (400 μL/mouse, diluted 1:2 in PBS) from Cd6 or WT mice before CLP induction. Percent average of mouse survival is represented over time. ∗p < 0.05 (Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon test).

(B) Cd6 mice were i.p. pre-treated overnight with saline or different doses of the H2h4-7-50 mAb (0.2 or 0.5 mg/mouse) before CLP-induction. Percent average of mouse survival is represented over time. ∗p < 0.05 (Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon test).

(C) Bacterial burden in peritoneum and spleen from saline (n = 5) or H2h4-7-50 mAb (n = 5) pre-treated Cd6 mice was determined at 24 h post-CLP induction. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM CFU/mL or CFU/g. ∗p < 0.05 (Mann-Whitney test).

(D) Plasma and peritoneum IL-6 levels from the same mice as in (C) were monitored at 24 h post-CLP induction by ELISA. Data expressed as mean ± SEM. ∗p < 0.05 (Mann-Whitney test).

Adoptive WT B cell transfer improves Cd6 mice survival to CLP-induced sepsis (A) Cd6 mice were i.p. pre-treated overnight with 107 cells/mouse of negatively sorted (GR1-CD11c-CD3-NK1.1-) spleen B cells from WT or Cd6 mice, before CLP induction. Percent average of mouse survival is represented over time. ∗p < 0.05 (Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon test). (B) Cd6 mice were i.p. pre-treated overnight with negatively sorted (GR1-CD11c-CD19-B220-) spleen T and NK cells (107 cells/mouse) from WT mice, before CLP induction. Percent average of mouse survival is represented over time. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01 (Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon test). Adoptive antibody transfer improves Cd6 mice survival to CLP-induced sepsis (A) Cd6 mice were i.p. pre-treated overnight with inactivated pooled whole sera (400 μL/mouse, diluted 1:2 in PBS) from Cd6 or WT mice before CLP induction. Percent average of mouse survival is represented over time. ∗p < 0.05 (Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon test). (B) Cd6 mice were i.p. pre-treated overnight with saline or different doses of the H2h4-7-50 mAb (0.2 or 0.5 mg/mouse) before CLP-induction. Percent average of mouse survival is represented over time. ∗p < 0.05 (Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon test). (C) Bacterial burden in peritoneum and spleen from saline (n = 5) or H2h4-7-50 mAb (n = 5) pre-treated Cd6 mice was determined at 24 h post-CLP induction. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM CFU/mL or CFU/g. ∗p < 0.05 (Mann-Whitney test). (D) Plasma and peritoneum IL-6 levels from the same mice as in (C) were monitored at 24 h post-CLP induction by ELISA. Data expressed as mean ± SEM. ∗p < 0.05 (Mann-Whitney test).

