| Literature DB >> 36147587 |
Seongwon Ma1, Hoekyeong Seo1, Dong Joon Park1, Byeongju Choi1, Shinhee Ye2.
Abstract
Background: It is widely known that carbon dioxide (CO2) arc welding generates carbon monoxide (CO). However, to the best of our knowledge, no case reports have been published regarding CO poisoning in CO2 arc welders. Therefore, we aimed to report a case of CO poisoning-induced encephalopathy in a CO2 arc welder in the Republic of Korea to inform about the dangers of CO exposure among CO2arc welders. Case presentation: A 40-year-old man working as a CO2 arc welder for 15 years visited a local hospital with a tremor, involuntary urination, and speaking gibberish, on April 9, 2019. He stated that he had intermittent headache and forgetting symptoms for the last 5 years, and had been lost on the way to work several times. On April 9, 2019, he was diagnosed with CO poisoning-induced encephalopathy through brain magnetic resonance imaging. He received hyperbaric oxygen therapy, and some of his symptoms improved. According to the exposure assessment of his work environment, he was continuously exposed to high concentrations of CO for 15 years while operating CO2 arc welding machines. Conclusions: After evaluating the patient's work environment and evaluating his medical history, we concluded that his encephalopathy was caused by CO exposure during CO2 arc welding. Thus CO2 arc welders must be aware of the risk of CO poisoning and strive to avoid CO exposure.Entities:
Keywords: Carbon monoxide poisoning; Encephalopathy; Metal workers
Year: 2022 PMID: 36147587 PMCID: PMC9483627 DOI: 10.35371/aoem.2022.34.e19
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Occup Environ Med ISSN: 2052-4374
Fig. 1T2 weighted brain magnetic resonance imaging of the patient shows the lesions with high signal intensity in the bilateral globus pallidus (white arrows).
Fig. 2Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery brain magnetic resonance imaging of the patient shows the lesions with high signal intensity in the bilateral globus pallidus (white arrows).
Carbon monoxide measurement results in the carbon dioxide welding process at the patient’s workplace from 2010 to 2018
| Year | Number of samples | Minimum value (ppm) | Maximum value (ppm) | Geometric mean (ppm) | Number of samples over half of the exposure limit | Number of samples over the exposure limit | Exposure limit (ppm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 49 | 1.13 | 23.30 | 6.98 | 8 | - | 30 |
| 2011 | 53 | 2.00 | 1533.33 | 7.41 | 2 | 1 | |
| 2012 | 44 | 1.26 | 13.02 | 4.63 | - | - | |
| 2013 | 68 | 1.25 | 11.38 | 3.58 | - | - | |
| 2014 | 65 | 1.67 | 20.67 | 7.64 | 8 | - | |
| 2015 | 70 | 2.33 | 20.50 | 9.67 | 12 | - | |
| 2016 | 115 | 2.50 | 20.83 | 9.05 | 18 | - | |
| 2017 | 83 | 5.00 | 58.33 | 25.72 | 69 | 36 | |
| 2018 | 24 | 5.00 | 25.67 | 13.40 | 11 | - |
Fig. 3Work environment of workers A and B during carbon monoxide measurements in 2020.
Carbon monoxide measurement results from workers A and B working for the carbon dioxide welding process at the patient’s workplace in 2020
| Worker | Measurement location | Minimum value (ppm) | Maximum value (ppm) | Measuring device |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | Shoulder line | 18.3 | 133.2 | Dräger X-am® 8000a |
| B | Near the grating | 90.2 | 818.5 |
aMulti-Gas Detector (range: 0–2,000 ppm).