| Literature DB >> 36144832 |
Dana Kumprechtová1, Thibaut Chabrillat2, Simon Guillaume2, Sylvain Kerros2, Romana Kadek3, Eva Indrová4, Josef Illek3.
Abstract
(1) Background: This study evaluated the effects of a plant bioactive (Phyto Ax'Cell, Phytosynthese, Mozac, France) on the inflammatory status and health of dairy cows during calving. (2)Entities:
Keywords: energy status; inflammation; periparturient cows; plant bioactive compounds
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36144832 PMCID: PMC9504483 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27186092
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.927
Average milk yield and composition from the first three individual milk tests.
| Treatment | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CON 1 ( | PAC 2 ( | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Milk yield (kg/d) | 41.8 | 35.47 | 40.33 | 34.53 | 6.57 | 0.345 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| Fat (%) | 4.02 | 3.92 | 3.93 | 3.86 | 0.24 | 0.936 | 0.316 | 0.145 |
| Protein (%) | 3.19 | 3.36 | 3.29 | 3.23 | 0.44 | 0.577 | 0.291 | 0.665 |
| Lactose (%) | 5.01 | 5.13 | 5.01 | 5.13 | 0.17 | 0.884 | 0.001 | 0.010 |
| ECM 3 (kg/d) | 41.41 | 35.00 | 40.75 | 33.33 | 6.88 | 0.421 | <0.0001 | 0.000 |
| Somatic Cell Count | 367.33 | 247.17 | 88.53 | 93.90 | 248.62 | 0.157 | 0.697 | 0.470 |
1 CON = control diet; 2 PAC = control diet + 25 g/cow/day of Phyto Ax’Cell; 3 ECM = energy-corrected milk.
Body condition scores of cows receiving plant bioactive compounds from D-15 to D+7 relative to parturition.
| Body Condition Score (BCS) | BCS Evolution | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D-14 | D14 | D40 | D14 minus D-14 | |||
| CON 1 | 3.55 a | 2.97 b | 2.87 b | <0.01 | −0.58 | |
| PAC 2 | 3.49 a | 3.07 b | 2.89 b | <0.01 | −0.42 | |
| SEM | 0.13 | 0.19 | 0.18 | 0.21 | ||
| 0.327 | 0.256 | 0.739 | <0.01 | 0.073 | ||
1 CON = control diet; 2 PAC = control diet + 25 g/cow/day of Phyto Ax’Cell. a,b Differed significantly over time, p < 0.05.
Serum metabolite concentrations in cows receiving plant bioactive compounds.
| Parameter | Day -7 | Day 0 | Day 7 | Day 14 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| CON 1 | 73.24 ab | 69.54 a | 73.44 ab | 77.80 b | 0.002 | |
|
| PAC 2 | 72.28 | 71.82 | 74.17 | 77.56 | 0.10 | |
| SEM | 5.76 | 5.96 | 5.45 | 6.40 | |||
| 0.500 | 0.370 | 0.670 | 0.890 | 0.004 | |||
|
| CON | 36.33 | 35.39 | 35.81 | 37.00 | 0.30 | |
|
| PAC | 36.03 | 35.44 | 35.98 | 36.55 | 0.16 | |
| SEM | 1.85 | 2.07 | 2.07 | 2.04 | |||
| 0.930 | 0.950 | 0.410 | 0.590 | 0.23 | |||
|
| CON | 36.91 ab | 34.15 a | 37.63 ab | 40.80 b | 0.04 | |
|
| PAC | 36.26 | 36.38 | 39.19 | 41.01 | 0.16 | |