Discussion

The results of the present work advocate for increased susceptibility of Cd6 mice to bacterial infection as supported from lower sepsis survival rates, lower bacterial clearance, higher pro-inflammatory cytokines, and lower peritoneal neutrophil infiltration. All these parameters are considered poor prognostic markers in experimental models of bacterial sepsis (Jin et al., 2017; Remick et al., 2002) and stand for a nonspecific susceptibility of Cd6 mice to bacterial infection, likely as a result of qualitative and/or quantitative defects in their innate and/or adaptive immune response. The fact that experimental bacterial sepsis models are acute (>50% mortality in 24 h to 72 h), with no time to mount effective adaptive immune responses, makes quite plausible the assumption of main innate immune response involvement. Nevertheless, available evidence also supports the involvement of T and B cells in the physiopathology of sepsis (Kasten et al., 2010; Kelly-Scumpia et al., 2011). B cells constitute a heterogeneous cellular compartment with different functional and phenotypical properties (B1a, B1b, MZB, transitional and follicular B cells), which play pivotal roles in both innate and adaptive immune responses (Vaughan et al., 2011). The classical roles attributed to B cells during the immune response against infectious agents include production of antibodies and presentation of microbial antigens to T cells, as well as cytokine production upon activation by bacterial products (e.g., LPS). Work carried out in B-cell-deficient mice (μMT) showed that B cells constitute early innate immune response enhancers for bacterial sepsis (Kelly-Scumpia et al., 2011). Such mice showed increased susceptibility to CLP-induced sepsis, which was T-cell-independent and overcome when μMT mice were transferred with B cells or whole normal (WT) mouse serum, as well as when treated with CXCL10, a type I interferon (IFN)-inducible chemokine. Further work demonstrated that those sepsis-protective effects could be assigned to the B1a cell subset (Aziz et al., 2017). Our B cell studies showed that Cd6 mice have lower levels of B1a and MZB cells, two cell subsets implicated in NAbs secretion. Indeed, the antibacterial activity of NAbs include binding to both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, inhibition of bacterial growth by lysis, enhancement of phagocytosis, and neutralization of the functional activity of endotoxin (Zhou et al., 2007). Pioneer work using mutant mice in which B cells do not secrete IgM (though still express surface IgM and IgD and undergo class switching) first demonstrated the importance of endogenous natural IgM in early defense against severe bacterial infections (Boes et al., 1998). Such mice showed increased susceptibility to CLP-induced sepsis associated to increased bacterial loads and serum levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines and decreased neutrophil recruitment. Moreover, resistance to CLP was restored when soluble IgM-deficient mice were reconstituted with polyclonal IgM from normal mouse sera. Importantly, our results show that Cd6 mice’s decreased levels of NAbs involve not only IgM but also IgA and some IgG subclasses, which imply involvement of B cells able to undergo class-switch recombination events. NAbs of IgM class have long been associated not only with B1a cells (Baumgarth et al., 1999, 2000; Chou et al., 2009; Thurnheer et al., 2003) but also with MZB cells (Palm and Kleinau, 2021; Rohrbeck et al., 2021). Nevertheless, it has been recently claimed that most serum IgM in resting mice is produced by a discrete subset of bone marrow resident CD5− IgM plasma cells originated from fetal-lineage progenitors residing in the peritoneal cavity (neither B1a nor B1b) (Reynolds et al., 2015). Regarding NAbs of IgA class, it is considered that Peyer’s patches would be the main place of production independently of germinal centers and through both T-dependent (TD) and T-independent (TI) pathways (Bunker et al., 2017; Shimoda et al., 1999) and that B1 cells would not be relevant contributors (Thurnheer et al., 2003). Altogether, the deficient production of NAbs in Cd6 mice would not involve a single B cell subset. However, adoptive B cell and serum transfer improved sepsis-induced Cd6 mice survival, indicating a nonredundant role of such components in Cd6 mice’s immune response to sepsis. Taken together, our results support quantitative and/or qualitative B1a and MZB cell defects and decreased availability of NAbs as a cause behind Cd6 mouse’ increased susceptibility to bacterial infection. To the best of our knowledge, the only B cell subset expressing CD6 are B1a cells once they move from the peritoneal cavity to the spleen (Enyindah-Asonye et