| Literature DB >> 36156984 |
Dongyun Li1, Lianni Mei1, Huiping Li1, Chunchun Hu1, Bingrui Zhou1, Kaifeng Zhang1, Zhongwei Qiao2, Xiu Xu1, Qiong Xu1.
Abstract
Rett syndrome (RTT) is a neurodevelopmental disorder caused by loss-of-function variants in the MECP2 gene, currently with no cure. Neuroimaging is an important tool for obtaining non-invasive structural and functional information about the in vivo brain. Multiple approaches to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans have been utilized effectively in RTT patients to understand the possible pathological basis. This study combined developmental evaluations with clinical severity, T1-weighted imaging, and diffusion tensor imaging, aiming to explore the structural alterations in cohorts of young girls with RTT, idiopathic autism spectrum disorder (ASD), or typical development. Voxel-based morphometry (VBM) was used to determine the voxel-wised volumetric characteristics of gray matter, while tract-based spatial statistics (SPSS) was used to obtain voxel-wised properties of white matter. Finally, a correlation analysis between the brain structural alterations and the clinical evaluations was performed. In the RTT group, VBM revealed decreased gray matter volume in the insula, frontal cortex, calcarine, and limbic/paralimbic regions; TBSS demonstrated decreased fractional anisotropy (FA) and increased mean diffusivity (MD) mainly in the corpus callosum and other projection and association fibers such as superior longitudinal fasciculus and corona radiata. The social impairment quotient and clinical severity were associated with these morphometric alterations. This monogenic study with an early stage of RTT may provide some valuable guidance for understanding the disease pathogenesis. At the same time, the pediatric-adjusted analytic pipelines for VBM and TBSS were introduced for significant improvement over classical approaches for MRI scans in children.Entities:
Keywords: MECP2; Rett; children; tract-based spatial statistics; voxel-based morphometry
Year: 2022 PMID: 36156984 PMCID: PMC9493495 DOI: 10.3389/fninf.2022.962197
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neuroinform ISSN: 1662-5196 Impact factor: 3.739
Figure 1Pediatric-adjusted pipelines for VBM and TBSS. VBM, voxel-based morphometry; TBSS, tract-based spatial statistics; GM, gray matter; DTI, diffusion tensor imaging; DWI, diffusion-weighted image; FA, fractional anisotropy; MD, mean diffusivity; GLM, general linear model; TFCE, threshold-free cluster enhancement.
Summary of clinical characteristics of study subjects.
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Number of subjects | 25 | 28 | 27 | |
| Age (M ± SD) | 3.5 ± 1.25 | 3.6 ± 1.45 | 3.8 ± 1.22 | 0.658a* |
|
| ||||
| Number of subjects | 22 | 23 | 23 | |
| Age (M ± SD) | 3.4 ± 0.81 | 3.5 ± 1.06 | 3.8 ± 1.18 | 0.359a* |
|
| ||||
| Gross motor | 32.32 ± 9.84 | 69.32 ± 16.00 | NA | 9.994c**** |
| Social | 15.48 ± 7.76 | 56.60 ± 17.65 | NA | 10.72c**** |
| Language | 14.96 ± 7.13 | 46.00 ± 17.74 | NA | 8.173c**** |
| Fine motor | 11.60 ± 6.93 | 55.71 ± 17.54 | NA | 11.77c**** |
| Performance | 10.80 ± 5.24 | 54.89 ± 17.86 | NA | 11.88c**** |
|
| 5.76 ± 1.17 | NA | NA | |
|
| 0.886 ± 0.03 | 0.884 ± 0.02 | 0.883 ± 0.02 | 0.687a* |
|
| 1200.80 ± 126.99 | 1437.36 ± 174.86 | 1432.67 ± 142.56 | 20.83b**** |
|
| 626.72 ± 56.98 | 795.14 ± 70.09 | 785.93 ± 55.30 | 61.43b**** |
|
| 289.60 ± 37.91 | 393.57 ± 61.47 | 400.11 ± 54.83 | 35.52b**** |
|
| 0.137 ± 0.006 | 0.147 ± 0.008 | 0.149 ± 0.009 | 15.29b**** |
|
| 0.896 ± 0.048E-03 | 0.867 ± 0.028E-03 | 0.863 ± 0.038E-03 | 5.17b** |
aOne-way ANOVA.
bANCOVA.
cUnpaired Student's t-test (two-tailed).
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001.
T1w, T1-weighted; VBM, voxel-based morphometry; DTI, diffusion tensor imaging; TBSS, tract-based spatial statistics; IQR, image quality rating; TIV, total intracranial volume; GMV, gray matter volume; WMV, white matter volume; FA, fractional anisotropy; MD, mean diffusivity; NA, not applicable.
