Literature DB >> 36147915

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of pancreatic melanoma: A case report and literature review.

Zhiqiang Yuan1, Hualin Yan1, Wenwu Ling1, Yan Luo1.   

Abstract

Melanoma is a malignant tumor that originates from melanocytes, most of which are of cutaneous origin. Most melanomas identified in the pancreas are metastatic, and primary pancreatic melanoma is extremely rare and has rarely been discussed. The correct preoperative diagnosis of pancreatic metastatic melanoma, especially primary melanoma, is challenging. Herein, we report a 43-year-old man who presented to our hospital due to unexplained left abdominal distension and pain. Abdominal ultrasound examination demonstrated multiple space-occupying lesions of the pancreas, and hypoechoic masses partially filled the splenic vein behind the pancreatic body. In the contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), all of these lesions showed iso-enhancement to slight hypo-enhancement in the arterial phase and hypo-enhancement in the venous phase. Masses in the splenic vein also showed hypo-enhancement. Imaging features suggested that the pancreatic lesions were malignant tumors. The tumor markers carcinoembryonic antigen, carbohydrate antigen 125 and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 were within normal limits. Based on clinical symptoms, imaging findings and incidence of pancreatic tumors, the patient's clinical diagnosis was pancreatic carcinoma. Surgery was performed for the patient, while postoperative pathology confirmed malignant melanoma of the pancreas. Therefore, it is significant to identify the clinical and imaging manifestations of pancreatic melanoma in order to better manage the disease. Herein, we reported this case and reviewed the literature from 2000 to 2021 on the clinical and imaging features of 26 patients with pancreatic melanoma. It may improve clinicians' awareness of the clinical and imaging performance of pancreatic melanoma, resulting in improved diagnosis, differential diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes.
Copyright © 2022 Yuan, Yan, Ling and Luo.

Entities:  

Keywords:  case report; contrast-enhanced ultrasound; enhancement; pancreatic carcinoma; pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; pancreatic melanoma

Year:  2022        PMID: 36147915      PMCID: PMC9485595          DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.989638

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Oncol        ISSN: 2234-943X            Impact factor:   5.738


Introduction

Malignant melanoma is a malignant tumor that originates from melanocytes and has a high mortality rate (1). Malignant melanoma of skin origin accounted for 91.2%, and other origin accounted for a small part (2). Most melanomas identified in the pancreas are metastatic, and primary pancreatic melanoma is extremely rare and has rarely been discussed. The clinical symptoms and imaging findings of pancreatic melanoma are not typical. Therefore, the correct preoperative diagnosis of pancreatic metastatic melanoma, especially primary melanoma, is challenging. Preoperative recognition of pancreatic melanoma is significant because of its different treatment and prognosis from other pancreatic malignant tumors. Although imaging features of pancreatic melanoma have been reported in a few cases, no features of pancreatic melanoma have been described through CEUS imaging before. To improve the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of pancreatic melanoma and related imaging findings, we report this unusual case and reviewed the related literature.