al., 2017b). CD6 expression gain for B1a cell function remains unexplored. Recent signalosome studies indicate that CD6 may recruit intracellular signal effectors in T cells (Mori et al., 2021), which may also be the case for B cells. Thus, CD6 may behave as a co-stimulatory or inhibitory receptor depending on the T/B cell stimulation conditions and/or the cell differentiation program. If the activating function dominates, CD6 deficiency may result in lower B1a homeostatic proliferation and antibody production. On the contrary, when the inhibitory function dominates, CD6-deficient B1a cells can be overactivated and undergo activation-induced cell death (AICD), also resulting in lower cell numbers and antibody production. In this regard, impaired B1a cell self-renewal has been reported to cause reduced B1a cell population in Cd6 mice (Enyindah-Asonye et al., 2017b). Higher activation in B cells has been associated to worse sepsis outcome in humans (Monserrat et al., 2013) and mice (Nolan et al., 2009). Analysis of peritoneum and spleen total B cells after CLP-induced sepsis showed a higher induction of the co-stimulatory CD80 and CD86 receptors for Cd6 mice compared with WT controls (Figures S1A and S1B). This finding would be indicative of overactivation of Cd6 B cells 24 h post-CLP. As mentioned earlier, such overactivation in the minor B cell subset constitutively expressing CD6 (i.e., B1a cells) could still be the consequence of absent CD6-mediated inhibitory signals. However, the assessment of apoptotic (Annexin V+ and 7-AAD+) B cells from spleen and peritoneum of WT and Cd6 mice before and 24 h post-CLP induction did not reveal significant differences (Figure S1C). This would indicate that overactivation of Cd6 B cells does not drive them to increased AICD induction. In case of the major B cell subset not constitutively expressing CD6 (B2), overactivation could result from other indirect causes such as a defective function of cells with regulatory/suppressive activity. Indeed, previous work from our group shows that steady state Cd6 mice already present higher frequencies of regulatory T (Treg) cells with decreased suppressive activity (Consuegra-Fernández et al., 2017; Orta-Mascaró et al., 2016). Ex vivo cell analyses showed that spleens from Cd6 mice post-CLP-induced sepsis also undergo higher Treg cell induction, associated to lower induction of CD69 surface expression, a maker correlating with Treg suppressive function (Yu et al., 2018) (Figure S2). Recent evidence shows that Treg cells, in addition to regulating adaptive immune responses, also regulate the function of innate immune cells such as macrophages, dendritic cells, and neutrophils (Okeke and Uzonna, 2019). As an example, it has been shown that Treg cells induce neutrophil recruitment through the production of CXCL8 (Himmel et al., 2011). Though the role of Tregs in immune response to infection is controversial, our findings would be compatible with the view of Tregs being important for successful elimination of bacteria and prevention of bacteria-induced hyperinflammation (i.e., systemic inflammatory response syndrome, SIRS) (Bosmann and Ward, 2013). There are also claims that T cells act as early mediators in host response to sepsis (Kasten et al., 2010). During sepsis, T cell apoptosis occurs and attenuates the innate immune response through direct and indirect effects on macrophages and neutrophils, resulting in decreased control of bacterial infection and worsened outcomes. In a scenario of dysfunctional Cd6 Treg cells, excessive AICD of T cells might occur, which would be detrimental for bacterial sepsis survival. Accordingly, increased T cell AICD phenomena have been previously reported in Cd6 mice following their polyclonal activation (by co-crosslinking of CD3 and CD28) (Li et al., 2017). In conclusion, our studies in Cd6 mice support an important role for the lymphocyte surface receptor CD6 during early/innate response against bacterial infections. The data point to CD6 expression as a key factor in the homeostatic expansion and functionality of relative small, though functionally relevant, B (B1a and MZB) and T (Treg) cell subsets. The consequences of such defects, either alone or in coordination, drive to a defective NAbs production and, consequently, to the loss of an important humoral element of the innate immune system. In this regard, clinical studies showed that the IgM levels are lower among nonsurvivor patients undergoing sepsis (Giamarellos-Bourboulis et al., 2013). Therefore, intravenous administration of IgM-enriched immunoglobulins has been tried in different clinical trials, exhibiting still unclear benefits probably due to the sepsis status of the patient at the moment of the infusion (Cui et al., 2019).

