| Literature DB >> 36147844 |
Bilal Aslam1, Tamoor Hamid Chaudhry1,2, Muhammad Imran Arshad3, Saima Muzammil1, Abu Baker Siddique1, Nafeesa Yasmeen4, Mohsin Khurshid1, Afreenish Amir2, Muhammad Salman2, Muhammad Hidayat Rasool1, Xueshan Xia5, Zulqarnain Baloch5.
Abstract
Klebsiella pneumoniae is ubiquitous and known to be a notorious pathogen of humans, animals, and plant-based foods. K. pneumoniae is a recognized trafficker of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) between and from different ecological niches. A total of 775 samples (n = 775) were collected from September 2017 to August 2019 from humans, animals, and environmental sources by applying the random convenient sampling technique. A total of 120 (15.7%) samples were confirmed as K. pneumoniae. The distribution of K. pneumoniae among humans, the environment, and animals was 17.1, 12.38, and 10%, respectively. Isolates have shown significant resistance against all the subjected antibiotics agents except colistin. ARGs profiling revealed that the highest percentage prevalence (67.5%) of bla CTX-M was estimated in the isolates, and various carbapenem resistance genes that were found in the study were bla NDM-1 (43.3%), bla OXA-48 (38%), and (1.67%) bla KPC-2. Overall, 21 distinct sequence types (ST) and 13 clonal complexes (CCs) were found through the multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) analysis. Taking together, the distribution of multi-drug resistance (MDR) K. pneumoniae clones in the community and associated environment is alarming for the health care system of the country. Health policymakers should consider the role of all the integral parts of humans, animals, and the associated environment intently to cope with this serious public and animal health concern.Entities:
Keywords: MLST analysis; Pakistan; antimicrobial resistance; human-animal-environment; transmission
Year: 2022 PMID: 36147844 PMCID: PMC9486001 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.898248
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 6.064
Details of all the collected samples and percentage prevalence of K. pneumoniae from various sample sources.
| Sample type | Number of isolates(n) | Prevalence percentage (%) |
|
| ||
| Urine ( | 13 | 10.6 |
| Sputum ( | 21 | 23.6 |
| Wounds and Pus ( | 21 | 13.3 |
| Blood ( | 35 | 22.4 |
|
|
|
|
| Chi sq-stat = 10.950; alph- chi-sq critical = 7.8147; | ||
|
| ||
| Ward waste ( | 3 | 16 |
| Operation theater waste ( | 1 | 3 |
| Wastewater ( | 9 | 23 |
| Hospital sludge ( | 4 | 17 |
| Abattoir/wastewater ( | 7 | 11 |
| Veterinary sludge/waste ( | 2 | 6 |
|
|
|
|
| Chi sq-stat = 8.615; alph- chi-sq critical = 11.070; | ||
|
| ||
| Milk ( | 1 | 5 |
| Fecal samples ( | 3 | 13.6 |
|
|
|
|
| Chi sq-stat = 0.7182; alph- chi-sq critical = 3.8414; | ||
Antibiotic resistance profile of indigenous K. pneumoniae isolates (n = 120) against all the antibiotics used in the study.
| Antibiotics | Resistance | Intermediate | Susceptible |
| Ampicillin | 120 (100%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| Piperacillin | 120 (100%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| Cefuroxime | 114 (95.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 6 (5.0%) |
| Cefixime | 97 (80.8%) | 2 (1.7%) | 21 (17.5%) |
| Ceftriaxone | 97 (80.8%) | 2 (1.7%) | 21 (17.5%) |
| Cefepime | 71 (59.2%) | 0 (0.0%) | 49 (40.8%) |
| Meropenem | 39 (32.5%) | 4 (3.3%) | 77 (64.2%) |
| Ciprofloxacin | 45 (37.5%) | 5 (4.2%) | 70 (58.3%) |
| Moxifloxacin | 87 (72.5%) | 0 (0.0%) | 33 (27.5%) |
| Minocycline | 65 (54.2%) | 4 (3.3%) | 51 (42.5%) |
| Tetracyclines | 72 (60.0%) | 3 (2.5%) | 45 (37.5%) |
| Tigecycline | 1 (0.8%) | 3 (2.5%) | 116 (96.7%) |
| Chloramphenicol | 18 (15.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 102 (85.0%) |
| Colistin | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 120 (100.0%) |
| Cotrimoxazole | 65 (54.2%) | 0 (0.0%) | 55 (45.8%) |
Prevalence of all beta-lactamases genes found in isolates from different sources.