Case presentation

A 43-year-old male patient was admitted to our hospital 1 month ago due to unexplained left abdominal distension and pain. Since the onset of the disease, the patient did not have nausea, vomiting, fever or jaundice. He experienced a weight loss of 7 kg over the course of the disease. There was no personal or family history of acute or chronic disease. No abnormal pigmentation of the skin or sclerae or enlarged superficial lymph nodes were observed. The patient showed no tenderness, rebound tenderness or muscle tension on abdominal palpation. The tumor markers carcinoembryonic antigen, carbohydrate antigen 125 and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 were within normal limits. Blood tests for liver and kidney function, electrolyte levels, and coagulation all demonstrated normal results. The patient underwent conventional ultrasound and CEUS examination by an ultrasound system (IU22, Philips Medical Solutions; Mountain View, CA, United States) equipped with a C5-1 abdominal convex transducer (frequency range of 1-5 MHz). Conventional ultrasound demonstrated an abnormal shape, large volume and uneven parenchymal echo of the pancreas. Meanwhile, three hypoechoic lesions were found at the head of the pancreas, the junction of the body and the tail of the pancreas, and the tail of the pancreas, with sizes of approximately 3.3x3.1 cm, 2.4x2.1 cm and 5.4x2.8 cm, respectively ( ). Hypoechoic masses partially filled in the splenic vein behind the pancreatic body ( ). All of these lesions had a slightly clear margins, and no obvious signal of blood flow was observed. Then, the patient underwent CEUS with the patient’s consent for further diagnosis. A 2.4-ml ultrasound contrast agent SonoVue (Bracco, Milan, Italy) suspension was injected through the left cubital vein followed by a flush with 5 ml saline. In the CEUS, all of these lesions showed iso-enhancement to slight hypo-enhancement in the arterial phase ( ) and hypo-enhancement in the venous phase ( ). Masses in the splenic vein also showed hypo-enhancement. Chest and abdominal CECT also showed hypo-enhancement in both the arterial and venous phases of these lesions ( ), with splenic vein emboli and no other lesions were found. CEUS and CECT imaging features both suggested that the pancreatic lesions were malignant tumors. Based on clinical symptoms, imaging findings and incidence of pancreatic tumors, the patient’s clinical diagnosis was pancreatic carcinoma. Total pancreatectomy and splenectomy and peripancreatic neurectomy with portal vein reconstruction were performed for the patient. Postoperative pathology confirmed a malignant tumor of the pancreas and some cytoplasm with deep brownish-black granules ( ), which invaded the fat, nerves and blood vessels outside the pancreas. Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells were positive for melanocytic marker S-100 ( ), Human Melanoma Black 45 ( ) and MART-1( ). The above pathological findings revealed malignant melanoma. Four months postoperatively, the patient underwent whole-body CECT examination, which revealed multiple liver, lung metastases. The patient was then given gemcitabine combined with cisplatin chemotherapy and PD-1 immunotherapy with ominous details. The patient and his family gave up treatment because of persistent fever during chemotherapy and fever symptoms even after changing drugs. The patient died 11 months after surgery.
Figure 1

Ultrasound images of the patient. (A, B): Grayscale ultrasound showed hypoechoic mass in the pancreatic parenchyma (orange arrow) and hypoechoic masses partially filled in the splenic vein (red arrow).In the arterial phase, contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) showed iso-enhancement to slight hypo-enhancement [(C), orange arrow)]; In the venous phase, CEUS showed hypo-enhancement [(D), orange arrow].

Figure 2

Contrast-enhanced computed tomography images of the patient. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography showed both hypo-enhancement masses in the arterial phase [(A), orange arrow)] and venous phase [(B), orange arrow)].

Figure 3

Postoperative histopathological images of the patient. (A) Hematoxylin and eosin staining showed some cytoplasm with deep brownish-black granules (magnification, × 400). Immunohistochemical staining displayed S100(+) (B), Human Melanoma Black 45(+) (C) and MART-1(+) (magnification, × 400) (D).

Ultrasound images of the patient. (A, B): Grayscale ultrasound showed hypoechoic mass in the pancreatic parenchyma (orange arrow) and hypoechoic masses partially filled in the splenic vein (red arrow).In the arterial phase, contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) showed iso-enhancement to slight hypo-enhancement [(C), orange arrow)]; In the venous phase, CEUS showed hypo-enhancement [(D), orange arrow]. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography images of the patient. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography showed both hypo-enhancement masses in the arterial phase [(A), orange arrow)] and venous phase [(B), orange arrow)]. Postoperative histopathological images of the patient. (A) Hematoxylin and eosin staining showed some cytoplasm with deep brownish-black granules (magnification, × 400). Immunohistochemical staining displayed S100(+) (B), Human Melanoma Black 45(+) (C) and MART-1(+) (magnification, × 400) (D).

Discussion

Melanoma is characterized by uncontrolled proliferation of melanocytes, and cutaneous melanoma accounts for 91.2% of all melanomas (2). Non-cutaneous forms of primary melanoma include ocular and mucosal lesions and represent 5.2% and 1.3% of all melanomas, respectively (2). Most melanomas identified in the pancreas are metastatic, and primary pancreatic melanoma is extremely rare and has rarely been discussed. Combined with medical history, physical examination, and imaging, we did not identify the primary site of our patient, so we thought this might be a case of primary pancreatic melanoma. We reviewed the literature from 2000 to 2021 and found 21 publications regarding the imaging features of pancreatic melanomas (3–23). The clinical findings and imaging features of these 21 reported cases are summarized in . Finally, 26 patients were included for further analysis. The age of the patients ranged from 32 to 75 years, with equal number of men and women. Most of the patients had a clear history of primary melanoma, while the primary lesion search was not performed or not found in some patients. The major symptoms found in these patients were abdominal pain, jaundice, and weight loss, while some patients had no apparent symptoms. Pancreatic melanoma is mainly distributed in the head and tail of the pancreas, with a few diffusely distributed in the pancreatic parenchyma. The tumor marker CA-199 was described in six cases, of which five were normal and one was slightly elevated. Most patients were treated with pancreatectomy, while a few were treated with surgery combined with chemotherapy and immunotherapy. Due to the difference of primary site, time in pancreatic lesion detection and treatment, the survival of patients is different to some extent.
Table 1

Pancreatic melanoma in the literature between 2000 and 2021.

