Literature DB >> 36147246

Evaluation of Apparatus Used to Test Liquid through Protective Materials: Comparison of a Modified Dot-Blot Apparatus to the ASTM Penetration Cell.

Matthew R Schwerin1, Lee Portnoff2, Jennifer L Furlong2, Srilekha S Das1, Edward A Gordon1, Terry O Woods1, Steven C Wood1, Anne D Lucas1.   

Abstract

Personal protective equipment (PPE), such as gowns used in the latest Ebola outbreak in Western Africa, are critical in preventing the spread of deadly diseases. Appropriate test systems and test soils are needed to adequately evaluate PPE. ASTM F903, Standard Test Method for Resistance of Materials Used in Protective Clothing to Penetration by Liquid, has been used for decades to test fabrics' resistance to liquid penetration. However, this test apparatus requires at least 60 mL of test solutions, is labor intensive, and has problems with leakage around the gaskets. We compared the F903 test apparatus to a modified dot-blot apparatus to evaluate the visual penetration of a blood test soil. A series of commercially available gowns and drapes were tested in each apparatus. Using blood test soil at 2 psi, there was no statistically significant difference between the two methods except for in one gown. By comparing this gown in the ASTM test apparatus with and without a screen, the particular screen selected did not account for the difference between the dot-blot and F903 apparatuses; however, it is conceivable that a particular screen/fabric combination could account for this difference. The modified dot-blot apparatus was evaluated using three different test solutions: blood, vomit, and a labeled protein (goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G-horseradish peroxidase [GaR IgG-HRP]) in a blood test soil solution. This testing revealed significant difference in penetration for some of the PPE garments. The modified dot-blot had several large advantages over the ASTM apparatus-over six times less specimen volume and no edge or gasket leakage. In addition, nitrocellulose can be easily incorporated into the modified dot-blot apparatus, enabling the trapping of viruses and proteins that penetrate PPE-thus permitting the use of antibodies to quickly and sensitively detect penetration.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ASTM standards; aprons; gowns; penetration testing; personal protective equipment; virus (generic)

Year:  2019        PMID: 36147246      PMCID: PMC9490760          DOI: 10.1520/jte20180350

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Test Eval        ISSN: 0090-3973            Impact factor:   1.333


  8 in total

1.  Alterations in physical state of silver nanoparticles exposed to synthetic human stomach fluid.

Authors:  Kim R Rogers; Karen Bradham; Thabet Tolaymat; David J Thomas; Thomas Hartmann; Longzhou Ma; Alan Williams
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2012-02-11       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Sample size calculation for the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test adjusting for ties.

Authors:  Yan D Zhao; Dewi Rahardja; Yongming Qu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-02-10       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Evaluation of gowns and coveralls used by medical personnel working with Ebola patients against simulated bodily fluids using an Elbow Lean Test.

Authors:  Peter A Jaques; Pengfei Gao; Selcen Kilinc-Balci; Lee Portnoff; Robyn Weible; Matthew Horvatin; Amanda Strauch; Ronald Shaffer
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.155

4.  The new American Society for Testing and Materials tests: all that glitters is not gold.

Authors:  N L Belkin
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 2.918

5.  Evaluation of one-way valves used in medical devices for prevention of cross-contamination.

Authors:  Poulomi Nandy; Megan Young; Shanil P Haugen; Kristy Katzenmeyer-Pleuss; Edward A Gordon; Stephen M Retta; Steven C Wood; Anne D Lucas
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 2.918

6.  Changes in silver nanoparticles exposed to human synthetic stomach fluid: effects of particle size and surface chemistry.

Authors:  Samuel K Mwilu; Amro M El Badawy; Karen Bradham; Clay Nelson; David Thomas; Kirk G Scheckel; Thabet Tolaymat; Longzhou Ma; Kim R Rogers
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  Measurement of bile acids in fasting gastric aspirates: an objective test for bile reflux after gastric surgery.

Authors:  A M Hoare; M R Keighley; B Starkey; J Alexander-Williams
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Challenge of Liquid Stressed Protective Materials and Environmental Persistence of Ebola Virus.

Authors:  Aidan M Nikiforuk; Todd A Cutts; Steven S Theriault; Bradley W M Cook
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.