| SEM | 6.21 | 5.89 | 6.34 | 7.16 | |||
| 0.772 | 0.379 | 0.501 | 0.930 | 0.06 | |||
|
| CON | 1.030 | 1.076 | 0.994 | 0.947 | 0.34 | |
| PAC | 1.036 | 1.028 | 0.927 | 0.929 | 0.19 | ||
| SEM | 0.199 | 0.196 | 0.184 | 0.187 | |||
| 0.770 | 0.370 | 0.310 | 0.950 | 0.27 | |||
|
| 3.51 a | 3.43 ab | 3.17 b | 3.10 b | 0.05 | ||
|
| PAC | 3.69 b | 3.93 | 3.26 b | 3.20 b | <0.001 | |
| SEM | 0.21 | 0.53 | 0.42 | 0.34 | |||
| 0.020 | 0.1500 | 0.54 | 0.870 | 0.001 | |||
|
| CON | 4.79 c | 4.49 bc | 3.69 a | 3.81 ab | 0.001 | |
|
| PAC | 4.71 b | 4.13 a | 3.89 a | 4.04 a | 0.01 | |
| SEM | 0.82 | 0.21 | 0.50 | 0.51 | |||
| 0.810 | 0.130 | 0.310 | 0.240 | <0.001 | |||
|
| CON | 1.982 a | 1.72 a | 2.03 a | 2.69 b | <0.001 | |
|
| PAC | 2.30 ab | 2.00 a | 2.50 bc | 2.99 c | <0.001 | |
| SEM | 0.31 | 0.42 | 0.43 | 0.55 | |||
| 0.012 | 0.460 | 0.003 | 0.140 | <0.001 | |||
|
| CON | 0.42 a | 0.69 b | 1.11 b | 1.09 b | <0.001 | |
|
| PAC | 0.51 a | 0.56 ab | 0.76 c | 0.73 bc | <0.001 | |
| SEM | 0.31 | 0.19 | 0.46 | 0.44 | |||
| 0.150 | 0.470 | 0.870 | 0.530 | <0.001 | |||
|
| CON | 0.21 a | 0.57 b | 0.65 b | 0.68 b | <0.001 | |
|
| PAC | 0.28 | 0.34 | 0.46 | 0.44 a | 0.12 | |
| SEM | 0.16 | 0.26 | 0.23 | 0.31 | |||
| 0.920 | 0.230 | 0.045 | 0.030 | <0.001 | |||
|
| CON | 0.11 a | 0.36 b | 0.36 b | 0.32 b | <0.001 | |
| PAC | 0.14 a | 0.21 b | 0.19 b | 0.15 b | 0.01 | ||
| SEM | 0.09 | 0.18 | 0.15 | 0.17 | |||
| 0.422 | 0.084 | 0.005 | 0.034 | <0.001 |
1 CON = control diet; 2 PAC = control diet + 25 g/cow/day of Phyto Ax’Cell; 3 BHB = β-hydroxybutyrate; 4 NEFAs = non-esterified fatty acids; a, b, c Differed significantly over time, p < 0.05.
Inflammation and antioxidant capacity markers in cows receiving plant bioactive compounds.
| Parameter | Day 0 | Day 7 | Day 14 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| CON 1 | 0.78 a | 0.81 a | 0.85 b | 0.03 | |
|
| PAC 2 | 0.83 | 0.85 | 0.88 | 0.25 | |
| SEM | 0.11 | 0.08 | 0.08 | |||
| 0.830 | 0.120 | 0.640 | 0.09 | |||
|
| CON | 55.00 a | 38.22 ab | 27.19 b | 0.01 | |
|
| PAC | 43.97 a | 28.58 ab | 20.63 b | 0.01 | |
| SEM | 21.21 | 20.72 | 17.92 | |||
| 0.130 | 0.120 | 0.170 | 0.00 | |||
|
| CON | 0.76 b | 0.79 b | 0.66 a | 0.05 | |
|
| PAC | 0.70 b | 0.55 ab | 0.44 a | 0.01 | |
| SEM | 0.26 | 0.35 | 0.28 | |||
| 0.170 | 0.035 | 0.027 | 0.06 | |||
|
| CON | 1095.74 | 1077.47 | 1061.32 | 0.74 | |
|
| PAC | 1065.15 | 1028.31 | 1000.51 | 0.20 | |
| SEM | 99.24 | 93.02 | 101.23 | |||
| 0.470 | 0.160 | 0.110 | 0.13 |
a,b Differed significantly over time, p < 0.05. 1 CON = control diet; 2 PAC = control diet + 25 g/cow/day of Phyto Ax’Cell. 3 TAC = total antioxidant capacity; 4 SAA = serum amyloid A; 5 GSH-Px = glutathione peroxidase.