Author, yearAge/sexPrimary siteSymptomsLocationImaging FindingsTreatmentFollow up(month)Outcome
DeWitt et al., 2003 (3)33/MNDEpigastric discomfortHeadUS: a 3.3 cm ill-defined mass, dilatation of the extrahepatic bile duct and slight dilatation of the pancreatic ductCholecystectomy, palliative gastrojejunostomy and chemical celiac splanchnicectomy6Dead
CT: a 4 cm mass, dilatation of the intrahepatic and extra hepatic biliary and pancreatic ductal dilatation          
ERCP: a 2 cm malignant-appearing stricture of the distal common bile duct with proximal intrahepatic and extrahepatic biliary dilatation
83/FNDAbdominal painTailEUS: a 25 x 20 mm round, cystic massRefused medical or surgical treatment10Alive
Vagefi et al., 2009 (4)57/FOcular melanomaAbdominal painTailCT: hypodense fociEn bloc laparoscopic resection of the distal pancreas and spleenNDND
MRCP: focal pancreatic enlargement involving the tail with indistinct borders, and associated splenic vein thrombosis
PET-CT: FDG-avid uptake
He et al., 2010 (5)39/MEyeball melanomaBack painTailCT: a pseudocyst with a diameter of 7 cm and poor demarcation from surrounding tissueMelanoma resection with combined distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy, chemotherapy25Alive
ERCP: a deviated main pancreatic duct with no branching
Lanitis et al., 2010 (6)69/MSuperficial spreading melanomaPainless jaundiceHeadCT: a mass with associated intra and extrahepatic biliary tract dilatationPancreatoduodenectomy30Alive
Mehrotra et al., 2010 (7)55/MUnknown primaryPancreatitisHeadCT: a 1.5 cm hypodense lesion suspicious of evolving pseudocystPylorus preserving Whipple resectionNDND
Portale et al., 2011 (8)43/FCutaneous melanomaFollow-upTailCT: a hypodense lesion with peripheral enhancementDistal pancreatectomy with splenectomyNDND
US: a hypoechoic tumor appropriately 17 mm with a peripheral halo and faint vascular signals in the peripheral part
PET: accumulation of the radiotracer in the distal portion of the pancreas and in lymph nodes around vessels of the spleen
Sperti et al.,2011 (9)45/MUnknown primaryFollow-upBodyCT: a 2 cm hypodense area with dilation of the main pancreatic ductDistal pancreatectomy with splenectomy, chemotherapy24Dead
MRI: moderate enlargement of the pancreatic head, and a well-circumscribed neoplasm in the body of the pancreas
Goyal et al., 2012 (10)47/FRight arm melanomaAbdominal pain and jaundiceDistal bile ductERCP-assisted biopsy revealed melanoma of the distal bile duct and the ampulla of VaterPylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy, interleukin-2 therapy, oral temozolomide supplemented with thalidomide15Dead
73/FLeft shoulder melanomaAnorexia and fatigue, jaundiceheadCT: a 4 cm massPylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy3Dead
58/FUnknown primaryAbdominal pain and bloatingHeadCT: a 10 x 8 cm mass with additional involvement of the descending duodenum and the distal ileumPylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy, small bowel resection11.4Dead
28/FRight shoulder melanomaAbdominal distensionHeadPET-CT: a lesion (2 cm in greatest dimension) centered on the distal common bile duct extending on to the head of the pancreasPylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy with Braun jejunostomy4.5Dead
69/MUnknown primaryPancreatitisTailCT: a 4.5 cm mass, a 2.5 cm mass in the hilum of the spleen, and thickening of a portion of the gastric wallDistal pancreatectomy and splenectomy, total gastrectomy, and Roux-en-Y esophagojejunostomy, chemotherapy26Dead
Sugtmoto, et al., 2013 (11)46/MNasal CavityFollow-upBodyPET-CT: significant fluorodeoxyglucose accumulation with a maximum standardized uptake value of 10.6Distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy as well as regional lymphadenectomy, chemotherapy10Dead
CT: a 33 x 31 mm oval tumor with a clear boundary and prolonged enhancement
Larsen et al., 2013 (12)32/FCutaneous malignant melanomaAbdominal pain, itching, and jaundiceHeadCT and a transabdominal ultrasonography-assisted biopsy: a large malignant melanoma metastasis (5 cm in greatest dimension)Interleukin-2 and interferon-α, radiotherapy, pancreaticoduodenectomy18Alive
