| Literature DB >> 36155857 |
Haidan M El-Shorbagy1,2, Ehab S Abdel-Aal3, Shaimaa A Mohamed4, Akmal A El-Ghor1.
Abstract
Studying variation in genes responsible for physiological characters is important to enhance goat productive and reproductive efficiency. This study aimed to detect specific nucleotide polymorphisms in prolactin receptor (PRLR), insulin-like growth factor (IGF1), and leptin (LEP) genes and their correlation with milk production (MP) and litter size (LS) traits in Zaraibi goat. PCR-SSCP products of different patterns of each gene were sequenced and aligned to reveal two mutations (T > C) and (G > A) in 3'UTR of PRLR gene and registered on NCBI with accession numbers OM418863 for TT and OM418864 for CT, while (G > A) variation was registered as OM418861 for GG and OM418862 for AG in exon 10. TT, CT, AG, and GG genotypes were distributed in the studied animals with frequencies 0.43, 0.57, 0.65, and 0.35, respectively. While alleles C, T, A, and G frequencies were 0.28, 0.72, 0.32, and 0.68, respectively. CT and AG genotypes associated significantly (P < 0.05) with higher MP and LS, respectively. By studying the haplotypes of PRLR, C-A and T-A were associated with the highest and the lowest level of MP, respectively. For LS, T-A and C-G showed significant correlation with the highest and the lowest rate, respectively. Regarding IGF1 gene, two polymorphisms were detected; T74C at exon 4 which registered on NCBI as OM418860, and combined mutations as ins. G470, A531G, and T534C (PP genotype) at 5' flanking region that registered as OM418859. For LEP, only one polymorphism was found in intron 2 (G281A) which submitted to NCBI as OM418855. All detected polymorphisms have shown to be involved in regulating the MP or LS as reproductive traits in goat.Entities:
Keywords: Goat; IGF1; LEP; Litter size; Milk production; Mutations; PRLR; Polymorphism
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36155857 PMCID: PMC9512711 DOI: 10.1007/s11250-022-03316-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Trop Anim Health Prod ISSN: 0049-4747 Impact factor: 1.893
PCR conditions of the primer sets of PRLR, IGF-1, and LEP genes
| Character | Initial denaturation | Cycles | Denaturation | Annealing | Extension | Final cycle | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| For milk production (PRLR-M) | 5 min at 95 °C | 35 cycles | 94 °C for 30 s | 50 °C for 30 s | 72 °C for 35 s | 10 min at 72 °C | Hou et al. |
| For litter size (PRLR-L) | 5 min at 94 °C | 32 cycles | 94 °C for 30 s | 55 °C for 30 s | 72 °C for 30 s | 10 min at 72 °C | Zhang et al. |
| For milk production (IGF1-M) | 5 min at 96 °C | 35 cycles | 94 °C for 40 s | 50 °C for 40 s | 72 °C for 40 s | 10 min at 72 °C | Deng et al. |
| For litter size (IGF1-L) | 2 min at 96 °C | 35 cycles | 95 °C for 30 s | 61 °C for 20 s | 68 °C for 60 s | 5 min at 68 °C | Naicy et al. |
| For milk production (LEP-M) | 2 min at 94 °C | 35 cycles | 94 °C for 1 min | 55 °C for 1 min | 72 °C for 1 min | 15 min at 72 °C | Singh et al. |
| For litter size (LEP-L) | 2 min at 95 °C | 30 cycles | 95 °C for 1 min | 55 °C for 1 min | 72 °C for 1 min | 7 min at 72 °C | Singh et al. |
Primers used for amplification of PRLR, IGF1, and LEP genes
| Gene name | Primer name | Sequence (5′-3′) | PCR product size |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prolactin receptor (PRLR) | PRLR-M–F PRLR-M–R | AGTGAGAGTTATGGAAGGATG AAGGTTAAGCAACTGGTCTT | 443 bp |
PRLR-L–F PRLR-L–R | AAACCCCCTTGTTCTCTGCTA CCCAACCCAACTGGAGTCTGC | 315 bp | |
| Insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) | IGF1-M–F IGF1-M–R | GCTGGGTGTAGCAGTGAACA GTTGCTTCAGAAGCATAACT | 320 bp |
IGF1-L–F IGF1-L–R | GGGTATTGCTAGCCAGCTGGT CCGGGCATGAAGACACACACAT | 601 bp | |
| Leptin (LEP) | LEP-M–F LEP-M–R | TGGAGTGGCTTGTCATTTCCTTCT GTCCCTGCTTCTGGCCACCTAACT | 400 bp |
LEP-L–F LEP-L–R | AGCAGTCCGTCTCCTCCAAA AGATATTTGGATCACATTTCTG | 152 bp |
