| Literature DB >> 36151411 |
Hafiz Qasim Ali1, Muhammad Umair Yasir2, Amir Farooq2, Mahrukh Khan2, Muhammad Salman3, Muhammad Waqar4.
Abstract
Leather industry is the second largest export-earning sector of Pakistan. However, because of poor waste management, this industry has been continuously polluting the environment. In this paper, the impact of tanneries on the groundwater quality of Kasur city (i.e., the second largest leather producing city) is examined. The study is conducted in the following three phases: (I) water samples collection, (II) determination of physio-chemical properties, and (III) application of data mining techniques. In phase I, groundwater samples were collected from various sources such as hand pumps, motor pumps, and tube wells. In phase II, several physio-chemical properties such as (i) total dissolved solids (TDS), (ii) pH, (iii) turbidity, (iv) electrical conductivity (EC), (v) total hardness (TH), (vi) total alkalinity (TA), (vii) nitrates, (viii) chromium, (ix) fluoride, and (x) chloride were estimated. The estimated values of all these foregoing parameters are then compared with the Punjab Environmental Quality Standards for Drinking Water (PEQSDW). In phase III, principle component analysis and cluster analysis of the estimated parameters were performed to elucidate the relation between various parameters and to highlight the highly vulnerable sites, respectively. The results exhibit that most of the sampling collections sites are at the threshold of losing quality water. Moreover, it is also found that Mangal Mandi carries the worst groundwater quality among all sampling locations. Overall, it is concluded that serious attention is due from the water and wastewater authorities to further investigate and monitor the groundwater quality of Kasur before the country strikes with another pandemic after COVID-19.Entities:
Keywords: Assessment; Global pandemic; Groundwater quality; Health impacts; Tanneries effluent
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36151411 PMCID: PMC9510162 DOI: 10.1007/s10661-022-10502-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Monit Assess ISSN: 0167-6369 Impact factor: 3.307
Fig. 1Sample collection points on geospatial map
Fig. 2Box plot analysis of the estimated parameters
Summary of the tested parameters with their permissible limits
| Total alkalinity | TA (mg/l) | 156 | 609 | 343.22 | 121.71 | |
| Sulfate | SO | 55 | 488 | 150.33 | 94.68 | |
| Total hardness | TH (mg/l) | 95 | 380 | 241.22 | 77.73 | |
| Nitrate | NO | 0.2 | 18.7 | 2.88 | 5.41 | |
| Fluoride | F (mg/l) | 0.2 | 0.7 | 0.45 | 0.13 | |
| Chloride | Cl (mg/l) | 38 | 834 | 147.06 | 197.25 | |
| Potential of hydrogen | pH (H | 7.5 | 8.9 | 8.43 | 0.4 | |
| Turbidity | Turbidity (NTU) | 0.2 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 0.27 | |
| Total dissolved solids | TDS (mg/l) | 311 | 2959 | 923.56 | 629.64 | |
| Electrical conductivity | EC ( | 710 | 6162 | 1902.06 | 1302.83 |
Comparison of tested parameters with their permissible limits
| ID | Site name | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TA | SO | TH | NO | F | Cl | pH | Turbidity | TDS | EC | ||
| (mg/l) | (mg/l) | (mg/l) | (mg/l) | (mg/l) | (mg/l) | (H | (NTU) | (mg/l) | ( | ||
| 1 | Nizam Pura | 471 | 126 | 172 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 169 | 8.6 | 0.7 | 963 | 1962 |
| 2 | Dollay Wala | 403 | 145 | 236 | 18.7 | 0.5 | 279 | 8.7 | 0.2 | 1369 | 2710 |
| 3 | Mangal Mandi | 609 | 488 | 299 | 15.7 | 0.5 | 834 | 8.1 | 0.3 | 2959 | 6162 |
| 4 | KTWMA | 302 | 74 | 95 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 94 | 7.8 | 0.4 | 723 | 1394 |
| 5 | Basti Gujaran Wali | 408 | 127 | 253 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 38 | 7.9 | 0.9 | 311 | 756 |
| 6 | Noori Wala | 454 | 135 | 207 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 77 | 8.7 | 0.7 | 489 | 1035 |
| 7 | Bhedian Usman Wala | 281 | 189 | 380 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 40 | 7.5 | 0.7 | 573 | 1246 |
| 8 | Naike Kalan | 331 | 153 | 300 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 57 | 8 | 0.6 | 710 | 1472 |
| 9 | Bangala Kamboha | 514 | 156 | 265 | 1.4 | 0.5 | 88 | 8.5 | 0.7 | 1047 | 2155 |
| 10 | Shrine | 286 | 141 | 218 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 419 | 8.7 | 0.3 | 1715 | 3559 |
| 11 | Bhuchke | 218 | 125 | 217 | 1 | 0.5 | 108 | 8.7 | 0.3 | 1113 | 2177 |
| 12 | Tullo Wala | 397 | 219 | 285 | 1.7 | 0.4 | 121 | 8.6 | 0.8 | 978 | 2058 |
| 13 | Faqeeria Wala | 369 | 125 | 275 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 56 | 8.5 | 0.7 | 1118 | 2262 |
| 14 | Sheikh Umad Kuhna | 235 | 183 | 211 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 40 | 8.9 | 0.8 | 493 | 967 |
| 15 | Kotla Sheikh Natha | 156 | 122 | 289 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 66 | 8.7 | 1.3 | 614 | 1240 |
| 16 | Chuhrpura | 166 | 55 | 369 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 39 | 8.4 | 0.5 | 630 | 1160 |
| 17 | Shamas Pura | 330 | 63 | 100 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 62 | 8.5 | 0.6 | 340 | 710 |
| 18 | Bahadurpura | 248 | 80 | 171 | 6.3 | 0.6 | 60 | 8.9 | 0.3 | 479 | 1012 |
| Mean | 343.22 | 150.33 | 241.22 | 2.88 | 0.45 | 147.06 | 8.43 | 0.6 | 923.56 | 1902.06 | |
| Median | 330.5 | 131 | 244.5 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 71.5 | 8.55 | 0.65 | 716.5 | 1433 | |
| Standard deviation | 121.71 | 94.68 | 77.73 | 5.41 | 0.13 | 197.25 | 0.4 | 0.27 | 629.64 | 1302.83 | |
| Permissible limit | |||||||||||
TA total alkalinity, SO sulfate, TH total hardness, nitrate, F fluoride, Cl chloride, TDS total dissolved solids, EC electrical conductivity
Shrine Hazrat Baba Shah Kamal Chishti
Fig. 3Spatial distribution of various parameters: a total alkalinity, b sulfates, c total hardness, d nitrate, e fluoride, f chloride, g pH, h turbidity, i total dissolved solids, and j electrical conductivity
Fig. 4Cross-correlation matrix
Fig. 5Plot for eigenvalues in the data-set
Fig. 6Comparison between various principal components (PCs) of the correlation matrix of data set. Each subplot shows the projection of collected data on the two PCs. Subplot (a) to (d) show that the first 5 PCs cover the 98% variance of the data while subplot (e) to (h) are almost identical and carry insignificant information between the various parameters of the data set
Fig. 7Cluster analysis of the data-set using dendrogram