Literature DB >> 3615285

Morphology of scoliosis: three-dimensional evolution.

R Perdriolle, J Vidal.   

Abstract

The clinical examination of the scoliotic child's profile shows that it does not correspond to the physiological curvatures. This three-dimensional study of scoliosis shows evidence of the existence of three components, frontal, sagittal, and axial. Each generates a pathological displacement of the vertebrae maximal at the apical vertebral level. Because of rotation, in order to analyze each of the components, radiographs must be taken along the frontal or sagittal plane of the vertebrae. A comparative study of the sagittal and frontal components during progression of scoliosis indicates that the apical vertebrae are displaced not only laterally but also forward and then backward. The apical vertebrae are situated anteriorly with respect to the end vertebrae. If the scoliotic curves progress, the apical vertebrae eventually become displaced backward. During this displacement at a given moment they are situated in the frontal plane of the child at the same level as the upper end vertebra; then they come to lie behind this if the scoliosis continues to progress. This explains why, when observed from the side, the appearance changes and passes through three successive stages, lordosis, flat back, and kyphosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3615285     DOI: 10.3928/0147-7447-19870601-10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  38 in total

1.  Surgical correction of severe dystrophic neurofibromatosis scoliosis: an experience of 32 cases.

Authors:  Wael Koptan; Yasser ElMiligui
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  The horizontal plane appearances of scoliosis: what information can be obtained from top-view images?

Authors:  Tamás S Illés; Máté Burkus; Szabolcs Somoskeőy; Fabien Lauer; Francois Lavaste; Jean F Dubousset
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Could clinical ultrasound improve the fitting of spinal orthosis for the patients with AIS?

Authors:  M Li; J Cheng; M Ying; B Ng; Y P Zheng; T P Lam; W Y Wong; M S Wong
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03-25       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Clinical investigation and imaging.

Authors:  Daniel Studer
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 1.548

5.  Computerized tomography imaging in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: prone versus supine.

Authors:  Gultekin Sıtkı Cecen; Deniz Gulabi; Aycicek Cecen; İsmail Oltulu; Bulent Guclu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Axial plane lumbar responses after anterior selective thoracic fusion for main thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Ki-Ho Na; Jürgen Harms; Kee-Yong Ha; Nam-Yong Choi
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2008-12-31

7.  Transverse plane pelvic rotation increase (TPPRI) following rotationally corrective instrumentation of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis double curves.

Authors:  Marc A Asher; Sue-Min Lai; Brandon B Carlson; Jeffrey L Gum; Douglas C Burton
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2010-08-26

8.  Biomechanical simulations of the spine deformation process in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis from different pathogenesis hypotheses.

Authors:  I Villemure; C E Aubin; J Dansereau; H Labelle
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-01-17       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Comparison of scoliosis measurements based on three-dimensional vertebra vectors and conventional two-dimensional measurements: advantages in evaluation of prognosis and surgical results.

Authors:  Tamás Illés; Szabolcs Somoskeöy
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Short anterior correction of the thoracolumbar/lumbar curve in King 1 idiopathic scoliosis: the behaviour of the instrumented and non-instrumented curves and the trunk balance.

Authors:  Kan Min; Frederik Hahn; Kai Ziebarth
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-03-17       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.