| Literature DB >> 36147557 |
Rahul Kumar1, Troy Kamuda1, Roshani Budhathoki1, Dan Tang1, Huseyin Yer1, Yunde Zhao2, Yi Li1.
Abstract
Genome editing technologies provide a powerful tool for genetic improvement of perennial ryegrass, an important forage and turfgrass species worldwide. The sole publication for gene editing in perennial ryegrass used gene-gun for plant transformation and a dual promoter based CRISPR/Cas9 system for editing. However, their editing efficiency was low (5.9% or only one gene-edited plant produced). To test the suitability of the maize Ubiquitin 1 (ZmUbi1) promoter in gene editing of perennial ryegrass, we produced ZmUbi1 promoter:RUBY transgenic plants. We observed that ZmUbi1 promoter was active in callus tissue prior to shoot regeneration, suggesting that the promoter is suitable for Cas9 and sgRNA expression in perennial ryegrass for high-efficiency production of bi-allelic mutant plants. We then used the ZmUbi1 promoter for controlling Cas9 and sgRNA expression in perennial ryegrass. A ribozyme cleavage target site between the Cas9 and sgRNA sequences allowed production of functional Cas9 mRNA and sgRNA after transcription. Using Agrobacterium for genetic transformation, we observed a 29% efficiency for editing the PHYTOENE DESATURASE gene in perennial ryegrass. DNA sequencing analyses revealed that most pds plants contained bi-allelic mutations. These results demonstrate that the expression of a single Cas9 and sgRNA transcript unit controlled by the ZmUbi1 promoter provides a highly efficient system for production of bi-allelic mutants of perennial ryegrass and should also be applicable in other related grass species.Entities:
Keywords: CRISPR/Cas9; PDS; ZmUbi1; genome editing; perennial ryegrass; ruby; single promoter; single transcript unit
Year: 2022 PMID: 36147557 PMCID: PMC9485938 DOI: 10.3389/fgeed.2022.960414
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Genome Ed ISSN: 2673-3439
FIGURE 1RUBY and CRISPR/Cas9 vector maps and target sequence for the perennial ryegrass PDS gene. (A) Schematic map of the RUBY construct. RUBY construct was designed by (He ct al., 2020). The three betalai biosynthetic genes were fused into a single open reading frame, The single transcript was expressed using a single ZmUbil promoter. 2A peptide coding sequences were inserted between these genes. A fler translation, the 2A peptides undergo self-cleavage. Thus releasing the individual proteins for betalain biosynthesss. (B) The ZmUbil promoter was used to contro] the expression of Cas9, PRNA, and RZ in a CRISPR/Cas9 construct. CRISPR'Cas9 construct was designed by Tang et al. (2016). A synthetic polyA (pA) sequence was used to terminate Cas9 mRNA translation. The RZ sequence (in blue) and its recognition sequence (in green) are used for producing functional Cas9 and sgRNA after transcription. (C) The gRNA sequence for the perennial ryegrass PDS gene.
FIGURE 2The activity of the ZmUbil promoter driving RUBY and production of pds mutants of perennial ryegrass. The ZmUbsl promoter:RUBY gene was expressed in call (A) (indicated by black arrows), shoots (B), and root and shoot (C). Putative CRISPR'Cas9 transformed perennial ryegrass calius under 50 mg/L hygromycin selection (D). Regenerating PDS genc-edited albino plants at the carty stage as indicated by orange arrows (E). PDS gene-cdited perennial ryegrass plant show mg albino phenotype (F).
Effects of hygromycin concentrations on natural albino plant percentage in perennial ryegrass tissue culture, transformed with a control vector containing no Cas9. Hygromycin resistant calli were transferred to a shoot regeneration medium supplemented with 0, 10, 20, 30, and 50 mg/L hygromycin.
| Hygromycin concentration (mg/L) | Total plants | Total albino plants | Albino plants (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 605 | 99 | 16.1 |
| 10 | 303 | 40 | 13.2 |
| 20 | 235 | 24 | 10.2 |
| 30 | 270 | 10 | 3.7 |
| 50 | 340 | 0 | 0 |
Production of pds perennial ryegrass mutants by targeted mutagenesis. Genome editing was confirmed by HindIII digestion and Sanger, and high-throughput Illumina sequencing.
| Experiment | Total transgenic plants | Total |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Experiment-1 | 15 | 5 | 33.3 |
| Experiment-2 | 12 | 3 | 25.0 |
| Experiment-3 | 11 | 3 | 27.3 |
| Total | 38 | 11 | 28.9 |
FIGURE 3Confirmation of editing of the PDS gene by Hindlll digestion and Sanger DNA sequencing method, (A) PDS gene editing was confirmed by Hindfll digestion of PCR products. Hindlll treated PCR DNA products were run im an agarose gel. The “—” symbol indicates PCR product without restriction digestion and the “+” symbol indicates products after the restricoon digestion. PDS gene-edited pkints have mutations in the restriction site as aresuk their PCR products were not digested. (B) Mutations were confirmed by Sanger DNA sequencing of the gRNA-target region. The “—” symbol indicates muckotides deletion in the pds matants: by CRISPR/Cas9. (C) Sanger DNA sequencing sgRNA region of the chromosome DNA from the WT and pds10 masant depicting a 6 bp deletion in the target region.
Illumina sequencing results of targeted mutations in pds mutants.
| Plant | Allele | Mutation | Indel type | Sequence (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WT | WT sequence | CTTGAGCTTCAACATAAGCTTGGCCACC | - | 100 |
|
| Allele 1 (WT) | CTTGAGCTTCAACATAAGCTTGGCCACC | - | 28 |
| Allele 2 | CTTGAGCTTCAA________________CACC | -12 | 34 | |
| Allele 3 | CTTGAGCTTCAACA_AAGCTTGGCCACC | -1 | 12 | |
| Allele 4 | CTTGAGCTCCAACATA_GCTTGGCCACC | -1 | 26 | |
|
| Allele 1 | CTTGAGCTTCAACAT__GCTTGGCCACC | -2 | 50 |
| Allele 2 | CTTGAGCTTCAACA_AAGCTTGGCCACC | -1 | 50 | |
|
| Allele 1 | CTTGAGCTTCAA________________CACC | - 12 | 50 |
| Allele 2 | CTTGAGCTTCAACAT__GCTTGGCCACC | -2 | 50 | |
|
| Allele 1 | CTTGAGCTTCAAC_TAAGCTTGGCCACC | -1 | 50 |
| Allele 2 | CTTGAGCTTCAA__TAAGCTTGGCCACC | -2 | 50 | |
|
| Allele 1 | CTTGAGCTTCAACAT__GCTTGGCCACC | -2 | 50 |
| Allele 2 | CTTGAGCTTCAACATA_GCTTGGCCACC | -1 | 50 |