Literature DB >> 36147204

Kidney Function Specific Reference Limits for N-terminal Pro Brain Natriuretic Peptide and High Sensitivity Troponin T: The Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial.

Nisha Bansal1,2, Ronit Katz3, Stephen Seliger4, Christopher deFilippi5, Nicholas Wettersten6, Leila R Zelnick1, Jarett D Berry7, James A de Lemos7, Robert Christenson8, Anthony A Killeen9, Michael G Shlipak10, Joachim H Ix2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 36147204      PMCID: PMC9485592          DOI: 10.1016/j.xkme.2022.100517

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kidney Med        ISSN: 2590-0595


× No keyword cloud information.
To the Editor: Cardiac-specific biomarkers N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and high sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hsTnT) are widely used for the diagnosis of acute heart failure and myocardial infarction., Upper reference limits for NT-proBNP and hsTnT are applied to determine probability of disease and are often derived from the manufacturer’s reported 99th percentile upper reference limit or from data reflecting the negative predictive value from select populations. , The current upper reference limit for hsTnT is 14 ng/L and for NT-proBNP is 125 pg/mL. Reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) contributes, in part, to elevations in hsTnT and NT-proBNP because of reduced kidney excretion as well as structural heart disease commonly seen in chronic kidney disease (CKD). Elevations in these biomarkers are often discounted as a consequence of reduced eGFR rather than acute heart failure or myocardial infarction, despite the high risk of the latter. While evaluating the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC), a CKD population without baseline cardiovascular disease, we found that 40%-88% of participants had concentrations of NT-proBNP and hsTnT above conventional upper reference limits, with greater proportions above the upper reference limit in those in lower eGFR strata. We proposed eGFR-specific thresholds for hsTnT and NT-proBNP using the 95th and 99th percentiles in CRIC. Replicating these thresholds in other CKD populations is necessary to ensure their generalizability. Here, among participants with CKD in the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT), we determined the proportion of participants who were above the 95th and 99th percentile thresholds developed in CRIC, overall and across eGFR strata. SPRINT randomized 9,361 hypertensive individuals at increased risk of cardiovascular disease to intensive versus standard systolic blood pressure lowering. Diabetes, proteinuria >1 g/day, eGFR <20 mL/min/1.73 m2, and acute heart failure or known reduced ejection fraction were exclusion criteria. For this analysis, we excluded those with missing NT-proBNP and hsTnT (n = 533), eGFR >60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (n = 6,380), prevalent cardiovascular disease (n = 608) or heart failure (n = 72) at enrollment, leaving an analytic sample size of 1,768 individuals with CKD. NT-proBNP and hsTnT were measured from stored specimens collected at enrollment (using the Roche COBAS 6000 platform). We determined the proportion of SPRINT participants who were above the 95th and 99th percentile thresholds developed in CRIC, overall and across strata by eGFR category. In secondary analyses, we described these proportions across strata of sex, race, and age., Among 1,768 SPRINT participants with CKD, the mean (standard deviation) age was 73 (9) years and mean (standard deviation) eGFR was 46 (10) mL/min/1.73 m2 (Table S1). The distributions of NT-proBNP and hsTnT were higher in lower categories of eGFR (Figure 1). Using a single cut-point for all CKD, the 95th percentile (1,039 pg/mL) and 99th percentile (3,592 pg/mL) CRIC thresholds for NT-proBNP were similar in SPRINT, with 5% and 0.7% of SPRINT participants above these upper reference limits, respectively (Table 1). The CRIC 95th and 99th percentile eGFR-specific thresholds for NT-proBNP were also replicated in SPRINT. In contrast, for hsTnT, the CRIC 95th (58 ng/L) and 99th (126 ng/L) percentile thresholds identified 1% and 0.1% of SPRINT participants above the upper reference limits, respectively (Table 1). Findings were similar using the CRIC eGFR stratum-specific thresholds. Findings were similar by sex, race, and age (Table S2).
Figure 1

Density plots of distribution of (A) NT-proBNP and (B) hsTnT across eGFR strata (mL/min/1.73 m2). Abbreviations: hsTnT; high sensitivity Troponin T; NT-proBNP, N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide.