Limitations of the study

This manuscript addresses the function of CD6 in a bacterial sepsis context. However, it remains to be tested whether such susceptibility is general and extendable to other infectious agents (e.g., viruses, fungi, or parasites). Indeed, interaction of CD6 with certain viral, fungal, and parasitic structures has been reported (Velasco-de Andrés et al., Cells 2020). Moreover, B1a and MZB cell deficiency found in Cd6 mice could also be deeply studied in order to find the molecular and functional causes behind this deficiency. This approach will be partly addressed by studying how CD6-deficiency impacts the development of different B cell subsets (either CD6-positive or -negative), because low but significant surface CD6 expression levels have been reported in early (CD34+ rho123med/lo) progenitors in bone marrow (Cortés et al., 1999).

STAR★Methods

Key resources table

Resource availability

Lead contact

Further information and requests for resources and reagents should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the lead contact Francisco Lozano (flozano@clinic.cat).

Materials availability

This study did not generate new unique reagents.

Experimental model and subject details

CD6-deficient mice (Cd6−/−) were generated in C57BL/6N background through the Mouse Biology Program (University of California, Davis, Davis, CA) using targeting vector DPGS00142_B_G12 from the trans-NIH Knock-Out Mouse Project (KOMP), and obtained from the KOMP repository (Orta-Mascaró et al., 2016). Cd6−/− and wild-type littermate (WT) mice were housed at the animal facilities of the Facultat de Medicina from the Universitat de Barcelona and their CD6−negative/positive phenotype was monitored by flow cytometry analysis using PE-conjugated rat anti-mouse CD6 mAb (OX-129, Biolegend). Eight- to twelve-week-old male mice were used in all experiments. Experimental procedures were approved by the Animal Experimentation Ethical Committee from Universitat de Barcelona (ref. 255/17).

Method details

In vivo infection models

Cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) was used as a model of polymicrobial peritonitis-induced sepsis (Rittirsch et al., 2008). Briefly, mice were anesthetised via i.p. with ketamine (100 mg/kg; Anesketin, Dechra Veterinary Products SLU) and xylazine (10 mg/kg; Rompun, Bayer). The lower half of the abdomen was shaved and sterilized with ethanol and 1-cm incision was done. The cecum was externalized and the distal 50% or 75% (mid- or high-grade mortality, respectively) was ligated using silicone coated braided silk 3–0 (Covidien). Cecal material was released by one ‘through and through’ puncture with a 21-gauge needle and a drop of faecal matter was exuded before reinstating the cecum into the peritoneal cavity and suturing the muscle and skin with TC16 26mm needle silk 3–0 (06100, Laboratorio Aragó, S.L.). Closed suture was cleaned with povidone-iodine. Mice were then s.c. administered with saline (0.5 mL) and buprenorphine (0.05 mg/kg/12 h) for hydration and analgesia purposes post-surgery. Escherichia coli–induced peritonitis and Klebsiella pneumoniae-induced pneumonitis were used as models of monobacterial sepsis. Briefly, bacteria were grown in Luria Bertoni (LB) liquid cultures at 37°C under horizontal shaking at 180 rpm, centrifuged and suspended in saline to desired concentration. Mice were then infected with E. coli (9 × 106 CFU/mouse, i.p.; ATCC 25922) or K. pneumoniae (9 × 108 CFU/mouse, i.n.; ATCC 13883) and survival was monitored over time. Buprenorphine (0.05 mg/kg/12 h, s.c.) was administered for 3 days after infection. For adoptive B and T plus NK cell transfer experiments, spleens from steady state Cd6 and WT littermate mice were homogenized. Splenocytes were suspended in 4 mL of 1× RBC lysis buffer (eBioscience) for 4 min at RT. After washing twice with PBS, cell pellets were suspended in PBS plus 10% FBS and pooled. Total B or NK and T cells were then negatively sorted in FACS Aria II and FACS Aria Sorp BD cytometers from IDIBAPS Flow cytometry platform, upon staining with the following fluorescent-labeled mAb mix for B cells sorting: GR-1-APC (RB6-8C5, Tonbo), CD11c-Violet Fluor (N418, eBioscience), CD3-PerCP-Cy5.5 (145-2C11, Tonbo) and NK1.1-PE (PK136, BD). For T and NK cells sorting, the mAb mix selected was: GR-1-APC (RB6-8C5, Tonbo), CD11c-Violet Fluor (N418, eBioscience), CD19-PECy7 (1D3, Tonbo) and CD45R/B220-Violet Fluor (RA3-6B2, Tonbo). Sorted WT and Cd6 B cells (96% purity) were collected, suspended in sterile saline and i.p. injected (107 cells/mouse) to Cd6 mice 15 h before CLP-induction. A control group of Cd6 mice was also i.p. injected with the same volume of vehicle. For T and NK transfer only WT cells were sorted (94% purity) and injected in the same conditions ad for B cell transfer experiment. For serum transfer experiments, whole blood samples from steady state Cd6 and WT littermate mice were obtained by cardiac puncture and allowed to clot at RT. Then, samples were centrifuged (10 min at 2000 rcf) for serum isolation and pooling, and further complement inactivation by incubation at 56 ᵒC for 30 min. Inactivated pooled sera were diluted 1:2 in PBS (400 μL final volume/mouse) and injected i.p. 15 h before CLP-induction. In parallel experiments, affinity-purified polyreactive H2h4-7-50 (IgG2b) mAb (Sáez Moya et al., 2021) was also injected (0.2 or 0.5 mg/mouse, i.p.) 15 h before CLP-induction. In all cases, survival was monitored over time. In some cases, mice were euthanized at 24 h post-CLP induction for organ samplings. Bacterial load measurements in peritoneal lavages and spleen homogenates were conducted by plating serial diluted samples (in sterile PBS) on LB agar, and incubated overnight at 37°C. Viable bacterial counts were expressed as CFU/mL or CFU/mg. IL-6 and TNF-α cytokine levels from plasma or peritoneal lavage samples were monitored by ELISA using OptEIA sets (BD Biosciences; catalogs no. 555240 and 558534, respectively) and following manufacturer’s instructions. Absorbance (450 nm and 570 nm) was read using Epoch spectrophotometer (Biotek).

