| Literature DB >> 36141635 |
Liang Chen1,2, Zhengxin Yin1,2, Meng Tang1,2, Tuanjie Li3, Dong Xu4.
Abstract
The sediments distributed in the marginal seas of the continental shelf are important burial materials for global organic carbon (OC). There have been many estimates of the global continental shelf OC reserves, but due to the limited acquisition of measured data, the estimated results have great uncertainty. The vast continental shelf in the northern part of the South China Sea (SCS) provides a good place for the storage of OC. Based on a large amount of sediment OC data obtained from the northern coast of the SCS, the OC storage in the surface sediment (0~10 cm) in the study area (approximately 8.63 × 104 km2) was accurately calculated as 51 Tg. The study area covers different regions, such as estuaries, open seas, strait areas and upwelling development areas, and the OC content of each area is quite different. According to provenance analysis, the source of OC in sediments is mainly from the input of Pearl River runoff. The OC content is significantly higher and less affected by sediment particle size in the Pearl River Estuary and the surrounding areas; meanwhile, the OC content gradually decreases with the distance from the Pearl River Estuary. Far from the western Pearl River Estuary, the sediment OC content is mainly controlled by the particle size of the sediments and is significantly correlated with silt and clay content. The deposition rate is also an important factor affecting the burial of OC, for the high deposition rates correspond to the high levels of OC in the nearshore estuarine areas, as well as the low deposition rate region having low OC content in the sediments even though it has a high productivity of OC, such in as the upwelling sea area on the eastern side of Hainan.Entities:
Keywords: organic carbon storage; particle size; sediment; the northern South China Sea
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36141635 PMCID: PMC9517380 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191811367
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Figure 1Study area and station distribution. A: Sampling station in the Pearl River Estuary. B: Sampling station outside the Pearl River Estuary. C: Sampling station around the western Guangdong Sea. Upwelling area modified from [23].
Figure 2Mean particle (Mz) size distribution of the sediments.
Figure 3Distribution of clay minerals. (a), distribution of clay minerals, (b), distribution of illite; (c), distribution of kaolinite; and (d), distribution of chlorite.
Figure 4Distribution of OC.
Calculation of organic carbon storage.
| NO. | Area/ | OC | BD | Depth/cm | Clay Content/% | Illite | Kaolinite | Chlorite | Smectite | Deposit | C Stock |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8221.18 | 0–0.2 | 1.03 | 10 | 5.74 | 1.76 | 1.18 | 1.00 | 0.90 | / | 0.85 |
| 2 | 24882.45 | 0.2–0.4 | 1.03 | 10 | 12.19 | 4.42 | 2.36 | 2.52 | 0.44 | 0.17 | 7.69 |
| 3 | 15318.94 | 0.4–0.6 | 1.03 | 10 | 14.52 | 4.90 | 3.13 | 2.95 | 1.35 | / | 7.89 |
| 4 | 14382.27 | 0.6–0.8 | 1.03 | 10 | 15.69 | 5.91 | 3.53 | 2.99 | 1.80 | 0.37 | 10.37 |
| 5 | 16105.90 | 0.8–1.0 | 1.03 | 10 | 17.41 | 7.25 | 3.94 | 3.26 | 2.27 | 1.06 | 14.93 |
| 6 | 4592.51 | 1.0–1.2 | 1.03 | 10 | 21.38 | 9.43 | 6.01 | 4.15 | 1.37 | 0.47 | 5.20 |
| 7 | 2390.49 | 1.2–1.4 | 1.03 | 10 | 26.03 | 11.77 | 8.33 | 4.84 | 0.63 | 1.81 | 3.20 |
| 8 | 360.48 | 1.4–1.6 | 1.03 | 10 | 30.64 | 13.16 | 10.42 | 5.87 | 1.20 | 4.38 | 0.56 |
| 9 | 121.20 | >1.6 | 1.03 | 10 | 22.55 | 7.29 | 8.38 | 4.27 | 2.61 | / | 0.21 |
| SUM | 50.90 | ||||||||||
Figure 5Distribution of sediment rates in the study area.
Figure 6Correlation analysis between OC and particle size in different sea areas.
Figure 7Correlation analysis of OC and clay minerals in different sea areas.
Figure 8Correlation analysis of OC and sediment rate in different sites.