Literature DB >> 36148977

Emerging Tickborne Bacteria in Cattle from Colombia.

Alejandro Ramírez-Hernández, Esteban Arroyave, Álvaro A Faccini-Martínez, Heidy C Martínez-Diaz, Paola Betancourt-Ruiz, Luz-Adriana Olaya-M, Elkin G Forero-Becerra, Marylin Hidalgo, Lucas S Blanton, David H Walker.   

Abstract

Ehrlichia minasensis is a new pathogenic bacterial species that infects cattle, and Borrelia theileri causes bovine borreliosis. We detected E. minasensis and B. theileri DNA in cattle from southwestern Colombia by using PCR. E. minasensis and B. theileri should be considered potential etiologies of febrile syndrome in cattle from Colombia.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Borrelia theileri; Colombia; Ehrlichia minasensis; Trp36; anaplasmosis; bacteria; cattle; parasites; tandem repeat protein 36; tickborne diseases; vector-borne infections; zoonoses

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36148977      PMCID: PMC9514337          DOI: 10.3201/eid2810.220657

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis        ISSN: 1080-6040            Impact factor:   16.126


Ehrlichia spp. are tickborne obligate intracellular bacteria and comprise different pathogenic species that affect both veterinary and public health (). Ehrlichia minasensis was first detected in cattle and deer in Canada and later in cattle and Rhipicephalus microplus ticks from Brazil (–). Infected cattle manifest signs that include fever, lethargy, depression, and anorexia (,). Borrelia theileri belongs to the relapsing fever group of borreliae and causes bovine borreliosis, which is a mild febrile disease associated with lethargy, hemoglobinuria, and anemia (). This spirochete is transmitted by Rhipicephalus (formerly Boophilus) sp. ticks and has been documented in Africa, Europe, Oceania, and South America (,). To our knowledge, E. minasensis or B. theileri infections have not been reported in cattle from Colombia. During September and October 2017, we collected blood samples from 30 bovids with tick parasitism in El Tambo and Santander de Quilichao municipalities, Cauca department, Colombia (Appendix Figure). We extracted DNA from blood using the QIAGEN DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (https://www.qiagen.com), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. We verified DNA quality using PCR amplification of the vertebrate cytochrome B gene CYTB. We subsequently performed PCR to detect dsb and trp36 genes for Ehrlichia spp.; flaB and 16S rRNA genes for Borrelia spp.; and rpoB, msp4, and msp1a genes for Anaplasma spp. (Appendix Table). DNA samples that produced strong PCR bands underwent sequencing on an Applied Biosystems 3130/3130xl Genetic Analyzer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, https://www.thermofisher.com). The msp1a PCR products were poor quality and did not undergo sequencing. We aligned sequences using GeneStudio (GeneStudio, Inc., https://genestudio-pro.software.informer.com) and performed multiple sequence alignments using the EMBL-European Bioinformatics Institute tools MUSCLE (for Ehrlichia spp.) and ClustalW (for Borrelia and Anaplasma spp.) (https://www.clustal.org). Phylogenetic analyses were performed with MEGA X software (https://www.megasoftware.net). We generated phylogenetic trees for dsb, flaB, and 16S rRNA genes and Trp36 protein using the maximum-likelihood estimation method. All procedures were approved by the Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Ethics Committee in Colombia. We detected CYTB in all samples. We detected the dsb gene in 10% (3/30) and trp36 in 20% (6/30) of samples. The flaB gene was detected in 13.3% (4/30), and the 16S rRNA gene was detected in 10% (3/30) of samples. The rpoB gene was amplified in 90% (27/30), msp4 was amplified in 83.3% (25/30), and msp1a was amplified in 83.3% (25/30) of samples. We performed phylogenetic analyses of 3 sequences for dsb (GenBank accession nos. ON209405–7), 6 sequences for Trp36 protein (inferred from GenBank accession nos. OL513405–10), 3 sequences for the 16S rRNA gene (GenBank accession nos. ON112216–8), 4 sequences for flaB (GenBank accession nos. ON135431–4); 6 sequences for rpoB (GenBank accession nos. ON209412–7), and 4 sequences for msp4 (GenBank accession nos. ON209408–11). Phylogenetic analyses showed that our dsb gene sequences clustered with E. minasensis dsb sequences from Brazil, Australia, and Colombia (Figure, panel A). The greater genetic diversity of Trp36 protein compared with dsb provided more detailed characterization of Ehrlichia sp. genotypes. Our Trp36 sequences clustered with 3 sequences from Brazil and a recently described E. minasensis strain from China isolated from Haemaphysalis hystricis ticks (Figure, panel B). The flaB and 16S rRNA genes clustered with B. theileri sequences (Figure, panels C, D). Bootstrap values were 86% for flaB and 72% for the 16S rRNA gene. The flaB sequences grouped with sequences from Argentina, Republic of the Congo, Egypt, and Israel (Figure, panel C). The 16S rRNA gene sequences grouped independently but close to sequences from Egypt and the United States (Figure, panel D). We confirmed A. marginale using identity analysis (100% identical to GenBank sequences; accession nos. CP023731, CP006846, CP001079, CP000030, and AF428086) of rpoB and msp4 genes. Co-infection with E. minasensis and A. marginale was confirmed in 6 animals from El Tambo. Co-infection with B. theileri and A. marginale was documented in 1 animal from El Tambo and 1 animal from Santander de Quilichao.
Figure

Phylogenetic analysis of emerging tickborne bacteria in cattle from Colombia. Phylogenetic trees are shown for dsb genes (A), Trp36 proteins (amino acid sequences) (B), flaB genes (C), and 16S rRNA genes (D). We performed PCR on blood samples from cattle in El Tambo and Santander de Quilichao, Cauca department, Colombia to detect dsb and trp36 genes for Ehrlichia sp.; flaB and 16S rRNA genes for Borrelia sp.; and rpoB, msp4, and msp1a genes for Anaplasma sp. We generated phylogenetic trees using the maximum-likelihood method and Tamura 3-parameter model with a gamma distribution parameter of 0.28 to compare evolutionary relationships between our sequences and publicly available sequences from Genbank (accession numbers indicated on trees). We applied bootstrap tests using 1,000 replicates; bootstrap values are shown at key nodes. The ●, ■, and ▲ symbols represent the differential clustering of sequences obtained in this study. Scale bars indicate nucleotide substitutions per site.

