| Literature DB >> 36157278 |
Xiaohan Xu1, Roy Anthony Rogers2, Mario Arturo Ruiz Estrada3.
Abstract
With the development of economic and technologies, the trend of annual Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emission changes with time passes. The relationship between economic growth and carbon dioxide emissions is considered as one of the most important empirical relationships. In this study, we focus on the member of Shanghai Cooperation Organization, including China, Russia, India, and Pakistan and collect CO2 emission and annual GDP from 1969 to 2014. The statistical methods and tests are used to find the relationship between annual GDP and CO2 emission in these countries. Based on relationship between annual and CO2 emission, a novel multi-step prediction algorithm called Extreme Learning Machine with Artificial Bee Colony (ELM-ABC) is proposed for forecasting annual GDP based on CO2 emission and historical GDP features. According to the experimental results, it proved that the proposed model had a super forecasting ability in GDP prediction and it could predict ten-year future annual GDP for the corresponding countries. Moreover, the forecasting results showed that the annual GDP of China and Pakistan will continue to grow but growth will slow after 2025. The annual GDP in India will exhibit unstable growth. The trend of Russia will follow the pattern between 2010 and 2016.Entities:
Keywords: CO2 emissions; Extreme learning machine; GDP; Optimization; SCO; Time series prediction
Year: 2022 PMID: 36157278 PMCID: PMC9488890 DOI: 10.1007/s10614-022-10311-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Econ ISSN: 0927-7099 Impact factor: 1.741
Fig. 1The flow chart of artificial bee colony
Fig. 3The time series trend in GDP and CO2 emission from the four different countries
Fig. 2The main flow chart of methodology
The model summary for R square test about GDP and CO2 emission of different four data sets
| Data | R | R2 | Adjusted R2 | Std. Error of the Estimate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| China | 0.941a | 0.885 | 0.883 | 8.627E+11 |
| Russia | 0.358a | 0.128 | 0.086 | 6.84948E+11 |
| Pakistan | 0.939a | 0.882 | 0.88 | 22752135956 |
| India | 0.962a | 0.926 | 0.924 | 1.48292E+11 |
aPredictors: (Constant), CO2
ANOVA test for GDP and CO2 emission of four different data sets
| Data | Sum of Squares | df | Mean Square | F | Sig. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| China | Regression | 3.036E+26 | 1 | 3.036E+26 | 407.994 | 0.000a |
| Residual | 3.944E+25 | 53 | 7.442E+23 | |||
| Total | 3.431E+26 | 54 | ||||
| Russia | Regression | 1.44467E+24 | 1 | 1.445E+24 | 3.079 | 0.94a |
| Residual | 9.85224E+24 | 21 | 4.692E+23 | |||
| Total | 1.12969E+25 | 22 | ||||
| Pakistan | Regression | 2.04913E+23 | 1 | 2.049E+23 | 395.845 | 0.000a |
| Residual | 2.7436E+22 | 53 | 5.177E+20 | |||
| Total | 2.32349E+23 | 54 | ||||
| India | Regression | 1.44897E+25 | 1 | 1.449E+25 | 658.907 | 0.000a |
| Residual | 1.1655E+24 | 53 | 2.199E+22 | |||
| Total | 1.56552E+25 | 54 |
Dependent Variable: GDP
aPredictors: (Constant), CO2
Correlation test between GDP and CO2 emission of China
| Data | CO2 | GDP | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| China | CO2 | Pearson Correlation | 1 | 0.941** |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.000 | |||
| GDP | Pearson Correlation | 0.941** | 1 | |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.000 | |||
| Russia | CO2 | Pearson Correlation | 1 | 0.358 |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.094 | |||
| GDP | Pearson Correlation | 0.358 | 1 | |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.094 | |||
| Pakistan | CO2 | Pearson Correlation | 1 | 0.939** |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.000 | |||
| GDP | Pearson Correlation | 0.939** | 1 | |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.000 | |||
| India | CO2 | Pearson Correlation | 1 | 0.962** |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.000 | |||
| GDP | Pearson Correlation | 0.962** | 1 | |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.000 |
**Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed)
The parameter setting for compared models
| Model | Parameter | Data Sets | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| China | Russia | Pakistan | India | ||
| KELM | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| ESN | Search in [1, 5, ..., 200] | ||||
| Search in [0.1, 0.2, 1] | |||||
| SVR | Parameters setting based on paper (Emsia & Coskuner, | ||||
The performance in MSE and SMAPE based on LOO cross-validation for different datasets
| Model | Measurement | Data set | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| China | Russia | Pakistan | India | ||
| ESN | MSE | 0.1104 | 0.5385 | 0.4143 | 0.1772 |
| SMAPE | 144.00% | 49.54% | 78.80% | 94.78% | |
| SVR | MSE | 0.19 | 0.3046 | 0.639 | 0.578 |
| SMAPE | 40.74% | 44.98% | 37.89% | 43.35% | |
| KELM | MSE | 0.1752 | 0.1278 | 0.1633 | 0.2564 |
| SMAPE | 32.71% | 27.49% | 25.82% | 33.58% | |
| ELM-ABC | MSE | ||||
| SMAPE | |||||
The best performance is in boldface
Fig. 4The convergence chart using ABC for four different countries
Fig. 5Line chart of four countries for predictive values based on ELM-ABC and actual values in annual GDP
Fig. 6The 10-year annual GDP prediction from 2019 to 2028