Literature DB >> 36153344

Integrated graph measures reveal survival likelihood for buildings in wildfire events.

Akshat Chulahwat1, Hussam Mahmoud2, Santiago Monedero3, Francisco Jośe Diez Vizcaíno3, Joaquin Ramirez3,4, David Buckley3, Adrián Cardil Forradellas3,5.   

Abstract

Wildfire events have resulted in unprecedented social and economic losses worldwide in the last few years. Most studies on reducing wildfire risk to communities focused on modeling wildfire behavior in the wildland to aid in developing fuel reduction and fire suppression strategies. However, minimizing losses in communities and managing risk requires a holistic approach to understanding wildfire behavior that fully integrates the wildland's characteristics and the built environment's features. This complete integration is particularly critical for intermixed communities where the wildland and the built environment coalesce. Community-level wildfire behavior that captures the interaction between the wildland and the built environment, which is necessary for predicting structural damage, has not received sufficient attention. Predicting damage to the built environment is essential in understanding and developing fire mitigation strategies to make communities more resilient to wildfire events. In this study, we use integrated concepts from graph theory to establish a relative vulnerability metric capable of quantifying the survival likelihood of individual buildings within a wildfire-affected region. We test the framework by emulating the damage observed in the historic 2018 Camp Fire and the 2020 Glass Fire. We propose two formulations based on graph centralities to evaluate the vulnerability of buildings relative to each other. We then utilize the relative vulnerability values to determine the damage state of individual buildings. Based on a one-to-one comparison of the calculated and observed damages, the maximum predicted building survival accuracy for the two formulations ranged from [Formula: see text] for the historical wildfires tested. From the results, we observe that the modified random walk formulation can better identify nodes that lie at the extremes on the vulnerability scale. In contrast, the modified degree formulation provides better predictions for nodes with mid-range vulnerability values.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36153344      PMCID: PMC9509321          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-19875-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.996


  23 in total

1.  Transmission dynamics of the etiological agent of SARS in Hong Kong: impact of public health interventions.

Authors:  Steven Riley; Christophe Fraser; Christl A Donnelly; Azra C Ghani; Laith J Abu-Raddad; Anthony J Hedley; Gabriel M Leung; Lai-Ming Ho; Tai-Hing Lam; Thuan Q Thach; Patsy Chau; King-Pan Chan; Su-Vui Lo; Pak-Yin Leung; Thomas Tsang; William Ho; Koon-Hung Lee; Edith M C Lau; Neil M Ferguson; Roy M Anderson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-05-23       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Learning to coexist with wildfire.

Authors:  Max A Moritz; Enric Batllori; Ross A Bradstock; A Malcolm Gill; John Handmer; Paul F Hessburg; Justin Leonard; Sarah McCaffrey; Dennis C Odion; Tania Schoennagel; Alexandra D Syphard
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Housing arrangement and location determine the likelihood of housing loss due to wildfire.

Authors:  Alexandra D Syphard; Jon E Keeley; Avi Bar Massada; Teresa J Brennan; Volker C Radeloff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Understanding the influence of all nodes in a network.

Authors:  Glenn Lawyer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Improving the accuracy of the k-shell method by removing redundant links: From a perspective of spreading dynamics.

Authors:  Ying Liu; Ming Tang; Tao Zhou; Younghae Do
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Interpreting the socio-technical interactions within a wind damage-artificial neural network model for community resilience.

Authors:  Stephanie F Pilkington; Hussam N Mahmoud
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 2.963

7.  A wildfire vulnerability index for buildings.

Authors:  M Papathoma-Köhle; M Schlögl; C Garlichs; M Diakakis; S Mavroulis; S Fuchs
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-16       Impact factor: 4.996

8.  Network analysis of wildfire transmission and implications for risk governance.

Authors:  Alan A Ager; Cody R Evers; Michelle A Day; Haiganoush K Preisler; Ana M G Barros; Max Nielsen-Pincus
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 3.752

9.  Adaptive social networks promote the wisdom of crowds.

Authors:  Abdullah Almaatouq; Alejandro Noriega-Campero; Abdulrahman Alotaibi; P M Krafft; Mehdi Moussaid; Alex Pentland
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Exposure to news grows less fragmented with an increase in mobile access.

Authors:  Tian Yang; Sílvia Majó-Vázquez; Rasmus K Nielsen; Sandra González-Bailón
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.