Birnbaum et al., 2013 (13)45/FDorsal melanomaEpigastric pain, weight lossHeadEUS: a 50 mm tumor without vascular invasionpancreatectomy72Alive
Jana et al., 2015 (14)75/MRight chest malignant melanomaRoutine surveillanceHead, bodyMRI: a 1.7 cm focal pancreatic mass and a large left upper retroperitoneal lymph nodeStereotactic gamma knife radiosurgery, immunotherapyNDND
PET-CT: increased metabolic activity in the proximal pancreas, with standardized uptake value of 10.36
EUS: several hypoechoic, rounded, well-defined masses. The dominant lesion was a 24.6 x 21.4 mm mass in the body of the pancreas
De et al., 2016 (15)58/FUveal malignant melanomaJaundice andabdominal painHeadCT: a low-attenuating lesion measuring 4 x 3 cm and a thinner section of the distal bile duct suspicious for compressionDuodenopancreatectomy, chemotherapyNDND
EUS: a solid, heteroechoic with predominantly hypoechoic areas, well-defined lesion with regular contours (measuring 3.1 x 2.6 cm)
Ben et al., 2017 (16)55/FUnknownprimaryUpper abdominal pain and itchingHeadCT and MRI: a 6 x 5 cm mass with peripheral enhancement, leading to intra and extrahepatic biliary tract dilatationPancreaticoduodenectomy15Dead
Liu et al., 2018 (17)54/MCutaneous melanomaFollow upThe junction of pancreatic head and uncinateCT: a solid hypovascular mass measuring approximately 3.1 x 2.4 cm compressed the lower common bile duct resulting in expansion of the upstream bile ductsLaparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy6Alive
Nakamura et al., 2019 (18)67/FLeft nasal cavityAbdominal painTailCT: a rounded, well-defined lesion with low attenuation and pancreatic ductal dilatation surrounded by a high-attenuation rimDistal pancreatectomy24Alive
MRI: the center of the mass was hyperintense on T1 and hypointense on T2, and the diffusion weighted image showed a hyperintense peripheral rim of the mass
ERCP: smooth narrowing and displacement of the pancreatic duct with upstream dilatation
EUS: a 35 mm mass, hypoechoic and heterogeneous with central anechoic areas
CE-EUS: iso-enhancement during the 20 s phase and hypo-enhancement during the 120 s phase of the peripheral rim of the mass with central non enhancement
PET-CT: intense FDG uptake
Voudoukis et al., 2020 (20)62/MA scalp lesionPainless jaundicePancreatic parenchymaCT: diffuse heterogeneity in the head of the pancreas, and slight enlargement of the pancreatic body and tail, but no discrete pancreatic lesion describedDabrafenib (a BRAF inhibitor) and trametinib (a MEK inhibitor)4Alive
EUS: pancreatic parenchyma diffusely enlarged, many hypoechoic well-demarcated lesions all with low blood flow signal
Jin et al., 2020 (19)43MUnknownprimaryEpigastric painDiffusion distributionContrast-enhanced ultrasound: multifocal hypoechoic mass in the pancreasExtended total pancreatectomy together with portal vein reconstruction and extensive lymphadenectomy, interferon-alpha 2b therapy20Alive
CT: multifocal lesions with low density and the largest one had a diameter of 2.6 cm
Three-dimensional vascular reconstruction of CT: a tumor thrombus formed in the superior mesenteric vein and central segment of the splenic vein
MRI: multi focal masses, hypointense on T1 and isointense on T2, heterogeneously enhanced during the arterial phase and portal venous phase
Vargas et al., 2021 (21)60/MNDAbdominalpain, jaundice, and pruritus, weight lossHeadUS: significant dilation of the intra and extrahepatic bile ducts and a mass in the pancreasNDNDND
CT: a 3.6 x 4.2 cm mass, round, well-defined, with no calcifications or documentation of ganglia or vessel involvement, no pancreatic gland atrophy or main pancreatic duct dilation
MRI: a 3.4 x 3.5x 4.4 cm mass with hyperintense enhancement on T1
EUS: a hypoechoic, heterogeneous mass
Zeman et al., 2021 (23)72/MUnknownprimaryJaundiceHeadCT: head of the pancreas enlarged and had a diameter anteroposteriorly of 33 mm with a prominence towards the duodenumNDNDDead
Shamim et al., 2021 (22)38/FRight eye choroidal melanomaIntermittent abdominal pain and vomitingHeadCT: an ill-defined heterogenous lesion measuring approximately 2.2 x 2.3 cmClassic Whipple procedure and segmental transverse colectomyNDND
PET-CT: ill-defined heterogenous lesion in the junction of head and neck of the pancreas, increased tracer uptake

