| Literature DB >> 36153566 |
Deniz Bakkalci1, Auxtine Micalet1,2, Rawiya Al Hosni1, Emad Moeendarbary2, Umber Cheema3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Engineering bone in 3D is important for both regenerative medicine purposes and for the development of accurate in vitro models of bone tissue. The changing material stiffness of bone tissue had not yet been monitored throughout the process of mineralisation and bone nodule formation by osteoblasts either during in vitro engineering or in development perspective.Entities:
Keywords: 3D models; AFM; Bone; ECM; Stiffness; Tissue engineering
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36153566 PMCID: PMC9509582 DOI: 10.1186/s13104-022-06203-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Res Notes ISSN: 1756-0500
Fig. 1In vitro bone nodule formation. Bone formation in a 2D, b 3D soft collagen scaffold, and c 3D dense collagen scaffold at 14 of BMA application. 2.5× Magnification, Scale bar = 500 μm. d Bone nodule formation timeline in 3D dense collagen. Height measurement of 21-day old bone nodules by Keyence VHX-7000 Digital Microscope (Keyence, Osaka, Japan). Scale bar (left image) = 10 μm.
The schematic has been created using SmartServier Medical Art
Fig. 2In vitro bone nodule formation in 3D dense collagen scaffolds. a Mineral deposition at day 5, Scale bar = 500 μm. b Osteoblast clusters and mineral and bone nodule deposition at day 8, Scale bar = 500 μm. c Bone nodule formation at day 8, Scale bar = 100 μm. Alizarin red stained 3D dense collagen scaffolds at d day 5 and e day 8. f Alizarin red stained 3D dense collagen scaffolds at day 8, Scale bar = 25 μm. g Percentage change in stiffness (%) at day 1, 5, and 8. Expression of h ALPL, and i E11 at days 1, 5, and 8. One-Way ANOVA, Dunnet’s Post Hoc; p-values 0.05< *, 0.005<**, 0.005<*** and 0.00005<****