| Literature DB >> 36147649 |
Xiaohong Jin1, Xiaoman Liu1, Huiwen Xie1, Jie Yu1, Dongmei Gu1.
Abstract
Patients with breast cancer frequently experience psychological distress. This study aimed to investigate the effect of narrative nursing on middle-aged patients with breast cancer. In all, 82 patients with breast cancer admitted to the Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University were divided into two groups, namely, the observation group and the control group, by simple random sampling, with 41 cases in each group. The patients in both groups were treated with breast cancer surgery. Additionally, the control group received routine nursing, whereas the observation group received narrative nursing based on the control group. After 8 weeks of nursing, the SAS (self-rating anxiety scale) and SDS (self-rating depression scale) scores in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P < 0.01). At the same time, the result of family hardiness showed that the patients with narrative nursing performed better in commitment, challenge, and control (P < 0.01). In conclusion, narrative nursing can alleviate the postoperative shame and negative emotions of patients with breast cancer and improve their quality of life.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36147649 PMCID: PMC9489349 DOI: 10.1155/2022/5499298
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.650
Baseline of patients.
| Characteristic | Control | Treat |
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 41 | 41 | |
| Work status, | 0.631 | ||
| Not working/retirement | 30 (36.6%) | 27 (32.9%) | |
| Working | 11 (13.4%) | 14 (17.1%) | |
| Education, | 0.790 | ||
| High school or above | 31 (37.8%) | 33 (40.2%) | |
| Junior high school or below | 10 (12.2%) | 8 (9.8%) | |
| Medical insurance, | 0.755 | ||
| With | 34 (41.5%) | 36 (43.9%) | |
| Without | 7 (8.5%) | 5 (6.1%) | |
| Age, mean ± SD | 52.22 ± 3.94 | 52.29 ± 4.43 | 0.937 |
| SAS Before intervention, mean ± SD | 63.95 ± 3.59 | 62.95 ± 4.6 | 0.276 |
| SDS Before intervention, mean ± SD | 62.73 ± 2.75 | 63.05 ± 2.52 | 0.588 |
Comparison of SAS scores and SDS scores.
| Group |
| SAS | SDS | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before intervention | 4 weeks after intervention | 8 weeks after intervention | Before intervention | 4 weeks after intervention | 8 weeks after intervention | ||
| control | 41 | 63.95 ± 3.59 | 49.27 ± 2.31 | 47.68 ± 4.44 | 62.73 ± 2.75 | 55.76 ± 2.74 | 48.44 ± 3.54 |
| Intervention | 41 | 62.95 ± 4.60 | 47.27 ± 2.44 | 38.51 ± 3.55 | 63.05 ± 2.52 | 52.49 ± 2.31 | 39.68 ± 3.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Figure 1(a) Line chart of SAS trends. (b) Line chart of SDS trends. (c) Boxplot of Family Hardiness including commitment, control, and challenges.
Correlation between family hardiness.
| Variables | Control | Intervention |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| commitment | 25.32 ± 3.12 | 27.32 ± 2.16 |
|
| control | 15.20 ± 2.29 | 19.24 ± 2.30 |
|
| challenges | 12.24 ± 2.29 | 17.24 ± 2.11 |
|
| Overall | 52.76 ± 5.17 | 63.81 ± 4.03 |
|