Figure 1Effect of pant bioactive compounds on serum haptoglobin levels (n = 23).
Hematological parameters in cows receiving plant bioactive compounds.
| Parameter | Day-7 | Day 0 | Day 7 | Day 14 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| CON 1 | 10.62 | 9.82 | 14.81 | 11.54 | 0.284 | |
| PAC 2 | 12.14 | 8.34 | 7.84 | 8.75 | 0.189 | ||
| SEM | 3.74 | 2.26 | 6.42 | 2.77 | |||
| 0.08 | 0.13 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.583 | |||
|
| CON | 3.29 | 2.74 | 3.54 | 3.26 | 0.239 | |
| PAC | 2.77 | 2.63 | 2.80 | 2.69 | 0.902 | ||
| SEM | 0.96 | 0.53 | 1.28 | 0.90 | |||
| 0.06 | 0.83 | 0.78 | 0.63 | 0.389 | |||
| CON | 0.95 | 0.88 | 0.81 | 0.90 | 0.201 | ||
| PAC | 0.86 | 0.84 | 0.77 | 0.89 | 0.363 | ||
| SEM | 0.20 | 0.23 | 0.2 | 0.24 | |||
| 0.21 | 0.87 | 0.52 | 0.98 | 0.333 | |||
|
| CON | 6.38 | 6.63 | 5.66 | 5.90 | 0.695 | |
| PAC | 5.58 | 5.67 | 4.27 | 5.17 | 0.066 | ||
| SEM | 1.36 | 1.70 | 1.85 | 1.34 | |||
| 0.130 | 0.180 | 0.035 | 0.150 | 0.007 | |||
|
| CON | 29.00 | 27.95 | 30.08 | 38.90 | 0.789 | |
| PAC | 30.11 a | 30.20 a | 38.11 b | 31.51 a | 0.039 | ||
| SEM | 7.08 | 7.51 | 9.79 | 12.37 | |||
| 0.970 | 0.320 | 0.020 | 0.210 | 0.513 | |||
|
| CON | 9.05 | 8.82 | 9.28 | 9.68 | 0.068 | |
| PAC | 9.53 | 9.28 | 10.09 | 10.62 | 0.096 | ||
| SEM | 1.35 | 1.45 | 1.44 | 1.32 | |||
| 0.300 | 0.120 | 0.300 | 0.066 | 0.042 | |||
|
| CON | 60.26 | 63.2 | 60.6 | 59.87 | 0.580 | |
| PAC | 61.60 b | 60.5 b | 51.8 a | 58.10 b | 0.017 | ||
| SEM | 5.96 | 7.93 | 10.09 | 6.94 | |||
| 0.620 | 0.400 | 0.017 | 0.058 | 0.040 | |||
|
| CON | 103.09 c | 99.7 b | 95.8 ab | 94.70 a | 0.006 | |
| PAC | 100.17 c | 95.3 c | 93.5 b | 89.83 a | <0.001 | ||
| SEM | 7.29 | 8.37 | 6.60 | 6.68 | |||
| 0.410 | 0.860 | 0.370 | 0.043 | 0.004 | |||
|
| CON | 6.92 | 6.55 | 6.42 | 6.32 | 0.053 | |
| PAC | 6.80 | 6.73 | 6.57 | 6.40 | 0.078 | ||
| SEM | 0.61 | 0.66 | 0.55 | 0.56 | |||
| 0.880 | 0.270 | 0.200 | 0.660 | 0.330 | |||
|
| CON | 34.61 | 35.10 | 33.80 | 34.51 | 0.498 | |
| PAC | 34.42 a | 34.20 a | 33.01 b | 31.37 b | 0.002 | ||
| SEM | 2.82 | 3.01 | 2.58 | 4.79 | |||
| 0.877 | 0.498 | 0.440 | 0.059 | 0.155 | |||
|
| CON | 255.91 a | 295.4 a | 338.6 b | 561.48 c | <0.0001 | |
| PAC | 271.09 a | 310.2 ab | 339.4 bc | 340.30 c | 0.045 | ||
| SEM | 88.00 | 72.69 | 58.11 | 182.26 | |||
| 0.670 | 0.655 | 0.974 | 0.217 | 0.047 |
1 CON = control diet; 2 PAC = control diet + 25 g/cow/day of Phyto Ax’Cell. a, b, c Differed significantly over time, p < 0.05.