Phylogenetic analysis of emerging tickborne bacteria in cattle from Colombia. Phylogenetic trees are shown for dsb genes (A), Trp36 proteins (amino acid sequences) (B), flaB genes (C), and 16S rRNA genes (D). We performed PCR on blood samples from cattle in El Tambo and Santander de Quilichao, Cauca department, Colombia to detect dsb and trp36 genes for Ehrlichia sp.; flaB and 16S rRNA genes for Borrelia sp.; and rpoB, msp4, and msp1a genes for Anaplasma sp. We generated phylogenetic trees using the maximum-likelihood method and Tamura 3-parameter model with a gamma distribution parameter of 0.28 to compare evolutionary relationships between our sequences and publicly available sequences from Genbank (accession numbers indicated on trees). We applied bootstrap tests using 1,000 replicates; bootstrap values are shown at key nodes. The ●, ■, and ▲ symbols represent the differential clustering of sequences obtained in this study. Scale bars indicate nucleotide substitutions per site. These results showed the simultaneous circulation of E. minasensis, B. theileri, and A. marginale in bovids from Cauca department, Colombia. In Latin America, E. minasensis has been identified in Brazil () and Colombia (found in R. microplus ticks) (), and B. theileri has been found in Argentina (), Mexico (), and Brazil (). The R. microplus tick is likely the main vector for both pathogens in these regions and has been confirmed by molecular detection of E. minasensis in tick specimens collected from the same animals (H.C. Martínez-Diaz, unpub. data) and various reports in Latin America for B. theileri (,). Despite the lack of clinical signs in these animals, tickborne infections caused by these pathogenic bacteria often occur as subclinical infections or with intermittent clinical manifestations. E. minasensis and B. theileri infections, either separately or as co-infections, may be more frequent than previously recognized and should be considered potential etiologies of febrile syndrome in cattle from this and other regions of Colombia.

Appendix

Additional information for emerging tickborne bacteria in cattle from Colombia.
  9 in total

1.  Ehrlichia minasensis, an old demon with a new name.

Authors:  Alejandro Cabezas-Cruz; Erich Zweygarth; Daniel M Aguiar
Journal:  Ticks Tick Borne Dis       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 3.744

2.  Molecular detection of Anaplasma sp. and Ehrlichia sp. in ticks collected in domestical animals, Colombia.

Authors:  Jorge Miranda; Salim Mattar
Journal:  Trop Biomed       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 0.623

3.  The presence of Borrelia theileri in Argentina.

Authors:  Nicolás Morel; María Nazarena De Salvo; Gabriel Cicuttin; Victoria Rossner; Carolina S Thompson; Atilio J Mangold; Santiago Nava
Journal:  Vet Parasitol Reg Stud Reports       Date:  2019-06-13

Review 4.  Tick-Borne Emerging Infections: Ehrlichiosis and Anaplasmosis.

Authors:  Nahed Ismail; Jere W McBride
Journal:  Clin Lab Med       Date:  2017-03-25       Impact factor: 1.935

5.  Pathobiology of Borrelia theileri in the tropical cattle tick, Boophilus microplus.

Authors:  R D Smith; J Brener; M Osorno; M Ristic
Journal:  J Invertebr Pathol       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 2.841

6.  A novel Ehrlichia genotype strain distinguished by the TRP36 gene naturally infects cattle in Brazil and causes clinical manifestations associated with ehrlichiosis.

Authors:  Daniel M Aguiar; Thayza F Ziliani; Xiaofeng Zhang; Andreia L T Melo; Isis A Braga; Rute Witter; Leodil C Freitas; André L H Rondelli; Michele A Luis; Eveline C B Sorte; Felipe W Jaune; Vamilton A Santarém; Mauricio C Horta; Carolina A Pescador; Edson M Colodel; Herbert S Soares; Richard C Pacheco; Selma S M Onuma; Marcelo B Labruna; Jere W McBride
Journal:  Ticks Tick Borne Dis       Date:  2014-06-08       Impact factor: 3.744

7.  Ehrlichia minasensis sp. nov., isolated from the tick Rhipicephalus microplus.

Authors:  Alejandro Cabezas-Cruz; Erich Zweygarth; Marie Vancová; Marzena Broniszewska; Libor Grubhoffer; Lygia Maria Friche Passos; Múcio Flávio Barbosa Ribeiro; Pilar Alberdi; José de la Fuente
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 2.747

Review 8.  Tick-borne relapsing fever as a potential veterinary medical problem.

Authors:  Nusirat Elelu
Journal:  Vet Med Sci       Date:  2018-06-26

9.  Isolation and Characterization of a Novel Pathogenic Strain of Ehrlichia minasensis.

Authors:  Daniel Moura de Aguiar; João Pessoa Araújo Junior; Luciano Nakazato; Emilie Bard; Lisandra Aguilar-Bultet; Fabien Vorimore; Vsevolod Leonidovich Popov; Edson Moleta Colodel; Alejandro Cabezas-Cruz
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2019-11-05
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.