Table 1

Proportion of SPRINT CKD Participants Above CRIC 95th and 99th percentiles for NT-proBNP and hsTnT

CategoryNNT-proBNP
hsTnT
CRIC 95th percentile threshold (pg/mL)n (%) >95th percentile in SPRINTCRIC 99th percentile threshold (pg/mL)n (%) >99th percentile in SPRINTCRIC 95th percentile threshold (ng/L)n (%) with >95th percentile in SPRINTCRIC 99th percentile threshold (ng/L)n (%) with >99th percentile in SPRINT
Overall1,7681,03981 (5%)3,59212 (0.7%)5823 (1%)1261 (0.1%)
eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2)
 <301572,5236 (4%)8,4021 (0.6%)932 (1%)2191 (0.6%)
 30-445291,13035 (7%)2,9218 (1.5%)596 (1%)1270 (0%)
 45-59108268250 (5%)1,88712 (1.1%)4323 (2%)971 (0.1%)

Abbreviations: CRIC, Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; hsTnT, high sensitivity Troponin T; NT-proBNP, N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide; SPRINT, Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial.

Density plots of distribution of (A) NT-proBNP and (B) hsTnT across eGFR strata (mL/min/1.73 m2). Abbreviations: hsTnT; high sensitivity Troponin T; NT-proBNP, N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide. Proportion of SPRINT CKD Participants Above CRIC 95th and 99th percentiles for NT-proBNP and hsTnT Abbreviations: CRIC, Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; hsTnT, high sensitivity Troponin T; NT-proBNP, N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide; SPRINT, Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial. We applied the 95th and 99th percentile thresholds for NT-proBNP and hsTnT developed in a relatively healthy ambulatory CKD cohort measured at a time of clinical stability to the SPRINT CKD population and found similar proportions above these thresholds for NT-proBNP. The proposed thresholds for hsTnT did not replicate, perhaps because of differences in the study populations (SPRINT participants were older, had higher systolic blood pressure, and did not have diabetes). There remains uncertainty on how to best apply the current upper reference limits of NT-proBNP and hsTnT for the diagnosis of acute cardiac disease in CKD, despite associations of elevated NT-proBNP and hsTnT with outcomes in CKD. These data may inform development of eGFR-specific thresholds for cardiac biomarkers to identify acute heart failure or myocardial infarction in patients with a broad range of eGFRs presenting with acute symptoms. Strengths of this study include use of a well-characterized clinical trial population and standardized measurement of cardiac biomarkers. The limitations include a small number of participants in specific eGFR strata. The Roche platforms used to measure the biomarkers were different in SPRINT relative to CRIC; however, this would not substantially influence results at the 95th and 99th percentiles. We studied a population with hypertension and without diabetes, which may explain some of the differences observed with the hsTnT thresholds. Both CRIC and SPRINT excluded persons with eGFR <20 mL/min/1.73 m2. In conclusion, the 95th and 99th percentile thresholds for NT-proBNP developed in CRIC across eGFR strata were similar in SPRINT participants with CKD. However, the CRIC hsTnT thresholds did not replicate, and larger studies are needed to identify eGFR-specific hsTnT thresholds. Further work is needed to validate eGFR-specific thresholds for cardiac biomarkers in patients presenting with acute symptoms to evaluate their accuracy for the diagnosis of acute heart failure and myocardial infarction in patients with a broad range of eGFRs.
  9 in total