Fig. 1Genotyping of 3′ UTR fragment of PRLR gene. A The electrophoretic pattern obtained after SSCP analysis shows homozygous genotype TT (lanes 1, 4) and heterozygous genotype CT (lanes 2, 3). B DNA sequencing analysis representing TT genotype. C DNA sequencing analysis representing CT genotype
Genotype and allelic frequencies of the PRLR locus in Zaraibi goats
| Genotypes’ frequencies | Allelic frequencies | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRLR-M | CT | TT | C | T | ||
| 0.57 (57) | 0.43 (43) | 0.285 | 0.725 | 15.89 | ||
| PRLR-L | AG | GG | A | G | ||
| 0.65 (65) | 0.35 (35) | 0.32 | 0.68 | 23.18 | ||
CT, TT, AG, and GG genotype frequencies were at the PRLR locus; n = 100 Zaraibi does; genotypes and alleles frequencies were assessed according to Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) and χ2, chi-square value. The number of animals per genotype is indicated in parentheses
Fig. 2Genotyping of exon 10 regions of PRLR gene. A The electrophoretic pattern obtained after SSCP analysis shows homozygous genotype GG (lanes 3, 4) and heterozygous genotype AG (lanes 2, 5). B DNA sequencing analysis representing GG genotype. C DNA sequencing analysis representing AG genotype
Fig. 3Genotyping of exon 4 of the IGF-1 gene. A The electrophoretic pattern obtained after SSCP analysis shows homozygous genotype CC (lanes 1–4). B DNA sequencing analysis representing CC genotype
Fig. 4Genotyping of 5′ flanking region of IGF-1 gene. A The electrophoretic pattern obtained after SSCP analysis showing homozygous genotype PP (lanes 1–3). B DNA sequencing analysis representing PP genotype (ins. G at 471, A530G, and T533C)
Fig. 5Genotyping of intron 2 regions of LEP gene. A The electrophoretic pattern obtained after SSCP analysis shows homozygous genotype AA (lanes 1–4). B DNA sequencing analysis representing AA genotype
Effect of PRLR genotypes on average daily, total milk yield, and litter size
| Genotypes | Average daily milk yield (kg/day) | Total milk yield (kg) | Litter size (kids) |
|---|---|---|---|
| PRLR-M | |||
| CT | 0.86 ± 0.03 a | 211.88 ± 6.8 a | 2.04 ± 0.1a |
| TT | 0.79 ± 0.03 b | 182.15 ± 7.6 b | 2.10 ± 0.1a |
| PRLR-L | |||
| AG | 0.84 ± 0.03 a | 203.46 ± 7.2 a | 2.10 ± 0.1a |
| GG | 0.83 ± 0.03 a | 212.46 ± 8.3 a | 1.79 ± 0.1b |
Results were expressed as least squares means (LSM) ± standard error (SE); mean values marked with the different letters are different (significant, P < 0.05)
Effect of haplotype on average daily, total milk yield, and litter size
| Average daily milk yield (kg/ day) | Total milk yield (kg) | Litter size (kids) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| C-A | 0.87 ± 0.03 a | 220.64 ± 7.0 a | 2.10 ± 0.1a |
| C-G | 0.84 ± 0.03 ab | 217.56 ± 8.5 a | 1.76 ± 0.1b |
| T-A | 0.73 ± 0.03 b | 181.75 ± 7.9 b | 2.11 ± 0.1a |
| T-G | 0.78 ± 0.04 b | 187.21 ± 9.4 b | 1.84 ± 0.1b |
Results were expressed as least squares means (LSM) ± standard error (SE); mean values marked with the different letters are different (significant, P < 0.05).
Effect of parity and breeding season on average daily, total milk yield, and litter size
| Items | Average daily milk yield (kg/day) | Total milk yield (kg) | Litter size |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parity | |||
| 1 | 0.74 ± 0.03b | 179.62 ± 7.3c | 1.76 ± 0.1c |
| 2 | 0.85 ± 0.03a | 201.35 ± 7.9ab | 1.85 ± 0.1bc |
| 3 | 0.86 ± 0.03a | 208.31 ± 8.5a | 1.99 ± 0.1ab |
| 4 | 0.87 ± 0.04a | 214.14 ± 9.4a | 2.11 ± 0.1a |
| ≥ 5 | 0.78 ± 0.04b | 193.03 ± 10.6bc | 2.06 ± 0.1a |
| Breeding season | |||
| Autumn (November) | 0.84 ± 0.03b | 197.36 ± 8.0b | 1.96 ± 0.1a |
| Spring (March) | 0. 90 ± 0.03a | 201.22 ± 7.1a | 1.94 ± 0.1a |
Results were expressed as least squares means (LSM) ± standard error (SE); mean values marked with the different letters are different (significant, P < 0.05)