| Literature DB >> 36147847 |
Yinglong Liu1, Pengbo He1, Pengfei He1, Shahzad Munir1, Ayesha Ahmed1, Yixin Wu1, Yuling Yang1, Junping Lu2, Jiansong Wang2, Jizhou Yang2, Xinlong Pan1, Yangyang Tian2, Yueqiu He1.
Abstract
Plant health is of utmost importance for optimal agricultural production and sustainability. Unfortunately, biotic and abiotic factors put a major constraint on crop safety and productivity. Plant diseases caused by oomycetes inflict serious damage to various crops. Moreover, the injudicious use of chemical pesticides poses threats related to pesticide resistance development in pathogens and environmental pollution. Biocontrol offers an effective solution for disease control; however, research on biocontrol of oomycete-related diseases is scarce. Thus, this study undertakes the screening of biocontrol resources for the effective management of oomycete-related plant diseases. In this regard, 86 isolates of Trichoderma spp. were assessed against Phytophthora nicotianae, P. capsici, Pythium vexans, P. ultimum, and P. dissotocum through dual culture assay. Furthermore, the antagonistic effect of selected isolates was studied against tobacco black shank disease and damping-off of cucumber seedlings in the greenhouse. The relative control effect of the three antagonistic Trichoderma strains AR-4, Tv-1, and ST4-1 on tobacco black shank was more than 60%, which was not significantly different from 6.88 gl-1 fluopicolide-propamocarb. Whereas, the relative control effect of Trichoderma AR-4 and ST4-1 on damping-off of cucumber seedlings was 80.33% and 82.67%, respectively, which were significantly higher than Trichoderma Tv-1 (35.49%) and fluopicolide-propamocarb (47.82%). According to the morphological and molecular characterization, the fungal strains AR-4, Tv-1, and ST4-1 were identified as Trichoderma koningiopsis, T. asperellum, and T. gamsii, respectively. In conclusion, the strains exhibited a strong antagonistic effect against oomycete pathogens and can be integrated into disease management strategies.Entities:
Keywords: Trichoderma spp.; antagonisim; biological control; control effect; oomycete disease
Year: 2022 PMID: 36147847 PMCID: PMC9487998 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.974024
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 6.064
Figure 1Antagonism of three antagonistic Trichoderma spp. against oomycete pathogens and inhibition rate. (A) Antagonism of Trichoderma, the red arrow shows the antagonistic zone of T. asperellum Tv-1 on P. nicotianae (5d); (B) the relative inhibition rate of three antagonistic Trichoderma spp. on oomycete pathogens; (C) antagonism of three Trichoderma spp. against oomycete pathogens.
Figure 2Trichoderma antagonized and killed oomycetes. (a) Antagonism of T. asperellum Tv-1 on P. nicotianae; (b) P. nicotianae could not form colonies on the selective medium after being parasitized by Tv-1; (c) pure P. nicotianae grew into colonies on the selective medium.
Figure 3Biocontrol effect of Trichoderma spp. on TBS disease and damping-off of cucumber seedlings. (A) Disease status of tobacco and cucumber seedlings after the application of Trichoderma spp. and control group; (B) disease index of TBS disease after the application of Trichoderma spp. and control group; (C) the incidence rate of damping-off of cucumber seedlings after the application of Trichoderma spp. and control group; (D) relative control effect of Trichoderma spp. and fluopicolide-propamocarb (FP) on TBS disease compared with water treatment; (E) relative control effect of Trichoderma spp. and fluopicolide-propamocarb (FP) on damping-off of cucumber seedlings compared with water treatment.
Figure 4Morphological characteristics of antagonistic Trichoderma spp. (a) Colony morphology of AR-4 (5d); (b) colony morphology of Tv-1 (5d); (c) colony morphology of ST4-1 (5d); (d) conidia of AR-4; (e) conidia of Tv-1; (f) chlamydospores of ST4-1.
Figure 5Phylogenetic tree of antagonistic Trichoderma strains AR-4, Tv-1, and ST4-1 based on their ITS sequences (red triangles).