| Literature DB >> 36140697 |
Michelle Barbosa1, Caroline Schwaner1, Emmanuelle Pales Espinosa1, Bassem Allam1.
Abstract
Ocean acidification (OA) is a major threat to marine calcifiers, and little is known regarding acclimation to OA in bivalves. This study combined physiological assays with next-generation sequencing to assess the potential for recovery from and acclimation to OA in the eastern oyster (Crassostrea virginica) and identify molecular mechanisms associated with resilience. In a reciprocal transplant experiment, larvae transplanted from elevated pCO2 (~1400 ppm) to ambient pCO2 (~350 ppm) demonstrated significantly lower mortality and larger size post-transplant than oysters remaining under elevated pCO2 and had similar mortality compared to those remaining in ambient conditions. The recovery after transplantation to ambient conditions demonstrates the ability for larvae to rebound and suggests phenotypic plasticity and acclimation. Transcriptomic analysis supported this hypothesis as genes were differentially regulated under OA stress. Transcriptomic profiles of transplanted and non-transplanted larvae terminating in the same final pCO2 converged, further supporting the idea that acclimation underlies resilience. The functions of differentially expressed genes included cell differentiation, development, biomineralization, ion exchange, and immunity. Results suggest acclimation as a mode of resilience to OA. In addition, the identification of genes associated with resilience can serve as a valuable resource for the aquaculture industry, as these could enable marker-assisted selection of OA-resilient stocks.Entities:
Keywords: RNASeq; acclimation; ocean acidification; oyster
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36140697 PMCID: PMC9498863 DOI: 10.3390/genes13091529
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genes (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4425 Impact factor: 4.141
Figure 1(A) Percent mortality for 7 day old oyster larvae before transplantation into the alternative pCO2 treatment (* denotes significant difference for (A), G-test of independence, p < 0.001; n = 4, with a minimum of 100 larvae per replicate). Error bars are the 95% confidence intervals. (B) Length in micrometers for 7 day old oyster larvae before transplantation into the alternative pCO2 treatment in the reciprocal transplant experiment (** denotes significant difference for (B), Mann–Whitney U test, p < 0.001; n = 4, with a minimum of 65 larvae per replicate). Error bars denote standard error of the mean.
Figure 2Percent mortality 1 week post-transplant (different letters a, b above error bars represent significant difference, G-test of independence, p < 0.001; n = 4 per treatment, with a minimum of 340 larvae per replicate). Error bars are the 95% confidence intervals. Sample code names: first letter indicates original pCO2 treatment (A: ambient, E: elevated); second letter indicates final pCO2 treatment (first and second letters are different for transplanted treatments).
Figure 3Length in micrometers for 15 day old oyster larvae transplanted (diagonal lines) and kept as controls (solid) (different letters a, b, c above error bars denote significant difference, Kruskal–Wallis rank sum test, p = 0.013; n = 4, with a minimum of 180 individuals per replicate). Error bars denote standard error of the mean. Sample code names: first letter indicates original pCO2 treatment (A: ambient, E: elevated); second letter indicates final pCO2 treatment (first and second letters are different for transplanted treatments).
Figure 4(A) Hierarchical cluster analysis of DEGs (n = 4 replicates per treatment coalesced into 1 column). Over- and under-expressed genes are represented in red and blue, respectively. Data are normalized by average expression in all samples. (B) Principal component analysis of the normalized RNASeq data. Sample code names: first letter signifies original pCO2 treatment (A: ambient, E: elevated); second letter signifies final pCO2 treatment (first and second letters are different for transplanted treatments).
