| Literature DB >> 36147241 |
Yaxin Gao1, Gongfeng Li1, Bingbing Cai1, Ziming Zhang1, Ning Li1, Yike Liu1, Qingyun Li1.
Abstract
Light is an important environmental factor influencing plant growth and development. However, artificial light supplement is difficult to spread for its high energy consumption. In recent years, rare-earth light conversion film (RPO) covering is being focused on to be a new technology to study the mechanism of light affecting plant growth and development. Compared with the polyolefin film (PO), the RPO film advanced the temperature and light environment inside the greenhouse. Ultimately, improved growth and higher yield were detected because of a higher photosynthesis, Rubisco activity and Rubisco small subunit transcription. Compared with that in the greenhouse with polyolefin film, the plant height, stem diameter and internode length of sweet pepper treated with RPO increased by 11.05, 16.96 and 25.27%, respectively. In addition, Gibberellic acid 3 (GA3), Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), Zeatin Riboside contents were increased by 11.95, 2.84 and 16.19%, respectively, compared with that with PO film. The fruit quality was improved, and the contents of ascorbic acid (Vc), soluble protein and soluble sugar were significantly higher than those of PO film, respectively, increased by 14.29, 47.10 and 67.69%. On the basis of improved fruit quality, the yield of RPO treatment increased by 20.34% compared with PO film. This study introduces an effective and low-energy method to study the mechanism and advancing plant growth in fruit vegetables production.Entities:
Keywords: growth; photosynthesis; quality; rare-earth light conversion film; sweet pepper; yield
Year: 2022 PMID: 36147241 PMCID: PMC9485565 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.989271
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 6.627
Figure 1Effects of RPO film on the changes of sunlight intensity and temperature in the greenhouse. (A) Daily variation of light intensity; (B) air temperature and (C) soil (10 cm soil layer) temperature.
Effect of RPO film on the spectral transmission ratio.
| Treatment | UV-A (%) (300–400 nm) | Purple light (%) (400–440 nm) | Blue light (%) (440–510 nm) | Green light (%) (510–610 nm) | Red orange light (%) (610–710 nm) | Far red light (%) (710–760 nm) | Transmittance /% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 8.32 ± 0.17a | 5.87 ± 0.17a | 15.31 ± 0.23b | 30.18 ± 0.25a | 27.56 ± 0.31b | 11.41 ± 0.20b | 79.64 ± 0.60b |
| RPO | 6.18 ± 0.01b | 5.09 ± 0.17b | 16.54 ± 0.29a | 28.15 ± 0.68b | 29.49 ± 0.35a | 12.16 ± 0.12a | 88.66 ± 1.49a |
All values are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 5). Lowercase letters indicate that the mean values are significantly different among samples (p < 0.05).
Figure 2Effect of RPO film on the structure of sweet pepper functional leaves. SPT: spongy tissue; PT: palisade tissue.
Effect of RPO film on the structure of mature sweet pepper leaves.
| Treatment | leaf thickness/ um | Upper epidermal/um | Lower epidermal/um | Palisade parenchyma cells/um | Spongy parenchyma cells /um | stomatal length/um |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 620.44 ± 1.62b | 32.43 ± 2.24b | 36.86 ± 0.35b | 190.44 ± 5.51b | 352.68 ± 9.03b | 85.40 ± 2.70b |
| RPO | 711.09 ± 2.91a | 42.78 ± 2.32a | 41.63 ± 1.29a | 213.47 ± 3.79a | 385.80 ± 3.94a | 108.20 ± 2.39a |
All values are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 5). Lowercase letters indicate that the mean values are significantly different among samples (p < 0.05).
Effect of RPO film on endogenous hormones in sweet pepper fruits.
| Treatment | GA3 (ng g-1 FW) | ABA (ng g-1 FW) | IAA (ng g-1 FW) | ZR (ng g-1 FW) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 3.18 ± 0.01b | 69.58 ± 0.15a | 19.37 ± 0.02b | 3.15 ± 0.01b |
| RPO | 3.56 ± 0.02a | 63.14 ± 1.44b | 19.92 ± 0.07a | 3.66 ± 0.02a |
All values are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 5). Lowercase letters indicate that the mean values are significantly different among samples (p < 0.05).
Figure 3Effect of RPO film on Photosynthetic Correlation Index of sweet pepper leaves. (A) Photosynthetic rate; (B) Rubisco activity; (C) RbcL gene expression; (D) RbcS gene expression.
Effect of RPO film on fruit yield of sweet pepper.
| Treatment | Fruit length (mm) | Fruit width (mm) | Number of fruits per plant | Average weight per fruit (g) | Yield (kg·hm-2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 114.69 ± 7.42b | 53.55 ± 3.74b | 5.90 ± 0.10a | 135.16 ± 3.27b | 18259.09 ± 18.96b |
| RPO | 130.52 ± 12.91a | 57.19 ± 2.21a | 5.90 ± 0.10a | 176.37 ± 2.06a | 21972.73 ± 17.25a |
All values are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 5). Lowercase letters indicate that the mean values are significantly different among samples (p < 0.05).
Fruit quality of sweet pepper fruits grown under RPO and PO film.
| Treatment | Vc (mg·g-1) | Soluble protein (mg·g-1) | Organic acid (%) | Free amino acids (mg·g-1) | Soluble sugars (g·per 100 g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 0.35 ± 0.001b | 1.55 ± 0.05b | 1.68 ± 0.14a | 0.75 ± 0.06a | 1.30 ± 0.04b |
| RPO | 0.40 ± 0.001a | 2.28 ± 0.11a | 1.28 ± 0.14b | 0.77 ± 0.08a | 2.18 ± 0.03a |
All values are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 5). Lowercase letters indicate that the mean values are significantly different among samples (p < 0.05).
Figure 4Principal component analysis results of RPO on sweet pepper quality and yield.