Figure 2Effect of plant bioactive compounds on total number of white blood cells and granulocytes (n = 23).
Figure 3Effect of plant bioactive compounds on leucogram (n = 23).
Figure 4Effect of plant bioactive compounds on cows with hyperthermia within 0–14 days postpartum (%) (n = 23).
Figure 5Cross-sectional ultrasound image of the uterine horn (Aloka SSD-500).
Randomization of the experimental cows (mean values and standard errors of the mean).
| Item | CON1 ( | PAC 2 ( | SEM |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average parity rank | 1.69 | 1.61 | 0.11 | NS 3 |
| Number of heifers | 11 | 11 | - | - |
| Number of cows | 12 | 12 | - | - |
1 CON = Control Diet; 2 PAC = Control Diet + 25 g/cow/day of Phyto Ax´Cell; 3 NS = statistically non-significant.
Composition of the control diet on a fresh matter basis 1.
| Ingredients | Close-Up Diet (kg) | Fresh Cow Diet (kg) |
|---|---|---|
| Maize silage | 19.0 | 22.0 |
| Alfalfa silage | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| Whole crop rye silage | 0.0 | 4.0 |
| Barley straw | 2.0 | 0.0 |
| Alfalfa hay | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Brewers’ grains | 1.5 | 6.0 |
| High moisture corn | 0.0 | 2.0 |
| Rapeseed meal | 0.6 | 0.0 |
| WDGS 3 | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Concentrate 2 | 2.8 | 5.8 |
| Palmitate | 0.0 | 0.15 |
| MP ion (anionic salts) | 0.5 | 0.0 |
| Water | 3 | 4 |
| Total fresh matter/cow/day | 31.40 | 48.95 |
1 Analytical composition of the total mixed ration: 43.87%, dry matter, on a dry matter basis; 15.35%, crude protein; 23.41%, starch; 6.18%, ash; 34.61%, NDF; 19.58%, ADF. 2 Concentrate composition on a DM basis: 70.90%, rapeseed meal; 19.35%, ground barley; 2.4%, potassium carbonate; 1.6%, salt; 2.4%, limestone; 1.0%, caustic magnesite; 0.75% mineral mix (Zemos VVS, Vermerovice, Czech Republic; Analytical values (per kg): calcium, 8.47%; sodium, 2.0%; magnesium, 4.57%; phosphorus, 0.49%;). Additives: calcium iodate (Ca(IO3)2), 15.0 mg; vitamin A, 165,000 IU; vitamin D3, 50,000 IU; vitamin E, 2300 mg (alpha-tocopherol 2010 mg); copper sulphate pentahydrate (CuSO4·5H2O), 500 mg; manganese oxide (MnO), 1000 mg; zinc oxide (ZnO), 800 mg; cobalt acetate tetrahydrate (Co(CH3COO·4H2O)), 5 mg; sodium selenite (Na2SeO3), 15 mg. Technological additives: BHT, 90 mg; BHA, 30 mg. 3 Wet distillers’ grains with solubles.
Composition of Phyto Ax’Cell.
| Compound | Content (mg/kg) |
|---|---|
| Curcuminoids | 3290 |
| Carnosic derivatives | 5010 |
| Salicylic derivatives | 6360 |
| Flavonoids (naringin) | 9665 |
| Artepillin C | 180 1 |
| Total polyphenols | 20,900 |
1 Calculated from ingredient analysis and the ingredient incorporation rate.