Figure 2Global-leveled ANCOVA analysis showed a significant difference in gray and white matter parameters among the three groups. RTT group exhibited significantly decreased GMV, WMV, FA, and increased MD values compared to ASD and TD controls. GMV, gray matter volume; WMV, white matter volume; FA, fractional anisotropy; MD, mean diffusivity; NS, not significant.
Decreased gray matter volumes in comparisons between RTT group and controls for VBM analysis.
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of voxels | 621 | 16,836 | 3,818 | 1,057 | ||||
| Peak MNI coordinate | −27, −10.5, −22.5 | −33, 49.5, −12 | 3, −99, 9 | −1.5, −81, 37.5 | ||||
| Peak MNI coordinate region | Hippocampus_L | 343 | Frontal_Mid_L | 1531 | Calcarine_L 1056 | Precuneus_R | 717 | |
| Peak intensity | 10.2694 | 11.8957 | 12.2698 | 4.8573 | ||||
| Other involved regions | ParaHippocampus_L | 140 | Insula_L | 2,679 | Calcarine_R | 583 | Precuneus_L | 340 |
| (with Top10 voxelsize >100) | Putamen_L | 138 | Frontal_Sup_L | 2,034 | Lingual_R | 530 | ||
| Insula_R | 1,580 | Cuneus_L | 529 | |||||
| OFCpost_L | 1,017 | Cuneus_R | 352 | |||||
| Rectus_R | 697 | Lingual_L | 311 | |||||
| Rectus_L | 615 | Occipital_Mid_L | 278 | |||||
| Frontal_Inf_L | 575 | Occipital_Inf_L | 118 | |||||
| Putamen_R | 468 | |||||||
| Hippocampus_R | 404 | |||||||
| ParaHippocampus_R | 303 | |||||||
| …… | ||||||||
| Number of voxels | 543 | 15,031 | 2,483 | 1,697 | ||||
| Peak MNI coordinate | −27, −15, −27 | −33, 49.5, −12 | 12, −82.5, −7.5 | −10.5, −63, 27 | ||||
| Peak MNI coordinate region | ParaHippocampus_L | 183 | Frontal_Mid_L | 1354 | Lingual_R | 551 | Precuneus_R | 632 |
| Peak intensity | 8.6294 | 11.6149 | 10.8569 | 9.6658 | ||||
| Other involved regions | Hippocampus_L | 252 | Insula_L | 2237 | Calcarine_L | 865 | Precuneus_L | 290 |
| (with Top10 voxelsize >100) | Putamen_L | 108 | Insula_R | 1557 | Calcarine_R | 546 | Cuneus_R | 282 |
| Frontal_Sup_L | 1531 | Cuneus_L | 433 | Occipital_Mid_L | 258 | |||
| Rectus_R | 822 | Lingual_L | 281 | Occipital_Inf_L | 100 | |||
| Rectus_L | 601 | |||||||
| Putamen_R | 466 | |||||||
| Hippocampus_R | 453 | |||||||
| OFCmed_R | 323 | |||||||
| OFCmed_L | 315 | |||||||
| ParaHippocampus_R | 296 | |||||||
| …… |
The table demonstrates four clusters with significant differences in the RTT group compared with two control groups (FWE corrected, p < 0.05). Number of voxels and MNI coordinates of the peak voxel as well as the AAL labeling are listed. Age and total cranial volume were included as covariates.
Figure 3VBM and TBSS findings in young girls with RTT compared to ASD and TD controls. These figures demonstrated the ANCOVA and post-hoc statistical results of VBM analysis (left) and TBSS analysis (right) among three groups. For VBM results, the RTT group showed significantly decreased gray matter volumes (red-yellow) compared with controls (p < 0.05, FWE corrected). For TBSS results, TDD group showed significantly decreased FA values (red) and increased MD values (blue) compared with controls (p < 0.05, FWE corrected). TBSS results are overlaid on the mean FA skeleton (green).