DEGs of non-transplanted (AA vs. EE) oyster larvae. Positive and negative Log2 fold changes indicate genes over- or under-expressed in EE as compared to AA, respectively.
| Gene ID | Gene Description | Log2FC | padj |
|---|---|---|---|
| 111100330 |
| 1.25 | 0.00 |
| 111100642 |
| 1.94 | 0.00 |
| 111101544 |
| 1.43 | 0.01 |
| 111103490 |
| 2.16 | 0.05 |
| 111114894 |
| 1.93 | 0.00 |
| 111117016 |
| 2.00 | 0.00 |
| 111117698 |
| 3.32 | 0.00 |
| 111120277 |
| 1.10 | 0.00 |
| 111122709 |
| 1.82 | 0.01 |
| 111123064 |
| 2.10 | 0.00 |
| 111125413 |
| 1.22 | 0.00 |
| 111126276 |
| 1.71 | 0.00 |
| 111126433 |
| 1.62 | 0.02 |
| 111127373 |
| 1.33 | 0.00 |
| 111128055 |
| 1.94 | 0.00 |
| 111128774 |
| 2.39 | 0.01 |
| 111134162 |
| 2.11 | 0.02 |
| 111134528 |
| 1.49 | 0.00 |
| 111138040 |
| 1.02 | 0.01 |
| 111138380 |
| 2.57 | 0.00 |
| 111138467 |
| 0.97 | 0.01 |
| 111101484 |
| −2.21 | 0.00 |
| 111106582 |
| −6.53 | 0.00 |
| 111109677 |
| −1.80 | 0.02 |
| 111114597 |
| −1.60 | 0.00 |
| 111118395 |
| NA | 0.01 |
| 111120247 |
| −4.27 | 0.05 |
| 111123230 |
| −6.00 | 0.00 |
| 111125329 |
| −2.70 | 0.02 |
| 111125850 |
| −1.27 | 0.03 |
| 111125973 |
| −1.45 | 0.05 |
| 111126272 |
| −2.61 | 0.00 |
| 111127289 |
| −0.87 | 0.03 |
| 111127865 |
| −3.20 | 0.00 |
| 111128647 |
| −3.23 | 0.01 |
| 111131442 |
| −1.85 | 0.00 |
| 111132959 |
| −2.37 | 0.02 |
| 111134775 |
| −1.33 | 0.00 |
| 111134777 |
| −4.42 | 0.02 |
| 111134779 |
| −2.09 | 0.00 |
| 111134780 |
| −2.43 | 0.00 |
| 111134925 |
| −1.16 | 0.05 |
| 111135192 |
| −1.39 | 0.00 |
| 111135859 |
| −1.15 | 0.01 |
| 111137234 |
| −2.51 | 0.00 |
| 111137486 |
| −0.94 | 0.00 |
| 111138187 |
| −1.55 | 0.01 |
DEGs detected among transplanted (AA vs. AE; EE vs. EA; AE vs. EA) oyster larvae. Positive Log2 fold changes indicate genes over-expressed in the second group within each pair.
| Gene ID | Gene Description | Log2FC | padj |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA vs. AE | |||
| 111113165 |
| 1.75 | 0.00 |
| 111114894 |
| 2.04 | 0.00 |
| 111121938 |
| 1.62 | 0.02 |
| 111123064 |
| 2.00 | 0.02 |
| 111128774 |
| 2.90 | 0.00 |
| 111138467 |
| 1.35 | 0.01 |
| EE vs. EA | |||
| 111114597 |
| 1.35 | 0.02 |
| 111134779 |
| 1.20 | 0.01 |
| 111137234 |
| 2.01 | 0.00 |
| 111137486 |
| 0.67 | 0.01 |
| 111134528 |
| −0.90 | 0.01 |
| AE vs. EA | |||
| 111113165 |
| −1.46 | 0.01 |
Figure 5(A): Venn diagram showing the number of genes uniquely expressed within each group, with the overlapping regions showing the number of genes that are expressed in two or more groups. (B) DEGs in common/shared between comparisons; * indicates the group with higher expression for the gene. Purple: AA vs. EE; Blue: AA vs. AE; Green EE vs. EA; Red: AE vs. EA.