| Literature DB >> 36153607 |
Anna Rubinski1, Nicolai Franzmeier1, Anna Dewenter1, Ying Luan1, Ruben Smith2,3, Olof Strandberg3, Rik Ossenkoppele3,4, Martin Dichgans1,5,6, Oskar Hansson3,7, Michael Ewers8,9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In Alzheimer's disease (AD), fibrillar tau initially occurs locally and progresses preferentially between closely connected regions. However, the underlying sources of regional vulnerability to tau pathology remain unclear. Previous brain-autopsy findings suggest that the myelin levels-which differ substantially between white matter tracts in the brain-are a key modulating factor of region-specific susceptibility to tau deposition. Here, we investigated whether myelination differences between fiber tracts of the human connectome are predictive of the interregional spreading of tau pathology in AD.Entities:
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease; Amyloid-PET; Myelin; Myelin water fraction; Resistance; Tau spreading; Tau-PET
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36153607 PMCID: PMC9508747 DOI: 10.1186/s13195-022-01074-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Alzheimers Res Ther Impact factor: 8.823
Fig. 1Analysis flow chart. A Surface rendering of the 200-ROI brain atlas, based on which we estimated B cortical MWF and C group-level tau-PET scores, which were further vectorized (D) and spatially correlated. E The same brain atlas shown in (A) was applied to each participant’s tau-PET score change rates, individual values were vectorized and all possible pairs of ROIs across participants were correlated to obtain a covariance in tau-PET score change matrix (F). G Using the 200 ROI brain atlas shown in (A), resting-state fMRI functional connectivity was assessed on 100 participants of the human connectome project (HCP). H Diffusion MRI from the HCP was used to estimate the fiber-tracts between each pair of ROIs in the brain atlas shown in (A). I The MWF atlas was overlayed to extract regional MWF values of underlying fiber tracts. J Linear regression analysis was performed with the covariance in tau-PET score change as the dependent variable, and the interaction of functional connectivity by MWF in fiber-tract as the predictor. In a sensitivity analysis, we further controlled the above-mentioned analyses for regional amyloid-PET levels or the covariance in amyloid-PET change (not shown)
Sample demographics, mean (SD)
| Age, years | 70.88 (6.40)†,‡,§ | 74.64 (7.39)* | 74.77 (7.40)* | 76.20 (9.33)* | <0.001 |
| Sex, M/F | 72 / 127 | 44 / 75 | 51 / 46 | 31 / 28 | 0.011 |
| Education, years | 16.78 (2.28)§ | 16.68 (2.38)§ | 16.11 (2.46) | 15.44 (2.41)*,† | <0.001 |
| MMSE | 29.19 (1.07)‡,§ | 28.91 (1.36)‡,§ | 27.49 (2.19)*,†,§ | 22.19 (3.96)*,†,‡ | <0.001 |
| APOE e4 carriers -/+a | 136- / 51+†,‡,§ | 54- / 60+* | 29- / 53+* | 18- / 32+* | <0.001 |
| Mean tau-PET follow-up, yearsb | 1.72 (0.53) | 1.64 (0.57) | 1.45 (0.71) | 1.37 (0.49) | 0.299 |
| Age, years | 73.86 (7.27) | 73.80 (7.44) | 71.73 (9.72) | 71.43 (7.34) | 0.274 |
| Sex, M/F | 19 / 17 | 12 / 18 | 18 / 8 | 25 / 21 | 0.187 |
| Education, years | 12.42 (3.80) | 11.93 (3.72) | 12.21 (3.93) | 12.22 (3.75) | 0.928 |
| MMSE | 28.86 (1.10)‡,§ | 28.83 (1.15)‡,§ | 25.58 (3.06)*,†,§ | 20.96 (4.87)*,†,‡ | < 0.001 |
| APOE e4 carriers -/+ | 29- / 7+†,‡,§ | 8- / 22+* | 6- / 20+* | 19- / 27+* | < 0.001 |
| Mean tau-PET follow-up, yearsc | 2.03 (0.47) | 1.94 (0.32) | 1.82 (0.12) | 1.87 (0.34) | 0.470 |
Abbreviations: Aβ Amyloid-beta, AD Alzheimer’s disease, APOE Apolipoprotein E, CN Cognitively normal, F Female, M Male, MCI Mild cognitive impairment, MMSE Mini-Mental State Exam
aavailable for 187 CN Aβ-/Tau-, 114 CN Aβ+, 82 MCI Aβ+, and 50 AD dementia
bsubsample of 35 CN Aβ-/Tau-, 60 CN Aβ+, 39 MCI Aβ+, and 24 AD dementia
csubsample of 16 CN Aβ-/Tau-, 14 CN Aβ+, 7 MCI Aβ+, and 18 AD dementia
*Significantly different from CN Aβ-/Tau-
†Significantly different from CN Aβ+
‡Significantly different from MCI Aβ+
§Significantly different from AD dementia (significant after applying a Bonferroni-corrected α-threshold of 0.0125)
Fig. 2Association between cortical MWF and baseline tau-PET scores. Scatterplots showing the association between ROI levels of MWF and tau-PET scores for controls (CN Aβ − /Tau − ; left column) and AD spectrum (Aβ + participants; right column) from the ADNI (A) and BioFINDER-1 (B) cohorts. The coloring indicates for each ROI the major functional network it belongs to. DAN, dorsal attention network; DMN, default-mode network; PFCN, fronto-parietal control network; VAN, ventral attention network; MWF, myelin water fraction
Fig. 3Interaction between functional connectivity and MWF in fiber-tracts on covariance in a tau-PET score change. Regression plots illustrating covariance in tau-PET change as a function of both functional connectivity and MWF in fiber-tracts (binarized by median spit) in the controls (CN Aβ − /Tau − ; left column) and AD spectrum (Aβ + participants; right column) groups of the ADNI (A) and BioFINDER-1 (B) cohorts. Red line is the regression line for participants with values < median MWF, and the blue regression line is for participants with values > median MWF. For the statistical analyses, MWF was used as a continuous measure and was stratified to high and low only for illustrational purposes. MWF, myelin water fraction