Decreased FA and increased MD values in comparisons between the RTT group and controls for TBSS analysis.
|
|
|
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |||||||||
| FA | 35,281 | 0.002 | 49 | 124 | 34 | Body of corpus callosum | 2919.64 | Body of corpus callosum | 738.53 |
| MD | 895 | 0.046 | 92 | 143 | 87 | Genu of corpus callosum | 1440.02 | Genu of corpus callosum | 156.39 |
| Splenium of corpus callosum | 1352.98 | ||||||||
| Superior longitudinal fasciculus R | 917.83 | ||||||||
| Anterior corona radiata R | 609.23 | ||||||||
| Sagittal stratum R | 245.27 | ||||||||
| Cingulum L | 245.27 | ||||||||
| Posterior thalamic radiation L | 237.37 | ||||||||
| Superior corona radiata L | 229.46 | ||||||||
| Retrolenticular part of internal capsule R | 197.8 | ||||||||
| Retrolenticular part of internal capsule L | 197.8 | ||||||||
| Cingulum R | 189.88 | ||||||||
| Anterior limb of internal capsule R | 166.17 | ||||||||
| Posterior thalamic radiation R | 158.23 | ||||||||
| Posterior corona radiata L | 150.33 | ||||||||
| Sagittal stratum L | 142.43 | ||||||||
| Cerebral peduncle R | 134.52 | ||||||||
| External capsule R | 102.84 | ||||||||
| …… | |||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| FA | 40,906 | 0.002 | 54 | 118 | 40 | Body of corpus callosum | 3025.48 | Body of corpus callosum | 2626.84 |
| MD | 4,903 | 0.006 | 102 | 157 | 80 | Genu of corpus callosum | 1556.64 | Genu of corpus callosum | 859.51 |
| Splenium of corpus callosum | 1293.22 | Splenium of corpus callosum | 598.76 | ||||||
| Superior longitudinal fasciculus R | 1077.67 | Cingulum L | 241.43 | ||||||
| Anterior corona radiata R | 678.52 | Anterior corona radiata L | 135.20 | ||||||
| Superior longitudinal fasciculus L | 534.84 | Posterior corona radiata R | 122.57 | ||||||
| Anterior corona radiata L | 311.34 | ||||||||
| Posterior corona radiata R | 295.35 | ||||||||
| Posterior thalamic radiation L | 279.41 | ||||||||
| Superior corona radiata L | 263.42 | ||||||||
| Cingulum L | 247.47 | ||||||||
| External capsule L | 239.48 | ||||||||
| Cerebral peduncle L | 231.49 | ||||||||
| Posterior corona radiata L | 207.55 | ||||||||
| Cingulum R | 199.55 | ||||||||
| Retrolenticular part of internal capsule R | 183.61 | ||||||||
| Retrolenticular part of internal capsule L | 175.62 | ||||||||
| Anterior limb of internal capsule L | 151.67 | ||||||||
| External capsule R | 143.68 | ||||||||
| Posterior limb of internal capsule R | 119.74 | ||||||||
| Sagittal stratum | 111.75 | ||||||||
| …… | |||||||||
The table demonstrates clusters with significant differences (FWE corrected, p < 0.05) with number of voxels, p-values, and MNI coordinates of the peak voxel of each positive tract in the RTT group and two control groups. Age and total cranial volume were included as covariates. TBSS, tract-based spatial statistics.
Correlations between clinical data and altered gray and white matter parameters in the RTT group.
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
| GMV | 0.411 | 0.041 | −0.403 | 0.046 |
| WMV | – | – | −0.408 | 0.045 |
| TBSS_FA | 0.446 | 0.038 | −0.601* | 0.003 |
| TBSS_MD | – | – | 0.422 | 0.037 |
| Hippocampus_L | 0.444* | 0.026 | −0.399 | 0.048 |
| Hippocampus_R | 0.410 | 0.041 | −0.372 | 0.047 |
| Precuneus_R | 0.472* | 0.017 | −0.377 | 0.043 |
| Cuneus_R | 0.402 | 0.047 | −0.433 | 0.031 |
| Cuneus_L | 0.411 | 0.041 | – | – |
| Putamen_R | – | – | −0.500* | 0.011 |
| Precuneus_L | 0.412 | 0.041 | – | – |
| Frontal_Mid_L | – | – | −0.410 | 0.033 |
| Calcarine_L | 0.446 | 0.026 | – | – |
| Calcatine_R | 0.411 | 0.041 | – | – |
| Lingual_L | 0.428 | 0.037 | – | – |
| Lingual_R | 0.340 | 0.048 | – | – |
| Rectus_L | 0.449* | 0.025 | – | – |
| Rectus_R | 0.452* | 0.023 | – | – |
| Rolandic_Oper_L | 0.488* | 0.013 | – | – |
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
| |
| TBSS_FA | 0.468 | 0.002 | 0.422 | 0.034 |
The table demonstrates the correlation analysis between clinical data (GDS-C and RSSS) with gray and white matter parameters. Two-tailed p < 0.05 was set for a significant level. –, no significant correlation. *Survived with multiple corrections with a significant level at p < 0.05.