Ex vivo phenotypical cell analyses

Peritoneum cells from mice euthanized before and 24 h after CLP-induction were obtained by centrifugation (5 min at 1500 rpm) of peritoneal lavages. Cell pellets were suspended in 1 mL of 1× RBC lysis buffer (eBioscience) and incubated for 4 min at RT. After two PBS washings, cells were suspended in PBS plus 2% FBS for total cell counting using 0.4% Trypan Blue (SV30084.01, VWR). Spleens from mice euthanized before and 24 h after CLP-induction were aseptically removed and incubated for 20 min at 37°C in 3 mL of PBS containing collagenase D (1 mg/mL; Roche 11088866001) and DNase I (0.1 mg/mL; Roche 10104159001). Following disaggregation through 40 μm cell strainers with a syringe plunger, cells were washed with 10 mL of PBS. After discarding the supernatant, cells were incubated at RT for 4 min with 4 mL of RBC lysis buffer. Upon two PBS washings, cells were suspended in PBS plus 2% FBS for total cell counting using 0.4% Trypan Blue. Then, 106 cells/well were plated into 96-well plates and incubated for 15 min at RT in blocking solution (PBS plus 2% FBS and anti-mouse CD16/CD32; Fc Shield, clone 2.4G2, Tonbo Bioscience) for flow cytometry analyses. Mixes of mAbs were prepared in 2% FBS-PBS solution and 50 μL of each mix was added to the cells. Fluorescent-labeled mAbs used were: F4/80-FITC (BM8.1, Tonbo), GR-1-allophycocyanin (APC) (RB6-8C5, Tonbo), CD45R/B220-Violet Fluor (RA3-6B2, Tonbo), CD80-APC (16–10A1, Biolegend), CD86-PE (GL1, BD Pharmaginen), CD3-PerCP-Cy5.5 (145-2C11, Tonbo), CD4-Violet Fluor (75–0042, Tonbo), CD25-Peridinin Chlorophyll Protein-Cyanine5.5 (PerCP-Cy5.5) (65–0251, Tonbo), FoxP3-PE (3G3, Tonbo), CD69-APC (104514, Biolegend), CD11b-APC (M1/70, eBioscience), CD5-PerCP-Cy5.5 (53–7.3, Biolegend), CD21/CD35-FITC (B3B4, BD) and CD23-PE (7G6, BD). Cell samples were incubated for 20 min at 4°C in dark, and then centrifuged at 1800 rpm, washed twice with PBS and suspended in fixing solution (PBS plus 1% paraformaldehyde). For apoptosis analysis APC Annexin V Apoptosis Detection Kit with 7-AAD (Biolegend, 640930) was used following manufacturer’s instructions. Labeled cells were analyzed with a BD FACSCanto II flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, US) and mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) data analyzed using FlowJo software (Tree Star, USA).