ND, Not described; US, Grayscale ultrasound; CT, Computed tomography; MRI, Magnetic resonance imaging; MRCP, Magnetic resonance cholangio pancreatography; EUS, Endoscopic ultrasonography; ERCP, Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; PET-CT, Positron Emission Computed Tomography.

Pancreatic melanoma in the literature between 2000 and 2021. ND, Not described; US, Grayscale ultrasound; CT, Computed tomography; MRI, Magnetic resonance imaging; MRCP, Magnetic resonance cholangio pancreatography; EUS, Endoscopic ultrasonography; ERCP, Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; PET-CT, Positron Emission Computed Tomography. Unfortunately, no specific imaging features for pancreatic melanomas have been found at present. Although some imaging modalities, such as ultrasonography, computed tomography, nuclear magnetic resonance imaging, endoscopic ultrasound, and positron emission tomography, are valuable to some extent, it remains a challenge to diagnose pancreatic melanomas preoperatively if there is no clear history of primary melanoma. Conventional ultrasound was performed in 4 of the 26 patients, and it usually presented as a hypoechoic mass with or without dilation of the bile duct and pancreatic duct. CT was performed in 21 of the 26 patients, and most of the findings were hypoechoic solid masses with or without dilatation of the bile duct and pancreatic duct, and only two of them presented pseudocysts. CECT findings were described in three cases, two with peripheral enhancement and one with delayed enhancement. Endoscopic ultrasound was performed in six cases, most of which presented as well-defined hypoechoic solid masses, and only one presented as cystic mass. There have been a few reports of other imaging techniques for diagnosing pancreatic melanomas, such as magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and positron emission computed tomography. None of these imaging methods revealed specific features for pancreatic melanomas. In this patient, the symptoms of abdominal distension and pain and weight loss were similar to those in the literature. CEUS and CECT indicated the pancreatic lesions were malignant tumors. In addition, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the most common form of pancreatic carcinoma, which accounts for the majority (90%) of pancreatic neoplasms (24–26). Therefore, based on the clinical symptoms, imaging findings and incidence of pancreas neoplasms, the surgeons misdiagnosed it as pancreatic carcinoma. ​It is crucial for us to accurately distinguish PDAC from pancreatic melanomas, which determines the patients’ treatment options and the doctors’ management of patients. Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels are elevated in 80% of pancreatic cancer patients (27). However, in this patient, the tumor markers carcinoembryonic antigen, carbohydrate antigen 125, and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 were within normal limits. We can also see some differences between pancreatic melanomas and PDAC in ultrasound images. PDACs are derived from epithelial cells that line the pancreatic duct (28), and most PDACs are localized in the pancreatic head (29). Consequently, the typical imaging features of PDAC in conventional ultrasound are hypoechoic mass, dilatation of the pancreatic duct, and dilatation of the bile duct (30). And PDAC is generally a solitary poorly defined lesion (31). Nonetheless, in this case, the large size of the pancreatic head lesion did not cause dilation of the main pancreatic duct. And the margins of these lesions were more clearly relative to PDAC. In the CEUS, PDAC is typically significantly hypo-enhancing in the arterial phase, because of the desmoplastic reaction with low vascular density that is present in 90% of cases (32–38). However, the lesions of this patients showed iso-enhancement to slightly hypo- enhancement in the arterial phase. Another common solid pancreatic neoplasm pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors typically present as hyper-enhancing lesions in the arterial phase of CEUS examinations (39–41). So when we encounter a solid lesion of the pancreas like this patient with a different sonographic appearance than typical PDAC and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor, the tumor markers are also not significantly elevated. We should consider other rare tumor possibilities, there is no doubt that pancreatic melanoma is one of the possibilities. It is important for clinicians to consider a broad differential diagnosis when faced with inconclusive imaging studies of pancreatic tumors. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) plays an important role in providing cytological confirmation for diagnosis (14). In the literature we reviewed, 9 of 26 patients underwent EUS-FNA and all were confirmed melanoma, which demonstrated the important role of EUS-FNA in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic tumors. In addition, EUS-FNA is now the gold standard method for sampling the pancreas (15). If conditions permit, patients can be clearly diagnosed by EUS-FNA. In summary, it is difficult to correctly diagnose pancreatic melanoma before surgery, especially if there is no history of primary lesions. The sonographic features of pancreatic melanoma in our patient are different from common solid lesions PDAC and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, but more cases are needed to summarize and validate these findings. Preoperative EUS-FNA could be considered for further confirmation, and preoperative biopsy combined with comprehensive imaging examination will contribute to identifying adequate surgical candidate (42, 43). Hence, awareness of pancreatic melanoma from imaging features and tumor markers may aid in the management of patients.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.

