| Literature DB >> 36148126 |
Zi-Xu Wang1,2, Amer Hamzah Bin Jantan3, Ruo-Xi Wu4, Yue Gong5, Meng-Ru Cao5, Philip Pong Weng Wong6, Lei Wang5.
Abstract
Policies to promote the usage of energy-saving vehicles (EVs), such as electric vehicles and hybrids, were introduced and implemented in many countries due to increasing awareness of the potential benefits of such vehicles on environmental and energy conservation. However, despite consumers' claims of their concerns and positive attitudes toward environmental issues, those claims have not been translated into energy-saving vehicles' purchasing behavior. Prior studies neglected the interrelationship between consumer ethnocentrism (CE), perceived value (PV), and consumer knowledge (CK) in influencing consumer behavior, including pro-environmental behavior. This study examines the relationship between CE, PV, CK, perceived usefulness (PU), perceived ease of use (PEU), attitude and intention to purchase domestic energy-saving vehicles. A total of 396 completed questionnaires were collected through convenience sampling in Xuzhou, China. The survey data were subjected to descriptive analysis and analysis of variance using SPSS. In addition, confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling (SEM) were utilized for the hypotheses testing. The results revealed that CE positively influenced PV and CK; PV and CK positively influenced PU and PEU. CK positively influenced PV, while PU and PEU positively influenced attitude and intention, and PEU was shown to influence PU. Furthermore, attitude was shown to significantly influence intention to purchase domestic energy-saving vehicles. Lastly, the theoretical and practical implications of the outcomes were discussed, including the limitations of the research.Entities:
Keywords: consumer ethnocentrism; consumer knowledge; domestic energy-saving vehicles; perceived value; technology acceptance model
Year: 2022 PMID: 36148126 PMCID: PMC9485439 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.927709
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
FIGURE 1Conceptual research model.
Sample characteristics (N = 396).
| Items | Characteristic | Frequency | Percentage (%) |
| Gender | Male | 295 | 74.5% |
| Age (Year) | Below 18 | 49 | 12.4% |
| Income | Below 1,700 yuan | 39 | 9.8% |
| Educational level | Middle or high school | 51 | 12.1% |
Convergent validity for measurement model.
| Constructs (Cronbach’s alpha) | Items | Item loadings | CR | AVE |
| Perceived ease of use (α = 0.954) | PEU1. I think it would be easy to use domestic EVs | 0.960 | 0.956 | 0.878 |
| Perceived usefulness (α = 0.951) | PU1. Domestic EVs can improve my travel efficiency and improve my living quality | 0.894 | 0.952 | 0.779 |
| Intention (α = 0.943) | Inten1. I am willing to purchase a domestic EVs when purchasing a vehicle in the near future | 0.907 | 0.943 | 0.806 |
| Attitude (α = 0.910) | Purchasing domestic EVs for me: | 0.886 | 0.663 | |
| Consumer knowledge (α = 0.970) | CK1. I know that domestic EVs technology can assist with driving | 0.950 | 0.970 | 0.915 |
| Perceived value (α = 0.823) | PV1. EVs get good mileage and preserved some traditional facets (functional value) | 0.714 | 0.812 | 0.519 |
| Consumer ethnocentrism (α = 0.919) | CE1. Chinese products first, last and foremost | 0.924 | 0.909 | 0.629 |
Discriminate validity for measurement model (Fornell-Larcker criterion).
| Item | AVE | MSV | ASV | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 1. Consumer knowledge | 0.915 | 0.593 | 0.368 |
| ||||||
| 2. Perceived usefulness | 0.799 | 0.771 | 0.444 | 0.770 |
| |||||
| 3. Perceived ease of use | 0.878 | 0.542 | 0.328 | 0.527 | 0.604 |
| ||||
| 4. Attitude | 0.663 | 0.584 | 0.434 | 0.599 | 0.672 | 0.579 |
| |||
| 5. Intention | 0.806 | 0.771 | 0.480 | 0.765 | 0.878 | 0.736 | 0.704 |
| ||
| 6. Perceived value | 0.519 | 0.378 | 0.260 | 0.444 | 0.482 | 0.416 | 0.615 | 0.484 |
| |
| 7. Consumer ethnocentrism | 0.629 | 0.584 | 0.316 | 0.441 | 0.499 | 0.522 | 0.764 | 0.505 | 0.585 |
|
Italic bold values denote the square root of AVE.
Discriminate validity for measurement model (HTMT test).
| Item | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 1. Perceived usefulness | 1.000 | ||||||
| 2. Perceived ease of use | 0.610 | 1.000 | |||||
| 3. Attitude | 0.684 | 0.606 | 1.000 | ||||
| 4. Intention | 0.874 | 0.747 | 0.720 | 1.000 | |||
| 5. Perceived value | 0.490 | 0.414 | 0.628 | 0.489 | 1.000 | ||
| 6. Consumer knowledge | 0.768 | 0.538 | 0.603 | 0.762 | 0.448 | 1.000 | |
| 7. Consumer ethnocentrism | 0.512 | 0.539 | 0.849 | 0.551 | 0.603 | 0.439 | 1.000 |
FIGURE 2The structural model outcomes. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and critical ratio > 1.96.
Structural relationships and hypotheses testing.
| Items | Parameter | Estimate | C.R. | S.E. | Decision | |
| H1 | Consumer ethnocentrism– > Intention | 0.088 | 0.001 | 3.257 | 0.028 | Supported |
| H2 | Consumer ethnocentrism– > consumer knowledge | 0.434 | *** | 8.236 | 0.052 | Supported |
| H3 | Consumer ethnocentrism– > Perceived value | 0.503 | *** | 7.896 | 0.050 | Supported |
| H4 | Perceived value– > perceived usefulness | 0.143 | *** | 3.382 | 0.050 | Supported |
| H5 | Perceived value– > Perceived ease of use | 0.277 | *** | 4.951 | 0.095 | Supported |
| H6 | Consumer knowledge– > perceived usefulness | 0.604 | *** | 2.436 | 0.040 | Supported |
| H7 | Consumer knowledge– > Perceived ease of use | 0.410 | *** | 8.034 | 0.068 | Supported |
| H8 | Consumer knowledge– > Perceived value | 0.226 | *** | 13.945 | 0.040 | Supported |
| H9 | Perceived usefulness– > Attitude | 0.523 | *** | 9.598 | 0.058 | Supported |
| H10 | Perceived usefulness– > Intention | 0.628 | *** | 14.364 | 0.049 | Supported |
| H11 | Perceived ease of use– > Attitude | 0.265 | *** | 5.093 | 0.039 | Supported |
| H12 | Perceived ease of use– > Intention | 0.302 | *** | 8.828 | 0.027 | Supported |
| H13 | Perceived ease of use– > Perceived usefulness | 0.218 | *** | 5.317 | 0.029 | Supported |
| H14 | Attitude– > Intention | 0.155 | *** | 4.075 | 0.040 | Supported |
C.R., Critical ratio; S.E., Standard error. ***p < 0.001.