Polyreactive natural antibody measurements

For in vitro studies, spleens from steady state Cd6-/- and WT mice were aseptically isolated and processed as explained above. Cells were counted and adjusted to the desired concentration in RPMI 1640 medium plus L-glutamine (R8758–6X500ML; Sigma & Aldrich), FBS (10%), 2-Mercaptoethanol (50μM; Merck), penicillin (100 U/mL; 6191309, Lab EBN) and streptomycin (100 μg/mL; 624569, Lab Normon). 2 × 105cells/well were plated in U-bottomed 96-well plates (Biofil). Cells were stimulated with LPS (0.2 or 1 μg/mL) for 24 h. Supernatants from in vitro studies and serum samples from Cd6-/- and WT steady state mice were serially diluted and plated into 96-well plates previously coated with dinitrophenol (DNP)-BSA (5 μg/mL; Biotools) overnight at 4°C and blocked with 1% BSA in PBS. After overnight incubation, plate-bound DNP-reactive IgM, IgG and IgA antibodies were developed by using HRP-conjugated anti-mouse Ig antibodies (Sigma A8786, A3673 and Southern Biotech 1040–05, respectively). Plate-bound DNP-reactive IgG1, IgG2b, IgG2c and IgG3 antibodies were developed by using biotin-labeled antibodies (Jackson Immunoresearch 115-065-205, 207, 208 and 209, respectively) plus streptavidin-POD conjugate (Roche 11089153001). Well-plates were developed using TMB Substrate Reagent Set (BD, 555214), and 2N H2SO4 was added to stop the reaction. Absorbance (450 nm and 570 nm) was read using Epoch spectrophotometer (Biotek).

Quantification and statistical analysis

GraphPad Prism 7 (GraphPad Software) was used to design graphs and for statistical comparisons. ∗p values ≤0.05 were considered statistically significant.
REAGENT or RESOURCESOURCEIDENTIFIER
Antibodies

