Literature DB >> 36156910

The Role of C-Reactive Protein as a Prognostic Biomarker in Patients with Early Breast Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Alexandra Edimiris-Herrmann1, Cornelia Kolberg-Liedtke2,3,4, Ann-Kathrin Bittner2, Oliver Hoffmann2, Sarah Wetzig5, Mohamed Shaheen6, Miltiades Stephanou6, Hans-Christian Kolberg3,6.   

Abstract

Background: C-reactive protein (CRP) is an acute phase reactant influenced by inflammation and tissue damage. Elevated CRP levels have been associated with poor outcome of various cancers including breast cancer. However, evidence regarding a potential impact of CRP levels on outcome of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients with early breast cancer (EBC) is insufficient.
Methods: Patients who had received NACT for EBC and had available data regarding CRP levels before therapy, pathologic complete remission (pCR), and follow-up were included. The association between CRP at baseline and outcome parameters was analyzed.
Results: 152 women were included in this analysis; median follow-up was 5.8 years. No association between CRP at baseline and pCR rates could be detected. 6.6% of the patients developed a local recurrence, 10.5% developed a distant recurrence, and 5.2% died from breast cancer. A negative correlation (Spearman-Rho) between CRP at baseline and overall survival (OS) (correlation coefficient (CC) -0.255; p = 0.45), disease-free survival (DFS) (CC -0.348; p = 0.075), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) (CC -0.245; p = 0.327), and distant DFS (DDFS) (CC -0.422; p = 0.057) was not statistically significant, although especially in DFS and DDFS a strong trend was detected. The probability of death from breast cancer was 2% if the CRP was <0.08 mg/dL and 40% if the CRP was >2.08 mg/dL; this association was highly statistically significant (χ2; p < 0.001). These results were independent from age, estrogen and progesterone receptor status, HER2 status, nodal status, and grading. The hazard ratio for OS was 5.75 (p = 0.004) for CRP <0.08 mg/dL versus CRP >2.08 mg/dL. Discussion/
Conclusion: CRP at baseline is not predictive for pCR in EBC after NACT in our patient dataset. However, an association of parameters of long-term prognosis with CRP could be demonstrated. Although the correlations of higher CRP levels at baseline and shorter OS, DFS, LRFS, and DDFS were not significant, a strong trend could be detected that was reproduced in the analysis of different groups of CRP levels and the probability of breast cancer mortality. Higher CRP levels are indicating a worse prognosis in EBC after NACT in this retrospective analysis. These results justify further investigation of CRP not as a predictive parameter for pCR but as a biomarker of long-term prognosis in EBC in prospective trials and may lead to therapeutic approaches with the aim of lowering CRP levels.
Copyright © 2022 by S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomarker; Breast cancer; C-reactive protein; Early disease; Neoadjuvant therapy

Year:  2022        PMID: 36156910      PMCID: PMC9453660          DOI: 10.1159/000522606

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)        ISSN: 1661-3791            Impact factor:   2.268


  34 in total

Review 1.  Physical activity and cancer prevention: etiologic evidence and biological mechanisms.

Authors:  Christine M Friedenreich; Marla R Orenstein
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.798

Review 2.  Inflammation and necrosis promote tumour growth.

Authors:  Jukka Vakkila; Michael T Lotze
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 53.106

Review 3.  The effect of physical activity on mediators of inflammation.

Authors:  M A Nimmo; M Leggate; J L Viana; J A King
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 6.577

Review 4.  Function of C-reactive protein.

Authors:  T W Du Clos
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.709

5.  Prognostic impact of interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein on patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Tatsuo Shimura; Masahiko Shibata; Kenji Gonda; Yuko Murakami; Masaru Noda; Kazunoshin Tachibana; Noriko Abe; Tohru Ohtake
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 6.  Prognostic role of C-reactive protein in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yijie Han; Feng Mao; Ying Wu; Xiaonan Fu; Xiaoli Zhu; Shuli Zhou; Wei Zhang; Qiang Sun; Yulan Zhao
Journal:  Int J Biol Markers       Date:  2011 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.659

Review 7.  Hepatic acute phase proteins--regulation by IL-6- and IL-1-type cytokines involving STAT3 and its crosstalk with NF-κB-dependent signaling.

Authors:  Johannes G Bode; Ute Albrecht; Dieter Häussinger; Peter C Heinrich; Fred Schaper
Journal:  Eur J Cell Biol       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 4.492

8.  C-reactive protein fifty years on.

Authors:  M B Pepys
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1981-03-21       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 9.  C-Reactive Protein and Breast Cancer: New Insights from Old Molecule.

Authors:  Shilpa Balaji Asegaonkar; Balaji Narayanrao Asegaonkar; Unmesh Vidyadhar Takalkar; Suresh Advani; Anand Pandurang Thorat
Journal:  Int J Breast Cancer       Date:  2015-11-26

10.  Serum C-reactive protein is an important and powerful prognostic biomarker in most adult solid tumors.

Authors:  Shiva Shrotriya; Declan Walsh; Amy S Nowacki; Cliona Lorton; Aynur Aktas; Barbara Hullihen; Nabila Benanni-Baiti; Katherine Hauser; Serkan Ayvaz; Bassam Estfan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.