| Beta-lactamases genes | Sequence | Reference | All Isolates n (%) | Human | Environment | Veterinary |
|
| F-TCAACATTTCCGTGTCG R-CTGACAGTTACCAATGCTTA | ( | 69 (58%) | 47 (52%) | 9 (53%) | 13 (100%) |
|
| F-ATGCGTTATATTCGCCTGTG R-AGATAAATCACCACAATGCGC | 119 (99%) | 88 (98%) | 17 (100%) | 13 (100%) | |
|
| F-GTTTCCGCTATTACAAACCGTTG R-GCCCATGGTTAAAAAATCACTGC | 77 (64%) | 54 (60%) | 12 (71%) | 11 (85%) | |
|
| F-TGGAAGCCCTGGAGAAAAGT R-CTTATCGCTCTCGCTCTGTT | 14 (12%) | 5 (6%) | 7 (41%) | 2 (15%) | |
|
| F-ATGGTGACAAAGAGAGTGCA R-CCCTTCGGCGATGATTCTC | 33 (28%) | 22 (24%) | 7 (41%) | 4 (31%) | |
|
| F-GAGAGTGCAACGGATGATG R-TGCGGCTGGGTAAAATAG | 59 (49%) | 41 (46%) | 7 (41%) | 11 (85%) | |
|
| F- GGATATCGTTGGTGGTGCCATA R-TTTGCGATGTGCAGTACCAGTAA | 81 (68%) | 55 (61%) | 13 (76%) | 13 (100%) | |
|
| F-TGCAGAGCCCAGTGTCAGTTT R-CGCTCTATCGGCGATACCA | 2 (2%) | 1 (1%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (8%) | |
|
| F-GGAATAGAGTGGCTTAATTCTC R-CCAAACCACTACGTTATC | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | |
|
| F-GATGGTGTTTGGTCGCATA R-CGAATGCGCAGCACCAG | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | |
|
| F-TCGACACACCTTGGTCTGAA R-AACTTCCAACTTTGCCATGC | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | |
|
| F-TGCCCAATATTATGCACCCGG R-CGAAACCCGGCATGTCGAGA | 52 (43%) | 31 (34%) | 9 (53%) | 12 (92%) | |
|
| F-TTGGTGGCATCGATTATCGG R-GAGCACTTCTTTTGTGATGGC | 46 (38%) | 29 (32%) | 6 (35%) | 11 (85%) |
FIGURE 1eBURST analysis (Phyloviz) of Klebsiella pneumoniae representing the STs and CCs, Partial snapshots of branches magnified and highlighted each CC and ST found in the study.
FIGURE 2(A) Distribution of multilocus sequence types (STs) of Klebsiella pneumoniae in Human, Animal, and Environment. (B) Prevalence of multilocus sequence types (STs) in blood, wound, sputum, urine (Human) (I), milk and fecal (Animal) (II) and ward-waste, wastewater, operation-theater, Abattoir, and sludge (Environment) (III).
The genetic diversity of indigenous K. pneumoniae isolates from different sources.
| Sequence type (Pasteur Scheme) | Clonal | Allelic profile | No. of isolates | Sources | No. of resistant antibiotics | MDR/XDR | Acquired carbapenem resistance mechanism |
| ST1 | 1 | 4 + 4 + 1 + 1 + 7 + 4 + 10 | 2 | Clinical (2) | 11 | MDR | |
| ST11 | 11 | 3 + 3 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 4 | 13 | Clinical (7) veterinary (6) | 10 | MDR | |
| ST15 | 15 | 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 | 9 | Clinical (8) environmental (1) | 10 | MDR | – |
| ST29 | 29 | 2 + 3 + 2 + 2 + 6 + 4 + 4 | 9 | Clinical (3) veterinary (6) | 8 | MDR | – |
| ST48 | 48 | 2 + 5 + 2 + 2 + 7 + 1 + 10 | 12 | Clinical (11) environmental (1) | 8 | MDR | – |
| ST100 | 101 | 2 + 6 + 5 + 5 + 4 + 4 + 6 | 1 | Clinical (1) | 4 | MDR | – |
| ST111 | 111 | 2 + 1 + 5 + 1 + 17 + 4 + 42 | 7 | Clinical (7) | 11–12 | XDR (1) MDR (6) | |
| ST134 | 292 | 3 + 1 + 2 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 4 | 3 | Clinical (3) | 8 | MDR | – |
| ST147 | 147 | 3 + 4 + 6 + 1 + 7 + 4 + 38 | 3 | Clinical (2) environmental (1) | 10 | MDR |
|
| ST231 | 231 | 2 + 6 + 1 + 3 + 26 + 1 + 77 | 10 | Clinical (9) Environmental (1) | 8–9 | MDR |
|
| ST258 | 258 | 3 + 3 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 79 | 2 | Clinical (1) Veterinary (1) | 13 | XDR | |
| ST273 | 147 | 3 + 4 + 6 + 1 + 7 + 4 + 4 | 8 | Clinical (8) | 10 | MDR |
|
| ST412 | 412 | 2 + 1 + 2 + 1 + 9 + 1 + 112 | 2 | Clinical (2) | 9 | MDR | – |
| ST431 | 15 | 2 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 | 3 | Clinical (2) environmental (1) | 9 | MDR | – |
| ST580 | 147 | 3 + 4 + 6 + 1 + 9 + 4 + 38 | 4 | Clinical (2) environmental (2) | 4 | MDR | – |
| ST859 | 11 | 3 + 3 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 | 6 | Clinical (5) environmental (1) | 9 | MDR |
|
| ST1137 | 147 | 3 + 4 + 6 + 4 + 7 + 4 + 38 | 6 | Clinical (5) environmental (1) | 5 | MDR | – |
| ST1488 | 147 | 3 + 4 + 2 + 1 + 7 + 4 + 38 | 4 | Clinical (3) environmental (1) | 4 | MDR | – |
| ST1561 | 147 | 3 + 4 + 6 + 1 + 7 + 1 + 38 | 5 | Clinical (2) environmental (3) | 6 | MDR | – |
| ST1709 | 147 | 3 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 7 + 4 + 38 | 8 | Clinical (6) environmental (2) | 3 | MDR | – |
| ST2167 | 37 | 2 + 9 + 2 + 1 + 13 + 1 + 35 | 3 | Clinical (1) environmental (2) | 5 | MDR | – |