FITC Anti-Mouse F4/80 Antigen (BM8.1)Tonbo BiosciencesCat# 35-4801, RRID:AB_2621714
APC Anti-Mouse Ly-6G (Gr-1) (RB6-8C5)Tonbo BiosciencesCat# 20–5931, RRID:AB_2621610
PE Anti-Human/Mouse CD45R (B220) (RA3-6B2) AntibodyTonbo BiosciencesCat# 50–0452, RRID:AB_2621764
APC anti-mouse CD80BioLegendCat# 104714, RRID:AB_313135
PE Ms CD86 CF594 GL1 50ugBD BiosciencesCat# 567592, RRID:AB_2916657
VioletFluor 450 Anti-Mouse CD4 (RM4-5)Tonbo BiosciencesCat# 75–0042, RRID:AB_2621928
PerCP-Cyanine 5.5 Anti-Mouse CD25 (PC61.5)Tonbo BiosciencesCat# 65–0251, RRID:AB_2621889
PE anti-Human/Mouse Foxp3 (3G3)Tonbo BiosciencesCat# 50–5773, RRID:AB_2621797
APC anti-mouse CD69 (H1.2F3)BioLegendCat# 104514, RRID:AB_492843
APC anti-mouse CD11b (M1/70)eBioscienceCat# 17-0112-82, RRID:AB_469343
PerCP-Cy5.5 anti-mouse CD5 (53–7.3)BioLegendCat# 100623, RRID: AB_2563432
FITC CD21/CD35 (B3B4)BD BiosciencesCat# 553818, RRID:AB_395070
PE anti-mouse CD23 PE (7G6)BD BiosciencesCat# 553139, RRID:AB_394654
PE anti-mouse CD6 (OX-129)BioLegendCat# 146404, RRID:AB_2562753
Violet Fluor anti-mouse CD11c (N418)eBioscienceCat# 48-0114-82, RRID:AB_1548654
PerCP Cy5.5 anti-mouse CD3 (145-2C11)TonboCat# 65-0031, RRID:AB_2621872
PE anti-mouse NK1.1 (PK136)BD Pharmingen™Cat# 557391, RRID:AB_396674
Purified anti-mouse CD16/CD32 (2.4G2)TonboCat# 70–0161, RRID:AB_2621487
HRP-conjugated anti-mouse IgMSigma-AldrichCat# A8786, RRID:AB_258413
HRP-conjugated anti-mouse IgGSigma-AldrichCat# A3673, RRID:AB_258099
Goat Anti-Mouse IgA-HRPSouthernBiotechCat# 1040–05, RRID:AB_2714213
PECy7 anti-mouse CD19 (1D3)TonboCat# 60–0193, RRID:AB_2621840
Biotin-SP-AffiniPure Goat Anti-Mouse IgG, Fc_ Subclass 1Jackson ImmunoresearchCat# 115-065-205, RRID:AB_2338571
Biotin-SP-AffiniPure Goat Anti-Mouse IgG, Fc_ Subclass 2bJackson ImmunoresearchCat# 115-065-207, RRID:AB_2338573
Biotin-SP-AffiniPure Goat Anti-Mouse IgG, Fc_ Subclass 2cJackson ImmunoresearchCat# 115-065-208, RRID:AB_2338574
Biotin-SP-AffiniPure Goat Anti-Mouse IgG, Fc_ Subclass 3Jackson ImmunoresearchCat# 115-065-209, RRID:AB_2338575
Affinity-purified polyreactive H2h4-7-50 (IgG2b) mAb(Sáez Moya et al., 2021)N/A

Bacterial and virus strains

Klebsiella pneumoniaeATCCATCC 13883
Escherichia coliATCCATCC 25922

Chemicals, peptides, and recombinant proteins

Collagenase DRoche11088866001
DNase IRoche10104159001
RBC lysis buffereBioscience00-4333-57
Anesketin (ketamine)Dechra Veterinary Products SLUN/A
XylazineRompun, BayerN/A
Streptavidin-POD conjugateRoche11089153001
DNP-BSABiotoolsD-5050-10
TMB Substrate Reagent SetBD Biosciences555214

Critical commercial assays

Mouse IL-6 ELISA OptEIA setBD Biosciences555240
TNF-α ELISA OptEIA setBD Biosciences558534
APC Annexin V Apoptosis Detection Kit with 7-AADBiolegend640930

Experimental models: Organisms/strains

Mouse: CD6KO in C57BL6N backgroundKOMPCd6tm1(KOMP)Wtsi

Software and algorithms

Gen 5BioTek Instruments Inc.N/A
FlowJo softwareTree Star, USAN/A
GraphPad Prism 7GraphPad SoftwareN/A
BioRenderBioRenderN/A
  55 in total

Review 1.  Innate immune recognition.

Authors:  Charles A Janeway; Ruslan Medzhitov
Journal:  Annu Rev Immunol       Date:  2001-10-04       Impact factor: 28.527

Review 2.  T cells are potent early mediators of the host response to sepsis.

Authors:  Kevin R Kasten; Johannes Tschöp; Samuel G Adediran; David A Hildeman; Charles C Caldwell
Journal:  Shock       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.454

3.  The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).

Authors:  Mervyn Singer; Clifford S Deutschman; Christopher Warren Seymour; Manu Shankar-Hari; Djillali Annane; Michael Bauer; Rinaldo Bellomo; Gordon R Bernard; Jean-Daniel Chiche; Craig M Coopersmith; Richard S Hotchkiss; Mitchell M Levy; John C Marshall; Greg S Martin; Steven M Opal; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Tom van der Poll; Jean-Louis Vincent; Derek C Angus
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Protective Effects of Human and Mouse Soluble Scavenger-Like CD6 Lymphocyte Receptor in a Lethal Model of Polymicrobial Sepsis.