Review 1.  Prognostic value of cardiac troponin in patients with chronic kidney disease without suspected acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Erin D Michos; Lisa M Wilson; Hsin-Chieh Yeh; Zackary Berger; Catalina Suarez-Cuervo; Sylvie R Stacy; Eric B Bass
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Associations of High-Sensitivity Troponin and Natriuretic Peptide Levels With Outcomes After Intensive Blood Pressure Lowering: Findings From the SPRINT Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Jarett D Berry; Vijay Nambi; Walter T Ambrosius; Haiying Chen; Anthony A Killeen; Addison Taylor; Robert D Toto; Elsayed Z Soliman; John W McEvoy; Ambarish Pandey; Parag H Joshi; Stefan Blankenberg; Dalane W Kitzman; Christie M Ballantyne; James A de Lemos
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 30.154

3.  Impact of age, race, and sex on the ability of B-type natriuretic peptide to aid in the emergency diagnosis of heart failure: results from the Breathing Not Properly (BNP) multinational study.

Authors:  Alan S Maisel; Paul Clopton; Padma Krishnaswamy; Richard M Nowak; James McCord; Judd E Hollander; Philippe Duc; Torbjørn Omland; Alan B Storrow; William T Abraham; Alan H B Wu; Gabriel Steg; Arne Westheim; Catherine Wold Knudsen; Alberto Perez; Radmila Kazanegra; Vikas Bhalla; Howard C Herrmann; Marie Claude Aumont; Peter A McCullough
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.749

4.  B-type natriuretic peptide and clinical judgment in emergency diagnosis of heart failure: analysis from Breathing Not Properly (BNP) Multinational Study.

Authors:  Peter A McCullough; Richard M Nowak; James McCord; Judd E Hollander; Howard C Herrmann; Philippe G Steg; Philippe Duc; Arne Westheim; Torbjørn Omland; Cathrine Wold Knudsen; Alan B Storrow; William T Abraham; Sumant Lamba; Alan H B Wu; Alberto Perez; Paul Clopton; Padma Krishnaswamy; Radmila Kazanegra; Alan S Maisel
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-07-23       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 5.  ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2008: the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure 2008 of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the Heart Failure Association of the ESC (HFA) and endorsed by the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM).

Authors:  Kenneth Dickstein; Alain Cohen-Solal; Gerasimos Filippatos; John J V McMurray; Piotr Ponikowski; Philip Alexander Poole-Wilson; Anna Strömberg; Dirk J van Veldhuisen; Dan Atar; Arno W Hoes; Andre Keren; Alexandre Mebazaa; Markku Nieminen; Silvia Giuliana Priori; Karl Swedberg
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 29.983

6.  Age- and sex-dependent upper reference limits for the high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T assay.

Authors:  M Odette Gore; Stephen L Seliger; Christopher R Defilippi; Vijay Nambi; Robert H Christenson; Ibrahim A Hashim; Ron C Hoogeveen; Colby R Ayers; Wensheng Sun; Darren K McGuire; Christie M Ballantyne; James A de Lemos
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Diagnostic efficiency of troponin T measurements in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  H A Katus; A Remppis; F J Neumann; T Scheffold; K W Diederich; G Vinar; A Noe; G Matern; W Kuebler
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  A Randomized Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control.

Authors:  Jackson T Wright; Jeff D Williamson; Paul K Whelton; Joni K Snyder; Kaycee M Sink; Michael V Rocco; David M Reboussin; Mahboob Rahman; Suzanne Oparil; Cora E Lewis; Paul L Kimmel; Karen C Johnson; David C Goff; Lawrence J Fine; Jeffrey A Cutler; William C Cushman; Alfred K Cheung; Walter T Ambrosius
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Upper Reference Limits for High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T and N-Terminal Fragment of the Prohormone Brain Natriuretic Peptide in Patients With CKD.

Authors:  Nisha Bansal; Leila R Zelnick; Christie M Ballantyne; Paulo H M Chaves; Robert H Christenson; Josef Coresh; Christopher R deFilippi; James A de Lemos; Lori B Daniels; Alan S Go; Jiang He; S Susan Hedayati; Kunihiro Matsushita; Vijay Nambi; Michael G Shlipak; Jonathan J Taliercio; Stephen L Seliger
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 8.860

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.