Literature DB >> 36147419

Research rating: Some technicalities.

Bobby Paul1, Indranil Saha2.   

Abstract

From time immemorial, the body of scientific knowledge has grown with incremental additions of research. Metrics-based research evaluation provides crucial information regarding research credibility that would be difficult to understand by means of individual expertise. h-index and its modifications give an approximate quantitative measure of research output. Furthermore, g-index, e-index, ħ-index and i10-index address various intricacies involving authorship. Altmetrics and Plum X metrics are newer usage metrics that put an additional weightage on the impact on social media, usage, capture and scholarly networking. Indirect evaluation of research can also be obtained from the Journal Impact Factor in which the research is published but with certain limitations. While the scientific community is still waiting for a unique one-stop solution based on a high-quality robust process to exert judgement on research, the Leiden Manifesto comprising ten principles for research assessment can act as a guiding tool for development of a comprehensive evaluation system.
© 2018 Director General, Armed Forces Medical Services. Published by Elsevier, a division of RELX India Pvt. Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Altmetric score; e-index; g-index; h-index; i10-index

Year:  2018        PMID: 36147419      PMCID: PMC9485735          DOI: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2018.09.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India        ISSN: 0377-1237


  8 in total

1.  An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output.

Authors:  J E Hirsch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-11-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The evolution of the Science Citation Index.

Authors:  Eugene Garfield
Journal:  Int Microbiol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.479

3.  How impact factors changed medical publishing--and science.

Authors:  Hannah Brown
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-03-17

4.  Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics.

Authors:  Diana Hicks; Paul Wouters; Ludo Waltman; Sarah de Rijcke; Ismael Rafols
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Research submission: Some technicalities and vital links.

Authors:  Indranil Saha; Bobby Paul
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2017-11-28

6.  From Excessive Journal Self-Cites to Citation Stacking: Analysis of Journal Self-Citation Kinetics in Search for Journals, Which Boost Their Scientometric Indicators.

Authors:  Petr Heneberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The Journal Impact Factor: Moving Toward an Alternative and Combined Scientometric Approach.

Authors:  Armen Yuri Gasparyan; Bekaidar Nurmashev; Marlen Yessirkepov; Elena E Udovik; Aleksandr A Baryshnikov; George D Kitas
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.153

8.  The e-index, complementing the h-index for excess citations.

Authors:  Chun-Ting Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.