Author contributions

ZY performed the literature review and wrote the manuscript. HY and WL supported the data collection and manuscript revision. YL supervised the writing and revision of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This research was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 82071940.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
  43 in total

1.  Neuroendocrine pancreatic tumor: value of contrast enhanced ultrasonography.

Authors:  M D'Onofrio; G Mansueto; M Falconi; C Procacci
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr

2.  Pancreatic resection for isolated metastasis from melanoma of unknown primary.

Authors:  S Ben Slama; D Bacha; R Bayar; L Gharbi; A Lahmar
Journal:  Acta Gastroenterol Belg       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.316

3.  Surgical resection of malignant melanoma metastatic to the pancreas: case series and review of literature.

Authors:  Jatinder Goyal; Evan J Lipson; Neda Rezaee; Barish H Edil; Rich Schulick; Christopher L Wolfgang; Ralph H Hruban; Emmanuel S Antonarakis
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2012-09

Review 4.  Molecular Pathogenesis of Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  T J Grant; K Hua; A Singh
Journal:  Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci       Date:  2016-10-15       Impact factor: 3.622

Review 5.  Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma and Its Variants: Pearls and Perils.

Authors:  Khoschy Schawkat; Maria A Manning; Jonathan N Glickman; Koenraad J Mortele
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 6.  Pancreatic resection for metastatic melanoma originating from the nasal cavity: a case report and literature review.

Authors:  Motokazu Sugimoto; Naoto Gotohda; Yuichiro Kato; Shinichiro Takahashi; Takahiro Kinoshita; Hidehito Shibasaki; Motohiro Kojima; Atsushi Ochiai; Sadamoto Zenda; Tetsuo Akimoto; Masaru Konishi
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.480

7.  Pancreatic metastases from ocular malignant melanoma: the use of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration to establish a definitive cytologic diagnosis: a case report.

Authors:  Diogo Turiani Hourneaux De Moura; Danielle Azevedo Chacon; Ryan Tanigawa; Martin Coronel; Spencer Cheng; Éverson L A Artifon; José Jukemura; Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux De Moura
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2016-12-01

Review 8.  Isolated pancreatic metastasis from malignant melanoma: a case report and literature review.

Authors:  Yoshifumi Nakamura; Reiko Yamada; Maki Kaneko; Hiroaki Naota; Yu Fujimura; Masami Tabata; Kazuhiko Kobayashi; Kyosuke Tanaka
Journal:  Clin J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-05-27

9.  Isolated pancreatic metastasis from malignant melanoma: is pancreatectomy worthwile?

Authors:  David Jérémie Birnbaum; Vincent Moutardier; Olivier Turrini; Anthony Gonçalves; Jean Robert Delpero
Journal:  J Surg Tech Case Rep       Date:  2013-07

10.  Isolated malignant melanoma metastasis to the pancreas.

Authors:  Anne K Larsen; Christen Krag; Poul Geertsen; Linda P Jakobsen
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2013-12-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.