Authors:  Mario Martínez-Florensa; Marta Consuegra-Fernández; Fernando Aranda; Noelia Armiger-Borràs; Marianna Di Scala; Esther Carrasco; Jerónimo Pachón; Jordi Vila; Gloria González-Aseguinolaza; Francisco Lozano
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  ALCAM/CD166: A pleiotropic mediator of cell adhesion, stemness and cancer progression.

Authors:  Fátima Ferragut; Vanina S Vachetta; María F Troncoso; Gabriel A Rabinovich; María T Elola
Journal:  Cytokine Growth Factor Rev       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 7.638

6.  Modulation of CD6 function through interaction with Galectin-1 and -3.

Authors:  Cristina Escoda-Ferran; Esther Carrasco; Miguel Caballero-Baños; Cristina Miró-Julià; Mario Martínez-Florensa; Marta Consuegra-Fernández; Vanesa G Martínez; Fu-Tong Liu; Francisco Lozano
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 4.124

7.  CD318 is a ligand for CD6.

Authors:  Gospel Enyindah-Asonye; Yan Li; Jeffrey H Ruth; Danislav S Spassov; Katie E Hebron; Andries Zijlstra; Mark M Moasser; Benlian Wang; Nora G Singer; Huadong Cui; Ray A Ohara; Stephanie M Rasmussen; David A Fox; Feng Lin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Relevance of CD6-Mediated Interactions in the Regulation of Peripheral T-Cell Responses and Tolerance.

Authors:  Marta Consuegra-Fernández; Mario Martínez-Florensa; Fernando Aranda; José de Salort; Noelia Armiger-Borràs; Teresa Lozano; Noelia Casares; Juan José Lasarte; Pablo Engel; Francisco Lozano
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 7.561

9.  Kinetics of circulating immunoglobulin M in sepsis: relationship with final outcome.

Authors:  Evangelos J Giamarellos-Bourboulis; Efterpi Apostolidou; Malvina Lada; Ioannis Perdios; Nikolaos K Gatselis; Iraklis Tsangaris; Marianna Georgitsi; Magdalini Bristianou; Theodora Kanni; Kalliopi Sereti; Miltiades A Kyprianou; Anastasia Kotanidou; Apostolos Armaganidis
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  CD6 modulates thymocyte selection and peripheral T cell homeostasis.

Authors:  Marc Orta-Mascaró; Marta Consuegra-Fernández; Esther Carreras; Romain Roncagalli; Amado Carreras-Sureda; Pilar Alvarez; Laura Girard; Inês Simões; Mario Martínez-Florensa; Fernando Aranda; Ramón Merino; Vanesa-Gabriela Martínez; Rubén Vicente; Jesús Merino; Adelaida Sarukhan; Marie Malissen; Bernard Malissen; Francisco Lozano
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  1 in total

1.  Experimental and genetic evidence for the impact of CD5 and CD6 expression and variation in inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Sergi Casadó-Llombart; María Velasco-de Andrés; Cristina Català; Alejandra Leyton-Pereira; Rebeca Gutiérrez-Cózar; Belén Suárez; Noelia Armiger; Esther Carreras; Miriam Esteller; Elena Ricart; Ingrid Ordás; Javier P Gisbert; María Chaparro; María Esteve; Lucía Márquez; David Busquets; Eva Iglesias; Esther García-Planella; María Dolores Martín-Arranz; Juliane Lohmann; C Korcan Ayata; Jan Hendrik Niess; Pablo Engel; Julián Panés; Azucena Salas; Eugeni Domènech; Francisco Lozano
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 8.786

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.